CWE-862
Allowed-with-ReviewMissing Authorization
Abstraction: Class · Status: Incomplete
The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.
15982 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-XGV9-3CM6-QCCQ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-07-12 12:30 – Updated: 2026-04-08 18:33The MStore API – Create Native Android & iOS Apps On The Cloud plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to authentication bypass in all versions up to, and including, 4.14.7. This is due to insufficient verification on the 'phone' parameter of the 'firebase_sms_login' and 'firebase_sms_login_v2' functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to log in as any existing user on the site, such as an administrator, if they have access to the email address or phone number. Additionally, if a new email address is supplied, a new user account is created with the default role, even if registration is disabled.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-6328"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-288",
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-07-12T11:15:11Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "The MStore API \u2013 Create Native Android \u0026 iOS Apps On The Cloud plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to authentication bypass in all versions up to, and including, 4.14.7. This is due to insufficient verification on the \u0027phone\u0027 parameter of the \u0027firebase_sms_login\u0027 and \u0027firebase_sms_login_v2\u0027 functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to log in as any existing user on the site, such as an administrator, if they have access to the email address or phone number. Additionally, if a new email address is supplied, a new user account is created with the default role, even if registration is disabled.",
"id": "GHSA-xgv9-3cm6-qccq",
"modified": "2026-04-08T18:33:32Z",
"published": "2024-07-12T12:30:38Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-6328"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/mstore-api/trunk/controllers/flutter-user.php#L699"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/mstore-api/trunk/controllers/flutter-user.php#L714"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/3115231"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/17d8e2e9-5e3f-433b-be1a-6ea765eba547?source=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-XGW9-335V-H35W
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-08-23 06:30 – Updated: 2025-08-23 06:30The Ni WooCommerce Customer Product Report plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the ni_woocpr_action() function in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.4. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to update plugin settings.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-7827"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-08-23T05:15:32Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The Ni WooCommerce Customer Product Report plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the ni_woocpr_action() function in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.4. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to update plugin settings.",
"id": "GHSA-xgw9-335v-h35w",
"modified": "2025-08-23T06:30:20Z",
"published": "2025-08-23T06:30:20Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-7827"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wordpress.org/plugins/ni-woocommerce-customer-product-report"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/35b02e79-9d31-482a-92b9-b1e8201d45f1?source=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-XGXP-F695-6VRP
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-19 19:27 – Updated: 2026-03-27 21:58Summary
An authorization flaw in repo import allows any authenticated SSH user to clone a server-local Git repository, including another user's private repo, into a new repository they control. This breaks the private-repository confidentiality boundary and should be treated as High severity.
Details
Repo import checks authorization only for the destination repository name, not for the source remote. The destination-side authorization comes from pkg/ssh/cmd/cmd.go:172, which calls pkg/backend/user.go:46. If the destination repo does not already exist, any authenticated user is granted ReadWriteAccess at pkg/backend/user.go:94.
The import command then passes the user-controlled REMOTE into pkg/backend/repo.go:102. In vulnerable HEAD, git.Clone(remote, rp, copts) is reached without validating that remote is actually a network remote. As a result, a user can supply a server filesystem path such as $DATA_PATH/repos/secret.git and cause the server to clone its own local bare repository into a new repo owned by the attacker.
The relevant vulnerable flow is:
- pkg/ssh/cmd/import.go
- pkg/ssh/cmd/cmd.go:172
- pkg/backend/user.go:94
- pkg/backend/repo.go:102
PoC
Configuration: - Default local test configuration is sufficient. - SSH must be enabled. - At least two users are needed: one owner/admin and one low-privilege authenticated user.
Reproduction steps: 1. Start Soft Serve. 2. As an admin, create a private repo:
soft repo create secret -p
- Create a second low-privilege user:
soft user create user1 --key "$USER1_AUTHORIZED_KEY"
- Seed the private repo with secret content:
git clone ssh://localhost:$SSH_PORT/secret secret
echo 'top secret' > secret/SECRET.txt
git -C secret add SECRET.txt
git -C secret commit -m 'first'
git -C secret push origin HEAD
- Confirm the low-privilege user cannot access the private repo directly:
usoft repo info secret
Expected result:
Error: repository not found
- As the low-privilege user, import the server-local bare repo path into a new repo:
usoft repo import stolen "$DATA_PATH/repos/secret.git" --lfs-endpoint http://example.com
- Clone the attacker-controlled imported repo and read the secret:
ugit clone ssh://localhost:$SSH_PORT/stolen stolen-clone
cat stolen-clone/SECRET.txt
Expected result:
top secret
Notes:
- The --lfs-endpoint value is needed to avoid later LFS endpoint handling rejecting the local-path import.
