CWE-94
Allowed-with-ReviewImproper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
Abstraction: Base · Status: Draft
The product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment.
8307 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-P7VF-FH6J-JRM8
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-14 18:31 – Updated: 2026-07-14 18:31A security vulnerability has been detected in tamagui up to 2.3.0. This affects the function updateConfig of the file code/core/web/src/config.ts. Such manipulation leads to improperly controlled modification of object prototype attributes. The attack may be performed from remote. Upgrading to version 2.3.1 is able to mitigate this issue. The name of the patch is e46af9879b7627934ea4d6d6e46e65cea53abb3d. The affected component should be upgraded.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-15702"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-07-14T17:16:45Z",
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "A security vulnerability has been detected in tamagui up to 2.3.0. This affects the function updateConfig of the file code/core/web/src/config.ts. Such manipulation leads to improperly controlled modification of object prototype attributes. The attack may be performed from remote. Upgrading to version 2.3.1 is able to mitigate this issue. The name of the patch is e46af9879b7627934ea4d6d6e46e65cea53abb3d. The affected component should be upgraded.",
"id": "GHSA-p7vf-fh6j-jrm8",
"modified": "2026-07-14T18:31:57Z",
"published": "2026-07-14T18:31:57Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-15702"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/tamagui/tamagui/issues/4029"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/tamagui/tamagui/commit/e46af9879b7627934ea4d6d6e46e65cea53abb3d"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/tamagui/tamagui"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/tamagui/tamagui/releases/tag/v2.3.1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-15702"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/submit/856138"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/378249"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/378249/cti"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-P7WM-439M-H6PP
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-04-28 18:30 – Updated: 2025-04-28 18:30OneVision Workspace before WS23.1 SR1 (build w31.040) allows arbitrary Java EL execution.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-42404"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-04-28T17:15:46Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "OneVision Workspace before WS23.1 SR1 (build w31.040) allows arbitrary Java EL execution.",
"id": "GHSA-p7wm-439m-h6pp",
"modified": "2025-04-28T18:30:57Z",
"published": "2025-04-28T18:30:57Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-42404"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://code-white.com/public-vulnerability-list"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.onevision.com"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-P83Q-99RC-VFMV
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-07-28 15:30 – Updated: 2023-08-03 19:37Duke v1.2 and below was discovered to contain a code injection vulnerability via the component no.priv.garshol.duke.server.CommonJTimer.init.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "no.priv.garshol.duke:duke"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"last_affected": "1.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-39013"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-74",
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2023-07-28T20:56:32Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2023-07-28T15:15:12Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "Duke v1.2 and below was discovered to contain a code injection vulnerability via the component no.priv.garshol.duke.server.CommonJTimer.init.",
"id": "GHSA-p83q-99rc-vfmv",
"modified": "2023-08-03T19:37:47Z",
"published": "2023-07-28T15:30:23Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-39013"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/larsga/Duke/issues/273"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/larsga/Duke"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Code injection in Duke"
}
GHSA-P849-VF5F-F3X7
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 02:37 – Updated: 2024-04-24 18:11An issue was discovered in phpMyAdmin. phpMyAdmin can be used to trigger a remote code execution attack against certain PHP installations that are running with the dbase extension. All 4.6.x versions (prior to 4.6.4), 4.4.x versions (prior to 4.4.15.8), and 4.0.x versions (prior to 4.0.10.17) are affected.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "phpmyadmin/phpmyadmin"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "4.6"
},
{
"fixed": "4.6.4"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "phpmyadmin/phpmyadmin"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "4.4"
},
{
"fixed": "4.4.15.8"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "phpmyadmin/phpmyadmin"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "4.0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.0.10.17"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2016-6633"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2024-04-24T18:11:23Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2016-12-11T02:59:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "An issue was discovered in phpMyAdmin. phpMyAdmin can be used to trigger a remote code execution attack against certain PHP installations that are running with the dbase extension. All 4.6.x versions (prior to 4.6.4), 4.4.x versions (prior to 4.4.15.8), and 4.0.x versions (prior to 4.0.10.17) are affected.",
"id": "GHSA-p849-vf5f-f3x7",
"modified": "2024-04-24T18:11:23Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T02:37:10Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-6633"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/phpmyadmin/composer"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201701-32"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.phpmyadmin.net/security/PMASA-2016-56"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92500"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "phpMyAdmin Remote code execution vulnerability when PHP is running with dbase extension"
}
GHSA-P85C-457J-22Q2
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 07:19 – Updated: 2022-05-01 07:19PHP remote file inclusion vulnerability in plugin.class.php in the com_comprofiler Components 1.0 RC2 for Mambo and Joomla! allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via a URL in the mosConfig_absolute_path parameter.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2006-4553"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2006-09-06T00:04:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "PHP remote file inclusion vulnerability in plugin.class.php in the com_comprofiler Components 1.0 RC2 for Mambo and Joomla! allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via a URL in the mosConfig_absolute_path parameter.",
"id": "GHSA-p85c-457j-22q2",
"modified": "2022-05-01T07:19:43Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T07:19:43Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2006-4553"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/28596"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/21636"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/1491"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/444425/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/19725"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-P86F-33VJ-VQM9
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-10-10 18:31 – Updated: 2024-04-04 08:31Microsoft Message Queuing Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-36591"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-10-10T18:15:14Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Microsoft Message Queuing Remote Code Execution Vulnerability",
