CWE-807
AllowedReliance on Untrusted Inputs in a Security Decision
Abstraction: Base · Status: Incomplete
The product uses a protection mechanism that relies on the existence or values of an input, but the input can be modified by an untrusted actor in a way that bypasses the protection mechanism.
222 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-PVXJ-25M6-7VQR
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-04-24 21:01 – Updated: 2024-07-08 20:41A vulnerability was discovered in Rancher 2.0.0 through the aforementioned patched versions, where a malicious Rancher user could craft an API request directed at the proxy for the Kubernetes API of a managed cluster to gain access to information they do not have access to. This is done by passing the "Impersonate-User" or "Impersonate-Group" header in the Connection header, which is then correctly removed by the proxy. At this point, instead of impersonating the user and their permissions, the request will act as if it was from the Rancher management server and incorrectly return the information. The vulnerability is limited to valid Rancher users with some level of permissions on the cluster. There is not a direct mitigation besides upgrading to the patched Rancher versions.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/rancher/rancher"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.4.16"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/rancher/rancher"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.5.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.5.9"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-31999"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-807"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2024-04-24T21:01:59Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2021-07-15T09:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A vulnerability was discovered in Rancher 2.0.0 through the aforementioned patched versions, where a malicious Rancher user could craft an API request directed at the proxy for the Kubernetes API of a managed cluster to gain access to information they do not have access to. This is done by passing the \"Impersonate-User\" or \"Impersonate-Group\" header in the Connection header, which is then correctly removed by the proxy. At this point, instead of impersonating the user and their permissions, the request will act as if it was from the Rancher management server and incorrectly return the information. The vulnerability is limited to valid Rancher users with some level of permissions on the cluster. There is not a direct mitigation besides upgrading to the patched Rancher versions. \n",
"id": "GHSA-pvxj-25m6-7vqr",
"modified": "2024-07-08T20:41:59Z",
"published": "2024-04-24T21:01:59Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-31999"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187084"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/rancher/rancher"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2024-2778"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Rancher Privilege escalation vulnerability via malicious \"Connection\" header"
}
GHSA-Q5MQ-9WC6-H8X8
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-10-11 15:31 – Updated: 2026-10-11 15:31pH7Builder (pH7 Social Dating CMS) before 19.3.0 contains a CAPTCHA bypass vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to skip form validation by supplying a client-chosen form ID to PFBC Form::isValid(). Attackers can load a CAPTCHA-free form like login or search, then submit its ID with contact, comment, forum, invite or signup data to automate abuse.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-108903"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-807"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-10-11T15:16:56Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "pH7Builder (pH7 Social Dating CMS) before 19.3.0 contains a CAPTCHA bypass vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to skip form validation by supplying a client-chosen form ID to PFBC Form::isValid(). Attackers can load a CAPTCHA-free form like login or search, then submit its ID with contact, comment, forum, invite or signup data to automate abuse.",
"id": "GHSA-q5mq-9wc6-h8x8",
"modified": "2026-10-11T15:31:11Z",
"published": "2026-10-11T15:31:11Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-108903"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/pH7Software/pH7-Social-Dating-CMS/commit/4758d7d2ebfd5772faa25ef728c14f8f452e82f4"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/pH7Software/pH7-Social-Dating-CMS"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/pH7Software/pH7-Social-Dating-CMS/blob/v19.2.0/_protected/app/system/modules/contact/forms/ContactForm.php#L33-L38"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/ph7builder-before-19.3.0-captcha-bypass-via-client-chosen-form-id"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-QMG5-V42X-QQHQ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-12-08 17:56 – Updated: 2025-12-09 19:19Summary
A CAPTCHA bypass vulnerability in the 1Panel authentication API allows an unauthenticated attacker to disable CAPTCHA verification by abusing a client-controlled parameter. Because the server previously trusted this value without proper validation, CAPTCHA protections could be bypassed, enabling automated login attempts and significantly increasing the risk of account takeover (ATO).
Details
The /api/login endpoint accepts a boolean field named ignoreCaptcha directly from the client request body:
"ignoreCaptcha": true
The backend implementation uses this value to determine whether CAPTCHA validation should be performed:
if !req.IgnoreCaptcha {
if errMsg := captcha.VerifyCode(req.CaptchaID, req.Captcha); errMsg != "" {
helper.BadAuth(c, errMsg, nil)
return
}
}
Because req.IgnoreCaptcha is taken directly from user input—with no server-side validation, no session binding, and no privilege checks—any unauthenticated attacker can force CAPTCHA validation to be skipped.
