CWE-94
Allowed-with-ReviewImproper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
Abstraction: Base · Status: Draft
The product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment.
8329 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-Q2HG-643C-GW8H
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-16 15:31 – Updated: 2026-04-16 22:57The example example_xcom that was included in airflow documentation implemented unsafe pattern of reading value from xcom in the way that could be exploited to allow UI user who had access to modify XComs to perform arbitrary execution of code on the worker. Since the UI users are already highly trusted, this is a Low severity vulnerability.
It does not affect Airflow release - example_dags are not supposed to be enabled in production environment, however users following the example could replicate the bad pattern. Documentation of Airflow 3.2.0 contains version of the example with improved resiliance for that case.
Users who followed that pattern are advised to adjust their implementations accordingly.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "apache-airflow"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "3.2.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-54550"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-04-16T22:57:15Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-04-15T04:17:32Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The example example_xcom\u00a0that was included in airflow documentation implemented unsafe pattern of reading value\nfrom xcom in the way that could be exploited to allow UI user who had access to modify XComs to perform arbitrary\nexecution of code on the worker. Since the UI users are already highly trusted, this is a Low severity vulnerability.\n\nIt does not affect Airflow release - example_dags are not supposed to be enabled in production environment, however\nusers following the example could replicate the bad pattern. Documentation of Airflow 3.2.0 contains version of\nthe example with improved resiliance for that case.\n\nUsers who followed that pattern are advised to adjust their implementations accordingly.",
"id": "GHSA-q2hg-643c-gw8h",
"modified": "2026-04-16T22:57:15Z",
"published": "2026-04-16T15:31:31Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-54550"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/63200"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/apache/airflow"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/3mf4cfx070ofsnf9qy0s2v5gqb5sc2g1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/04/15/1"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Apache Airflow: RCE by race condition in example_xcom dag"
}
GHSA-Q2JR-HV2M-2PV5
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 23:37 – Updated: 2022-05-01 23:37Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in FLA file parsing in Adobe Flash CS3 Professional, Flash Professional 8, and Flash Basic 8 on Windows allow user-assisted remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted .FLA file.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2008-1201"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2008-03-24T17:44:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in FLA file parsing in Adobe Flash CS3 Professional, Flash Professional 8, and Flash Basic 8 on Windows allow user-assisted remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted .FLA file.",
"id": "GHSA-q2jr-hv2m-2pv5",
"modified": "2022-05-01T23:37:38Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T23:37:38Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-1201"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/41327"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://ruder.cdut.net/blogview.asp?logID=241"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/29455"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.adobe.com/support/security/advisories/apsa08-03.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.fortiguardcenter.com/advisory/FGA-2008-07.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/28349"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1019681"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/0948/references"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-Q2JX-RGV9-XM3X
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 02:01 – Updated: 2025-10-22 03:30The TabStrip ActiveX control in the Common Controls in MSCOMCTL.OCX in Microsoft Office 2003 SP3, Office 2003 Web Components SP3, Office 2007 SP2 and SP3, Office 2010 SP1, SQL Server 2000 SP4, SQL Server 2005 SP4, SQL Server 2008 SP2, SP3, R2, R2 SP1, and R2 SP2, Commerce Server 2002 SP4, Commerce Server 2007 SP2, Commerce Server 2009 Gold and R2, Host Integration Server 2004 SP1, Visual FoxPro 8.0 SP1, Visual FoxPro 9.0 SP2, and Visual Basic 6.0 Runtime allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted (1) document or (2) web page that triggers system-state corruption, aka "MSCOMCTL.OCX RCE Vulnerability."
