CWE-73
AllowedExternal Control of File Name or Path
Abstraction: Base · Status: Draft
The product allows user input to control or influence paths or file names that are used in filesystem operations.
1084 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-Q7C4-GHWQ-63XH
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-14 00:32 – Updated: 2026-08-14 00:32luci-app-lxc contains an ACL inconsistency vulnerability that allows low-privileged authenticated LuCI users to access backend container management routes without proper authorization checks. Attackers can exploit path traversal via /.%2E in the lxc_name parameter to escape container directories and control host-side scripts executed through lxc.hook.start-host, achieving root code execution on the OpenWrt host.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-72842"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-73"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-08-13T22:17:23Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "luci-app-lxc contains an ACL inconsistency vulnerability that allows low-privileged authenticated LuCI users to access backend container management routes without proper authorization checks. Attackers can exploit path traversal via `/.%2E` in the `lxc_name` parameter to escape container directories and control host-side scripts executed through `lxc.hook.start-host`, achieving root code execution on the OpenWrt host.",
"id": "GHSA-q7c4-ghwq-63xh",
"modified": "2026-08-14T00:32:02Z",
"published": "2026-08-14T00:32:02Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openwrt/luci/security/advisories/GHSA-jf59-v86x-fwf2"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-72842"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openwrt-luci-app-lxc-acl-inconsistency-authentication-bypass"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-Q939-RPR3-3284
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-12 15:19 – Updated: 2026-08-18 18:05Summary
ScpClient.Download(string directoryName, DirectoryInfo directoryInfo) writes files and directories using names returned by the remote SCP server during recursive downloads, with no validation that the resulting path stays inside the requested local directory. A malicious, compromised, or man-in-the-middle SCP server can return names containing ../ sequences (or absolute paths), causing the client to create directories and write/overwrite files anywhere the client process has access. This is similar to OpenSSH CVE-2019-6111, but with directory traversal capability.
Impact
A malicious/compromised/MITM SCP server can create or write files outside the intended download directory, anywhere the client process can write. Overwriting files such as ~/.ssh/authorized_keys, shell rc files, cron entries, or application binaries/config can lead to persistence, privilege escalation, or remote code execution on the client host. Requires the victim to perform a directory download from the attacker-controlled server.
Remediation
The fixed release ensures that remotely-supplied file and directory names are valid local names such that the constructed local path is contained within the given local directory, and throws ScpException when an invalid name is detected.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 2025.1.0"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "NuGet",
"name": "SSH.NET"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2026.0.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-48798"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-22",
"CWE-73"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-08-12T15:19:10Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-08-18T15:16:54Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "## Summary\n\n`ScpClient.Download(string directoryName, DirectoryInfo directoryInfo)` writes files and directories using names returned by the remote SCP server during recursive downloads, with no validation that the resulting path stays inside the requested local directory. A malicious, compromised, or man-in-the-middle SCP server can return names containing `../` sequences (or absolute paths), causing the client to create directories and write/overwrite files anywhere the client process has access. This is similar to OpenSSH [CVE-2019-6111](https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-jr78-hfw4-xp7g), but with directory traversal capability.\n\n## Impact\n\nA malicious/compromised/MITM SCP server can create or write files outside the intended download directory, anywhere the client process can write. Overwriting files such as ~/.ssh/authorized_keys, shell rc files, cron entries, or application binaries/config can lead to persistence, privilege escalation, or remote code execution on the client host. Requires the victim to perform a directory download from the attacker-controlled server.\n\n## Remediation\n\nThe fixed release ensures that remotely-supplied file and directory names are valid local names such that the constructed local path is contained within the given local directory, and throws `ScpException` when an invalid name is detected.\n\n[600be0de543765995a189b5d7cd4efac5007f3ce](https://github.com/sshnet/SSH.NET/commit/600be0de543765995a189b5d7cd4efac5007f3ce)",
"id": "GHSA-q939-rpr3-3284",
"modified": "2026-08-18T18:05:07Z",
"published": "2026-08-12T15:19:10Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/sshnet/SSH.NET/security/advisories/GHSA-q939-rpr3-3284"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-48798"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/sshnet/SSH.NET/commit/600be0de543765995a189b5d7cd4efac5007f3ce"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/sshnet/SSH.NET"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/sshnet/SSH.NET/releases/tag/2026.0.0"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "SSH.NET: ScpClient Recursive Download Allows Arbitrary File Write via Server-Controlled SCP Filenames"
}
GHSA-QC5J-2MQX-X83Q
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-20 18:31 – Updated: 2026-05-05 18:12Duplicate Advisory
This advisory has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of GHSA-mr34-9552-qr95. This link is maintained to preserve external references.
