Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-94

Allowed-with-Review

Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')

Abstraction: Base · Status: Draft

API response cwe.mitre.org

The product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment.

8319 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.

GHSA-V57G-J4XW-H383

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 04:30 – Updated: 2022-05-17 04:30
VLAI
Details

Eval injection vulnerability in luci 0.26.0 allows remote authenticated users with certain permissions to execute arbitrary Python code via a crafted cluster configuration.

Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2014-3593"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-94"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2014-10-15T14:55:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Eval injection vulnerability in luci 0.26.0 allows remote authenticated users with certain permissions to execute arbitrary Python code via a crafted cluster configuration.",
  "id": "GHSA-v57g-j4xw-h383",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T04:30:51Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T04:30:51Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-3593"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014:1390"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-3593"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989005"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1390.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

GHSA-V5C9-MMW9-829Q

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 02:39 – Updated: 2022-06-17 21:23
VLAI
Summary
PHPMailer susceptible to arbitrary code execution
Details

html2text.php in Chuggnutt HTML to Text Converter, as used in PHPMailer before 5.2.10, RoundCube Webmail (roundcubemail) 0.2-1.alpha and 0.2-3.beta, Mahara, and AtMail Open 1.03, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted input that is processed by the preg_replace function with the eval switch.

Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Packagist",
        "name": "phpmailer/phpmailer"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "5.2.10"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2008-5619"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-94"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2022-06-17T21:23:30Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2008-12-17T02:30:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "html2text.php in Chuggnutt HTML to Text Converter, as used in PHPMailer before 5.2.10, RoundCube Webmail (roundcubemail) 0.2-1.alpha and 0.2-3.beta, Mahara, and AtMail Open 1.03, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted input that is processed by the preg_replace function with the eval switch.",
  "id": "GHSA-v5c9-mmw9-829q",
  "modified": "2022-06-17T21:23:30Z",
  "published": "2022-05-14T02:39:43Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-5619"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/PHPMailer/PHPMailer/commit/8beacc646acb67c995aea10ac5585970efc7355a"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/PHPMailer/PHPMailer"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/7549"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/7553"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2008-December/msg00783.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2008-December/msg00802.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://mahara.org/interaction/forum/topic.php?id=533"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://osvdb.org/53893"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=898542"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://trac.roundcube.net/changeset/2148"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://trac.roundcube.net/ticket/1485618"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2008/12/12/1"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [],
  "summary": "PHPMailer susceptible to arbitrary code execution"
}

GHSA-V5FF-9Q35-Q26F

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-16 17:35 – Updated: 2026-06-16 17:35
VLAI
Summary
Langflow: Unauthenticated RCE in Shareable Playgrounds
Details

Summary

The "Shareable Playground" (or "Public Flows" in code) contains a critical RCE vulnerability. Simply sharing a flow exposes the deployment to RCE risk by authenticated users.

Tested on commit 2d67402b1dbaefcbce85a244d4a6cd5e4bda1cfe

Details

Shareable Playground feature works by enabling the execution of workflows by unauthenticated users, by accessing a link. Specifically, it enables the route /api/v1/build_public_tmp to execute any public flow, given a public flow ID. When the route executes the flow, it allows for providing arbitrary custom Python code as the nodes code, inside the JSON payload!

The vulnerable field is data.nodes[X].data.node.template.code.value. See PoC for an example.

PoC

Reproduction: 1. Create a new flow and add a Chat Input node to it 2. Share the flow ("Shareable Playground") 3. Access the public link with the browser developers tools open and execute the flow. 4. Find the /api/v1/build_public_tmp route and copy as cURL 5. Edit the data.nodes[X].data.node.template.code.value JSON field with any python code and run the cURL command.

Example PoC (replace flow ID with the correct one), and download test_with_python.json:

curl 'http://localhost:7860/api/v1/build_public_tmp/<flow-id>/flow?start_component_id=ChatInput-syEJp&log_builds=false&event_delivery=streaming' \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -b 'client_id=anything' \
  --data-raw "$(cat test_with_python.json)"

Search for touch /tmp/pwned in the test_with_python.json and edit for any other code.

