Common Weakness Enumeration
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Back to CWE stats page
CWE-345
Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
The product does not sufficiently verify the origin or authenticity of data, in a way that causes it to accept invalid data.
CVE-2026-45058 (GCVE-0-2026-45058)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-05-28 17:20 – Updated: 2026-05-30 02:04
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
electerm: Import unsafe bookmark data could lead to unsafe operation when click local type bookmark
Summary
electerm is an open-sourced terminal/ssh/sftp/telnet/serialport/RDP/VNC/Spice/ftp client. In 3.8.8 and earlier, there is persistent local-pty code execution via imported bookmarks or compromised sync targets. Affects users who import bookmark JSON files or who have electerm sync configured (gist/WebDAV). The attacker can inject exec* fields or global config to cause remote code to run when a bookmark is opened or when sync is applied.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/electerm/electerm/security/adv… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-45058",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-05-30T02:03:52.146092Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-30T02:04:03.353Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "electerm",
"vendor": "electerm",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c= 3.8.8"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "electerm is an open-sourced terminal/ssh/sftp/telnet/serialport/RDP/VNC/Spice/ftp client. In 3.8.8 and earlier, there is persistent local-pty code execution via imported bookmarks or compromised sync targets. Affects users who import bookmark JSON files or who have electerm sync configured (gist/WebDAV). The attacker can inject exec* fields or global config to cause remote code to run when a bookmark is opened or when sync is applied."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 9.4,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"subIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"userInteraction": "ACTIVE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-94",
"description": "CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-345",
"description": "CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-494",
"description": "CWE-494: Download of Code Without Integrity Check",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-915",
"description": "CWE-915: Improperly Controlled Modification of Dynamically-Determined Object Attributes",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-28T17:20:41.799Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/electerm/electerm/security/advisories/GHSA-jgg9-rw32-44pj",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/electerm/electerm/security/advisories/GHSA-jgg9-rw32-44pj"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-jgg9-rw32-44pj",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "electerm: Import unsafe bookmark data could lead to unsafe operation when click local type bookmark"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-45058",
"datePublished": "2026-05-28T17:20:41.799Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-05-08T18:07:27.342Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-30T02:04:03.353Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-4541 (GCVE-0-2026-4541)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-03-22 08:35 – Updated: 2026-04-18 03:39 X_Open Source
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
janmojzis tinyssh Ed25519 Signature crypto_sign_ed25519_tinyssh.c signature verification
Summary
A flaw has been found in janmojzis tinyssh up to 20250501. Impacted is an unknown function of the file tinyssh/crypto_sign_ed25519_tinyssh.c of the component Ed25519 Signature Handler. This manipulation causes improper verification of cryptographic signature. The attack is restricted to local execution. The attack's complexity is rated as high. The exploitability is considered difficult. The exploit has been published and may be used. Upgrading to version 20260301 is recommended to address this issue. Patch name: 9c87269607e0d7d20174df742accc49c042cff17. Upgrading the affected component is recommended.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
Assigner
References
9 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://vuldb.com/vuln/352358 | vdb-entry |
| https://vuldb.com/vuln/352358/cti | signaturepermissions-required |
| https://vuldb.com/submit/774687 | third-party-advisory |
| https://github.com/janmojzis/tinyssh/issues/101 | issue-tracking |
| https://github.com/janmojzis/tinyssh/pull/102 | issue-trackingpatch |
| https://github.com/janmojzis/tinyssh/issues/101#i… | exploitissue-tracking |
| https://github.com/janmojzis/tinyssh/commit/9c872… | patch |
| https://github.com/janmojzis/tinyssh/releases/tag… | patch |
| https://github.com/janmojzis/tinyssh/ | product |
Impacted products
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-4541",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-03-23T15:33:32.521628Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-23T15:33:50.378Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"modules": [
"Ed25519 Signature Handler"
],
"product": "tinyssh",
"vendor": "janmojzis",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "20250501"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "20260301"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "pythok (VulDB User)"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A flaw has been found in janmojzis tinyssh up to 20250501. Impacted is an unknown function of the file tinyssh/crypto_sign_ed25519_tinyssh.c of the component Ed25519 Signature Handler. This manipulation causes improper verification of cryptographic signature. The attack is restricted to local execution. The attack\u0027s complexity is rated as high. The exploitability is considered difficult. The exploit has been published and may be used. Upgrading to version 20260301 is recommended to address this issue. Patch name: 9c87269607e0d7d20174df742accc49c042cff17. Upgrading the affected component is recommended."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"baseScore": 2,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P",
"version": "4.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 2.5,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N/E:P/RL:O/RC:C",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_0": {
"baseScore": 2.5,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N/E:P/RL:O/RC:C",
"version": "3.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV2_0": {
"baseScore": 1,