Impact
This is an authorization bypass and confidentiality issue.
Any authenticated SSH user on a multi-user Soft Serve instance can duplicate server-local Git repositories into new repositories they own, even when they are not a collaborator and direct access to the original private repo is denied. The primary impact is unauthorized disclosure of private source code and any secrets committed to those repositories.
Impacted parties:
- Operators hosting Soft Serve for multiple users or teams
- Owners of private repositories on the same instance
- Any deployment where untrusted authenticated users can use repo import
Practical impact: - Theft of private source code - Disclosure of secrets committed to private repos - Exposure of unreleased or internal projects - Possible follow-on supply-chain risk if stolen code contains credentials or release material
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/charmbracelet/soft-serve"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0.6.0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.11.6"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-33353"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-200",
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-19T19:27:58Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-24T20:16:29Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "### Summary\nAn authorization flaw in `repo import` allows any authenticated SSH user to clone a server-local Git repository, including another user\u0027s private repo, into a new repository they control. This breaks the private-repository confidentiality boundary and should be treated as High severity.\n\n### Details\nRepo import checks authorization only for the destination repository name, not for the source remote. The destination-side authorization comes from [`pkg/ssh/cmd/cmd.go:172`](https://github.com/charmbracelet/soft-serve/blob/main/pkg/ssh/cmd/cmd.go#L172), which calls [`pkg/backend/user.go:46`](https://github.com/charmbracelet/soft-serve/blob/main/pkg/backend/user.go#L46). If the destination repo does not already exist, any authenticated user is granted `ReadWriteAccess` at [`pkg/backend/user.go:94`](https://github.com/charmbracelet/soft-serve/blob/main/pkg/backend/user.go#L94).\n\nThe import command then passes the user-controlled `REMOTE` into [`pkg/backend/repo.go:102`](https://github.com/charmbracelet/soft-serve/blob/main/pkg/backend/repo.go#L102). In vulnerable `HEAD`, `git.Clone(remote, rp, copts)` is reached without validating that `remote` is actually a network remote. As a result, a user can supply a server filesystem path such as `$DATA_PATH/repos/secret.git` and cause the server to clone its own local bare repository into a new repo owned by the attacker.\n\nThe relevant vulnerable flow is:\n- [`pkg/ssh/cmd/import.go`](https://github.com/charmbracelet/soft-serve/blob/main/pkg/ssh/cmd/import.go)\n- [`pkg/ssh/cmd/cmd.go:172`](https://github.com/charmbracelet/soft-serve/blob/main/pkg/ssh/cmd/cmd.go#L172)\n- [`pkg/backend/user.go:94`](https://github.com/charmbracelet/soft-serve/blob/main/pkg/backend/user.go#L94)\n- [`pkg/backend/repo.go:102`](https://github.com/charmbracelet/soft-serve/blob/main/pkg/backend/repo.go#L102)\n\n### PoC\nConfiguration:\n- Default local test configuration is sufficient.\n- SSH must be enabled.\n- At least two users are needed: one owner/admin and one low-privilege authenticated user.\n\nReproduction steps:\n1. Start Soft Serve.\n2. As an admin, create a private repo:\n\n```sh\nsoft repo create secret -p\n```\n\n3. Create a second low-privilege user:\n\n```sh\nsoft user create user1 --key \"$USER1_AUTHORIZED_KEY\"\n```\n\n4. Seed the private repo with secret content:\n\n```sh\ngit clone ssh://localhost:$SSH_PORT/secret secret\necho \u0027top secret\u0027 \u003e secret/SECRET.txt\ngit -C secret add SECRET.txt\ngit -C secret commit -m \u0027first\u0027\ngit -C secret push origin HEAD\n```\n\n5. Confirm the low-privilege user cannot access the private repo directly:\n\n```sh\nusoft repo info secret\n```\n\nExpected result:\n\n```text\nError: repository not found\n```\n\n6. As the low-privilege user, import the server-local bare repo path into a new repo:\n\n```sh\nusoft repo import stolen \"$DATA_PATH/repos/secret.git\" --lfs-endpoint http://example.com\n```\n\n7. Clone the attacker-controlled imported repo and read the secret:\n\n```sh\nugit clone ssh://localhost:$SSH_PORT/stolen stolen-clone\ncat stolen-clone/SECRET.txt\n```\n\nExpected result:\n\n```text\ntop secret\n```\n\nNotes:\n- The `--lfs-endpoint` value is needed to avoid later LFS endpoint handling rejecting the local-path import.\n\n### Impact\nThis is an authorization bypass and confidentiality issue.\n\nAny authenticated SSH user on a multi-user Soft Serve instance can duplicate server-local Git repositories into new repositories they own, even when they are not a collaborator and direct access to the original private repo is denied. The primary impact is unauthorized disclosure of private source code and any secrets committed to those repositories.\n\nImpacted parties:\n- Operators hosting Soft Serve for multiple users or teams\n- Owners of private repositories on the same instance\n- Any deployment where untrusted authenticated users can use `repo import`\n\nPractical impact:\n- Theft of private source code\n- Disclosure of secrets committed to private repos\n- Exposure of unreleased or internal projects\n- Possible follow-on supply-chain risk if stolen code contains credentials or release material",
