Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-94

Allowed-with-Review

Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')

Abstraction: Base · Status: Draft

The product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment.

8301 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.

GHSA-W7XJ-7RF9-CG4X

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-12-04 18:32 – Updated: 2024-12-12 03:32
VLAI
Details

An issue in INOVANCE AM401_CPU1608TPTN allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the ExecuteUserProgramUpgrade function

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-48453"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-94"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-12-04T18:15:14Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "An issue in INOVANCE AM401_CPU1608TPTN allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the ExecuteUserProgramUpgrade function",
  "id": "GHSA-w7xj-7rf9-cg4x",
  "modified": "2024-12-12T03:32:59Z",
  "published": "2024-12-04T18:32:37Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-48453"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/N0zoM1z0/CVEs/blob/main/CVE-2024-48453.md"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/N0zoM1z0/Vuln-Search/blob/main/INOVANCE%20AM401_CPU1608TPTN%20Unauthorized%20Arbitrary%20Code%20Execution%20Vulnerability.md"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.inovance.com"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-W7XQ-2X44-5M2X

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:48 – Updated: 2022-05-13 01:48
VLAI
Details

Command injection vulnerability in Combodo iTop 2.4.1 allows remote authenticated administrators to execute arbitrary commands by changing the platform configuration, because web/env-production/itop-config/config.php contains a function called TestConfig() that calls the vulnerable function eval().

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2018-10642"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-94"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2018-05-02T07:29:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Command injection vulnerability in Combodo iTop 2.4.1 allows remote authenticated administrators to execute arbitrary commands by changing the platform configuration, because web/env-production/itop-config/config.php contains a function called TestConfig() that calls the vulnerable function eval().",
  "id": "GHSA-w7xq-2x44-5m2x",
  "modified": "2022-05-13T01:48:50Z",
  "published": "2022-05-13T01:48:50Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-10642"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/arbahayoub/POC/blob/master/itop_command_injection_1.txt"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://sourceforge.net/p/itop/tickets/1585"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-W832-V3C6-M6RG

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-08-21 18:31 – Updated: 2023-08-21 20:46
VLAI
Summary
pandasai vulnerable to prompt injection
Details

An issue in Gaberiele Venturi pandasai v.0.8.0 and before allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via a crafted request to the prompt function.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "pandasai"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.8.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-39660"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-94"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2023-08-21T20:46:52Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2023-08-21T17:15:48Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "An issue in Gaberiele Venturi pandasai v.0.8.0 and before allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via a crafted request to the prompt function.",
  "id": "GHSA-w832-v3c6-m6rg",
  "modified": "2023-08-21T20:46:52Z",
  "published": "2023-08-21T18:31:23Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-39660"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/gventuri/pandas-ai/issues/399"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/gventuri/pandas-ai/pull/409"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/gventuri/pandas-ai/commit/3aac79be8fc1d18b53d66a566adddbbdd2b38ad5"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/gventuri/pandas-ai"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [],
  "summary": "pandasai vulnerable to prompt injection"
}

GHSA-W848-4388-CVV2

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-01-10 06:30 – Updated: 2023-01-18 18:30
VLAI
Details

SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence Analysis edition for OLAP allows an authenticated attacker to inject malicious code that can be executed by the application over the network. On successful exploitation, an attacker can perform operations that may completely compromise the application causing a high impact on the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the application.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-0022"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-94"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2023-01-10T04:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence Analysis edition for OLAP allows an authenticated attacker to inject malicious code that can be executed by the application over the network. On successful exploitation, an attacker can perform operations that may completely compromise the application causing a high impact on the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the application.",
  "id": "GHSA-w848-4388-cvv2",
  "modified": "2023-01-18T18:30:16Z",
  "published": "2023-01-10T06:30:25Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-0022"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://launchpad.support.sap.com/#/notes/3262810"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.sap.com/documents/2022/02/fa865ea4-167e-0010-bca6-c68f7e60039b.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-W85M-GVQP-PH86

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-12-13 09:31 – Updated: 2026-04-08 21:32
VLAI
Details