"vectorString": "AV:L/AC:H/Au:S/C:N/I:P/A:N/E:POC/RL:OF/RC:C",
"version": "2.0"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-347",
"description": "Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-345",
"description": "Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-18T03:39:33.191Z",
"orgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"shortName": "VulDB"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "VDB-352358 | janmojzis tinyssh Ed25519 Signature crypto_sign_ed25519_tinyssh.c signature verification",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/352358"
},
{
"name": "VDB-352358 | CTI Indicators (IOB, IOC, IOA)",
"tags": [
"signature",
"permissions-required"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/352358/cti"
},
{
"name": "Submit #774687 | GitHub tinyssh 20250501 Cryptographic Issues",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/submit/774687"
},
{
"tags": [
"issue-tracking"
],
"url": "https://github.com/janmojzis/tinyssh/issues/101"
},
{
"tags": [
"issue-tracking",
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/janmojzis/tinyssh/pull/102"
},
{
"tags": [
"exploit",
"issue-tracking"
],
"url": "https://github.com/janmojzis/tinyssh/issues/101#issue-3983586116"
},
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/janmojzis/tinyssh/commit/9c87269607e0d7d20174df742accc49c042cff17"
},
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/janmojzis/tinyssh/releases/tag/20260301"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://github.com/janmojzis/tinyssh/"
}
],
"tags": [
"x_open-source"
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-03-01T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Countermeasure disclosed"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-03-21T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Advisory disclosed"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-03-21T01:00:00.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry created"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-03-23T05:12:55.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry last update"
}
],
"title": "janmojzis tinyssh Ed25519 Signature crypto_sign_ed25519_tinyssh.c signature verification"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"assignerShortName": "VulDB",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-4541",
"datePublished": "2026-03-22T08:35:03.623Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-03-21T15:10:27.592Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-18T03:39:33.191Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-45674 (GCVE-0-2026-45674)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-06-12 14:17 – Updated: 2026-07-10 12:06
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Netty Vulnerable to DNS Cache Poisoning via Missing Bailiwick Checks in CNAME Records
Summary
Netty is a network application framework for development of protocol servers and clients. Prior to versions 4.1.135.Final and 4.2.15.Final, Netty's DnsResolveContext fails to validate the origin (bailiwick) of CNAME records in DNS responses. Versions 4.1.135.Final and 4.2.15.Final patch the issue.
Severity
8.7 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
Assigner
References
11 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisorie… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/netty/netty/releases/tag/netty… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/netty/netty/releases/tag/netty… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-45674 | vdb-entryx_refsource_REDHAT |
| https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2488400 | issue-trackingx_refsource_REDHAT |
| https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/v… | x_sadp-csaf-vex |
| https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26586 | vendor-advisoryx_refsource_REDHAT |
| https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:37390 | vendor-advisoryx_refsource_REDHAT |
| https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26018 | vendor-advisoryx_refsource_REDHAT |
| https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26017 | vendor-advisoryx_refsource_REDHAT |
| https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:34608 | vendor-advisoryx_refsource_REDHAT |
Impacted products
23 products
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-45674",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-06-13T03:56:02.852513Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-16T13:17:42.663Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:apache_camel_quarkus:3.33"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Build of Apache Camel 3.33 for Quarkus 3.33.2.SP1",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:apache_camel_spring_boot:4.18"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4.18.1.P1 for Spring Boot 3.5.16",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quarkus:3.27::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat build of Quarkus 3.27.4.SP1",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quarkus:3.33::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat build of Quarkus 3.33.2.SP1",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:amq_streams:2.9::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Streams for Apache Kafka 2.9.4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:cryostat:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Cryostat 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:serverless:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "OpenShift Serverless",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:apache_camel_hawtio:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat build of Apache Camel - HawtIO 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:camel_quarkus:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:apicurio_registry:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat build of Apicurio Registry 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:debezium:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat build of Debezium 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:build_keycloak:"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Build of Keycloak",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_data_grid:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Data Grid 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_fuse:7"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Fuse 7",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform:7"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jbosseapxp"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_devspaces:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:amq_streams:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "streams for Apache Kafka 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:enterprise_linux_ai:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:red_hat_single_sign_on:7"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Single Sign-On 7",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-06-12T14:17:50.203Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A flaw was found in Netty\u0027s DnsResolveContext. This vulnerability allows a remote attacker to achieve information disclosure or data manipulation by crafting malicious DNS responses. The flaw occurs because the DnsResolveContext fails to validate the origin (bailiwick) of CNAME records in DNS responses, which could enable an attacker to redirect network traffic or intercept sensitive data from affected applications."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"namespace": "https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/",