"id": "GHSA-xgxp-f695-6vrp",
"modified": "2026-03-27T21:58:26Z",
"published": "2026-03-19T19:27:58Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/charmbracelet/soft-serve/security/advisories/GHSA-xgxp-f695-6vrp"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-33353"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/charmbracelet/soft-serve/commit/c147421caf234bcfc1570c79d728ecbbe5813e55"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/charmbracelet/soft-serve"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/charmbracelet/soft-serve/releases/tag/v0.11.6"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "In Soft Serve, an authenticated repo import can clone server-local private repositories"
}
GHSA-XH28-R3J4-439X
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-11-13 12:31 – Updated: 2026-01-20 15:31Missing Authorization vulnerability in QuantumCloud ChatBot chatbot allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects ChatBot: from n/a through <= 7.3.9.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-64277"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-11-13T10:15:53Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Missing Authorization vulnerability in QuantumCloud ChatBot chatbot allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects ChatBot: from n/a through \u003c= 7.3.9.",
"id": "GHSA-xh28-r3j4-439x",
"modified": "2026-01-20T15:31:55Z",
"published": "2025-11-13T12:31:42Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-64277"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/chatbot/vulnerability/wordpress-chatbot-plugin-7-3-9-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vdp.patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/chatbot/vulnerability/wordpress-chatbot-plugin-7-3-9-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-XH2C-M49Q-F2GF
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-04-29 12:30 – Updated: 2026-04-28 21:35Missing Authorization vulnerability in RedNao Smart Forms.This issue affects Smart Forms: from n/a through 2.6.91.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-33593"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-04-29T10:15:08Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Missing Authorization vulnerability in RedNao Smart Forms.This issue affects Smart Forms: from n/a through 2.6.91.",
"id": "GHSA-xh2c-m49q-f2gf",
"modified": "2026-04-28T21:35:00Z",
"published": "2024-04-29T12:30:35Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-33593"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/smart-forms/wordpress-smart-forms-plugin-2-6-91-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-XH3R-GPF9-2V95
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-02-14 06:30 – Updated: 2026-02-14 06:30The BlueSnap Payment Gateway for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Missing Authorization in all versions up to, and including, 3.3.0. This is due to the plugin relying on WooCommerce's WC_Geolocation::get_ip_address() function to validate IPN requests, which trusts user-controllable headers like X-Real-IP and X-Forwarded-For to determine the client IP address. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to bypass IP allowlist restrictions by spoofing a whitelisted BlueSnap IP address and send forged IPN (Instant Payment Notification) data to manipulate order statuses (mark orders as paid, failed, refunded, or on-hold) without proper authorization.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-0692"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-02-14T05:16:16Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The BlueSnap Payment Gateway for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Missing Authorization in all versions up to, and including, 3.3.0. This is due to the plugin relying on WooCommerce\u0027s `WC_Geolocation::get_ip_address()` function to validate IPN requests, which trusts user-controllable headers like X-Real-IP and X-Forwarded-For to determine the client IP address. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to bypass IP allowlist restrictions by spoofing a whitelisted BlueSnap IP address and send forged IPN (Instant Payment Notification) data to manipulate order statuses (mark orders as paid, failed, refunded, or on-hold) without proper authorization.",
"id": "GHSA-xh3r-gpf9-2v95",
"modified": "2026-02-14T06:30:58Z",
"published": "2026-02-14T06:30:58Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-0692"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/bluesnap-payment-gateway-for-woocommerce/tags/3.4.0/includes/class-wc-bluesnap-ipn-webhooks.php#L417"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/bluesnap-payment-gateway-for-woocommerce/trunk/includes/class-wc-bluesnap-ipn-webhooks.php#L417"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/dc676e18-c895-4f6a-bce9-1f92207af885?source=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-XH75-6M4G-H6HF
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-11-01 15:32 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:32Missing Authorization vulnerability in WP Sunshine Sunshine Photo Cart allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Sunshine Photo Cart: from n/a through 3.2.8.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-47314"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-11-01T15:15:54Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Missing Authorization vulnerability in WP Sunshine Sunshine Photo Cart allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Sunshine Photo Cart: from n/a through 3.2.8.",
