Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-918

Allowed

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

Abstraction: Base · Status: Incomplete

API response cwe.mitre.org

The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination.

4757 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.

GHSA-C5R6-M4MR-8Q5J

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-01 18:14 – Updated: 2026-07-01 18:14
VLAI
Summary
@jshookmcp/jshook: ICMP probe and traceroute skip local-network SSRF authorization
Details

Summary

The network domain has a central SSRF authorization policy that blocks private, loopback, link-local, and reserved targets unless an explicit authorization object allows private network access. The policy is enforced by raw HTTP/TCP/TLS RTT tools, but the ICMP probe and traceroute tools resolve the target and invoke the native ICMP/traceroute sink directly.

An MCP client with access to an active network domain can therefore ask the jshookmcp server to probe internal addresses such as 10.0.0.1 even when local SSRF access is disabled for the other raw network tools. This exposes an internal reachability and route mapping primitive from the server network position.

Affected code

Current main https://github.com/vmoranv/jshookmcp/commit/d309c395738638e384c28c0f599b47b2213ab595 and npm package @jshookmcp/jshook 0.3.1 both contain the issue.

  • src/server/domains/network/handlers/raw-latency-handlers.ts:61-66: network_rtt_measure parses optional authorization and calls resolveAuthorizedTransportTarget before probing.
  • src/server/domains/network/handlers/raw-latency-handlers.ts:185-190: network_latency_stats uses the same authorization guard.
  • src/server/domains/network/handlers/raw-latency-handlers.ts:123-139: network_traceroute resolves target with resolveHostname and calls traceroute without an authorization policy check.
  • src/server/domains/network/handlers/raw-latency-handlers.ts:240-257: network_icmp_probe resolves target with resolveHostname and calls icmpProbe without an authorization policy check.
  • src/server/domains/network/handlers/raw-latency-handlers.ts:408-416: resolveHostname returns IPv4 literals directly and otherwise performs DNS A lookup without checking private, loopback, link-local, or reserved ranges.
  • src/utils/network/ssrf-policy.ts:244-316: the central policy blocks private targets unless explicit authorization or ALLOW_LOCAL_SSRF=true is set.

Reproduction

Used a focused regression test against the real handleCallTool and RawHandlers call path with fake native ICMP and policy sinks. The test does not send external traffic. It proves the denied control and the bypass through the same MCP meta-tool dispatch path.

Test file path in my local checkout:

tests/server/security/jshookmcp-network-meta-boundary.test.ts

Relevant test body:

it('denied control: RTT path consults the SSRF authorization guard for private targets', async () => {
  const handler = new RawHandlers();
  state.resolveAuthorizedTransportTarget.mockRejectedValue(new Error('RTT measurement blocked: target resolves to a private or reserved address.'));
  await expect(handler.handleNetworkRttMeasure({ url: 'https://10.0.0.1/', probeType: 'tcp' })).rejects.toThrow(/blocked/);
  expect(state.resolveAuthorizedTransportTarget).toHaveBeenCalled();
  expect(state.icmpProbe).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});

it('bypass proof: call_tool can drive network_icmp_probe to a private IP without the SSRF authorization guard', async () => {
  const raw = new RawHandlers();
  const ctx = {
    router: { has: vi.fn((name: string) => name === 'network_icmp_probe') },
    executeToolWithTracking: vi.fn((name: string, args: Record<string, unknown>) => raw.handleNetworkIcmpProbe(args)),
  } as any;

  const response = await handleCallTool(ctx, { name: 'network_icmp_probe', args: { target: '10.0.0.1', ttl: 64 } });
  const body = JSON.parse(response.content[0].text);

  expect(body.success).toBe(true);
  expect(ctx.router.has).toHaveBeenCalledWith('network_icmp_probe');
  expect(ctx.executeToolWithTracking).toHaveBeenCalledWith('network_icmp_probe', { target: '10.0.0.1', ttl: 64 });
  expect(state.resolveAuthorizedTransportTarget).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
  expect(state.icmpProbe).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.objectContaining({ target: '10.0.0.1', ttl: 64 }));
});