"value": "Important"
},
"type": "Red Hat severity rating"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 8.7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-346",
"description": "Origin Validation Error",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-10T12:06:02.026Z",
"orgId": "0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c",
"shortName": "redhat-SADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-45674"
},
{
"name": "RHBZ#2488400",
"tags": [
"issue-tracking",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2488400"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_sadp-csaf-vex"
],
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-45674.json"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26586"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:37390"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26018"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26017"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:34608"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:26586: Red Hat Build of Apache Camel 3.33 for Quarkus 3.33.2.SP1"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:37390: Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4.18.1.P1 for Spring Boot 3.5.16"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:26018: Red Hat build of Quarkus 3.27.4.SP1"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:26017: Red Hat build of Quarkus 3.33.2.SP1"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:34608: Streams for Apache Kafka 2.9.4"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-06-12T15:02:15.565Z",
"value": "Reported to Red Hat."
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-06-12T14:17:50.203Z",
"value": "Made public."
}
],
"title": "netty-resolver-dns: Netty: Information disclosure and data manipulation due to improper CNAME record validation",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability."
}
],
"x_adpType": "supplier",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "sadp-cli 1.0.0"
}
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "netty",
"vendor": "netty",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 4.2.0.Final, \u003c 4.2.15.Final"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 4.1.135.Final"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Netty is a network application framework for development of protocol servers and clients. Prior to versions 4.1.135.Final and 4.2.15.Final, Netty\u0027s DnsResolveContext fails to validate the origin (bailiwick) of CNAME records in DNS responses. Versions 4.1.135.Final and 4.2.15.Final patch the issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 8.7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-345",
"description": "CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-12T14:17:50.203Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisories/GHSA-676x-f7gg-47vc",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisories/GHSA-676x-f7gg-47vc"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/netty/netty/releases/tag/netty-4.1.135.Final",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/netty/netty/releases/tag/netty-4.1.135.Final"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/netty/netty/releases/tag/netty-4.2.15.Final",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/netty/netty/releases/tag/netty-4.2.15.Final"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-676x-f7gg-47vc",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Netty Vulnerable to DNS Cache Poisoning via Missing Bailiwick Checks in CNAME Records"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-45674",
"datePublished": "2026-06-12T14:17:50.203Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-05-12T21:59:25.666Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-10T12:06:02.026Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-45792 (GCVE-0-2026-45792)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-06-23 19:02 – Updated: 2026-06-26 15:18
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
RTK improperly trusts project-local filter configuration, allowing silent tampering of command output shown to LLM
Summary
rtk filters and compresses command outputs before they reach your LLM context. Prior to 0.32.0, RTK (Rust Token Killer) improperly trusts project-local configuration files. RTK automatically loads .rtk/filters.toml from the working directory with highest priority and without user notification. An attacker can place a malicious filter file in a repository to apply regex-based modifications (e.g., strip_lines_matching) to shell command output before it is shown to the LLM, without any indication that the output has been modified. This allows attackers to selectively suppress or alter command output (including file contents, diffs, and security scan results) without detection, potentially concealing malicious code during AI-assisted development or review. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.32.0.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
Assigner
References
3 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/rtk-ai/rtk/security/advisories… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/rtk-ai/rtk/pull/623 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/rtk-ai/rtk/pull/625 | x_refsource_MISC |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-45792",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-06-26T15:18:00.292179Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-26T15:18:22.521Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/rtk-ai/rtk/pull/623"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "rtk",
