CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
The product does not validate, or incorrectly validates, a certificate.
CVE-2025-61778 (GCVE-0-2025-61778)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-10-06 16:53 – Updated: 2025-10-06 17:05
VLAI
Title
Akka.Remote TLS did not properly implement certificate-based authentication
Summary
Akka.NET is a .NET port of the Akka project from the Scala / Java community. In all versions of Akka.Remote from v1.2.0 to v1.5.51, TLS could be enabled via our `akka.remote.dot-netty.tcp` transport and this would correctly enforce private key validation on the server-side of inbound connections. Akka.Remote, however, never asked the outbound-connecting client to present ITS certificate - therefore it's possible for untrusted parties to connect to a private key'd Akka.NET cluster and begin communicating with it without any certificate. The issue here is that for certificate-based authentication to work properly, ensuring that all members of the Akka.Remote network are secured with the same private key, Akka.Remote needed to implement mutual TLS. This was not the case before Akka.NET v1.5.52. Those who run Akka.NET inside a private network that they fully control or who were never using TLS in the first place are now affected by the bug. However, those who use TLS to secure their networks must upgrade to Akka.NET V1.5.52 or later. One patch forces "fail fast" semantics if TLS is enabled but the private key is missing or invalid. Previous versions would only check that once connection attempts occurred. The second patch, a critical fix, enforces mutual TLS (mTLS) by default, so both parties must be keyed using the same certificate. As a workaround, avoid exposing the application publicly to avoid the vulnerability having a practical impact on one's application. However, upgrading to version 1.5.52 is still recommended by the maintainers.
Severity
CWE
Assigner
References
5 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/akkadotnet/akka.net/security/a… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/akkadotnet/akka.net/pull/7847 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/akkadotnet/akka.net/pull/7851 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://getakka.net/articles/remoting/security.html | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/akkadotnet/akka.net/releases/t… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| akkadotnet | akka.net |
Affected:
>= 1.2.0, < 1.5.52
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-61778",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-10-06T17:05:20.929457Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-06T17:05:33.450Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "akka.net",
"vendor": "akkadotnet",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 1.2.0, \u003c 1.5.52"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Akka.NET is a .NET port of the Akka project from the Scala / Java community. In all versions of Akka.Remote from v1.2.0 to v1.5.51, TLS could be enabled via our `akka.remote.dot-netty.tcp` transport and this would correctly enforce private key validation on the server-side of inbound connections. Akka.Remote, however, never asked the outbound-connecting client to present ITS certificate - therefore it\u0027s possible for untrusted parties to connect to a private key\u0027d Akka.NET cluster and begin communicating with it without any certificate. The issue here is that for certificate-based authentication to work properly, ensuring that all members of the Akka.Remote network are secured with the same private key, Akka.Remote needed to implement mutual TLS. This was not the case before Akka.NET v1.5.52. Those who run Akka.NET inside a private network that they fully control or who were never using TLS in the first place are now affected by the bug. However, those who use TLS to secure their networks must upgrade to Akka.NET V1.5.52 or later. One patch forces \"fail fast\" semantics if TLS is enabled but the private key is missing or invalid. Previous versions would only check that once connection attempts occurred. The second patch, a critical fix, enforces mutual TLS (mTLS) by default, so both parties must be keyed using the same certificate. As a workaround, avoid exposing the application publicly to avoid the vulnerability having a practical impact on one\u0027s application. However, upgrading to version 1.5.52 is still recommended by the maintainers."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 9.3,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-290",
"description": "CWE-290: Authentication Bypass by Spoofing",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-295",
"description": "CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-306",
"description": "CWE-306: Missing Authentication for Critical Function",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-06T16:53:41.707Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/akkadotnet/akka.net/security/advisories/GHSA-jhpv-4q4f-43g5",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/akkadotnet/akka.net/security/advisories/GHSA-jhpv-4q4f-43g5"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/akkadotnet/akka.net/pull/7847",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/akkadotnet/akka.net/pull/7847"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/akkadotnet/akka.net/pull/7851",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/akkadotnet/akka.net/pull/7851"
},
{
"name": "https://getakka.net/articles/remoting/security.html",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://getakka.net/articles/remoting/security.html"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/akkadotnet/akka.net/releases/tag/1.5.52",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/akkadotnet/akka.net/releases/tag/1.5.52"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-jhpv-4q4f-43g5",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Akka.Remote TLS did not properly implement certificate-based authentication"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-61778",
"datePublished": "2025-10-06T16:53:41.707Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-09-30T19:43:49.901Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-06T17:05:33.450Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-62371 (GCVE-0-2025-62371)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-10-15 17:25 – Updated: 2025-10-15 18:13
VLAI
Title
OpenSearch Data Prepper plugins trusts all SSL certificates by default
Summary
OpenSearch Data Prepper as an open source data collector for observability data. In versions prior to 2.12.2, the OpenSearch sink and source plugins in Data Prepper trust all SSL certificates by default when no certificate path is provided. Prior to this fix, the OpenSearch sink and source plugins would automatically use a trust all SSL strategy when connecting to OpenSearch clusters if no certificate path was explicitly configured. This behavior bypasses SSL certificate validation, potentially allowing attackers to intercept and modify data in transit through man-in-the-middle attacks. The vulnerability affects connections to OpenSearch when the cert parameter is not explicitly provided. This issue has been patched in version 2.12.2. As a workaround, users can add the cert parameter to their OpenSearch sink or source configuration with the path to the cluster's CA certificate.