The stacktrace for the code executed is:

...
  File "/Users/ori/Work/research/langchain/langflow/src/backend/base/langflow/api/build.py", line 495, in generate_flow_events
    ids, vertices_to_run, graph = await build_graph_and_get_order()
  File "/Users/ori/Work/research/langchain/langflow/src/backend/base/langflow/api/build.py", line 234, in build_graph_and_get_order
    graph = await create_graph(fresh_session, flow_id_str, flow_name)
  File "/Users/ori/Work/research/langchain/langflow/src/backend/base/langflow/api/build.py", line 298, in create_graph
    return await build_graph_from_data(
  File "/Users/ori/Work/research/langchain/langflow/src/backend/base/langflow/api/utils/core.py", line 192, in build_graph_from_data
    graph = Graph.from_payload(payload, str_flow_id, flow_name, kwargs.get("user_id"))
  File "/Users/ori/Work/research/langchain/langflow/src/lfx/src/lfx/graph/graph/base.py", line 1153, in from_payload
    graph.add_nodes_and_edges(vertices, edges)
  File "/Users/ori/Work/research/langchain/langflow/src/lfx/src/lfx/graph/graph/base.py", line 270, in add_nodes_and_edges
    self.initialize()
  File "/Users/ori/Work/research/langchain/langflow/src/lfx/src/lfx/graph/graph/base.py", line 512, in initialize
    self._build_graph()
  File "/Users/ori/Work/research/langchain/langflow/src/lfx/src/lfx/graph/graph/base.py", line 1305, in _build_graph
    self._instantiate_components_in_vertices()
  File "/Users/ori/Work/research/langchain/langflow/src/lfx/src/lfx/graph/graph/base.py", line 1347, in _instantiate_components_in_vertices
    vertex.instantiate_component(self.user_id)
  File "/Users/ori/Work/research/langchain/langflow/src/lfx/src/lfx/graph/vertex/base.py", line 382, in instantiate_component
    self.custom_component, _ = initialize.loading.instantiate_class(
  File "/Users/ori/Work/research/langchain/langflow/src/lfx/src/lfx/interface/initialize/loading.py", line 45, in instantiate_class
    custom_component: CustomComponent | Component = class_object(
  File "<string>", line 59, in __init__

Impact

Unauthenticated RCE on any deployment with a shareable playground.

Ori Lahav Security Researcher @ Rubrik Inc.