"vendor": "rtk-ai",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 0.32.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "rtk filters and compresses command outputs before they reach your LLM context. Prior to 0.32.0, RTK (Rust Token Killer) improperly trusts project-local configuration files. RTK automatically loads .rtk/filters.toml from the working directory with highest priority and without user notification. An attacker can place a malicious filter file in a repository to apply regex-based modifications (e.g., strip_lines_matching) to shell command output before it is shown to the LLM, without any indication that the output has been modified. This allows attackers to selectively suppress or alter command output (including file contents, diffs, and security scan results) without detection, potentially concealing malicious code during AI-assisted development or review. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.32.0."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"baseScore": 6.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"subIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"userInteraction": "ACTIVE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-345",
"description": "CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-426",
"description": "CWE-426: Untrusted Search Path",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-23T19:02:08.357Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/rtk-ai/rtk/security/advisories/GHSA-fvvm-949w-qj4w",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/rtk-ai/rtk/security/advisories/GHSA-fvvm-949w-qj4w"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/rtk-ai/rtk/pull/623",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/rtk-ai/rtk/pull/623"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/rtk-ai/rtk/pull/625",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/rtk-ai/rtk/pull/625"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-fvvm-949w-qj4w",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "RTK improperly trusts project-local filter configuration, allowing silent tampering of command output shown to LLM"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-45792",
"datePublished": "2026-06-23T19:02:08.357Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-05-13T08:19:32.602Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-26T15:18:22.521Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-46538 (GCVE-0-2026-46538)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-05-27 21:56 – Updated: 2026-05-28 12:38
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Microsoft UFO accepts cross-device TASK_END messages by session_id only, allowing peer task-result injection
Summary
Microsoft UFO open-source framework for intelligent automation across devices and platforms. In 3.0.1-4-ge2626659, Microsoft UFO's constellation client tracks pending task responses by session_id only and does not verify that a TASK_END message came from the device that originally received the task. When the constellation sends a task to a target device, it records a pending Future under a session key. The pending task record stores the expected device ID, but the completion path ignores that binding. If another authenticated peer device sends a forged TASK_END with the same session_id, the constellation accepts the response and completes the victim device's pending Future with attacker-controlled result data. This is an authenticated cross-device task-result injection issue.
Severity
5.9 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/microsoft/UFO/security/advisor… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-46538",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-05-28T12:37:58.013066Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-28T12:38:02.790Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/microsoft/UFO/security/advisories/GHSA-wmq2-74rj-7pjc"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "UFO",
"vendor": "microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.1-4-ge2626659"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Microsoft UFO open-source framework for intelligent automation across devices and platforms. In 3.0.1-4-ge2626659, Microsoft UFO\u0027s constellation client tracks pending task responses by session_id only and does not verify that a TASK_END message came from the device that originally received the task. When the constellation sends a task to a target device, it records a pending Future under a session key. The pending task record stores the expected device ID, but the completion path ignores that binding. If another authenticated peer device sends a forged TASK_END with the same session_id, the constellation accepts the response and completes the victim device\u0027s pending Future with attacker-controlled result data. This is an authenticated cross-device task-result injection issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 5.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-294",
"description": "CWE-294: Authentication Bypass by Capture-replay",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-345",
"description": "CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-27T21:56:55.361Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/microsoft/UFO/security/advisories/GHSA-wmq2-74rj-7pjc",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/microsoft/UFO/security/advisories/GHSA-wmq2-74rj-7pjc"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-wmq2-74rj-7pjc",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Microsoft UFO accepts cross-device TASK_END messages by session_id only, allowing peer task-result injection"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-46538",
"datePublished": "2026-05-27T21:56:55.361Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-05-14T20:42:31.368Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-28T12:38:02.790Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-46539 (GCVE-0-2026-46539)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-06-09 23:44 – Updated: 2026-06-10 14:36
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
nimiq-primitives: BlockInclusionProof interlink issue when hops are empty
Summary
Nimiq is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.4.0, a logic flaw in BlockInclusionProof::is_block_proven causes the function to return true without performing any cryptographic verification when get_interlink_hops yields an empty hop list. This occurs when the target block is at the election block position immediately preceding the election head's epoch. An attacker providing transaction inclusion proofs can forge a MacroBlock header for that epoch position and have it accepted as "proven" without any hash or signature verification. This issue has been patched in version 1.4.0.