Severity
7.4 (High)
CWE
- CWE-295 - Improper Certificate Validation
Assigner
References
4 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/opensearch-project/data-preppe… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/opensearch-project/data-preppe… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/opensearch-project/data-preppe… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/opensearch-project/data-preppe… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| opensearch-project | data-prepper |
Affected:
< 2.12.2
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-62371",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-10-15T18:13:30.517138Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-15T18:13:42.168Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "data-prepper",
"vendor": "opensearch-project",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 2.12.2"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "OpenSearch Data Prepper as an open source data collector for observability data. In versions prior to 2.12.2, the OpenSearch sink and source plugins in Data Prepper trust all SSL certificates by default when no certificate path is provided. Prior to this fix, the OpenSearch sink and source plugins would automatically use a trust all SSL strategy when connecting to OpenSearch clusters if no certificate path was explicitly configured. This behavior bypasses SSL certificate validation, potentially allowing attackers to intercept and modify data in transit through man-in-the-middle attacks. The vulnerability affects connections to OpenSearch when the cert parameter is not explicitly provided. This issue has been patched in version 2.12.2. As a workaround, users can add the cert parameter to their OpenSearch sink or source configuration with the path to the cluster\u0027s CA certificate."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.4,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-295",
"description": "CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-15T17:25:43.428Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/opensearch-project/data-prepper/security/advisories/GHSA-43ff-rr26-8hx4",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/opensearch-project/data-prepper/security/advisories/GHSA-43ff-rr26-8hx4"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/opensearch-project/data-prepper/commit/98fcf0d0ff9c18f1f7501e11dbed918814724b99",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/opensearch-project/data-prepper/commit/98fcf0d0ff9c18f1f7501e11dbed918814724b99"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/opensearch-project/data-prepper/commit/b0386a5af3fb71094ba6c86cd8b2afc783246599",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/opensearch-project/data-prepper/commit/b0386a5af3fb71094ba6c86cd8b2afc783246599"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/opensearch-project/data-prepper/commit/db11ce8f27ebca018980b2bca863f7173de9ce56",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/opensearch-project/data-prepper/commit/db11ce8f27ebca018980b2bca863f7173de9ce56"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-43ff-rr26-8hx4",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "OpenSearch Data Prepper plugins trusts all SSL certificates by default"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-62371",
"datePublished": "2025-10-15T17:25:43.428Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-10-10T14:22:48.204Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-15T18:13:42.168Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-62375 (GCVE-0-2025-62375)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-10-15 19:23 – Updated: 2025-10-15 19:44
VLAI
Title
go-witness Improper Verification of AWS EC2 Identity Documents
Summary
go-witness and witness are Go modules for generating attestations. In go-witness versions 0.8.6 and earlier and witness versions 0.9.2 and earlier the AWS attestor improperly verifies AWS EC2 instance identity documents. Verification can incorrectly succeed when a signature is not present or is empty, and when RSA signature verification fails. The attestor also embeds a single legacy global AWS public certificate and does not account for newer region specific certificates issued in 2024, making detection of forged documents difficult without additional trusted region data. An attacker able to supply or intercept instance identity document data (such as through Instance Metadata Service impersonation) can cause a forged identity document to be accepted, leading to incorrect trust decisions based on the attestation. This is fixed in go-witness 0.9.1 and witness 0.10.1. As a workaround, manually verify the included identity document, signature, and public key with standard tools (for example openssl) following AWS’s verification guidance, or disable use of the AWS attestor until upgraded.