There are no additional conditions, such as:
no requirement for MFA
no trusted device
no IP reputation checks
no prior valid session
no rate limiting
This results in CAPTCHA being entirely client-controlled, which violates fundamental authentication and anti-automation security assumptions.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/1Panel-dev/1Panel"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.0.14"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/1Panel-dev/1Panel/core"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.0.0-20251128030527-ac43f00273be"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-66507"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-290",
"CWE-602",
"CWE-807"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2025-12-08T17:56:27Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2025-12-09T16:18:19Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "### Summary\n\nA CAPTCHA bypass vulnerability in the 1Panel authentication API allows an unauthenticated attacker to disable CAPTCHA verification by abusing a client-controlled parameter. Because the server previously trusted this value without proper validation, CAPTCHA protections could be bypassed, enabling automated login attempts and significantly increasing the risk of account takeover (ATO).\n\n### Details\n\nThe /api/login endpoint accepts a boolean field named ignoreCaptcha directly from the client request body:\n\n`\"ignoreCaptcha\": true`\n\n\nThe backend implementation uses this value to determine whether CAPTCHA validation should be performed:\n\n```\nif !req.IgnoreCaptcha {\n if errMsg := captcha.VerifyCode(req.CaptchaID, req.Captcha); errMsg != \"\" {\n helper.BadAuth(c, errMsg, nil)\n return\n }\n}\n\n```\n\nBecause req.IgnoreCaptcha is taken directly from user input\u2014with no server-side validation, no session binding, and no privilege checks\u2014any unauthenticated attacker can force CAPTCHA validation to be skipped.\n\nThere are no additional conditions, such as:\n\nno requirement for MFA\n\nno trusted device\n\nno IP reputation checks\n\nno prior valid session\n\nno rate limiting\n\nThis results in CAPTCHA being entirely client-controlled, which violates fundamental authentication and anti-automation security assumptions.",
"id": "GHSA-qmg5-v42x-qqhq",
"modified": "2025-12-09T19:19:10Z",
"published": "2025-12-08T17:56:27Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/1Panel-dev/1Panel/security/advisories/GHSA-qmg5-v42x-qqhq"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-66507"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/1Panel-dev/1Panel/commit/ac43f00273be745f8d04b90b6e2b9c1a40ef7bca"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/1Panel-dev/1Panel"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/1Panel-dev/1Panel/releases/tag/v2.0.14"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "1Panel \u2013 CAPTCHA Bypass via Client-Controlled Flag "
}
GHSA-QX32-GMJH-J7X6
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-11-06 21:31 – Updated: 2025-11-06 21:31oobabooga text-generation-webui trust_remote_code Reliance on Untrusted Inputs Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of oobabooga text-generation-webui. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability.
The specific flaw exists within the handling of the trust_remote_code parameter provided to the join endpoint. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of a user-supplied argument before using it to load a model. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the service account. Was ZDI-CAN-26681.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-12487"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-807"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-11-06T21:15:39Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "oobabooga text-generation-webui trust_remote_code Reliance on Untrusted Inputs Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of oobabooga text-generation-webui. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability.\n\nThe specific flaw exists within the handling of the trust_remote_code parameter provided to the join endpoint. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of a user-supplied argument before using it to load a model. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the service account. Was ZDI-CAN-26681.",
"id": "GHSA-qx32-gmjh-j7x6",
"modified": "2025-11-06T21:31:31Z",
"published": "2025-11-06T21:31:31Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-12487"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/oobabooga/text-generation-webui/commit/b5a6904c4ac4049823396090360b6f566f4e4603"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-25-982"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-R2GR-75QM-QF6M
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-14 12:31 – Updated: 2026-09-14 12:31Joomla Extension - joomshaper.com - Unauthenticated CAPTCHA Bypass in Module Context in the Contact, Opt-in and Form Builder Addons in SP Page Builder Pro 3.2.6 - 6.9.0 - In the ajax_contact, optin_form and form_builder addons, the result returned by the CAPTCHA plugin's onCheckAnswer event was discarded and replaced with a test for a non-empty string whenever the request-supplied view_type parameter equalled module. Submitting view_type=module together with any arbitrary token value therefore passed verification. This affected every instance of these addons placed inside an SP Page Builder module, irrespective of the CAPTCHA type configured for the site, and the view_type parameter was never validated against the context in which the form was actually rendered.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-79701"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-807"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-09-14T12:17:46Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Joomla Extension - joomshaper.com - Unauthenticated CAPTCHA Bypass in Module Context in the Contact, Opt-in and Form Builder Addons in SP Page Builder Pro 3.2.6 - 6.9.0 - In the ajax_contact, optin_form and form_builder addons, the result returned by the CAPTCHA plugin\u0027s onCheckAnswer event was discarded and replaced with a test for a non-empty string whenever the request-supplied view_type parameter equalled module. Submitting view_type=module together with any arbitrary token value therefore passed verification. This affected every instance of these addons placed inside an SP Page Builder module, irrespective of the CAPTCHA type configured for the site, and the view_type parameter was never validated against the context in which the form was actually rendered.",
"id": "GHSA-r2gr-75qm-qf6m",
"modified": "2026-09-14T12:31:40Z",
"published": "2026-09-14T12:31:40Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-79701"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.joomshaper.com/joomla-extensions/sp-page-builder-pro"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-RCX4-77X4-HJX5
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-21 03:31 – Updated: 2026-03-24 19:07Duplicate Advisory
This advisory has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of GHSA-7jx5-9fjg-hp4m. This link is maintained to preserve external references.
