CWE-862
Weakness Allowed-with-ReviewMissing Authorization
Abstraction: Class · Status: Incomplete
The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.
Dimensions
- Behavior-Property: Missing
- Behavior-Type: Authorization
Mapping guidance
This CWE entry is a Class and might have Base-level children that would be more appropriate
Examine children of this entry to see if there is a better fit
Relationships and members
Modes of introduction
OMISSION: This weakness is caused by missing a security tactic during the architecture and design phase.
Authorization weaknesses may arise when a single-user application is ported to a multi-user environment.
A developer may introduce authorization weaknesses because of a lack of understanding about the underlying technologies. For example, a developer may assume that attackers cannot modify certain inputs such as headers or cookies.
Detection methods
Automated Static Analysis
Automated static analysis is useful for detecting commonly-used idioms for authorization. A tool may be able to analyze related configuration files, such as .htaccess in Apache web servers, or detect the usage of commonly-used authorization libraries.
Generally, automated static analysis tools have difficulty detecting custom authorization schemes. In addition, the software's design may include some functionality that is accessible to any user and does not require an authorization check; an automated technique that detects the absence of authorization may report false positives.
Effectiveness: Limited
Automated Dynamic Analysis
Automated dynamic analysis may find many or all possible interfaces that do not require authorization, but manual analysis is required to determine if the lack of authorization violates business logic.
Manual Analysis
This weakness can be detected using tools and techniques that require manual (human) analysis, such as penetration testing, threat modeling, and interactive tools that allow the tester to record and modify an active session.
Specifically, manual static analysis is useful for evaluating the correctness of custom authorization mechanisms.
Effectiveness: Moderate
These may be more effective than strictly automated techniques. This is especially the case with weaknesses that are related to design and business rules. However, manual efforts might not achieve desired code coverage within limited time constraints.
Manual Static Analysis - Binary or Bytecode
According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:
Cost effective for partial coverage:
Binary / Bytecode disassembler - then use manual analysis for vulnerabilities & anomalies
Effectiveness: SOAR Partial
Dynamic Analysis with Automated Results Interpretation
According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:
Cost effective for partial coverage:
Web Application Scanner
Web Services Scanner
Database Scanners
Effectiveness: SOAR Partial
Dynamic Analysis with Manual Results Interpretation
According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:
Cost effective for partial coverage:
Host Application Interface Scanner
Fuzz Tester
Framework-based Fuzzer
Effectiveness: SOAR Partial
Manual Static Analysis - Source Code
According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:
Cost effective for partial coverage:
Focused Manual Spotcheck - Focused manual analysis of source
Manual Source Code Review (not inspections)
Effectiveness: SOAR Partial
Automated Static Analysis - Source Code
According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:
Cost effective for partial coverage:
Source code Weakness Analyzer
Context-configured Source Code Weakness Analyzer
Effectiveness: SOAR Partial
Architecture or Design Review
According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:
Highly cost effective:
Inspection (IEEE 1028 standard) (can apply to requirements, design, source code, etc.)
Formal Methods / Correct-By-Construction
Effectiveness: High
Notes
Terminology
Assuming a user with a given identity, authorization is the process of determining whether that user can access a given resource, based on the user's privileges and any permissions or other access-control specifications that apply to the resource.
Content history
Suggested mappings to ISA/IEC 62443.