Severity
CWE
- CWE-295 - Improper Certificate Validation
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/in-toto/go-witness/security/ad… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/in-toto/go-witness/commit/04ff… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| in-toto | go-witness |
Affected:
< 0.9.1
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-62375",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-10-15T19:44:18.639906Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-15T19:44:29.097Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "go-witness",
"vendor": "in-toto",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 0.9.1"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "go-witness and witness are Go modules for generating attestations. In go-witness versions 0.8.6 and earlier and witness versions 0.9.2 and earlier the AWS attestor improperly verifies AWS EC2 instance identity documents. Verification can incorrectly succeed when a signature is not present or is empty, and when RSA signature verification fails. The attestor also embeds a single legacy global AWS public certificate and does not account for newer region specific certificates issued in 2024, making detection of forged documents difficult without additional trusted region data. An attacker able to supply or intercept instance identity document data (such as through Instance Metadata Service impersonation) can cause a forged identity document to be accepted, leading to incorrect trust decisions based on the attestation. This is fixed in go-witness 0.9.1 and witness 0.10.1. As a workaround, manually verify the included identity document, signature, and public key with standard tools (for example openssl) following AWS\u2019s verification guidance, or disable use of the AWS attestor until upgraded."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 6.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-295",
"description": "CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-15T19:23:24.916Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/in-toto/go-witness/security/advisories/GHSA-72c7-4g63-hpw5",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/in-toto/go-witness/security/advisories/GHSA-72c7-4g63-hpw5"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/in-toto/go-witness/commit/04ff20b600e28ce8fd1aa287534dd383a1cfefb9",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/in-toto/go-witness/commit/04ff20b600e28ce8fd1aa287534dd383a1cfefb9"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-72c7-4g63-hpw5",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "go-witness Improper Verification of AWS EC2 Identity Documents"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-62375",
"datePublished": "2025-10-15T19:23:24.916Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-10-10T14:22:48.204Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-15T19:44:29.097Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-64432 (GCVE-0-2025-64432)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-11-07 18:38 – Updated: 2025-11-07 18:54
VLAI
Title
KubeVirt Affected by an Authentication Bypass in Kubernetes Aggregation Layer
Summary
KubeVirt is a virtual machine management add-on for Kubernetes. Versions 1.5.3 and below, and 1.6.0 contained a flawed implementation of the Kubernetes aggregation layer's authentication flow which could enable bypass of RBAC controls. It was discovered that the virt-api component fails to correctly authenticate the client when receiving API requests over mTLS. In particular, it fails to validate the CN (Common Name) field in the received client TLS certificates against the set of allowed values defined in the extension-apiserver-authentication configmap. Failre to validate certain fields in the client TLS certificate may allow an attacker to bypass existing RBAC controls by directly communicating with the aggregated API server, impersonating the Kubernetes API server and its aggregator component. This issue is fixed in versions 1.5.3 and 1.6.1.
Severity
4.7 (Medium)
Assigner
References
4 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/kubevirt/kubevirt/security/adv… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/kubevirt/kubevirt/commit/231dc… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/kubevirt/kubevirt/commit/af2f0… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/kubevirt/kubevirt/commit/b9773… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-64432",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-11-07T18:54:22.327810Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-07T18:54:46.779Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "kubevirt",
"vendor": "kubevirt",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 1.5.3"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 1.6.0, \u003c 1.6.1"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "KubeVirt is a virtual machine management add-on for Kubernetes. Versions 1.5.3 and below, and 1.6.0 contained a flawed implementation of the Kubernetes aggregation layer\u0027s authentication flow which could enable bypass of RBAC controls. It was discovered that the virt-api component fails to correctly authenticate the client when receiving API requests over mTLS. In particular, it fails to validate the CN (Common Name) field in the received client TLS certificates against the set of allowed values defined in the extension-apiserver-authentication configmap. Failre to validate certain fields in the client TLS certificate may allow an attacker to bypass existing RBAC controls by directly communicating with the aggregated API server, impersonating the Kubernetes API server and its aggregator component. This issue is fixed in versions 1.5.3 and 1.6.1."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 4.7,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-287",
"description": "CWE-287: Improper Authentication",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-295",