Severity
5.9 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-345 - Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
Assigner
References
3 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/nimiq/core-rs-albatross/securi… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/nimiq/core-rs-albatross/pull/3705 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/nimiq/core-rs-albatross/releas… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| nimiq | core-rs-albatross |
Affected:
< 1.4.0
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-46539",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-06-10T14:36:09.150189Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-10T14:36:28.257Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "core-rs-albatross",
"vendor": "nimiq",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 1.4.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Nimiq is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.4.0, a logic flaw in BlockInclusionProof::is_block_proven causes the function to return true without performing any cryptographic verification when get_interlink_hops yields an empty hop list. This occurs when the target block is at the election block position immediately preceding the election head\u0027s epoch. An attacker providing transaction inclusion proofs can forge a MacroBlock header for that epoch position and have it accepted as \"proven\" without any hash or signature verification. This issue has been patched in version 1.4.0."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-345",
"description": "CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-09T23:44:34.283Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/nimiq/core-rs-albatross/security/advisories/GHSA-799f-29jm-gr6c",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/nimiq/core-rs-albatross/security/advisories/GHSA-799f-29jm-gr6c"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/nimiq/core-rs-albatross/pull/3705",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/nimiq/core-rs-albatross/pull/3705"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/nimiq/core-rs-albatross/releases/tag/v1.4.0",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/nimiq/core-rs-albatross/releases/tag/v1.4.0"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-799f-29jm-gr6c",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "nimiq-primitives: BlockInclusionProof interlink issue when hops are empty"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-46539",
"datePublished": "2026-06-09T23:44:34.283Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-05-14T20:42:31.368Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-10T14:36:28.257Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-46654 (GCVE-0-2026-46654)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-06-10 20:06 – Updated: 2026-06-11 14:01
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Plonky3 MultiField32Challenger: transcript malleability and challenge entropy loss
Summary
Plonky3 is a toolkit for polynomial IOPs (PIOPs). Prior to versions 0.4.3 and 0.5.3, an attacker controlling prover-side observations can craft distinct transcripts that produce identical challenges, breaking the binding property of Fiat-Shamir. This issue has been patched in versions 0.4.3 and 0.5.3.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/Plonky3/Plonky3/security/advis… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-46654",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-06-11T14:01:33.851648Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-11T14:01:57.462Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "Plonky3",
"vendor": "Plonky3",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 0.4.3"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 0.5.0, \u003c 0.5.3"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Plonky3 is a toolkit for polynomial IOPs (PIOPs). Prior to versions 0.4.3 and 0.5.3, an attacker controlling prover-side observations can craft distinct transcripts that produce identical challenges, breaking the binding property of Fiat-Shamir. This issue has been patched in versions 0.4.3 and 0.5.3."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.9,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-1240",
"description": "CWE-1240: Use of a Cryptographic Primitive with a Risky Implementation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-345",
"description": "CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-10T20:06:10.554Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/Plonky3/Plonky3/security/advisories/GHSA-vj64-rjf3-w3v7",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/Plonky3/Plonky3/security/advisories/GHSA-vj64-rjf3-w3v7"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-vj64-rjf3-w3v7",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Plonky3 MultiField32Challenger: transcript malleability and challenge entropy loss"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-46654",
"datePublished": "2026-06-10T20:06:10.554Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-05-15T20:11:54.585Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-11T14:01:57.462Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-47123 (GCVE-0-2026-47123)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-05-29 19:51 – Updated: 2026-06-02 01:54
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
FreeScout: Agent Impersonation via Missing HMAC Verification on Notification Reply Message-ID Path
Summary
FreeScout is a free help desk and shared inbox built with PHP's Laravel framework. Prior to 1.8.220, the email processing pipeline in FreeScout's FetchEmails command has two code paths for identifying agent (user) replies based on In-Reply-To / References headers. The notification reply path (notify-{thread_id}-{user_id}-...) extracts thread_id and user_id directly from the Message-ID without HMAC verification. An external attacker who can spoof the From address of a helpdesk agent can inject messages that FreeScout processes as legitimate agent replies — which are then automatically forwarded to customers via the legitimate SMTP server. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.220.