Command run:

corepack pnpm exec vitest run --config vitest.config.ts tests/server/security/jshookmcp-network-meta-boundary.test.ts --reporter=verbose

Result:

Test Files  1 passed (1)
Tests       4 passed (4)

The observed vulnerable call sequence is:

call_tool(name=network_icmp_probe, args={target: 10.0.0.1, ttl: 64})
  -> ctx.router.has(network_icmp_probe) == true
  -> ctx.executeToolWithTracking(network_icmp_probe, validatedArgs)
  -> RawHandlers.handleNetworkIcmpProbe(validatedArgs)
  -> resolveHostname(10.0.0.1) returns 10.0.0.1
  -> icmpProbe({ target: 10.0.0.1, ttl: 64, ... })

resolveAuthorizedTransportTarget is not called on this path. The same missing policy pattern exists for network_traceroute.

Impact

An MCP client with access to the active network domain can use the server as a backend-origin internal network probing oracle. The result can reveal whether internal hosts respond, approximate latency, traceroute hops, and ICMP error classes from the server network position.

The practical impact is strongest when jshookmcp is exposed over Streamable HTTP or another remote transport, multiple clients share one server, or the server runs on Windows or with raw socket capability. This is not code execution and does not by itself exfiltrate response bodies.

Remediation

Apply the same authorization model used by network_rtt_measure and network_latency_stats to network_icmp_probe and network_traceroute. In particular, accept an optional authorization object, resolve the target through the central policy helper or an equivalent host-only policy helper, block private and reserved ranges by default, and pass only the policy-approved resolved address to the native probe. Add regression tests for default-denied private targets, authorized private CIDR access, private hostnames, and call_tool dispatch.