"id": "GHSA-xh75-6m4g-h6hf",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:32:17Z",
"published": "2024-11-01T15:32:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47314"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/sunshine-photo-cart/vulnerability/wordpress-sunshine-photo-cart-plugin-3-2-8-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/sunshine-photo-cart/wordpress-sunshine-photo-cart-plugin-3-2-8-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-XH85-MVMQ-HG43
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-06-01 09:30 – Updated: 2024-06-01 09:30The QQWorld Auto Save Images plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized access of data due to a missing capability check on the save_remote_images_get_auto_saved_results() function hooked via a norpriv AJAX in all versions up to, and including, 1.9.8. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to retrieve the contents of arbitrary posts that may not be public.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-1324"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-06-01T07:15:07Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The QQWorld Auto Save Images plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized access of data due to a missing capability check on the save_remote_images_get_auto_saved_results() function hooked via a norpriv AJAX in all versions up to, and including, 1.9.8. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to retrieve the contents of arbitrary posts that may not be public.",
"id": "GHSA-xh85-mvmq-hg43",
"modified": "2024-06-01T09:30:35Z",
"published": "2024-06-01T09:30:35Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-1324"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/qqworld-auto-save-images/trunk/qqworld-auto-save-images.php#L417"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/ed82f527-b7af-4466-a977-855f109ed997?source=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-XH96-FGXF-4776
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-05 06:30 – Updated: 2026-03-05 21:30Missing Authorization vulnerability in Frenify Guff guff allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Guff: from n/a through <= 1.0.1.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-28076"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-05T06:16:41Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Missing Authorization vulnerability in Frenify Guff guff allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Guff: from n/a through \u003c= 1.0.1.",
"id": "GHSA-xh96-fgxf-4776",
"modified": "2026-03-05T21:30:43Z",
"published": "2026-03-05T06:30:29Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-28076"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Theme/guff/vulnerability/wordpress-guff-theme-1-0-1-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-XH97-FH55-WR34
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-04-03 15:31 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:34Missing Authorization vulnerability in turitop TuriTop Booking System allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects TuriTop Booking System: from n/a through 1.0.10.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-31541"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-04-03T14:15:36Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Missing Authorization vulnerability in turitop TuriTop Booking System allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects TuriTop Booking System: from n/a through 1.0.10.",
"id": "GHSA-xh97-fh55-wr34",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:34:27Z",
"published": "2025-04-03T15:31:15Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-31541"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/turitop-booking-system/vulnerability/wordpress-turitop-booking-system-plugin-1-0-10-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation
- Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries.
- Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
Mitigation
Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].
Mitigation MIT-4.4
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
- For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
Mitigation
- For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page.
- One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
Mitigation
Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.
CAPEC-665: Exploitation of Thunderbolt Protection Flaws
An adversary leverages a firmware weakness within the Thunderbolt protocol, on a computing device to manipulate Thunderbolt controller firmware in order to exploit vulnerabilities in the implementation of authorization and verification schemes within Thunderbolt protection mechanisms. Upon gaining physical access to a target device, the adversary conducts high-level firmware manipulation of the victim Thunderbolt controller SPI (Serial Peripheral Interface) flash, through the use of a SPI Programing device and an external Thunderbolt device, typically as the target device is booting up. If successful, this allows the adversary to modify memory, subvert authentication mechanisms, spoof identities and content, and extract data and memory from the target device. Currently 7 major vulnerabilities exist within Thunderbolt protocol with 9 attack vectors as noted in the Execution Flow.