The The Simple Link Directory plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary shortcode execution in all versions up to, and including, 8.4.0. This is due to the software allowing users to execute an action that does not properly validate a value before running do_shortcode. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary shortcodes.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-12417"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-94"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-12-13T09:15:08Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The The Simple Link Directory plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary shortcode execution in all versions up to, and including, 8.4.0. This is due to the software allowing users to execute an action that does not properly validate a value before running do_shortcode. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary shortcodes.",
  "id": "GHSA-w85m-gvqp-ph86",
  "modified": "2026-04-08T21:32:57Z",
  "published": "2024-12-13T09:31:14Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-12417"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/simple-link-directory/trunk/embed/qcopd-embed-link.php#L17"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/3206971/simple-link-directory/trunk/embed/qcopd-embed-link.php"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/3232625"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/b7112840-f190-4867-9408-c96408f28b7a?source=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-W85Q-F77R-393Q

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 00:34 – Updated: 2022-05-17 00:34
VLAI
Details

Norton Remove & Reinstall can be susceptible to a DLL preloading vulnerability. These types of issues occur when an application looks to call a DLL for execution and an attacker provides a malicious DLL to use instead. Depending on how the application is configured, it will generally follow a specific search path to locate the DLL. The vulnerability can be exploited by a simple file write (or potentially an over-write) which results in a foreign DLL running under the context of the application. A Norton Remove & Reinstall update, version 4.4.0.58, has been released which addresses the aforementioned vulnerability.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2017-13676"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-94"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2017-09-28T01:29:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Norton Remove \u0026 Reinstall can be susceptible to a DLL preloading vulnerability. These types of issues occur when an application looks to call a DLL for execution and an attacker provides a malicious DLL to use instead. Depending on how the application is configured, it will generally follow a specific search path to locate the DLL. The vulnerability can be exploited by a simple file write (or potentially an over-write) which results in a foreign DLL running under the context of the application. A Norton Remove \u0026 Reinstall update, version 4.4.0.58, has been released which addresses the aforementioned vulnerability.",
  "id": "GHSA-w85q-f77r-393q",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T00:34:42Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T00:34:42Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-13676"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.symantec.com/security_response/securityupdates/detail.jsp?fid=security_advisory\u0026pvid=security_advisory\u0026year=\u0026suid=20170926_00"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/100939"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-W86X-6FW3-W2RF

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 23:28 – Updated: 2025-04-09 03:50
VLAI
Details

CRLF injection vulnerability in index.php in ExpressionEngine 1.2.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks via the URL parameter.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2008-0202"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-94"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2008-01-10T00:46:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "CRLF injection vulnerability in index.php in ExpressionEngine 1.2.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks via the URL parameter.",
  "id": "GHSA-w86x-6fw3-w2rf",
  "modified": "2025-04-09T03:50:09Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T23:28:21Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-0202"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2008-January/059439.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/3539"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://securityvulns.ru/Sdocument472.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://websecurity.com.ua/1454"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/485786/100/0/threaded"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/27128"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

GHSA-W87M-86MJ-58QJ

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 07:34 – Updated: 2025-04-09 03:33
VLAI
Details

PHP remote file inclusion vulnerability in src/ark_inc.php in e-Ark 1.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via a URL in the cfg_pear_path parameter.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2006-6086"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-94"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2006-11-24T18:07:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "PHP remote file inclusion vulnerability in src/ark_inc.php in e-Ark 1.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via a URL in the cfg_pear_path parameter.",
  "id": "GHSA-w87m-86mj-58qj",
  "modified": "2025-04-09T03:33:48Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T07:34:41Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2006-6086"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/30457"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/2818"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://arfis.wordpress.com/2007/09/13/rfi-02-eark"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/23059"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/21224"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/4661"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

GHSA-W885-G67J-XWCG

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 05:27 – Updated: 2022-05-17 05:27
VLAI
Details

PHP remote file inclusion vulnerability in front/popup.php in GLPI 0.78 through 0.80.61 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary PHP code via a URL in the sub_type parameter.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2012-1037"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-94"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2012-07-12T20:55:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "PHP remote file inclusion vulnerability in front/popup.php in GLPI 0.78 through 0.80.61 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary PHP code via a URL in the sub_type parameter.",
  "id": "GHSA-w885-g67j-xwcg",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T05:27:46Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T05:27:46Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-1037"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://forge.indepnet.net/issues/3338"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://forge.indepnet.net/projects/glpi/repository/revisions/17457/diff/branches/0.80-bugfixes/front/popup.php"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://forge.indepnet.net/projects/glpi/versions/685"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2012/Feb/157"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2012:016"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