Severity
4.3 (Medium)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "@jshookmcp/jshook"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0.3.1"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.3.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ],
      "versions": [
        "0.3.1"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-49856"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-918"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-07-01T18:14:57Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "## Summary\n\nThe network domain has a central SSRF authorization policy that blocks private, loopback, link-local, and reserved targets unless an explicit authorization object allows private network access. The policy is enforced by raw HTTP/TCP/TLS RTT tools, but the ICMP probe and traceroute tools resolve the target and invoke the native ICMP/traceroute sink directly.\n\nAn MCP client with access to an active network domain can therefore ask the jshookmcp server to probe internal addresses such as 10.0.0.1 even when local SSRF access is disabled for the other raw network tools. This exposes an internal reachability and route mapping primitive from the server network position.\n\n## Affected code\n\nCurrent main https://github.com/vmoranv/jshookmcp/commit/d309c395738638e384c28c0f599b47b2213ab595 and npm package @jshookmcp/jshook 0.3.1 both contain the issue.\n\n- src/server/domains/network/handlers/raw-latency-handlers.ts:61-66: network_rtt_measure parses optional authorization and calls resolveAuthorizedTransportTarget before probing.\n- src/server/domains/network/handlers/raw-latency-handlers.ts:185-190: network_latency_stats uses the same authorization guard.\n- src/server/domains/network/handlers/raw-latency-handlers.ts:123-139: network_traceroute resolves target with resolveHostname and calls traceroute without an authorization policy check.\n- src/server/domains/network/handlers/raw-latency-handlers.ts:240-257: network_icmp_probe resolves target with resolveHostname and calls icmpProbe without an authorization policy check.\n- src/server/domains/network/handlers/raw-latency-handlers.ts:408-416: resolveHostname returns IPv4 literals directly and otherwise performs DNS A lookup without checking private, loopback, link-local, or reserved ranges.\n- src/utils/network/ssrf-policy.ts:244-316: the central policy blocks private targets unless explicit authorization or ALLOW_LOCAL_SSRF=true is set.\n\n## Reproduction\n\nUsed a focused regression test against the real handleCallTool and RawHandlers call path with fake native ICMP and policy sinks. The test does not send external traffic. It proves the denied control and the bypass through the same MCP meta-tool dispatch path.\n\nTest file path in my local checkout:\n\n```text\ntests/server/security/jshookmcp-network-meta-boundary.test.ts\n```\n\nRelevant test body:\n\n```ts\nit(\u0027denied control: RTT path consults the SSRF authorization guard for private targets\u0027, async () =\u003e {\n  const handler = new RawHandlers();\n  state.resolveAuthorizedTransportTarget.mockRejectedValue(new Error(\u0027RTT measurement blocked: target resolves to a private or reserved address.\u0027));\n  await expect(handler.handleNetworkRttMeasure({ url: \u0027https://10.0.0.1/\u0027, probeType: \u0027tcp\u0027 })).rejects.toThrow(/blocked/);\n  expect(state.resolveAuthorizedTransportTarget).toHaveBeenCalled();\n  expect(state.icmpProbe).not.toHaveBeenCalled();\n});\n\nit(\u0027bypass proof: call_tool can drive network_icmp_probe to a private IP without the SSRF authorization guard\u0027, async () =\u003e {\n  const raw = new RawHandlers();\n  const ctx = {\n    router: { has: vi.fn((name: string) =\u003e name === \u0027network_icmp_probe\u0027) },\n    executeToolWithTracking: vi.fn((name: string, args: Record\u003cstring, unknown\u003e) =\u003e raw.handleNetworkIcmpProbe(args)),\n  } as any;\n\n  const response = await handleCallTool(ctx, { name: \u0027network_icmp_probe\u0027, args: { target: \u002710.0.0.1\u0027, ttl: 64 } });\n  const body = JSON.parse(response.content[0].text);\n\n  expect(body.success).toBe(true);\n  expect(ctx.router.has).toHaveBeenCalledWith(\u0027network_icmp_probe\u0027);\n  expect(ctx.executeToolWithTracking).toHaveBeenCalledWith(\u0027network_icmp_probe\u0027, { target: \u002710.0.0.1\u0027, ttl: 64 });\n  expect(state.resolveAuthorizedTransportTarget).not.toHaveBeenCalled();\n  expect(state.icmpProbe).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.objectContaining({ target: \u002710.0.0.1\u0027, ttl: 64 }));\n});\n```\n\nCommand run:\n\n```bash\ncorepack pnpm exec vitest run --config vitest.config.ts tests/server/security/jshookmcp-network-meta-boundary.test.ts --reporter=verbose\n```\n\nResult:\n\n```text\nTest Files  1 passed (1)\nTests       4 passed (4)\n```\n\nThe observed vulnerable call sequence is:\n\n```text\ncall_tool(name=network_icmp_probe, args={target: 10.0.0.1, ttl: 64})\n  -\u003e ctx.router.has(network_icmp_probe) == true\n  -\u003e ctx.executeToolWithTracking(network_icmp_probe, validatedArgs)\n  -\u003e RawHandlers.handleNetworkIcmpProbe(validatedArgs)\n  -\u003e resolveHostname(10.0.0.1) returns 10.0.0.1\n  -\u003e icmpProbe({ target: 10.0.0.1, ttl: 64, ... })\n```\n\nresolveAuthorizedTransportTarget is not called on this path. The same missing policy pattern exists for network_traceroute.\n\n## Impact\n\nAn MCP client with access to the active network domain can use the server as a backend-origin internal network probing oracle. The result can reveal whether internal hosts respond, approximate latency, traceroute hops, and ICMP error classes from the server network position.\n\nThe practical impact is strongest when jshookmcp is exposed over Streamable HTTP or another remote transport, multiple clients share one server, or the server runs on Windows or with raw socket capability. This is not code execution and does not by itself exfiltrate response bodies.\n\n## Remediation\n\nApply the same authorization model used by network_rtt_measure and network_latency_stats to network_icmp_probe and network_traceroute. In particular, accept an optional authorization object, resolve the target through the central policy helper or an equivalent host-only policy helper, block private and reserved ranges by default, and pass only the policy-approved resolved address to the native probe. Add regression tests for default-denied private targets, authorized private CIDR access, private hostnames, and call_tool dispatch.",
  "id": "GHSA-c5r6-m4mr-8q5j",
  "modified": "2026-07-01T18:14:57Z",
  "published": "2026-07-01T18:14:57Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/vmoranv/jshookmcp/security/advisories/GHSA-c5r6-m4mr-8q5j"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/vmoranv/jshookmcp"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "@jshookmcp/jshook: ICMP probe and traceroute skip local-network SSRF authorization"
}