"description": "CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-07T18:38:33.246Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/kubevirt/kubevirt/security/advisories/GHSA-38jw-g2qx-4286",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/kubevirt/kubevirt/security/advisories/GHSA-38jw-g2qx-4286"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/kubevirt/kubevirt/commit/231dc69723f331dc02f65a31ab4c3d6869f40d6a",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/kubevirt/kubevirt/commit/231dc69723f331dc02f65a31ab4c3d6869f40d6a"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/kubevirt/kubevirt/commit/af2f08a9a186eccc650f87c30ab3e07b669e8b5b",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/kubevirt/kubevirt/commit/af2f08a9a186eccc650f87c30ab3e07b669e8b5b"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/kubevirt/kubevirt/commit/b9773bc588e6e18ece896a2dad5336ef7a653074",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/kubevirt/kubevirt/commit/b9773bc588e6e18ece896a2dad5336ef7a653074"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-38jw-g2qx-4286",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "KubeVirt Affected by an Authentication Bypass in Kubernetes Aggregation Layer"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-64432",
"datePublished": "2025-11-07T18:38:33.246Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-11-03T22:12:51.365Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-07T18:54:46.779Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-65083 (GCVE-0-2025-65083)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-11-17 00:00 – Updated: 2025-11-17 16:11 Disputed
VLAI
Summary
GoSign Desktop through 2.4.1 disables TLS certificate validation when configured to use a proxy server. This can be problematic if the GoSign Desktop user selects an arbitrary proxy server without consideration of whether outbound HTTPS connections from the proxy server to Internet servers succeed even for untrusted or invalid server certificates. In this scenario (which is outside of the product's design objectives), integrity protection could be bypassed. In typical cases of a proxy server for outbound HTTPS traffic from an enterprise, those connections would not succeed. (Admittedly, the usual expectation is that a client application is configured to trust an enterprise CA and does not set SSL_VERIFY_NONE.) Also, it is of course unsafe to place ~/.gosign in the home directory of an untrusted user and then have other users execute downloaded files.
Severity
CWE
- CWE-295 - Improper Certificate Validation
Assigner
References
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tinexta Infocert | GoSign Desktop |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 2.4.1
(custom)
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-65083",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-11-17T16:11:32.993514Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-17T16:11:44.983Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "GoSign Desktop",
"vendor": "Tinexta Infocert",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "2.4.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GoSign Desktop through 2.4.1 disables TLS certificate validation when configured to use a proxy server. This can be problematic if the GoSign Desktop user selects an arbitrary proxy server without consideration of whether outbound HTTPS connections from the proxy server to Internet servers succeed even for untrusted or invalid server certificates. In this scenario (which is outside of the product\u0027s design objectives), integrity protection could be bypassed. In typical cases of a proxy server for outbound HTTPS traffic from an enterprise, those connections would not succeed. (Admittedly, the usual expectation is that a client application is configured to trust an enterprise CA and does not set SSL_VERIFY_NONE.) Also, it is of course unsafe to place ~/.gosign in the home directory of an untrusted user and then have other users execute downloaded files."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 3.2,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-295",
"description": "CWE-295 Improper Certificate Validation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-17T15:55:08.296Z",
"orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"shortName": "mitre"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.firma.infocert.it/prodotti/gosign"
},
{
"url": "https://securityaffairs.com/184672/hacking/multiple-vulnerabilities-in-gosign-desktop-lead-to-remote-code-execution.html"
}
],
"tags": [
"disputed"
],
"x_generator": {
"engine": "enrichogram 0.0.1"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"assignerShortName": "mitre",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-65083",
"datePublished": "2025-11-17T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-11-17T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-17T16:11:44.983Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-66001 (GCVE-0-2025-66001)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-01-08 10:23 – Updated: 2026-01-08 14:56
VLAI
Title
NeuVector OpenID Connect is vulnerable to man-in-the-middle (MITM)
Summary
NeuVector supports login authentication through OpenID Connect. However, the TLS verification (which verifies the remote server's authenticity and integrity) for OpenID Connect is not enforced by default. As a result this may expose the system to man-in-the-middle (MITM) attacks.
Severity
8.8 (High)
CWE
- CWE-295 - Improper Certificate Validation
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Date Public
2025-12-12 18:22
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-66001",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-01-08T14:55:45.323632Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-08T14:56:07.901Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "github.com/neuvector/neuvector",
"product": "neuvector",
"vendor": "SUSE",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "5.4.8",
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.3.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2025-12-12T18:22:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "NeuVector supports login authentication through OpenID Connect. However, the TLS verification (which verifies the remote server\u0027s authenticity and integrity) for OpenID Connect is not enforced by default. As a result this may expose the system to man-in-the-middle (MITM) attacks."