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2012-1856"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2012-08-15T01:55:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The TabStrip ActiveX control in the Common Controls in MSCOMCTL.OCX in Microsoft Office 2003 SP3, Office 2003 Web Components SP3, Office 2007 SP2 and SP3, Office 2010 SP1, SQL Server 2000 SP4, SQL Server 2005 SP4, SQL Server 2008 SP2, SP3, R2, R2 SP1, and R2 SP2, Commerce Server 2002 SP4, Commerce Server 2007 SP2, Commerce Server 2009 Gold and R2, Host Integration Server 2004 SP1, Visual FoxPro 8.0 SP1, Visual FoxPro 9.0 SP2, and Visual Basic 6.0 Runtime allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted (1) document or (2) web page that triggers system-state corruption, aka \"MSCOMCTL.OCX RCE Vulnerability.\"",
"id": "GHSA-q2jx-rgv9-xm3x",
"modified": "2025-10-22T03:30:31Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T02:01:47Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-1856"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2012/ms12-060"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A15447"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2012-1856"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/54948"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA12-227A.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-Q2W8-W8PJ-C9WH
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-16 21:34 – Updated: 2026-03-17 15:36A command injection vulnerability in the minimal_wrapper.py component of kubectl-mcp-server v1.2.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands via injecting arbitrary shell metacharacters.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-69902"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-16T21:16:17Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "A command injection vulnerability in the minimal_wrapper.py component of kubectl-mcp-server v1.2.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands via injecting arbitrary shell metacharacters.",
"id": "GHSA-q2w8-w8pj-c9wh",
"modified": "2026-03-17T15:36:22Z",
"published": "2026-03-16T21:34:32Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-69902"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://asec.ahnlab.com/ko/92922"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/rohitg00/kubectl-mcp-server"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/rohitg00/kubectl-mcp-server/blob/main/kubectl_mcp_tool/minimal_wrapper.py"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://pypi.org/project/kubectl-mcp-tool"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-Q2X3-2F9G-H559
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-03-23 21:30 – Updated: 2024-04-19 16:22The Mustache pix helper contained a potential Mustache injection risk if combined with user input (note: This did not appear to be implemented/exploitable anywhere in the core Moodle LMS).
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "moodle/moodle"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "4.1.0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.1.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "moodle/moodle"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "4.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.0.7"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "moodle/moodle"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "3.11.0"
},
{
"fixed": "3.11.13"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "moodle/moodle"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "3.9.20"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-28333"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2023-03-23T23:09:12Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2023-03-23T21:15:00Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "The Mustache pix helper contained a potential Mustache injection risk if combined with user input (note: This did not appear to be implemented/exploitable anywhere in the core Moodle LMS).",
"id": "GHSA-q2x3-2f9g-h559",
"modified": "2024-04-19T16:22:00Z",
"published": "2023-03-23T21:30:18Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-28333"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/moodle/moodle/commit/128c0c21607a71f411611a0104b2a8c858dd6fca"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179422"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.moodle.org/gw?p=moodle.git;a=commitdiff;h=128c0c21607a71f411611a0104b2a8c858dd6fca"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/moodle/moodle"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/3QZN34VSF4HTCW3C3ZP2OZYSLYUKADPF"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/3QZN34VSF4HTCW3C3ZP2OZYSLYUKADPF"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://moodle.org/mod/forum/discuss.php?d=445065"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Moodle\u0027s Mustache pix helper contained a potential Mustache injection risk if combined with user input"
}
GHSA-Q2XH-GXFM-H723
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-04-29 01:26 – Updated: 2025-04-03 03:54Caché Database 5.x installs the /cachesys/csp directory with insecure permissions, which allows local users to execute arbitrary code by adding server-side scripts that are executed with root privileges.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2003-0498"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2003-08-07T04:00:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Cach\u00e9 Database 5.x installs the /cachesys/csp directory with insecure permissions, which allows local users to execute arbitrary code by adding server-side scripts that are executed with root privileges.",
"id": "GHSA-q2xh-gxfm-h723",
"modified": "2025-04-03T03:54:34Z",
"published": "2022-04-29T01:26:32Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2003-0498"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.intersystems.com/support-learning/support/product-news-alerts/support-alerts-2003"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.verisigninc.com/en_US/products-and-services/network-intelligence-availability/idefense/public-vulnerability-reports/articles/index.xhtml?id=7"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-Q32C-GGQM-F5Q7
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 06:58 – Updated: 2022-05-01 06:58Microsoft Office Excel 2000 through 2004 allows user-assisted attackers to execute arbitrary code via malformed cell comments, which lead to modification of "critical data offsets" during the rebuilding process.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2006-2388"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2006-07-13T21:05:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Microsoft Office Excel 2000 through 2004 allows user-assisted attackers to execute arbitrary code via malformed cell comments, which lead to modification of \"critical data offsets\" during the rebuilding process.",
"id": "GHSA-q32c-ggqm-f5q7",
"modified": "2022-05-01T06:58:42Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T06:58:42Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2006-2388"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2006/ms06-037"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/27604"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A234"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1016472"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/439786/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/18938"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/2755"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-06-022.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-Q337-FQ3F-WPXQ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-02 03:48 – Updated: 2022-05-02 03:48PHP remote file inclusion vulnerability in doc/releasenote.php in the BookLibrary (com_booklibrary) component 1.0 for Joomla! allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via a URL in the mosConfig_absolute_path parameter, a different vector than CVE-2009-2637. NOTE: the provenance of this information is unknown; the details are obtained solely from third party information.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2009-3817"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2009-10-28T10:30:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "PHP remote file inclusion vulnerability in doc/releasenote.php in the BookLibrary (com_booklibrary) component 1.0 for Joomla! allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via a URL in the mosConfig_absolute_path parameter, a different vector than CVE-2009-2637. NOTE: the provenance of this information is unknown; the details are obtained solely from third party information.",
"id": "GHSA-q337-fq3f-wpxq",
"modified": "2022-05-02T03:48:50Z",
"published": "2022-05-02T03:48:50Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-3817"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/36732"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/36732/exploit"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/2969"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-Q33M-RRQM-6XHW
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2021-12-16 00:02 – Updated: 2022-05-24 00:00Windows Encrypting File System (EFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-43217"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2021-12-15T15:15:00Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "Windows Encrypting File System (EFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability",
"id": "GHSA-q33m-rrqm-6xhw",
"modified": "2022-05-24T00:00:48Z",
"published": "2021-12-16T00:02:01Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-43217"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-43217"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-Q33R-GFJJ-QMQ4
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-01-23 06:31 – Updated: 2026-01-23 06:31Langflow PythonFunction Code Injection Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Langflow. Attack vectors and exploitability will vary depending on the configuration of the product.