GHSA-C5VV-2CVX-X67J

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-02-13 00:30 – Updated: 2024-02-15 06:31
VLAI
Details

Server Side Template Injection in Gambio 4.9.2.0 allows attackers to run arbitrary code via crafted smarty email template.

Severity
9.8 (Critical)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-23761"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-918"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-02-12T22:15:08Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "Server Side Template Injection in Gambio 4.9.2.0 allows attackers to run arbitrary code via crafted smarty email template.",
  "id": "GHSA-c5vv-2cvx-x67j",
  "modified": "2024-02-15T06:31:35Z",
  "published": "2024-02-13T00:30:27Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-23761"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://herolab.usd.de/security-advisories/usd-2023-0048"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-C5XG-3JCM-R48J

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-03-22 21:30 – Updated: 2024-03-22 21:30
VLAI
Details

A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in lakernote EasyAdmin up to 20240315. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /ureport/designer/saveReportFile. The manipulation leads to server-side request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier VDB-257717 was assigned to this vulnerability.

Severity
6.3 (Medium)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-2827"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-918"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-03-22T19:15:09Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in lakernote EasyAdmin up to 20240315. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /ureport/designer/saveReportFile. The manipulation leads to server-side request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier VDB-257717 was assigned to this vulnerability.",
  "id": "GHSA-c5xg-3jcm-r48j",
  "modified": "2024-03-22T21:30:56Z",
  "published": "2024-03-22T21:30:56Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-2827"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://gitee.com/lakernote/easy-admin/issues/I98ZTA"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.257717"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.257717"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-C5XV-QC8P-MH2V

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-09-23 00:00 – Updated: 2025-11-03 21:30
VLAI
Summary
Apache Batik Server-Side Request Forgery
Details

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Batik of Apache XML Graphics allows an attacker to load a url thru the jar protocol. This issue affects Apache XML Graphics Batik 1.14.

Severity
5.3 (Medium)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "1.14"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.15"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-bridge"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "1.14"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.15"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-38398"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-918"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2022-09-23T20:52:26Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-09-22T15:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Batik of Apache XML Graphics allows an attacker to load a url thru the jar protocol. This issue affects Apache XML Graphics Batik 1.14.",
  "id": "GHSA-c5xv-qc8p-mh2v",
  "modified": "2025-11-03T21:30:43Z",
  "published": "2022-09-23T00:00:39Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-38398"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/apache/xmlgraphics-batik"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BATIK-1331"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/712c9xwtmyghyokzrm2ml6sps4xlmbsx"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/10/msg00021.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/07/msg00006.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202401-11"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Apache Batik Server-Side Request Forgery "
}

GHSA-C66C-VQ6W-FVH5

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-05 15:25 – Updated: 2026-06-05 15:25
VLAI
Summary
Omni: Operator can traverse image-factory API paths via unsanitized `talos_version` in CreateSchematic
Details

Summary

managementServer.CreateSchematic (internal/backend/grpc/schematics.go) passes the caller-controlled TalosVersion field directly to imageFactoryClient.OverlaysVersions, which embeds it verbatim into a fmt.Sprintf("/version/%s/overlays/official", talosVersion) path template. url.URL.JoinPath resolves any ../ sequences in that path, allowing an authenticated Operator to rewrite the URL path and force Omni to issue HTTP GET requests to unintended paths on the configured image-factory server. Error body content from those unintended endpoints is returned to the caller.