Provided diagram to improve CWE usability
updated Demonstrative_Examples, Related_Attack_Patterns, Relationships
updated Potential_Mitigations, References, Relationships
updated Demonstrative_Examples, Observed_Examples, References, Relationships
updated Potential_Mitigations
updated Relationships
updated Detection_Factors
updated Relationships
updated Applicable_Platforms, Modes_of_Introduction, References, Relationships
updated References
updated Relationships
updated Relationships
updated Relationships
updated Relationships
updated Alternate_Terms, Observed_Examples
updated Observed_Examples, Related_Attack_Patterns, Relationships
updated Relationships
updated Relationships
updated Observed_Examples
updated Description, Potential_Mitigations
updated References, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
updated Mapping_Notes, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
updated Common_Consequences, Description, Diagram, Relationships, Terminology_Notes
updated Applicable_Platforms, Detection_Factors, Observed_Examples, References
updated Applicable_Platforms, Relationships, Weakness_Ordinalities
updated Applicable_Platforms, Observed_Examples, Relationships
updated Applicable_Platforms, Dimensions, References, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
19926 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-F2R8-4C84-9C9F
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-12-16 09:31 – Updated: 2026-01-20 15:32Missing Authorization vulnerability in Design Stylish Price List stylish-price-list allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Stylish Price List: from n/a through <= 7.2.2.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-66122"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-12-16T09:15:56Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Missing Authorization vulnerability in Design Stylish Price List stylish-price-list allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Stylish Price List: from n/a through \u003c= 7.2.2.",
"id": "GHSA-f2r8-4c84-9c9f",
"modified": "2026-01-20T15:32:14Z",
"published": "2025-12-16T09:31:09Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-66122"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/stylish-price-list/vulnerability/wordpress-stylish-price-list-plugin-7-2-2-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vdp.patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/stylish-price-list/vulnerability/wordpress-stylish-price-list-plugin-7-2-2-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-F2RM-GF2X-XX53
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-06-06 15:30 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:35Missing Authorization vulnerability in Ability, Inc Accessibility Suite allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects Accessibility Suite: from n/a through 4.19.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-30636"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-06-06T13:15:32Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Missing Authorization vulnerability in Ability, Inc Accessibility Suite allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects Accessibility Suite: from n/a through 4.19.",
"id": "GHSA-f2rm-gf2x-xx53",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:35:19Z",
"published": "2025-06-06T15:30:47Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-30636"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/online-accessibility/vulnerability/wordpress-accessibility-suite-4-19-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-F2RW-W22V-54VH
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-04 21:01 – Updated: 2026-09-04 21:01CVE: This vulnerability corresponds to CVE-2026-72797.
Summary
POST /api/notebook/getEncryptedNotebookStatus returns the identifier, name, and current lock state of every encrypted notebook, with no publish-access filtering. The route is registered CheckAuth only, no CheckReadonly, no CheckAdminRole so it is reachable by the publish RoleReader token and by the anonymous account when Publish.Auth.Enable is false. Encrypted notebooks are private by design; their names frequently reveal the sensitive topic that motivated encrypting them.
Details
Route registration (kernel/api/router.go:131):
ginServer.Handle("POST", "/api/notebook/getEncryptedNotebookStatus", model.CheckAuth, getEncryptedNotebookStatus)
The handler (kernel/api/notebook.go) accepts no arguments and contains no IsReadOnlyRoleContext branch and no publish-access filter of any kind. It returns, for every encrypted notebook, {id, name, unlocked}, the notebook's box.Name and its live lock state together with enabled, count, migrationPending, migrationBoxes, and hasHistoryDependency.
Guarded-sibling asymmetry. The primary notebook listing lsNotebooks, in the same file and also reader-reachable, does filter: it skips notebooks that are Closed and any notebook whose publishAccess entry is not Visible. The project therefore publish-scopes notebook listings but getEncryptedNotebookStatus enumerates all encrypted notebooks unconditionally.
Still unfixed at HEAD. The encrypted-notebook hardening series (issue #18034 idle auto-lock, lock-on-background, key handling, atomic unlock) is local-threat work. Commit f2d966659 ("Expose encrypted notebook unlock status to plugins") introduced this exposure, and no subsequent commit gates it for the publish/reader boundary.
Secondary effect. unlocked: true is a live indicator of exactly when an encrypted notebook's plaintext is resident in memory, the window during which reader-reachable code paths that accept a notebook argument can read its decrypted content.
Proof of Concept
Precondition: publish mode enabled (default port 6808); anonymous when Publish.Auth.Enable is false, otherwise any publish reader account. At least one encrypted notebook exists.