Severity
7.5 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
Assigner
References
3 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/freescout-help-desk/freescout/… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/freescout-help-desk/freescout/… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://vincent.vulcoord.net/score/?state=Not+Sco… | exploit |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| freescout-help-desk | freescout |
Affected:
< 1.8.220
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-47123",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-06-02T01:54:19.123127Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-02T01:54:46.486Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://vincent.vulcoord.net/score/?state=Not+Scored\u0026year=2026\u0026year=2025\u0026assigned_to=a165dae3-480e-4f7d-bbb8-9b1d78115b69\u0026cve=CVE-2026-47123\u0026analyze=1"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "freescout",
"vendor": "freescout-help-desk",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 1.8.220"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "FreeScout is a free help desk and shared inbox built with PHP\u0027s Laravel framework. Prior to 1.8.220, the email processing pipeline in FreeScout\u0027s FetchEmails command has two code paths for identifying agent (user) replies based on In-Reply-To / References headers. The notification reply path (notify-{thread_id}-{user_id}-...) extracts thread_id and user_id directly from the Message-ID without HMAC verification. An external attacker who can spoof the From address of a helpdesk agent can inject messages that FreeScout processes as legitimate agent replies \u2014 which are then automatically forwarded to customers via the legitimate SMTP server. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.220."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-290",
"description": "CWE-290: Authentication Bypass by Spoofing",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-345",
"description": "CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-29T19:51:41.383Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/freescout-help-desk/freescout/security/advisories/GHSA-6r38-6mcf-2ww3",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/freescout-help-desk/freescout/security/advisories/GHSA-6r38-6mcf-2ww3"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/freescout-help-desk/freescout/commit/d902f19038213c6a376947d269b00440908e88a0",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/freescout-help-desk/freescout/commit/d902f19038213c6a376947d269b00440908e88a0"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-6r38-6mcf-2ww3",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "FreeScout: Agent Impersonation via Missing HMAC Verification on Notification Reply Message-ID Path"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-47123",
"datePublished": "2026-05-29T19:51:41.383Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-05-18T19:50:18.694Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-02T01:54:46.486Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-47155 (GCVE-0-2026-47155)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-06-22 22:20 – Updated: 2026-06-23 12:35
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
vLLM: Artifact Pin Decay in vLLM allows pinned deployments to load unpinned code, weights, and processors
Summary
vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.22.0, vLLM's revision pinning controls do not consistently apply to all artifacts loaded for a model. A deployment that supplies --revision or --code-revision can still load dynamic code, GGUF files, image processors, retrieval side weights, or same-repository subfolder weights/config from an unpinned/default revision. This is a supply-chain integrity issue for pinned vLLM deployments. Operators can believe they are serving a reviewed model revision while vLLM resolves behavior-affecting nested or sibling artifacts outside that reviewed revision. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.22.0.
Severity
6.5 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-345 - Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
Assigner
References
4 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/security/adv… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/42616 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/d26a2… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://huntr.com/bounties/3f1e24c0-87d2-4f6c-a70… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| vllm-project | vllm |
Affected:
< 0.22.0
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-47155",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-06-23T12:34:39.566846Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-23T12:35:39.739Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "vllm",
"vendor": "vllm-project",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 0.22.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.22.0, vLLM\u0027s revision pinning controls do not consistently apply to all artifacts loaded for a model. A deployment that supplies --revision or --code-revision can still load dynamic code, GGUF files, image processors, retrieval side weights, or same-repository subfolder weights/config from an unpinned/default revision. This is a supply-chain integrity issue for pinned vLLM deployments. Operators can believe they are serving a reviewed model revision while vLLM resolves behavior-affecting nested or sibling artifacts outside that reviewed revision. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.22.0."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-345",
"description": "CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-22T22:20:10.793Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/security/advisories/GHSA-3ww4-5jv9-j5gm",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/security/advisories/GHSA-3ww4-5jv9-j5gm"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/42616",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/42616"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/d26a28ab033697f55a1414b5b0435de7cd6045b6",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/d26a28ab033697f55a1414b5b0435de7cd6045b6"
},
{