Severity

  • Attack Vector: Network: exploited via the gRPC CreateSchematic API endpoint.
  • Attack Complexity: Low: once the attacker holds an Operator credential and has identified a media ID with an overlay, exploitation is a single API call.
  • Privileges Required: High: role.Operator is required, which has administrative capabilities on Omni.
  • User Interaction: None.
  • Scope: Unchanged: the traversal is constrained to the configured image-factory host; the attacker cannot redirect Omni to an arbitrary external server.
  • Confidentiality Impact: Low: error body content from unintended image-factory endpoints is reflected back to the operator, potentially leaking server-internal information.
  • Integrity Impact: None: only HTTP GET requests are issued; no write operations are performed.
  • Availability Impact: None.

Impact

  • Same-host path traversal: An authenticated Operator can force Omni to issue GET requests to arbitrary URL paths on the configured image-factory server, bypassing the intended versioned overlay API structure.
  • Error-body disclosure: HTTP error responses from unintended image-factory endpoints are reflected back to the operator, potentially leaking server-internal diagnostics or sensitive path content.
  • Internal network probing: In deployments using a private image-factory instance on an internal network, the attacker can probe endpoint existence and partial responses through error-text differences.
  • Depth control: By varying the number of ../ prefixes in talosVersion, the attacker can reach any path hierarchy on the image-factory host.

Credit

This vulnerability was discovered and reported by bugbunny.ai.

Severity
2.7 (Low)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/siderolabs/omni"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.6.6"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/siderolabs/omni"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "1.7.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.7.3"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-45723"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-20",
      "CWE-209",
      "CWE-22",
      "CWE-441",
      "CWE-918"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-06-05T15:25:58Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "LOW"
  },
  "details": "## Summary\n\n`managementServer.CreateSchematic` (`internal/backend/grpc/schematics.go`) passes the caller-controlled `TalosVersion` field directly to `imageFactoryClient.OverlaysVersions`, which embeds it verbatim into a `fmt.Sprintf(\"/version/%s/overlays/official\", talosVersion)` path template. `url.URL.JoinPath` resolves any `../` sequences in that path, allowing an authenticated Operator to rewrite the URL path and force Omni to issue HTTP GET requests to unintended paths on the configured image-factory server. Error body content from those unintended endpoints is returned to the caller.\n\n## Severity\n\n- **Attack Vector:** Network: exploited via the gRPC `CreateSchematic` API endpoint.\n- **Attack Complexity:** Low: once the attacker holds an Operator credential and has identified a media ID with an overlay, exploitation is a single API call.\n- **Privileges Required:** High: `role.Operator` is required, which has administrative capabilities on Omni.\n- **User Interaction:** None.\n- **Scope:** Unchanged: the traversal is constrained to the configured image-factory host; the attacker cannot redirect Omni to an arbitrary external server.\n- **Confidentiality Impact:** Low: error body content from unintended image-factory endpoints is reflected back to the operator, potentially leaking server-internal information.\n- **Integrity Impact:** None: only HTTP GET requests are issued; no write operations are performed.\n- **Availability Impact:** None.\n\n## Impact\n\n- **Same-host path traversal**: An authenticated Operator can force Omni to issue GET requests to arbitrary URL paths on the configured image-factory server, bypassing the intended versioned overlay API structure.\n- **Error-body disclosure**: HTTP error responses from unintended image-factory endpoints are reflected back to the operator, potentially leaking server-internal diagnostics or sensitive path content.\n- **Internal network probing**: In deployments using a private image-factory instance on an internal network, the attacker can probe endpoint existence and partial responses through error-text differences.\n- **Depth control**: By varying the number of `../` prefixes in `talosVersion`, the attacker can reach any path hierarchy on the image-factory host.\n\n## Credit\nThis vulnerability was discovered and reported by [bugbunny.ai](https://bugbunny.ai).",
  "id": "GHSA-c66c-vq6w-fvh5",
  "modified": "2026-06-05T15:25:58Z",
  "published": "2026-06-05T15:25:58Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/siderolabs/omni/security/advisories/GHSA-c66c-vq6w-fvh5"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/siderolabs/omni"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/siderolabs/omni/releases/tag/v1.6.6"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/siderolabs/omni/releases/tag/v1.7.3"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Omni: Operator can traverse image-factory API paths via unsanitized `talos_version` in CreateSchematic"
}