"id": "GHSA-p86f-33vj-vqm9",
"modified": "2024-04-04T08:31:16Z",
"published": "2023-10-10T18:31:34Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-36591"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2023-36591"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-P882-2J97-M4HP
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-07-13 03:30 – Updated: 2024-04-04 06:06acme.sh before 3.0.6 runs arbitrary commands from a remote server via eval, as exploited in the wild in June 2023.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-38198"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-07-13T03:15:09Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "acme.sh before 3.0.6 runs arbitrary commands from a remote server via eval, as exploited in the wild in June 2023.",
"id": "GHSA-p882-2j97-m4hp",
"modified": "2024-04-04T06:06:23Z",
"published": "2023-07-13T03:30:48Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-38198"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/acmesh-official/acme.sh/issues/4659"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/acmesh-official/acme.sh/releases/tag/3.0.6"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://groups.google.com/a/mozilla.org/g/dev-security-policy/c/heXVr8o83Ys"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36252310"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36254093"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.reddit.com/r/netsec/comments/144ygg7/acmesh_runs_arbitrary_commands_from_a_remote"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/07/13/1"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-P888-PPQ3-6F8C
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 04:41 – Updated: 2025-04-12 12:34The av-centerd SOAP service in AlienVault OSSIM before 4.8.0 allows remote attackers to create arbitrary files and execute arbitrary code via a crafted set_file request.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2014-4151"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2014-06-18T19:55:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The av-centerd SOAP service in AlienVault OSSIM before 4.8.0 allows remote attackers to create arbitrary files and execute arbitrary code via a crafted set_file request.",
"id": "GHSA-p888-ppq3-6f8c",
"modified": "2025-04-12T12:34:57Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T04:41:49Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-4151"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://forums.alienvault.com/discussion/2806"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/59112"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-14-205"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-P8F8-PJ6V-742R
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 02:57 – Updated: 2022-05-17 02:57Adobe Campaign versions 16.4 Build 8724 and earlier have a code injection vulnerability.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2017-2968"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2017-02-15T06:59:00Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "Adobe Campaign versions 16.4 Build 8724 and earlier have a code injection vulnerability.",
"id": "GHSA-p8f8-pj6v-742r",
"modified": "2022-05-17T02:57:32Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T02:57:32Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-2968"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/campaign/apsb17-03.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/campaign/apsb17-06.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/96197"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-P8FH-J448-7454
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:24 – Updated: 2022-05-13 01:24The TELNET service in Mobatek MobaXterm 10.4 does not require authentication, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via TCP port 23.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2017-15376"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2017-10-16T04:29:00Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "The TELNET service in Mobatek MobaXterm 10.4 does not require authentication, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via TCP port 23.",
"id": "GHSA-p8fh-j448-7454",
"modified": "2022-05-13T01:24:57Z",
"published": "2022-05-13T01:24:57Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-15376"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulnerability-lab.com/get_content.php?id=2097"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation
Strategy: Refactoring
Refactor your program so that you do not have to dynamically generate code.
Mitigation
- Run your code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which code can be executed by your product.
- Examples include the Unix chroot jail and AppArmor. In general, managed code may provide some protection.
- This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating system; the rest of your application may still be subject to compromise.
- Be careful to avoid CWE-243 and other weaknesses related to jails.
Mitigation MIT-5
Strategy: Input Validation
- Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
- When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
- Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
- To reduce the likelihood of code injection, use stringent allowlists that limit which constructs are allowed. If you are dynamically constructing code that invokes a function, then verifying that the input is alphanumeric might be insufficient. An attacker might still be able to reference a dangerous function that you did not intend to allow, such as system(), exec(), or exit().
Mitigation
Use dynamic tools and techniques that interact with the product using large test suites with many diverse inputs, such as fuzz testing (fuzzing), robustness testing, and fault injection. The product's operation may slow down, but it should not become unstable, crash, or generate incorrect results.
Mitigation MIT-32
Strategy: Compilation or Build Hardening
Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Mitigation MIT-32
Strategy: Environment Hardening
Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Mitigation
For Python programs, it is frequently encouraged to use the ast.literal_eval() function instead of eval, since it is intentionally designed to avoid executing code. However, an adversary could still cause excessive memory or stack consumption via deeply nested structures [REF-1372], so the python documentation discourages use of ast.literal_eval() on untrusted data [REF-1373].
CAPEC-242: Code Injection
An adversary exploits a weakness in input validation on the target to inject new code into that which is currently executing. This differs from code inclusion in that code inclusion involves the addition or replacement of a reference to a code file, which is subsequently loaded by the target and used as part of the code of some application.
CAPEC-35: Leverage Executable Code in Non-Executable Files
An attack of this type exploits a system's trust in configuration and resource files. When the executable loads the resource (such as an image file or configuration file) the attacker has modified the file to either execute malicious code directly or manipulate the target process (e.g. application server) to execute based on the malicious configuration parameters. Since systems are increasingly interrelated mashing up resources from local and remote sources the possibility of this attack occurring is high.
CAPEC-77: Manipulating User-Controlled Variables
This attack targets user controlled variables (DEBUG=1, PHP Globals, and So Forth). An adversary can override variables leveraging user-supplied, untrusted query variables directly used on the application server without any data sanitization. In extreme cases, the adversary can change variables controlling the business logic of the application. For instance, in languages like PHP, a number of poorly set default configurations may allow the user to override variables.