GHSA-W888-5JPQ-HWQC

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-09-10 03:31 – Updated: 2024-09-10 03:31
VLAI
Details

The The Affiliate Super Assistent plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary shortcode execution in all versions up to, and including, 1.5.3. This is due to the software allowing users to supply arbitrary shortcodes in comments when the 'Parse comments' option is enabled. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary shortcodes.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-8478"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-94"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-09-10T03:15:03Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "The The Affiliate Super Assistent plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary shortcode execution in all versions up to, and including, 1.5.3. This is due to the software allowing users to supply arbitrary shortcodes in comments when the \u0027Parse comments\u0027 option is enabled. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary shortcodes.",
  "id": "GHSA-w888-5jpq-hwqc",
  "modified": "2024-09-10T03:31:32Z",
  "published": "2024-09-10T03:31:32Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-8478"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/amazonsimpleadmin/trunk/AsaCore.php#L285"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset?sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail=\u0026reponame=\u0026old=3147740%40amazonsimpleadmin\u0026new=3147740%40amazonsimpleadmin\u0026sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail="
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/7f50769c-77b8-42ff-b67d-b9b289fc51da?source=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

Mitigation
Architecture and Design

Strategy: Refactoring

Refactor your program so that you do not have to dynamically generate code.

Mitigation
Architecture and Design
  • Run your code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which code can be executed by your product.
  • Examples include the Unix chroot jail and AppArmor. In general, managed code may provide some protection.
  • This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating system; the rest of your application may still be subject to compromise.
  • Be careful to avoid CWE-243 and other weaknesses related to jails.
Mitigation MIT-5
Implementation

Strategy: Input Validation

  • Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
  • When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
  • Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
  • To reduce the likelihood of code injection, use stringent allowlists that limit which constructs are allowed. If you are dynamically constructing code that invokes a function, then verifying that the input is alphanumeric might be insufficient. An attacker might still be able to reference a dangerous function that you did not intend to allow, such as system(), exec(), or exit().
Mitigation
Testing

Use dynamic tools and techniques that interact with the product using large test suites with many diverse inputs, such as fuzz testing (fuzzing), robustness testing, and fault injection. The product's operation may slow down, but it should not become unstable, crash, or generate incorrect results.

Mitigation MIT-32
Operation

Strategy: Compilation or Build Hardening

Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).

Mitigation MIT-32
Operation

Strategy: Environment Hardening

Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).

Mitigation
Implementation

For Python programs, it is frequently encouraged to use the ast.literal_eval() function instead of eval, since it is intentionally designed to avoid executing code. However, an adversary could still cause excessive memory or stack consumption via deeply nested structures [REF-1372], so the python documentation discourages use of ast.literal_eval() on untrusted data [REF-1373].

CAPEC-242: Code Injection

An adversary exploits a weakness in input validation on the target to inject new code into that which is currently executing. This differs from code inclusion in that code inclusion involves the addition or replacement of a reference to a code file, which is subsequently loaded by the target and used as part of the code of some application.

CAPEC-35: Leverage Executable Code in Non-Executable Files

An attack of this type exploits a system's trust in configuration and resource files. When the executable loads the resource (such as an image file or configuration file) the attacker has modified the file to either execute malicious code directly or manipulate the target process (e.g. application server) to execute based on the malicious configuration parameters. Since systems are increasingly interrelated mashing up resources from local and remote sources the possibility of this attack occurring is high.

CAPEC-77: Manipulating User-Controlled Variables

This attack targets user controlled variables (DEBUG=1, PHP Globals, and So Forth). An adversary can override variables leveraging user-supplied, untrusted query variables directly used on the application server without any data sanitization. In extreme cases, the adversary can change variables controlling the business logic of the application. For instance, in languages like PHP, a number of poorly set default configurations may allow the user to override variables.