POST http://127.0.0.1:6808/api/notebook/getEncryptedNotebookStatus
{}
Returns the full set of encrypted notebooks with their IDs, names, and current unlocked state including notebooks that lsNotebooks withholds from the same reader session. No arguments and no privileged access are required.
Impact
An anonymous reader (publish mode with auth disabled) or any publish RoleReader learns which encrypted notebooks exist, what they are called, and whether each is currently unlocked. Notebook names are themselves sensitive: a user encrypts a notebook precisely because its subject matter is private, and the name commonly states that subject. Disclosing existence and naming to unauthenticated parties defeats that expectation, and the live lock state additionally reveals when the notebook's contents are decrypted in memory. Confidentiality-only.
Suggested fix
For IsReadOnlyRoleContext sessions, either reject the request or restrict the response to notebooks that are publish-visible, mirroring the filtering already applied in lsNotebooks. Encrypted notebooks arguably should never be enumerated to a reader at all.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.0.0-20260724123622-8fb1b5766093"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-72797"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-09-04T21:01:46Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "**CVE:** This vulnerability corresponds to [CVE-2026-72797](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-72797).\n\n### Summary\n\n`POST /api/notebook/getEncryptedNotebookStatus` returns the identifier, name, and current lock state of every encrypted notebook, with no publish-access filtering. The route is registered `CheckAuth` only, no `CheckReadonly`, no `CheckAdminRole` so it is reachable by the publish `RoleReader` token and by the anonymous account when `Publish.Auth.Enable` is `false`. Encrypted notebooks are private by design; their names frequently reveal the sensitive topic that motivated encrypting them.\n\n### Details\n\nRoute registration (`kernel/api/router.go:131`):\n```go\nginServer.Handle(\"POST\", \"/api/notebook/getEncryptedNotebookStatus\", model.CheckAuth, getEncryptedNotebookStatus)\n```\n\nThe handler (`kernel/api/notebook.go`) accepts no arguments and contains no `IsReadOnlyRoleContext` branch and no publish-access filter of any kind. It returns, for every encrypted notebook, `{id, name, unlocked}`, the notebook\u0027s `box.Name` and its live lock state together with `enabled`, `count`, `migrationPending`, `migrationBoxes`, and `hasHistoryDependency`.\n\n**Guarded-sibling asymmetry.** The primary notebook listing `lsNotebooks`, in the same file and also reader-reachable, *does* filter: it skips notebooks that are `Closed` and any notebook whose `publishAccess` entry is not `Visible`. The project therefore publish-scopes notebook listings but `getEncryptedNotebookStatus` enumerates all encrypted notebooks unconditionally.\n\n**Still unfixed at HEAD.** The encrypted-notebook hardening series (issue #18034 idle auto-lock, lock-on-background, key handling, atomic unlock) is local-threat work. Commit `f2d966659` (\"Expose encrypted notebook unlock status to plugins\") introduced this exposure, and no subsequent commit gates it for the publish/reader boundary.\n\n**Secondary effect.** `unlocked: true` is a live indicator of exactly when an encrypted notebook\u0027s plaintext is resident in memory, the window during which reader-reachable code paths that accept a notebook argument can read its decrypted content.\n\n### Proof of Concept\n\nPrecondition: publish mode enabled (default port 6808); anonymous when `Publish.Auth.Enable` is `false`, otherwise any publish reader account. At least one encrypted notebook exists.\n\n```\nPOST http://127.0.0.1:6808/api/notebook/getEncryptedNotebookStatus\n{}\n```\n\nReturns the full set of encrypted notebooks with their IDs, names, and current `unlocked` state including notebooks that `lsNotebooks` withholds from the same reader session. No arguments and no privileged access are required.\n\n### Impact\n\nAn anonymous reader (publish mode with auth disabled) or any publish `RoleReader` learns which encrypted notebooks exist, what they are called, and whether each is currently unlocked. Notebook names are themselves sensitive: a user encrypts a notebook precisely because its subject matter is private, and the name commonly states that subject. Disclosing existence and naming to unauthenticated parties defeats that expectation, and the live lock state additionally reveals when the notebook\u0027s contents are decrypted in memory. Confidentiality-only.\n\n### Suggested fix\n\nFor `IsReadOnlyRoleContext` sessions, either reject the request or restrict the response to notebooks that are publish-visible, mirroring the filtering already applied in `lsNotebooks`. Encrypted notebooks arguably should never be enumerated to a reader at all.",
"id": "GHSA-f2rw-w22v-54vh",
"modified": "2026-09-04T21:01:46Z",