Original Description
OpenClaw versions prior to 2026.2.23 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in the ACP client that auto-approves tool calls based on untrusted toolCall.kind metadata and permissive name heuristics. Attackers can bypass interactive approval prompts for read-class operations by spoofing tool metadata or using non-core read-like names to reach auto-approve paths.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "openclaw"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"last_affected": "2026.2.22-2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-807"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-24T19:07:09Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-21T01:17:10Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "## Duplicate Advisory\n\nThis advisory has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of GHSA-7jx5-9fjg-hp4m. This link is maintained to preserve external references.\n\n## Original Description\nOpenClaw versions prior to 2026.2.23 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in the ACP client that auto-approves tool calls based on untrusted toolCall.kind metadata and permissive name heuristics. Attackers can bypass interactive approval prompts for read-class operations by spoofing tool metadata or using non-core read-like names to reach auto-approve paths.",
"id": "GHSA-rcx4-77x4-hjx5",
"modified": "2026-03-24T19:07:09Z",
"published": "2026-03-21T03:31:15Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-7jx5-9fjg-hp4m"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-32898"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/12cc754332f9a7c92e158ce7644aa22df79c0904"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/63dcd28ae0be2de1c75af09cc81841cebeec068f"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openclaw-acp-permission-auto-approval-bypass-via-untrusted-tool-metadata"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Duplicate Advisory: OpenClaw ACP client has permission auto-approval bypass via untrusted tool metadata",
"withdrawn": "2026-03-24T19:07:09Z"
}
GHSA-RJMQ-HVPJ-4QRC
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-08 03:31 – Updated: 2026-09-08 03:31SAP GUI for Java does not correctly enforce the trust level policy for certain functions invoked from a connected backend system. A low-privileged attacker could exploit this weakness by manipulating a connected backend system to trigger affected functionality. This could allow arbitrary command execution on the victim's machine, leading to a high impact on the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the affected system.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-66768"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-807"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-09-08T01:17:52Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "SAP GUI for Java does not correctly enforce the trust level policy for certain functions invoked from a connected backend system. A low-privileged attacker could exploit this weakness by manipulating a connected backend system to trigger affected functionality. This could allow arbitrary command execution on the victim\u0027s machine, leading to a high impact on the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the affected system.",
"id": "GHSA-rjmq-hvpj-4qrc",
"modified": "2026-09-08T03:31:12Z",
"published": "2026-09-08T03:31:12Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-66768"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://me.sap.com/notes/3781729"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://url.sap/sapsecuritypatchday"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-RRH4-6QQP-9MPV
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-11-06 21:31 – Updated: 2025-11-06 21:31oobabooga text-generation-webui trust_remote_code Reliance on Untrusted Inputs Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of oobabooga text-generation-webui. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability.