"name": "https://huntr.com/bounties/3f1e24c0-87d2-4f6c-a705-820f380879ac",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://huntr.com/bounties/3f1e24c0-87d2-4f6c-a705-820f380879ac"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-3ww4-5jv9-j5gm",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "vLLM: Artifact Pin Decay in vLLM allows pinned deployments to load unpinned code, weights, and processors"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-47155",
"datePublished": "2026-06-22T22:20:10.793Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-05-18T21:25:34.496Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-23T12:35:39.739Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-47202 (GCVE-0-2026-47202)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-05-26 17:30 – Updated: 2026-05-27 17:23
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Kavita: Pre-Auth Account Takeover
Summary
Kavita is a cross platform reading server. Prior to 0.9.0.2, an Improper Token validation flaw permits a remote and unauthenticated threat actor to request a JWT for any user including admins given knowledge of their username. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.9.0.2.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/Kareadita/Kavita/security/advi… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/Kareadita/Kavita/releases/tag/… | x_refsource_MISC |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-47202",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-05-27T17:23:33.702090Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-27T17:23:39.941Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "Kavita",
"vendor": "Kareadita",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 0.9.0.2"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Kavita is a cross platform reading server. Prior to 0.9.0.2, an Improper Token validation flaw permits a remote and unauthenticated threat actor to request a JWT for any user including admins given knowledge of their username. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.9.0.2."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 9.3,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-287",
"description": "CWE-287: Improper Authentication",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-345",
"description": "CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-697",
"description": "CWE-697: Incorrect Comparison",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-26T17:30:55.961Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/Kareadita/Kavita/security/advisories/GHSA-m2v3-fcjh-hm22",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/Kareadita/Kavita/security/advisories/GHSA-m2v3-fcjh-hm22"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/Kareadita/Kavita/releases/tag/v0.9.0.2",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/Kareadita/Kavita/releases/tag/v0.9.0.2"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-m2v3-fcjh-hm22",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Kavita: Pre-Auth Account Takeover"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-47202",
"datePublished": "2026-05-26T17:30:55.961Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-05-18T22:07:37.436Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-27T17:23:39.941Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
No mitigation information available for this CWE.
CAPEC-111: JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking)
An attacker targets a system that uses JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) as a transport mechanism between the client and the server (common in Web 2.0 systems using AJAX) to steal possibly confidential information transmitted from the server back to the client inside the JSON object by taking advantage of the loophole in the browser's Same Origin Policy that does not prohibit JavaScript from one website to be included and executed in the context of another website.
CAPEC-141: Cache Poisoning
An attacker exploits the functionality of cache technologies to cause specific data to be cached that aids the attackers' objectives. This describes any attack whereby an attacker places incorrect or harmful material in cache. The targeted cache can be an application's cache (e.g. a web browser cache) or a public cache (e.g. a DNS or ARP cache). Until the cache is refreshed, most applications or clients will treat the corrupted cache value as valid. This can lead to a wide range of exploits including redirecting web browsers towards sites that install malware and repeatedly incorrect calculations based on the incorrect value.
CAPEC-142: DNS Cache Poisoning
A domain name server translates a domain name (such as www.example.com) into an IP address that Internet hosts use to contact Internet resources. An adversary modifies a public DNS cache to cause certain names to resolve to incorrect addresses that the adversary specifies. The result is that client applications that rely upon the targeted cache for domain name resolution will be directed not to the actual address of the specified domain name but to some other address. Adversaries can use this to herd clients to sites that install malware on the victim's computer or to masquerade as part of a Pharming attack.
CAPEC-148: Content Spoofing
An adversary modifies content to make it contain something other than what the original content producer intended while keeping the apparent source of the content unchanged. The term content spoofing is most often used to describe modification of web pages hosted by a target to display the adversary's content instead of the owner's content. However, any content can be spoofed, including the content of email messages, file transfers, or the content of other network communication protocols. Content can be modified at the source (e.g. modifying the source file for a web page) or in transit (e.g. intercepting and modifying a message between the sender and recipient). Usually, the adversary will attempt to hide the fact that the content has been modified, but in some cases, such as with web site defacement, this is not necessary. Content Spoofing can lead to malware exposure, financial fraud (if the content governs financial transactions), privacy violations, and other unwanted outcomes.