Original Description
OpenClaw versions 2026.4.7 before 2026.4.15 fail to enforce local-root containment on tool-result media paths, allowing arbitrary local and UNC file access. Attackers can craft malicious tool-result media references to trigger host-side file reads or Windows network path access, potentially disclosing sensitive files or exposing credentials.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "openclaw"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2026.4.7"
},
{
"fixed": "2026.4.15"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-73"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-05T18:12:14Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-04-20T18:16:27Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Duplicate Advisory\nThis advisory has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of GHSA-mr34-9552-qr95. This link is maintained to preserve external references.\n\n### Original Description\nOpenClaw versions 2026.4.7 before 2026.4.15 fail to enforce local-root containment on tool-result media paths, allowing arbitrary local and UNC file access. Attackers can craft malicious tool-result media references to trigger host-side file reads or Windows network path access, potentially disclosing sensitive files or exposing credentials.",
"id": "GHSA-qc5j-2mqx-x83q",
"modified": "2026-05-05T18:12:14Z",
"published": "2026-04-20T18:31:50Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-mr34-9552-qr95"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-41389"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/1470de5d3e0970856d86cd99336bb8ada3fe87da"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/52ef42302ead9e183e6c8810e0a04ee4ef8ae9fc"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/6e58f1f9f54bca1fea1268ec0ee4c01a2af03dde"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openclaw-arbitrary-file-read-via-unvalidated-tool-result-media-paths"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Duplicate Advisory: OpenClaw: Webchat media embedding enforces local-root containment for tool-result files",
"withdrawn": "2026-05-05T18:12:14Z"
}
GHSA-QG5X-JC32-6G34
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-09 15:30 – Updated: 2026-08-09 15:30A vulnerability has been found in DedeCMS up to 5.7.118 UTF8SP2. The affected element is the function _4_Setup of the file install/index.php of the component Installation Wizard. Such manipulation leads to file inclusion. The attack can be executed remotely. This attack is characterized by high complexity. The exploitability is described as difficult. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-19353"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-73"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-08-09T13:16:51Z",
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "A vulnerability has been found in DedeCMS up to 5.7.118 UTF8SP2. The affected element is the function _4_Setup of the file install/index.php of the component Installation Wizard. Such manipulation leads to file inclusion. The attack can be executed remotely. This attack is characterized by high complexity. The exploitability is described as difficult. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.",
"id": "GHSA-qg5x-jc32-6g34",
"modified": "2026-08-09T15:30:28Z",
"published": "2026-08-09T15:30:28Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-19353"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/I4m6da/CVE/issues/9"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-19353"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/submit/865977"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/387207"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/387207/cti"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-QGJP-5G5X-VHQ2
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-12-08 18:30 – Updated: 2025-12-17 01:11A lack of file name validation or verification in the Attachment service of usememos memos v0.25.2 allows attackers to execute a path traversal.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/usememos/memos"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.25.3"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-65799"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-73"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2025-12-09T14:25:42Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2025-12-08T17:16:21Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A lack of file name validation or verification in the Attachment service of usememos memos v0.25.2 allows attackers to execute a path traversal.",
"id": "GHSA-qgjp-5g5x-vhq2",
"modified": "2025-12-17T01:11:13Z",
"published": "2025-12-08T18:30:44Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-65799"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/usememos/memos/pull/5218"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/usememos/memos/commit/5f57f48673e2054f404b2c5b497a8eaa3690591d"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-qgjp-5g5x-vhq2"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/usememos/memos"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://herolab.usd.de/security-advisories/usd-2025-0056"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://memos.com"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://usememos.com"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "memos lacks file name validation or verification"
}
GHSA-QMWH-9M9C-H36M
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-07 18:16 – Updated: 2026-04-07 18:16Summary
The fix for ExifTool arbitrary file write (commit 043b158, released in v8.29.0) uses a case-sensitive blocklist to filter dangerous pseudo-tags. ExifTool processes tag names case-insensitively, so alternate casings bypass the filter. The blocklist also omits the HardLink and SymLink pseudo-tags entirely.
Confirmed end-to-end against Gotenberg v8.29.1 via the unauthenticated HTTP API.
Root Cause
pkg/modules/exiftool/exiftool.go lines 231-237:
dangerousTags := []string{
"FileName", // Writing this triggers a file rename in ExifTool
"Directory", // Writing this triggers a file move in ExifTool
}
for _, tag := range dangerousTags {
delete(metadata, tag)
}
Go's delete(metadata, tag) is case-sensitive. It only removes the exact keys "FileName" and "Directory". ExifTool processes tag names case-insensitively (per ExifTool documentation). Alternate casings like filename, FILENAME, directory all bypass the Go blocklist but ExifTool treats them identically.