}
],
"value": "NeuVector supports login authentication through OpenID Connect. However, the TLS verification (which verifies the remote server\u0027s authenticity and integrity) for OpenID Connect is not enforced by default. As a result this may expose the system to man-in-the-middle (MITM) attacks."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-295",
"description": "CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-08T10:23:18.934Z",
"orgId": "404e59f5-483d-4b8a-8e7a-e67604dd8afb",
"shortName": "suse"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2025-66001"
},
{
"url": "https://github.com/neuvector/neuvector/security/advisories/GHSA-4jj9-cgqc-x9h5"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "NeuVector OpenID Connect is vulnerable to man-in-the-middle (MITM)",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "404e59f5-483d-4b8a-8e7a-e67604dd8afb",
"assignerShortName": "suse",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-66001",
"datePublished": "2026-01-08T10:23:18.934Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-11-19T08:52:54.076Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-08T14:56:07.901Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-66491 (GCVE-0-2025-66491)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-12-09 00:38 – Updated: 2025-12-09 16:03
VLAI
Title
Traefik has Inverted TLS Verification Logic in its ingress-nginx Provider
Summary
Traefik is an HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer. Versions 3.5.0 through 3.6.2 have inverted TLS verification logic in the nginx.ingress.kubernetes.io/proxy-ssl-verify annotation. Setting the annotation to "on" (intending to enable backend TLS certificate verification) actually disables verification, allowing man-in-the-middle attacks against HTTPS backends when operators believe they are protected. This issue is fixed in version 3.6.3.
Severity
5.9 (Medium)
CWE
- CWE-295 - Improper Certificate Validation
Assigner
References
3 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/traefik/traefik/security/advis… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/traefik/traefik/commit/14a1aed… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.6.3 | x_refsource_MISC |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-66491",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-12-09T14:17:29.439457Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-09T16:03:28.511Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "traefik",
"vendor": "traefik",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 3.5.0, \u003c 3.6.3"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Traefik is an HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer. Versions 3.5.0 through 3.6.2 have inverted TLS verification logic in the nginx.ingress.kubernetes.io/proxy-ssl-verify annotation. Setting the annotation to \"on\" (intending to enable backend TLS certificate verification) actually disables verification, allowing man-in-the-middle attacks against HTTPS backends when operators believe they are protected. This issue is fixed in version 3.6.3."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-295",
"description": "CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-09T00:38:39.208Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/traefik/traefik/security/advisories/GHSA-7vww-mvcr-x6vj",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/traefik/traefik/security/advisories/GHSA-7vww-mvcr-x6vj"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/traefik/traefik/commit/14a1aedf5704673d875d210d7bacf103a43c77e4",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/traefik/traefik/commit/14a1aedf5704673d875d210d7bacf103a43c77e4"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.6.3",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.6.3"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-7vww-mvcr-x6vj",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Traefik has Inverted TLS Verification Logic in its ingress-nginx Provider"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-66491",
"datePublished": "2025-12-09T00:38:39.208Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-12-02T22:44:04.707Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-09T16:03:28.511Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-67601 (GCVE-0-2025-67601)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-02-25 10:36 – Updated: 2026-02-26 14:44
VLAI
Title
Rancher CLI skips TLS verification on Rancher CLI login command
Summary
A vulnerability has been identified within Rancher Manager, where using self-signed CA certificates and passing the -skip-verify flag to the Rancher CLI login command without also passing the –cacert flag results in the CLI attempting to fetch CA certificates stored in Rancher’s setting cacerts.