The specific flaw exists within the handling of the trust_remote_code parameter provided to the load endpoint. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of a user-supplied argument before using it to load a model. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the service account. . Was ZDI-CAN-26680.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-12488"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-807"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-11-06T21:15:39Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "oobabooga text-generation-webui trust_remote_code Reliance on Untrusted Inputs Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of oobabooga text-generation-webui. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability.\n\nThe specific flaw exists within the handling of the trust_remote_code parameter provided to the load endpoint. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of a user-supplied argument before using it to load a model. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the service account.\n. Was ZDI-CAN-26680.",
"id": "GHSA-rrh4-6qqp-9mpv",
"modified": "2025-11-06T21:31:31Z",
"published": "2025-11-06T21:31:31Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-12488"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/oobabooga/text-generation-webui/commit/b5a6904c4ac4049823396090360b6f566f4e4603"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-25-981"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-RXQH-7QX7-59M3
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-11-05 12:31 – Updated: 2024-11-07 12:30In 2N Access Commander versions 3.1.1.2 and prior, an Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity vulnerability could allow an attacker to escalate their privileges and gain root access to the system.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-47254"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-345",
"CWE-807"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-11-05T10:20:04Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In 2N Access Commander versions 3.1.1.2 and prior, an Insufficient \nVerification of Data Authenticity vulnerability could allow an attacker \nto escalate their privileges and gain root access to the system.",
"id": "GHSA-rxqh-7qx7-59m3",
"modified": "2024-11-07T12:30:34Z",
"published": "2024-11-05T12:31:03Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47254"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.2n.com/en-GB/about-2n/cybersecurity"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.2n.com/en-GB/download/Access-Commander-Security-Advisory-2024-11"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-V226-32C7-X2V7
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-02-10 00:29 – Updated: 2026-02-10 02:57Impact
It is possible to make a specially crafted request with a valid API token that leads to privilege escalation.
Affected Versions:
≥= 0.27.19
Mitigation:
Upgrade to a patched version:
- 1.5.13 and later (regular release)
- 1.4.2 (active LTS release)
- 1.0.14 (end-of-life LTS release)
References
The issue was reported by our Core engineer, Dmitrii Patsura (@ovr), in our internal Slack and was promptly patched in a recent update.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "@cubejs-backend/server-core"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0.27.19"
},
{
"fixed": "1.0.14"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "@cubejs-backend/server-core"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "1.1.0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.4.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "@cubejs-backend/server-core"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "1.5.0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.5.13"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-25958"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-807"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-02-10T00:29:07Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-02-09T23:16:06Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "### **Impact**\n\nIt is possible to make a specially crafted request with a valid API token that leads to privilege escalation.\n\n### Affected Versions:\n\n`\u2265= 0.27.19` \n\n### Mitigation:\n\nUpgrade to a patched version:\n\n- 1.5.13 and later (regular release)\n- 1.4.2 (active\u00a0[LTS release](https://cube.dev/docs/product/administration/distribution#long-term-support))\n- 1.0.14 (end-of-life LTS release)\n\n### **References**\n\nThe issue was reported by our Core engineer, Dmitrii Patsura (@ovr), in our internal Slack and was promptly patched in a recent update.",
"id": "GHSA-v226-32c7-x2v7",
"modified": "2026-02-10T02:57:34Z",
"published": "2026-02-10T00:29:07Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/cube-js/cube/security/advisories/GHSA-v226-32c7-x2v7"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-25958"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/cube-js/cube"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Cube Core is vulnerable to privilege escalation via a specially crafted request"
}
Mitigation MIT-14
Strategy: Attack Surface Reduction
- Store state information and sensitive data on the server side only.
- Ensure that the system definitively and unambiguously keeps track of its own state and user state and has rules defined for legitimate state transitions. Do not allow any application user to affect state directly in any way other than through legitimate actions leading to state transitions.
- If information must be stored on the client, do not do so without encryption and integrity checking, or otherwise having a mechanism on the server side to catch tampering. Use a message authentication code (MAC) algorithm, such as Hash Message Authentication Code (HMAC) [REF-529]. Apply this against the state or sensitive data that has to be exposed, which can guarantee the integrity of the data - i.e., that the data has not been modified. Ensure that a strong hash function is used (CWE-328).
Mitigation MIT-4.2
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
- With a stateless protocol such as HTTP, use a framework that maintains the state for you.
- Examples include ASP.NET View State [REF-756] and the OWASP ESAPI Session Management feature [REF-45].
- Be careful of language features that provide state support, since these might be provided as a convenience to the programmer and may not be considering security.
Mitigation MIT-15
For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Mitigation MIT-16
Strategy: Environment Hardening
When using PHP, configure the application so that it does not use register_globals. During implementation, develop the application so that it does not rely on this feature, but be wary of implementing a register_globals emulation that is subject to weaknesses such as CWE-95, CWE-621, and similar issues.
Mitigation MIT-6
Strategy: Attack Surface Reduction
- Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter your software: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Remember that such inputs may be obtained indirectly through API calls.
- Identify all inputs that are used for security decisions and determine if you can modify the design so that you do not have to rely on submitted inputs at all. For example, you may be able to keep critical information about the user's session on the server side instead of recording it within external data.
No CAPEC attack patterns related to this CWE.