The specific flaw exists within the handling of Python function components. Depending upon product configuration, an attacker may be able to introduce custom Python code into a workflow. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the application. Was ZDI-CAN-27497.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-0771"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-01-23T04:16:04Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Langflow PythonFunction Code Injection Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Langflow. Attack vectors and exploitability will vary depending on the configuration of the product.\n\nThe specific flaw exists within the handling of Python function components. Depending upon product configuration, an attacker may be able to introduce custom Python code into a workflow. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the application. Was ZDI-CAN-27497.",
"id": "GHSA-q33r-gfjj-qmq4",
"modified": "2026-01-23T06:31:24Z",
"published": "2026-01-23T06:31:24Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-0771"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-26-037"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation
Strategy: Refactoring
Refactor your program so that you do not have to dynamically generate code.
Mitigation
- Run your code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which code can be executed by your product.
- Examples include the Unix chroot jail and AppArmor. In general, managed code may provide some protection.
- This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating system; the rest of your application may still be subject to compromise.
- Be careful to avoid CWE-243 and other weaknesses related to jails.
Mitigation MIT-5
Strategy: Input Validation
- Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
- When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
- Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
- To reduce the likelihood of code injection, use stringent allowlists that limit which constructs are allowed. If you are dynamically constructing code that invokes a function, then verifying that the input is alphanumeric might be insufficient. An attacker might still be able to reference a dangerous function that you did not intend to allow, such as system(), exec(), or exit().
Mitigation
Use dynamic tools and techniques that interact with the product using large test suites with many diverse inputs, such as fuzz testing (fuzzing), robustness testing, and fault injection. The product's operation may slow down, but it should not become unstable, crash, or generate incorrect results.
Mitigation MIT-32
Strategy: Compilation or Build Hardening
Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Mitigation MIT-32
Strategy: Environment Hardening
Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Mitigation
For Python programs, it is frequently encouraged to use the ast.literal_eval() function instead of eval, since it is intentionally designed to avoid executing code. However, an adversary could still cause excessive memory or stack consumption via deeply nested structures [REF-1372], so the python documentation discourages use of ast.literal_eval() on untrusted data [REF-1373].
CAPEC-242: Code Injection
An adversary exploits a weakness in input validation on the target to inject new code into that which is currently executing. This differs from code inclusion in that code inclusion involves the addition or replacement of a reference to a code file, which is subsequently loaded by the target and used as part of the code of some application.
CAPEC-35: Leverage Executable Code in Non-Executable Files
An attack of this type exploits a system's trust in configuration and resource files. When the executable loads the resource (such as an image file or configuration file) the attacker has modified the file to either execute malicious code directly or manipulate the target process (e.g. application server) to execute based on the malicious configuration parameters. Since systems are increasingly interrelated mashing up resources from local and remote sources the possibility of this attack occurring is high.
CAPEC-77: Manipulating User-Controlled Variables
This attack targets user controlled variables (DEBUG=1, PHP Globals, and So Forth). An adversary can override variables leveraging user-supplied, untrusted query variables directly used on the application server without any data sanitization. In extreme cases, the adversary can change variables controlling the business logic of the application. For instance, in languages like PHP, a number of poorly set default configurations may allow the user to override variables.