Severity
9.6 (Critical)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 1.9.1"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "langflow"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.9.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-48519"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-94"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-06-16T17:35:32Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\nThe \"Shareable Playground\" (or \"Public Flows\" in code) contains a critical RCE vulnerability.\nSimply sharing a flow exposes the deployment to RCE risk by authenticated users.\n\nTested on commit 2d67402b1dbaefcbce85a244d4a6cd5e4bda1cfe\n\n### Details\nShareable Playground feature works by enabling the execution of workflows by unauthenticated users, by accessing a link.\nSpecifically, it enables the route `/api/v1/build_public_tmp` to execute any public flow, given a public flow ID.\nWhen the route executes the flow, it allows for providing arbitrary custom Python code as the nodes code, inside the JSON payload!\n\nThe vulnerable field is data.nodes[X].data.node.template.code.value. See PoC for an example.\n\n### PoC\nReproduction:\n1. Create a new flow and add a Chat Input node to it\n2. Share the flow (\"Shareable Playground\")\n3. Access the public link with the browser developers tools open and execute the flow.\n4. Find the `/api/v1/build_public_tmp` route and copy as cURL\n5. Edit the `data.nodes[X].data.node.template.code.value` JSON field with any python code and run the cURL command.\n\nExample PoC (replace flow ID with the correct one), and download [test_with_python.json](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/25159927/test_with_python.json):\n```bash\ncurl \u0027http://localhost:7860/api/v1/build_public_tmp/\u003cflow-id\u003e/flow?start_component_id=ChatInput-syEJp\u0026log_builds=false\u0026event_delivery=streaming\u0027 \\\n  -H \u0027Content-Type: application/json\u0027 \\\n  -b \u0027client_id=anything\u0027 \\\n  --data-raw \"$(cat test_with_python.json)\"\n```\nSearch for `touch /tmp/pwned` in the `test_with_python.json` and edit for any other code.\n\n\n\nThe stacktrace for the code executed is:\n```\n...\n  File \"/Users/ori/Work/research/langchain/langflow/src/backend/base/langflow/api/build.py\", line 495, in generate_flow_events\n    ids, vertices_to_run, graph = await build_graph_and_get_order()\n  File \"/Users/ori/Work/research/langchain/langflow/src/backend/base/langflow/api/build.py\", line 234, in build_graph_and_get_order\n    graph = await create_graph(fresh_session, flow_id_str, flow_name)\n  File \"/Users/ori/Work/research/langchain/langflow/src/backend/base/langflow/api/build.py\", line 298, in create_graph\n    return await build_graph_from_data(\n  File \"/Users/ori/Work/research/langchain/langflow/src/backend/base/langflow/api/utils/core.py\", line 192, in build_graph_from_data\n    graph = Graph.from_payload(payload, str_flow_id, flow_name, kwargs.get(\"user_id\"))\n  File \"/Users/ori/Work/research/langchain/langflow/src/lfx/src/lfx/graph/graph/base.py\", line 1153, in from_payload\n    graph.add_nodes_and_edges(vertices, edges)\n  File \"/Users/ori/Work/research/langchain/langflow/src/lfx/src/lfx/graph/graph/base.py\", line 270, in add_nodes_and_edges\n    self.initialize()\n  File \"/Users/ori/Work/research/langchain/langflow/src/lfx/src/lfx/graph/graph/base.py\", line 512, in initialize\n    self._build_graph()\n  File \"/Users/ori/Work/research/langchain/langflow/src/lfx/src/lfx/graph/graph/base.py\", line 1305, in _build_graph\n    self._instantiate_components_in_vertices()\n  File \"/Users/ori/Work/research/langchain/langflow/src/lfx/src/lfx/graph/graph/base.py\", line 1347, in _instantiate_components_in_vertices\n    vertex.instantiate_component(self.user_id)\n  File \"/Users/ori/Work/research/langchain/langflow/src/lfx/src/lfx/graph/vertex/base.py\", line 382, in instantiate_component\n    self.custom_component, _ = initialize.loading.instantiate_class(\n  File \"/Users/ori/Work/research/langchain/langflow/src/lfx/src/lfx/interface/initialize/loading.py\", line 45, in instantiate_class\n    custom_component: CustomComponent | Component = class_object(\n  File \"\u003cstring\u003e\", line 59, in __init__\n```\n\n### Impact\nUnauthenticated RCE on any deployment with a shareable playground.\n\n\n\nOri Lahav\nSecurity Researcher @ Rubrik Inc.",
  "id": "GHSA-v5ff-9q35-q26f",
  "modified": "2026-06-16T17:35:32Z",
  "published": "2026-06-16T17:35:32Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/security/advisories/GHSA-v5ff-9q35-q26f"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Langflow: Unauthenticated RCE in Shareable Playgrounds"
}

GHSA-V5PX-3GJX-X7VR

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-02 03:52 – Updated: 2022-05-02 03:52
VLAI
Details

PHP remote file inclusion vulnerability in adm/krgourl.php in KR-Web 1.1b2 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via a URL in the DOCUMENT_ROOT parameter.

Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2009-4223"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-94"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2009-12-07T17:30:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "PHP remote file inclusion vulnerability in adm/krgourl.php in KR-Web 1.1b2 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via a URL in the DOCUMENT_ROOT parameter.",
  "id": "GHSA-v5px-3gjx-x7vr",
  "modified": "2022-05-02T03:52:46Z",
  "published": "2022-05-02T03:52:46Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-4223"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/54395"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/10216"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

GHSA-V5QV-P4X6-222F

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-02 03:35 – Updated: 2022-05-02 03:35
VLAI
Details

The Common Language Runtime (CLR) in Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0, 2.0 SP1, 2.0 SP2, 3.5, and 3.5 SP1, and Silverlight 2, does not properly handle interfaces, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a crafted XAML browser application (XBAP), (2) a crafted Silverlight application, (3) a crafted ASP.NET application, or (4) a crafted .NET Framework application, aka "Microsoft Silverlight and Microsoft .NET Framework CLR Vulnerability."

Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2009-2497"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-94"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2009-10-14T10:30:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "The Common Language Runtime (CLR) in Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0, 2.0 SP1, 2.0 SP2, 3.5, and 3.5 SP1, and Silverlight 2, does not properly handle interfaces, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a crafted XAML browser application (XBAP), (2) a crafted Silverlight application, (3) a crafted ASP.NET application, or (4) a crafted .NET Framework application, aka \"Microsoft Silverlight and Microsoft .NET Framework CLR Vulnerability.\"",
  "id": "GHSA-v5qv-p4x6-222f",
  "modified": "2022-05-02T03:35:50Z",
  "published": "2022-05-02T03:35:50Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-2497"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2009/ms09-061"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A6510"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA09-286A.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

GHSA-V5W5-498X-XFRC

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-10-10 03:30 – Updated: 2024-10-10 03:30
VLAI
Details

The Shortcodes AnyWhere plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary shortcode execution in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.1. This is due to the software allowing users to execute an action that does not properly validate a value before running do_shortcode. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary shortcodes.

Severity
7.3 (High)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-9581"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-94"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-10-10T02:15:06Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "The Shortcodes AnyWhere plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary shortcode execution in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.1. This is due to the software allowing users to execute an action that does not properly validate a value before running do_shortcode. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary shortcodes.",
  "id": "GHSA-v5w5-498x-xfrc",
  "modified": "2024-10-10T03:30:46Z",
  "published": "2024-10-10T03:30:46Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-9581"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/shortcodes-anywhere/trunk/core/shortcodeEverywhere.class.php#L15"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/7e289b06-66c8-4d50-a8f7-e07c5ae8f7c8?source=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-V62P-HC6H-7MCR

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 03:11 – Updated: 2022-05-17 03:11
VLAI
Details

Adobe Flash Player before 13.0.0.250 and 14.x and 15.x before 15.0.0.189 on Windows and OS X and before 11.2.202.411 on Linux, Adobe AIR before 15.0.0.293, Adobe AIR SDK before 15.0.0.302, and Adobe AIR SDK & Compiler before 15.0.0.302 allow attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-0564.

Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2014-0558"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-94"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2014-10-15T10:55:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Adobe Flash Player before 13.0.0.250 and 14.x and 15.x before 15.0.0.189 on Windows and OS X and before 11.2.202.411 on Linux, Adobe AIR before 15.0.0.293, Adobe AIR SDK before 15.0.0.302, and Adobe AIR SDK \u0026 Compiler before 15.0.0.302 allow attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-0564.",
  "id": "GHSA-v62p-hc6h-7mcr",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T03:11:37Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T03:11:37Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-0558"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/flash-player/apsb14-22.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2014-11/msg00002.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-04/msg00013.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2014-10/msg00033.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1648.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/61980"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1031019"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

GHSA-V639-X6Q2-C892

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 07:20 – Updated: 2022-05-01 07:20
VLAI
Details

PHP remote file inclusion vulnerability in bp_news.php in BinGo News (BP News) 3.01 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via a URL in the bnrep parameter.

Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2006-4649"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-94"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2006-09-08T21:04:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "PHP remote file inclusion vulnerability in bp_news.php in BinGo News (BP News) 3.01 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via a URL in the bnrep parameter.",
  "id": "GHSA-v639-x6q2-c892",
  "modified": "2022-05-01T07:20:48Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T07:20:48Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2006-4649"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1016811"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/445506/100/0/threaded"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/3494"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

GHSA-V63X-XC9J-HHVQ

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2019-12-11 02:01 – Updated: 2021-07-28 16:43
VLAI
Summary
Sandbox Breakout / Arbitrary Code Execution in safer-eval
Details

All versions of safer-eval are vulnerable to Sandbox Escape leading to Remote Code Execution. The package fails to restrict access to the main context and is not suited to process arbitrary user input. This may allow attackers to execute arbitrary code in the system.

Recommendation

The package is not meant to receive user input. Consider using an alternative package until a fix is made available.

Severity
9.8 (Critical)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "safer-eval"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "last_affected": "1.3.6"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2019-10769"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-20",
      "CWE-94"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2020-06-16T21:56:57Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2019-12-06T23:15:00Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "All versions of `safer-eval` are vulnerable to Sandbox Escape leading to Remote Code Execution. The package fails to restrict access to the main context and is not suited to process arbitrary user input. This may allow attackers to execute arbitrary code in the system.\n\n\n## Recommendation\n\nThe package is not meant to receive user input. Consider using an alternative package until a fix is made available.",
  "id": "GHSA-v63x-xc9j-hhvq",
  "modified": "2021-07-28T16:43:29Z",
  "published": "2019-12-11T02:01:44Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/commenthol/safer-eval/security/advisories/GHSA-v63x-xc9j-hhvq"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-10769"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-v63x-xc9j-hhvq"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-SAFEREVAL-534901"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.npmjs.com/advisories/1428"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Sandbox Breakout / Arbitrary Code Execution in safer-eval"
}