Severity
8.3 (High)
CWE
- CWE-295 - Improper Certificate Validation
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Date Public
2026-02-01 16:58
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-67601",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-02-26T04:55:52.856025Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-26T14:44:07.081Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "github.com/rancher/rancher",
"product": "rancher",
"vendor": "SUSE",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "0.0.0-20260129092249-bb0625fd1896",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "2.13.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.13.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "2.12.6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.12.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "2.11.10",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.11.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "2.10.11",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.10.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-02-01T16:58:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eA vulnerability has been identified within Rancher Manager, where using self-signed CA certificates and passing the \u003c/span\u003e\u003ccode\u003e-skip-verify\u003c/code\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;flag to the Rancher CLI login command without also passing the \u003c/span\u003e\u003ccode\u003e\u2013cacert\u003c/code\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;flag results in the CLI attempting to fetch CA certificates stored in Rancher\u2019s setting cacerts. \u003c/span\u003e\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "A vulnerability has been identified within Rancher Manager, where using self-signed CA certificates and passing the -skip-verify\u00a0flag to the Rancher CLI login command without also passing the \u2013cacert\u00a0flag results in the CLI attempting to fetch CA certificates stored in Rancher\u2019s setting cacerts."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.3,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-295",
"description": "CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-25T10:36:57.771Z",
"orgId": "404e59f5-483d-4b8a-8e7a-e67604dd8afb",
"shortName": "suse"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2025-67601"
},
{
"url": "https://github.com/rancher/rancher/security/advisories/GHSA-mc24-7m59-4q5p"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Rancher CLI skips TLS verification on Rancher CLI login command",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "404e59f5-483d-4b8a-8e7a-e67604dd8afb",
"assignerShortName": "suse",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-67601",
"datePublished": "2026-02-25T10:36:57.771Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-12-09T14:05:21.453Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-26T14:44:07.081Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-67752 (GCVE-0-2025-67752)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-02-25 01:09 – Updated: 2026-02-27 17:30
VLAI
Title
OpenEMR Has Disabled SSL Certificate Verification in HTTP Client
Summary
OpenEMR is a free and open source electronic health records and medical practice management application. Prior to version 7.0.4, OpenEMR's HTTP client wrapper (`oeHttp`/`oeHttpRequest`) disables SSL/TLS certificate verification by default (`verify: false`), making all external HTTPS connections vulnerable to man-in-the-middle (MITM) attacks. This affects communication with government healthcare APIs and user-configurable external services, potentially exposing Protected Health Information (PHI). Version 7.0.4 fixes the issue.
Severity
8.1 (High)
CWE
- CWE-295 - Improper Certificate Validation
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/openemr/openemr/security/advis… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/openemr/openemr/commit/22f8e53… | x_refsource_MISC |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-67752",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-02-27T17:30:34.986301Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-27T17:30:42.203Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "openemr",
"vendor": "openemr",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 7.0.4"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "OpenEMR is a free and open source electronic health records and medical practice management application. Prior to version 7.0.4, OpenEMR\u0027s HTTP client wrapper (`oeHttp`/`oeHttpRequest`) disables SSL/TLS certificate verification by default (`verify: false`), making all external HTTPS connections vulnerable to man-in-the-middle (MITM) attacks. This affects communication with government healthcare APIs and user-configurable external services, potentially exposing Protected Health Information (PHI). Version 7.0.4 fixes the issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-295",
"description": "CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-25T01:26:01.604Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/openemr/openemr/security/advisories/GHSA-2g6h-725p-pqhp",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openemr/openemr/security/advisories/GHSA-2g6h-725p-pqhp"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/openemr/openemr/commit/22f8e53e5769a88b7a16cb223bd197d044c84e5a",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openemr/openemr/commit/22f8e53e5769a88b7a16cb223bd197d044c84e5a"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-2g6h-725p-pqhp",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "OpenEMR Has Disabled SSL Certificate Verification in HTTP Client"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-67752",
"datePublished": "2026-02-25T01:09:20.946Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-12-11T20:30:54.927Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-27T17:30:42.203Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-68482 (GCVE-0-2025-68482)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-03-10 16:44 – Updated: 2026-03-10 17:41
VLAI
Summary
A improper certificate validation vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiAnalyzer 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, FortiAnalyzer 7.2 all versions, FortiAnalyzer 7.0 all versions, FortiAnalyzer 6.4 all versions, FortiManager 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiManager 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, FortiManager 7.2 all versions, FortiManager 7.0 all versions, FortiManager 6.4 all versions may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to view confidential information via a man in the middle [MiTM] attack.