"published": "2026-09-04T21:01:46Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/security/advisories/GHSA-f2rw-w22v-54vh"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-72797"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/commit/8fb1b5766093371f6a516c221c92026b904fe779"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/siyuan-before-information-disclosure-via-getencryptednotebookstatus"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "SiYuan: getEncryptedNotebookStatus discloses names and current lock/unlock state of all encrypted notebooks to anonymous readers"
}
GHSA-F2V3-PF6X-RW2J
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-24 00:30 – Updated: 2026-09-24 00:30GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab EE affecting all versions from 18.7 before 19.2.7, 19.3 before 19.3.3, and 19.4 before 19.4.1 that under certain conditions could have allowed an authenticated user to access sensitive CI/CD variable values from debug-mode job traces through the Duo AI troubleshooting feature due to missing authorization checks.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-92470"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-09-24T00:17:22Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab EE affecting all versions from 18.7 before 19.2.7, 19.3 before 19.3.3, and 19.4 before 19.4.1 that under certain conditions could have allowed an authenticated user to access sensitive CI/CD variable values from debug-mode job traces through the Duo AI troubleshooting feature due to missing authorization checks.",
"id": "GHSA-f2v3-pf6x-rw2j",
"modified": "2026-09-24T00:30:26Z",
"published": "2026-09-24T00:30:26Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-92470"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://docs.gitlab.com/releases/patches/patch-release-gitlab-19-4-1-released"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/work_items/617719"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-F2V6-XR44-FWRM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-01-22 18:30 – Updated: 2026-01-28 18:30Missing Authorization vulnerability in Icegram Icegram icegram allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Icegram: from n/a through <= 3.1.35.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-68507"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-01-22T17:16:10Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Missing Authorization vulnerability in Icegram Icegram icegram allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Icegram: from n/a through \u003c= 3.1.35.",
"id": "GHSA-f2v6-xr44-fwrm",
"modified": "2026-01-28T18:30:43Z",
"published": "2026-01-22T18:30:35Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-68507"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/icegram/vulnerability/wordpress-icegram-plugin-3-1-35-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-F2V8-P56H-3QJ9
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-04 03:31 – Updated: 2026-04-04 03:31The Pie Register – User Registration, Profiles & Content Restriction plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the pie_main() function in all versions up to, and including, 3.8.4.8. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change registration form status.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-3571"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-04-04T02:15:59Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The Pie Register \u2013 User Registration, Profiles \u0026 Content Restriction plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the pie_main() function in all versions up to, and including, 3.8.4.8. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change registration form status.",
"id": "GHSA-f2v8-p56h-3qj9",
"modified": "2026-04-04T03:31:13Z",
"published": "2026-04-04T03:31:13Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-3571"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/3494602/pie-register"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/3137a85e-82e3-4111-ae60-1bcf1abd0c0b?source=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-F2WH-CRM6-349C
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-11-10 12:01 – Updated: 2025-05-01 15:31The LBS module has a vulnerability in geofencing API access. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may cause third-party apps to access the geofencing APIs without authorization, affecting user confidentiality.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-44549"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-668",
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-11-09T21:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The LBS module has a vulnerability in geofencing API access. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may cause third-party apps to access the geofencing APIs without authorization, affecting user confidentiality.",
"id": "GHSA-f2wh-crm6-349c",
"modified": "2025-05-01T15:31:29Z",
"published": "2022-11-10T12:01:16Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-44549"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://consumer.huawei.com/en/support/bulletin/2022/11"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://device.harmonyos.com/en/docs/security/update/security-bulletins-phones-202211-0000001441016433"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-F2X8-RW4P-PPW9