The go-exiftool library passes tag names directly to ExifTool's stdin at line 258:
fmt.Fprintln(e.stdin, "-"+k+"="+str)
So filename becomes -filename=/attacker/path which ExifTool interprets as -FileName=/attacker/path.
The blocklist also omits two dangerous ExifTool pseudo-tags:
- HardLink: creates a hard link to the file at the specified path
- SymLink: creates a symbolic link to the file at the specified path
PoC
All three vectors confirmed against a running Gotenberg v8.29.1 Docker container.
Case-insensitive filename bypass (file moved to /tmp/evil_bypass.pdf):
curl -X POST http://localhost:3000/forms/pdfengines/metadata/write \
-F files=@sample.pdf \
-F 'metadata={"filename": "/tmp/evil_bypass.pdf"}'
HardLink (hard link created at /tmp/hardlink_bypass.pdf):
curl -X POST http://localhost:3000/forms/pdfengines/metadata/write \
-F files=@sample.pdf \
-F 'metadata={"HardLink": "/tmp/hardlink_bypass.pdf"}'
SymLink (symbolic link created at /tmp/symlink_bypass.pdf):
curl -X POST http://localhost:3000/forms/pdfengines/metadata/write \
-F files=@sample.pdf \
-F 'metadata={"SymLink": "/tmp/symlink_bypass.pdf"}'
Verification inside the container:
$ docker exec gotenberg-poc ls -la /tmp/evil_bypass.pdf /tmp/hardlink_bypass.pdf /tmp/symlink_bypass.pdf
-rw-r--r-- 1 gotenberg gotenberg 321 ... /tmp/evil_bypass.pdf
-rw-r--r-- 1 gotenberg gotenberg 321 ... /tmp/hardlink_bypass.pdf
lrwxrwxrwx 1 gotenberg gotenberg 119 ... /tmp/symlink_bypass.pdf -> /tmp/.../source.pdf
Also confirmed ExifTool case-insensitivity directly:
exiftool -filename=bypassed.pdf test.pdf # Works identically to -FileName=
Impact
An attacker with access to the Gotenberg API (unauthenticated by default) can:
- Rename/move uploaded PDFs to arbitrary filesystem paths via lowercase
filename/directory - Create hard links at arbitrary paths via
HardLink, persisting data beyond temp directory cleanup - Create symbolic links at arbitrary paths via
SymLink
In containerized deployments, impact is limited to the container filesystem (DoS by overwriting temp files). In bare-metal deployments or those with shared volumes, this can affect other services.
Suggested Fix
Use case-insensitive comparison and expand the blocklist:
dangerousTags := []string{
"FileName",
"Directory",
"HardLink",
"SymLink",
}
for key := range metadata {
for _, tag := range dangerousTags {
if strings.EqualFold(key, tag) {
delete(metadata, key)
}
}
}
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 8.29.1"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/gotenberg/gotenberg/v8"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "8.30.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-178",
"CWE-73"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-04-07T18:16:22Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "## Summary\n\nThe fix for ExifTool arbitrary file write (commit `043b158`, released in v8.29.0) uses a case-sensitive blocklist to filter dangerous pseudo-tags. ExifTool processes tag names case-insensitively, so alternate casings bypass the filter. The blocklist also omits the `HardLink` and `SymLink` pseudo-tags entirely.\n\nConfirmed end-to-end against Gotenberg v8.29.1 via the unauthenticated HTTP API.\n\n## Root Cause\n\n`pkg/modules/exiftool/exiftool.go` lines 231-237:\n\n dangerousTags := []string{\n \"FileName\", // Writing this triggers a file rename in ExifTool\n \"Directory\", // Writing this triggers a file move in ExifTool\n }\n for _, tag := range dangerousTags {\n delete(metadata, tag)\n }\n\nGo\u0027s `delete(metadata, tag)` is case-sensitive. It only removes the exact keys `\"FileName\"` and `\"Directory\"`. ExifTool processes tag names case-insensitively (per ExifTool documentation). Alternate casings like `filename`, `FILENAME`, `directory` all bypass the Go blocklist but ExifTool treats them identically.\n\nThe go-exiftool library passes tag names directly to ExifTool\u0027s stdin at line 258:\n\n fmt.Fprintln(e.stdin, \"-\"+k+\"=\"+str)\n\nSo `filename` becomes `-filename=/attacker/path` which ExifTool interprets as `-FileName=/attacker/path`.\n\nThe blocklist also omits two dangerous ExifTool pseudo-tags:\n- `HardLink`: creates a hard link to the file at the specified path\n- `SymLink`: creates a symbolic link to the file at the specified path\n\n## PoC\n\nAll three vectors confirmed against a running Gotenberg v8.29.1 Docker container.