GHSA-C693-X898-5G4H

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-21 12:30 – Updated: 2026-06-21 12:30
VLAI
Details

A weakness has been identified in BerriAI litellm up to 1.82.2. Affected by this vulnerability is the function load_openapi_spec_async of the file litellm/proxy/_experimental/mcp_server/openapi_to_mcp_generator.py of the component MCP OpenAPI Spec Loader. This manipulation of the argument spec_path causes server-side request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure.

Severity
6.3 (Medium)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
2.1 (Low)
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-12798"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-918"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-06-21T10:16:17Z",
    "severity": "LOW"
  },
  "details": "A weakness has been identified in BerriAI litellm up to 1.82.2. Affected by this vulnerability is the function load_openapi_spec_async of the file litellm/proxy/_experimental/mcp_server/openapi_to_mcp_generator.py of the component MCP OpenAPI Spec Loader. This manipulation of the argument spec_path causes server-side request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure.",
  "id": "GHSA-c693-x898-5g4h",
  "modified": "2026-06-21T12:30:52Z",
  "published": "2026-06-21T12:30:52Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-12798"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://gist.github.com/YLChen-007/c1104c529975699ba347feedfbe02c5a"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-12798"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/submit/811290"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/372560"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/372560/cti"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-C69J-PCC5-V392

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-04-24 09:30 – Updated: 2026-04-28 21:34
VLAI
Details

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Culqi.This issue affects Culqi: from n/a through 3.0.14.

Severity
4.9 (Medium)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-32819"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-918"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-04-24T07:15:47Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Culqi.This issue affects Culqi: from n/a through 3.0.14.",
  "id": "GHSA-c69j-pcc5-v392",
  "modified": "2026-04-28T21:34:51Z",
  "published": "2024-04-24T09:30:30Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-32819"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/culqi-checkout/wordpress-culqi-plugin-3-0-14-server-side-request-forgery-ssrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-C6CX-MJ2W-VJCR

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-16 18:31 – Updated: 2026-07-16 18:31
VLAI
Details

text-generation-inference through 3.3.7 contains a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the OpenAI-compatible multimodal chat completions endpoint that allows unauthenticated network attackers to coerce the server into issuing arbitrary HTTP GET requests by supplying a crafted image_url value in chat message content. The fetch_image function in router/src/validation.rs performs no validation of private, loopback, link-local, or cloud metadata target addresses, and the reqwest HTTP client follows redirects by default, enabling attackers to bypass scheme checks via redirect chains to reach internal services and cloud instance-metadata endpoints for internal port scanning and credential theft.

Severity
8.6 (High)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
6.9 (Medium)
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-63086"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-918"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-07-16T17:16:58Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "text-generation-inference through 3.3.7 contains a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the OpenAI-compatible multimodal chat completions endpoint that allows unauthenticated network attackers to coerce the server into issuing arbitrary HTTP GET requests by supplying a crafted image_url value in chat message content. The fetch_image function in router/src/validation.rs performs no validation of private, loopback, link-local, or cloud metadata target addresses, and the reqwest HTTP client follows redirects by default, enabling attackers to bypass scheme checks via redirect chains to reach internal services and cloud instance-metadata endpoints for internal port scanning and credential theft.",
  "id": "GHSA-c6cx-mj2w-vjcr",
  "modified": "2026-07-16T18:31:34Z",
  "published": "2026-07-16T18:31:34Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-63086"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/geo-chen/oss/blob/main/text-generation-inference.md"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/text-generation-inference-ssrf-via-fetch-image-in-multimodal-chat-completions"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-C6G5-G6R7-Q4J6

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-08-09 06:30 – Updated: 2025-08-12 00:13
VLAI
Summary
Liferay Portal and Liferay DXP vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery
Details

An SSRF vulnerability in FreeMarker templates in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.132, and Liferay DXP 2025.Q1.0 through 2025.Q1.5, 2024.Q4.0 through 2024.Q4.7, 2024.Q3.1 through 2024.Q3.13, 2024.Q2.0 through 2024.Q2.13, 2024.Q1.1 through 2024.Q1.15, and 7.4 GA through update 92 allows template editors to bypass access validations via crafted URLs.