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-10-29 15:30 – Updated: 2026-10-29 15:30Missing Authorization vulnerability in WP Desk Flexible Quantity – Measurement Price Calculator for WooCommerce flexible-quantity-measurement-price-calculator-for-woocommerce allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Flexible Quantity – Measurement Price Calculator for WooCommerce: from n/a through 2.3.24.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-116856"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-10-29T15:17:20Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Missing Authorization vulnerability in WP Desk Flexible Quantity \u2013 Measurement Price Calculator for WooCommerce flexible-quantity-measurement-price-calculator-for-woocommerce allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Flexible Quantity \u2013 Measurement Price Calculator for WooCommerce: from n/a through 2.3.24.",
"id": "GHSA-f2x8-rw4p-ppw9",
"modified": "2026-10-29T15:30:59Z",
"published": "2026-10-29T15:30:59Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-116856"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/flexible-quantity-measurement-price-calculator-for-woocommerce/vulnerability/wordpress-flexible-quantity-measurement-price-calculator-for-woocommerce-plugin-2-3-24-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-F33W-F2Q9-9JX3
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-11-21 06:30 – Updated: 2025-11-21 06:30The ELEX WordPress HelpDesk & Customer Ticketing System plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'eh_crm_settings_restore_trash' AJAX endpoint in all versions up to, and including, 3.3.1. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to restore all deleted tickets.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-12022"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-11-21T06:15:47Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The ELEX WordPress HelpDesk \u0026 Customer Ticketing System plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the \u0027eh_crm_settings_restore_trash\u0027 AJAX endpoint in all versions up to, and including, 3.3.1. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to restore all deleted tickets.",
"id": "GHSA-f33w-f2q9-9jx3",
"modified": "2025-11-21T06:30:50Z",
"published": "2025-11-21T06:30:50Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-12022"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/3399391/elex-helpdesk-customer-support-ticket-system/trunk/includes/class-crm-archive-ajax-functions.php"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/982b23c5-2414-48f7-a2f5-96fef54f8d69?source=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-F348-QVM9-C5FH
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-11-06 12:30 – Updated: 2026-11-06 12:30In JetBrains YouTrack before 2026.2.19197 article editors could change visibility of restricted child articles
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-123331"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-11-06T11:17:13Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In JetBrains YouTrack before 2026.2.19197 article editors could change visibility of restricted child articles",
"id": "GHSA-f348-qvm9-c5fh",
"modified": "2026-11-06T12:30:44Z",
"published": "2026-11-06T12:30:44Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-123331"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.jetbrains.com/privacy-security/issues-fixed"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation
- Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries.
- Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
Mitigation
Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].
Mitigation MIT-4.4
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
- For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
Mitigation
- For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page.
- One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
Mitigation
Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.
CAPEC-665: Exploitation of Thunderbolt Protection Flaws
An adversary leverages a firmware weakness within the Thunderbolt protocol, on a computing device to manipulate Thunderbolt controller firmware in order to exploit vulnerabilities in the implementation of authorization and verification schemes within Thunderbolt protection mechanisms. Upon gaining physical access to a target device, the adversary conducts high-level firmware manipulation of the victim Thunderbolt controller SPI (Serial Peripheral Interface) flash, through the use of a SPI Programing device and an external Thunderbolt device, typically as the target device is booting up. If successful, this allows the adversary to modify memory, subvert authentication mechanisms, spoof identities and content, and extract data and memory from the target device. Currently 7 major vulnerabilities exist within Thunderbolt protocol with 9 attack vectors as noted in the Execution Flow.