Severity
CWE
- CWE-295 - Information disclosure
Assigner
References
1 reference
Impacted products
4 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fortinet | FortiAnalyzer |
Affected:
7.6.0 , ≤ 7.6.4
(semver)
Affected: 7.4.0 , ≤ 7.4.8 (semver) Affected: 7.2.0 , ≤ 7.2.12 (semver) Affected: 7.0.0 , ≤ 7.0.16 (semver) Affected: 6.4.0 , ≤ 6.4.15 (semver) cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.6.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.6.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.6.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.6.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.4.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.4.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.4.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.4.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.4.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.4.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.4.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.4.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.4.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.2.12:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.2.11:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.2.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.2.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.2.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.2.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.2.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.2.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.2.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.2.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.2.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.2.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.2.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.0.16:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.0.15:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.0.14:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.0.13:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.0.12:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.0.11:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.0.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.0.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.0.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.0.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.0.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.0.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.0.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.0.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.0.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.0.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:6.4.15:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:6.4.14:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:6.4.13:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:6.4.12:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:6.4.11:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:6.4.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:6.4.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:6.4.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:6.4.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:6.4.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:6.4.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:6.4.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:6.4.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:6.4.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:6.4.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:6.4.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
|
| Fortinet | FortiManager |
Affected:
7.6.0 , ≤ 7.6.4
(semver)
Affected: 7.4.0 , ≤ 7.4.8 (semver) Affected: 7.2.0 , ≤ 7.2.12 (semver) Affected: 7.0.0 , ≤ 7.0.16 (semver) Affected: 6.4.0 , ≤ 6.4.15 (semver) cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.6.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.6.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.6.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.6.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.4.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.4.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.4.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.4.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.4.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.4.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.4.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.4.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.4.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.2.12:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.2.11:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.2.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.2.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.2.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.2.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.2.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.2.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.2.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.2.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.2.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.2.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.2.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.0.16:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.0.15:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.0.14:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.0.13:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.0.12:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.0.11:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.0.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.0.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.0.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.0.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.0.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.0.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.0.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.0.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.0.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.0.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:6.4.15:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:6.4.14:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:6.4.13:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:6.4.12:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:6.4.11:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:6.4.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:6.4.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:6.4.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:6.4.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:6.4.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:6.4.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:6.4.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:6.4.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:6.4.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:6.4.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:6.4.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
|
| Fortinet | FortiManager Cloud |
Affected:
7.6.2 , ≤ 7.6.3
(semver)
Affected: 7.4.1 , ≤ 7.4.7 (semver) Affected: 7.2.1 , ≤ 7.2.10 (semver) Affected: 7.0.1 , ≤ 7.0.14 (semver) Affected: 6.4.1 , ≤ 6.4.7 (semver) cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.6.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.6.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.4.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.4.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.4.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.4.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.4.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.4.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.4.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.2.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.2.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.2.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.2.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.2.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.2.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.2.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.2.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.2.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.2.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.0.14:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.0.13:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.0.12:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.0.11:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.0.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.0.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.0.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.0.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.0.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.0.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.0.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.0.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.0.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.0.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:6.4.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:6.4.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:6.4.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:6.4.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:6.4.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:6.4.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:6.4.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
|
| Fortinet | FortiAnalyzer Cloud |
Affected:
7.6.2
Affected: 7.4.1 , ≤ 7.4.7 (semver) Affected: 7.2.1 , ≤ 7.2.10 (semver) Affected: 7.0.1 , ≤ 7.0.14 (semver) Affected: 6.4.1 , ≤ 6.4.7 (semver) cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.6.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.4.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.4.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.4.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.4.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.4.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.4.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.4.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.2.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.2.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.2.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.2.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.2.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.2.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.2.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.2.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.2.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.2.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.0.14:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.0.13:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.0.12:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.0.11:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.0.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.0.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.0.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.0.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.0.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.0.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.0.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.0.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.0.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.0.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:6.4.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:6.4.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:6.4.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:6.4.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:6.4.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:6.4.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:6.4.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-68482",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-03-10T17:31:24.845135Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-10T17:41:32.587Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.6.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.6.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.6.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.6.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.4.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.4.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.4.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.4.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.4.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.4.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.4.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.4.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.4.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.2.12:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.2.11:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.2.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.2.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.2.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.2.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.2.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.2.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.2.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.2.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.2.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.2.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.2.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.0.16:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.0.15:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.0.14:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.0.13:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.0.12:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.0.11:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.0.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.0.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.0.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.0.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.0.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.0.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.0.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.0.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.0.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.0.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:7.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:6.4.15:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:6.4.14:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:6.4.13:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:6.4.12:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:6.4.11:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:6.4.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:6.4.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:6.4.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:6.4.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:6.4.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:6.4.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:6.4.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:6.4.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:6.4.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:6.4.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer:6.4.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "FortiAnalyzer",