GHSA-V64W-96P6-FX7W

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 04:48 – Updated: 2024-03-05 18:31
VLAI
Summary
Apache Geronimo JMX Remoting functionality allows remote code execution in 3.x before v3.0.1
Details

The JMX Remoting functionality in Apache Geronimo 3.x before 3.0.1, as used in IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) Community Edition 3.0.0.3 and other products, does not properly implement the RMI classloader, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by using the JMX connector to send a crafted serialized object.

Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "org.apache.geronimo.framework:geronimo-jmx-remoting"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "3.0-beta-1"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "3.0.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2013-1777"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-94"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2022-07-27T21:38:21Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2013-07-11T22:55:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "The JMX Remoting functionality in Apache Geronimo 3.x before 3.0.1, as used in IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) Community Edition 3.0.0.3 and other products, does not properly implement the RMI classloader, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by using the JMX connector to send a crafted serialized object.",
  "id": "GHSA-v64w-96p6-fx7w",
  "modified": "2024-03-05T18:31:42Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T04:48:11Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-1777"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/apache/geronimo/commit/ee031c5e62b0d358250d06c2aa6722518579a6c5"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/apache/geronimo"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6477"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2013-07/0008.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://geronimo.apache.org/30x-security-report.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/server/trunk"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision\u0026revision=1458113"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21643282"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [],
  "summary": "Apache Geronimo JMX Remoting functionality allows remote code execution in 3.x before v3.0.1"
}
Mitigation
Architecture and Design

Strategy: Refactoring

Refactor your program so that you do not have to dynamically generate code.

Mitigation
Architecture and Design
  • Run your code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which code can be executed by your product.
  • Examples include the Unix chroot jail and AppArmor. In general, managed code may provide some protection.
  • This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating system; the rest of your application may still be subject to compromise.
  • Be careful to avoid CWE-243 and other weaknesses related to jails.
Mitigation MIT-5
Implementation

Strategy: Input Validation

  • Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
  • When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
  • Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
  • To reduce the likelihood of code injection, use stringent allowlists that limit which constructs are allowed. If you are dynamically constructing code that invokes a function, then verifying that the input is alphanumeric might be insufficient. An attacker might still be able to reference a dangerous function that you did not intend to allow, such as system(), exec(), or exit().
Mitigation
Testing

Use dynamic tools and techniques that interact with the product using large test suites with many diverse inputs, such as fuzz testing (fuzzing), robustness testing, and fault injection. The product's operation may slow down, but it should not become unstable, crash, or generate incorrect results.

Mitigation MIT-32
Operation

Strategy: Compilation or Build Hardening

Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).

Mitigation MIT-32
Operation

Strategy: Environment Hardening

Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).

Mitigation
Implementation

For Python programs, it is frequently encouraged to use the ast.literal_eval() function instead of eval, since it is intentionally designed to avoid executing code. However, an adversary could still cause excessive memory or stack consumption via deeply nested structures [REF-1372], so the python documentation discourages use of ast.literal_eval() on untrusted data [REF-1373].

CAPEC-242: Code Injection

An adversary exploits a weakness in input validation on the target to inject new code into that which is currently executing. This differs from code inclusion in that code inclusion involves the addition or replacement of a reference to a code file, which is subsequently loaded by the target and used as part of the code of some application.

CAPEC-35: Leverage Executable Code in Non-Executable Files

An attack of this type exploits a system's trust in configuration and resource files. When the executable loads the resource (such as an image file or configuration file) the attacker has modified the file to either execute malicious code directly or manipulate the target process (e.g. application server) to execute based on the malicious configuration parameters. Since systems are increasingly interrelated mashing up resources from local and remote sources the possibility of this attack occurring is high.

CAPEC-77: Manipulating User-Controlled Variables

This attack targets user controlled variables (DEBUG=1, PHP Globals, and So Forth). An adversary can override variables leveraging user-supplied, untrusted query variables directly used on the application server without any data sanitization. In extreme cases, the adversary can change variables controlling the business logic of the application. For instance, in languages like PHP, a number of poorly set default configurations may allow the user to override variables.

← Back to the CWE list