CAPEC-218: Spoofing of UDDI/ebXML Messages
An attacker spoofs a UDDI, ebXML, or similar message in order to impersonate a service provider in an e-business transaction. UDDI, ebXML, and similar standards are used to identify businesses in e-business transactions. Among other things, they identify a particular participant, WSDL information for SOAP transactions, and supported communication protocols, including security protocols. By spoofing one of these messages an attacker could impersonate a legitimate business in a transaction or could manipulate the protocols used between a client and business. This could result in disclosure of sensitive information, loss of message integrity, or even financial fraud.
CAPEC-384: Application API Message Manipulation via Man-in-the-Middle
An attacker manipulates either egress or ingress data from a client within an application framework in order to change the content of messages. Performing this attack can allow the attacker to gain unauthorized privileges within the application, or conduct attacks such as phishing, deceptive strategies to spread malware, or traditional web-application attacks. The techniques require use of specialized software that allow the attacker to perform adversary-in-the-middle (CAPEC-94) communications between the web browser and the remote system. Despite the use of AiTH software, the attack is actually directed at the server, as the client is one node in a series of content brokers that pass information along to the application framework. Additionally, it is not true "Adversary-in-the-Middle" attack at the network layer, but an application-layer attack the root cause of which is the master applications trust in the integrity of code supplied by the client.
CAPEC-385: Transaction or Event Tampering via Application API Manipulation
An attacker hosts or joins an event or transaction within an application framework in order to change the content of messages or items that are being exchanged. Performing this attack allows the attacker to manipulate content in such a way as to produce messages or content that look authentic but may contain deceptive links, substitute one item or another, spoof an existing item and conduct a false exchange, or otherwise change the amounts or identity of what is being exchanged. The techniques require use of specialized software that allow the attacker to man-in-the-middle communications between the web browser and the remote system in order to change the content of various application elements. Often, items exchanged in game can be monetized via sales for coin, virtual dollars, etc. The purpose of the attack is for the attack to scam the victim by trapping the data packets involved the exchange and altering the integrity of the transfer process.
CAPEC-386: Application API Navigation Remapping
An attacker manipulates either egress or ingress data from a client within an application framework in order to change the destination and/or content of links/buttons displayed to a user within API messages. Performing this attack allows the attacker to manipulate content in such a way as to produce messages or content that looks authentic but contains links/buttons that point to an attacker controlled destination. Some applications make navigation remapping more difficult to detect because the actual HREF values of images, profile elements, and links/buttons are masked. One example would be to place an image in a user's photo gallery that when clicked upon redirected the user to an off-site location. Also, traditional web vulnerabilities (such as CSRF) can be constructed with remapped buttons or links. In some cases navigation remapping can be used for Phishing attacks or even means to artificially boost the page view, user site reputation, or click-fraud.
CAPEC-387: Navigation Remapping To Propagate Malicious Content
An adversary manipulates either egress or ingress data from a client within an application framework in order to change the content of messages and thereby circumvent the expected application logic.
CAPEC-388: Application API Button Hijacking
An attacker manipulates either egress or ingress data from a client within an application framework in order to change the destination and/or content of buttons displayed to a user within API messages. Performing this attack allows the attacker to manipulate content in such a way as to produce messages or content that looks authentic but contains buttons that point to an attacker controlled destination.
CAPEC-665: Exploitation of Thunderbolt Protection Flaws
An adversary leverages a firmware weakness within the Thunderbolt protocol, on a computing device to manipulate Thunderbolt controller firmware in order to exploit vulnerabilities in the implementation of authorization and verification schemes within Thunderbolt protection mechanisms. Upon gaining physical access to a target device, the adversary conducts high-level firmware manipulation of the victim Thunderbolt controller SPI (Serial Peripheral Interface) flash, through the use of a SPI Programing device and an external Thunderbolt device, typically as the target device is booting up. If successful, this allows the adversary to modify memory, subvert authentication mechanisms, spoof identities and content, and extract data and memory from the target device. Currently 7 major vulnerabilities exist within Thunderbolt protocol with 9 attack vectors as noted in the Execution Flow.
CAPEC-701: Browser in the Middle (BiTM)
An adversary exploits the inherent functionalities of a web browser, in order to establish an unnoticed remote desktop connection in the victim's browser to the adversary's system. The adversary must deploy a web client with a remote desktop session that the victim can access.