"vendor": "Fortinet",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.6.4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.6.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.4.8",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.4.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.2.12",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.2.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.0.16",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.4.15",
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.4.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.6.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.6.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.6.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.6.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.4.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.4.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.4.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.4.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.4.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.4.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.4.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.4.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.4.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.2.12:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.2.11:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.2.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.2.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.2.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.2.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.2.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.2.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.2.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.2.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.2.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.2.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.2.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.0.16:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.0.15:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.0.14:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.0.13:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.0.12:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.0.11:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.0.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.0.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.0.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.0.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.0.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.0.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.0.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.0.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.0.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.0.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:7.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:6.4.15:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:6.4.14:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:6.4.13:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:6.4.12:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:6.4.11:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:6.4.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:6.4.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:6.4.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:6.4.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:6.4.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:6.4.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:6.4.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:6.4.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:6.4.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:6.4.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortimanager:6.4.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "FortiManager",
"vendor": "Fortinet",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.6.4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.6.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.4.8",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.4.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.2.12",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.2.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.0.16",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.4.15",
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.4.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.6.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.6.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.4.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.4.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.4.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.4.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.4.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.4.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.4.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.2.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.2.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.2.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.2.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.2.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.2.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.2.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.2.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.2.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.2.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.0.14:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.0.13:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.0.12:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.0.11:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.0.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.0.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.0.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.0.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.0.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.0.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.0.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.0.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.0.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:7.0.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:6.4.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:6.4.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:6.4.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:6.4.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:6.4.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:6.4.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortimanagercloud:6.4.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "FortiManager Cloud",
"vendor": "Fortinet",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.6.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.6.2",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.4.7",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.4.1",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.2.10",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.2.1",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.0.14",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.0.1",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.4.7",
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.4.1",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.6.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.4.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.4.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.4.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.4.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.4.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.4.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.4.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.2.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.2.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.2.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.2.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.2.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.2.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.2.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.2.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.2.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.2.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.0.14:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.0.13:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.0.12:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.0.11:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.0.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.0.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.0.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.0.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.0.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.0.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.0.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.0.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.0.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:7.0.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:6.4.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:6.4.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:6.4.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:6.4.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:6.4.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:6.4.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortianalyzercloud:6.4.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "FortiAnalyzer Cloud",
"vendor": "Fortinet",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.6.2"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.4.7",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.4.1",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.2.10",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.2.1",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.0.14",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.0.1",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.4.7",
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.4.1",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A improper certificate validation vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiAnalyzer 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, FortiAnalyzer 7.2 all versions, FortiAnalyzer 7.0 all versions, FortiAnalyzer 6.4 all versions, FortiManager 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiManager 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, FortiManager 7.2 all versions, FortiManager 7.0 all versions, FortiManager 6.4 all versions may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to view confidential information via a man in the middle [MiTM] attack."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N/E:P/RL:W/RC:C",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-295",
"description": "Information disclosure",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-10T16:44:18.285Z",
"orgId": "6abe59d8-c742-4dff-8ce8-9b0ca1073da8",
"shortName": "fortinet"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://fortiguard.fortinet.com/psirt/FG-IR-26-078",
"url": "https://fortiguard.fortinet.com/psirt/FG-IR-26-078"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Upgrade to upcoming FortiAnalyzer version 8.0.0 or above\nUpgrade to FortiAnalyzer version 7.6.5 or above\nUpgrade to FortiAnalyzer version 7.4.9 or above\nUpgrade to upcoming FortiManager version 8.0.0 or above\nUpgrade to FortiManager version 7.6.5 or above\nUpgrade to FortiManager version 7.4.9 or above"
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "6abe59d8-c742-4dff-8ce8-9b0ca1073da8",
"assignerShortName": "fortinet",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-68482",
"datePublished": "2026-03-10T16:44:18.285Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-12-19T00:12:19.381Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-10T17:41:32.587Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
Mitigation
Phases: Architecture and Design, Implementation
Description:
- Certificates should be carefully managed and checked to assure that data are encrypted with the intended owner's public key.
Mitigation
Phase: Implementation
Description:
- If certificate pinning is being used, ensure that all relevant properties of the certificate are fully validated before the certificate is pinned, including the hostname.
CAPEC-459: Creating a Rogue Certification Authority Certificate
An adversary exploits a weakness resulting from using a hashing algorithm with weak collision resistance to generate certificate signing requests (CSR) that contain collision blocks in their "to be signed" parts. The adversary submits one CSR to be signed by a trusted certificate authority then uses the signed blob to make a second certificate appear signed by said certificate authority. Due to the hash collision, both certificates, though different, hash to the same value and so the signed blob works just as well in the second certificate. The net effect is that the adversary's second X.509 certificate, which the Certification Authority has never seen, is now signed and validated by that Certification Authority.
CAPEC-475: Signature Spoofing by Improper Validation
An adversary exploits a cryptographic weakness in the signature verification algorithm implementation to generate a valid signature without knowing the key.