Severity
5.1 (Medium)
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "com.liferay.portal:release.portal.bom"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "7.4.0"
            },
            {
              "last_affected": "7.4.3.132"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 2025.Q1.5"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "com.liferay.portal:release.dxp.bom"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "2025.Q1.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2025.Q1.6"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "com.liferay.portal:release.dxp.bom"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "2024.Q4.0"
            },
            {
              "last_affected": "2024.Q4.7"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "com.liferay.portal:release.dxp.bom"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "2024.Q3.1"
            },
            {
              "last_affected": "2024.Q3.13"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "com.liferay.portal:release.dxp.bom"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "2024.Q2.0"
            },
            {
              "last_affected": "2024.Q2.13"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 2024.Q1.15"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "com.liferay.portal:release.dxp.bom"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "2024.Q1.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2024.Q1.16"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "com.liferay.portal:release.dxp.bom"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "last_affected": "7.4.13.u92"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-4655"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-918"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2025-08-12T00:13:20Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-08-09T05:15:29Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "An SSRF vulnerability in FreeMarker templates in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.132, and Liferay DXP 2025.Q1.0 through 2025.Q1.5, 2024.Q4.0 through 2024.Q4.7, 2024.Q3.1 through 2024.Q3.13, 2024.Q2.0 through 2024.Q2.13, 2024.Q1.1 through 2024.Q1.15, and 7.4 GA through update 92 allows template editors to bypass access validations via crafted URLs.",
  "id": "GHSA-c6g5-g6r7-q4j6",
  "modified": "2025-08-12T00:13:20Z",
  "published": "2025-08-09T06:30:28Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-4655"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/liferay/liferay-portal"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://liferay.dev/portal/security/known-vulnerabilities/-/asset_publisher/jekt/content/CVE-2025-4655"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Liferay Portal and Liferay DXP vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery"
}

GHSA-C6W3-G6H7-FP2F

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 03:29 – Updated: 2022-05-14 03:29
VLAI
Details

SSRF (Server Side Request Forgery) in tpshop 2.0.5 and 2.0.6 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information, attack intranet hosts, or possibly trigger remote command execution via the plugins/payment/weixin/lib/WxPay.tedatac.php fBill parameter.

Severity
9.8 (Critical)
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2017-16614"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-918"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2018-03-30T21:29:00Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "SSRF (Server Side Request Forgery) in tpshop 2.0.5 and 2.0.6 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information, attack intranet hosts, or possibly trigger remote command execution via the plugins/payment/weixin/lib/WxPay.tedatac.php fBill parameter.",
  "id": "GHSA-c6w3-g6h7-fp2f",
  "modified": "2022-05-14T03:29:54Z",
  "published": "2022-05-14T03:29:54Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-16614"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2018/Mar/77"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

No mitigation information available for this CWE.

CAPEC-664: Server Side Request Forgery

An adversary exploits improper input validation by submitting maliciously crafted input to a target application running on a server, with the goal of forcing the server to make a request either to itself, to web services running in the server’s internal network, or to external third parties. If successful, the adversary’s request will be made with the server’s privilege level, bypassing its authentication controls. This ultimately allows the adversary to access sensitive data, execute commands on the server’s network, and make external requests with the stolen identity of the server. Server Side Request Forgery attacks differ from Cross Site Request Forgery attacks in that they target the server itself, whereas CSRF attacks exploit an insecure user authentication mechanism to perform unauthorized actions on the user's behalf.

← Back to the CWE list