\n\n**Case-insensitive filename bypass (file moved to /tmp/evil_bypass.pdf):**\n\n curl -X POST http://localhost:3000/forms/pdfengines/metadata/write \\\n -F files=@sample.pdf \\\n -F \u0027metadata={\"filename\": \"/tmp/evil_bypass.pdf\"}\u0027\n\n**HardLink (hard link created at /tmp/hardlink_bypass.pdf):**\n\n curl -X POST http://localhost:3000/forms/pdfengines/metadata/write \\\n -F files=@sample.pdf \\\n -F \u0027metadata={\"HardLink\": \"/tmp/hardlink_bypass.pdf\"}\u0027\n\n**SymLink (symbolic link created at /tmp/symlink_bypass.pdf):**\n\n curl -X POST http://localhost:3000/forms/pdfengines/metadata/write \\\n -F files=@sample.pdf \\\n -F \u0027metadata={\"SymLink\": \"/tmp/symlink_bypass.pdf\"}\u0027\n\nVerification inside the container:\n\n $ docker exec gotenberg-poc ls -la /tmp/evil_bypass.pdf /tmp/hardlink_bypass.pdf /tmp/symlink_bypass.pdf\n -rw-r--r-- 1 gotenberg gotenberg 321 ... /tmp/evil_bypass.pdf\n -rw-r--r-- 1 gotenberg gotenberg 321 ... /tmp/hardlink_bypass.pdf\n lrwxrwxrwx 1 gotenberg gotenberg 119 ... /tmp/symlink_bypass.pdf -\u003e /tmp/.../source.pdf\n\nAlso confirmed ExifTool case-insensitivity directly:\n\n exiftool -filename=bypassed.pdf test.pdf # Works identically to -FileName=\n\n## Impact\n\nAn attacker with access to the Gotenberg API (unauthenticated by default) can:\n\n1. Rename/move uploaded PDFs to arbitrary filesystem paths via lowercase `filename`/`directory`\n2. Create hard links at arbitrary paths via `HardLink`, persisting data beyond temp directory cleanup\n3. Create symbolic links at arbitrary paths via `SymLink`\n\nIn containerized deployments, impact is limited to the container filesystem (DoS by overwriting temp files). In bare-metal deployments or those with shared volumes, this can affect other services.\n\n## Suggested Fix\n\nUse case-insensitive comparison and expand the blocklist:\n\n dangerousTags := []string{\n \"FileName\",\n \"Directory\",\n \"HardLink\",\n \"SymLink\",\n }\n for key := range metadata {\n for _, tag := range dangerousTags {\n if strings.EqualFold(key, tag) {\n delete(metadata, key)\n }\n }\n }",
"id": "GHSA-qmwh-9m9c-h36m",
"modified": "2026-04-07T18:16:22Z",
"published": "2026-04-07T18:16:22Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/gotenberg/gotenberg/security/advisories/GHSA-qmwh-9m9c-h36m"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/gotenberg/gotenberg/commit/15050a311b73d76d8b9223bafe7fa7ba71240011"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/gotenberg/gotenberg"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Gotenberg has incomplete fix for ExifTool arbitrary file write: case-insensitive bypass and missing HardLink/SymLink tags"
}
GHSA-QP76-PQ9F-GR9M
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-22 15:31 – Updated: 2026-08-22 15:31NLTK versions before 3.10.0 contain a path traversal vulnerability in FramenetCorpusReader and NKJPCorpusReader that allows attackers to parse XML files outside the corpus root by supplying unsafe selectors or poisoned index state. Attackers can exploit frame_by_name, doc, lu, and header methods with crafted parameters to read arbitrary XML files accessible to the application.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-62385"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-73"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-08-22T15:16:18Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "NLTK versions before 3.10.0 contain a path traversal vulnerability in FramenetCorpusReader and NKJPCorpusReader that allows attackers to parse XML files outside the corpus root by supplying unsafe selectors or poisoned index state. Attackers can exploit frame_by_name, doc, lu, and header methods with crafted parameters to read arbitrary XML files accessible to the application.",
"id": "GHSA-qp76-pq9f-gr9m",
"modified": "2026-08-22T15:31:03Z",
"published": "2026-08-22T15:31:03Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/nltk/nltk/security/advisories/GHSA-568f-pv23-39p4"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-62385"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/nltk-path-traversal-via-framenet-and-nkjp-readers"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-QPW8-G895-7HC7
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-10-04 18:31 – Updated: 2024-10-04 18:31There is a local file inclusion vulnerability in Esri Portal for ArcGIS 11.2. 11.1, 11.0 and 10.9.1 that may allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to craft a URL that could potentially disclose sensitive configuration information by reading internal files.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-38040"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-73"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-10-04T18:15:07Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "There is a local file inclusion vulnerability in Esri Portal for ArcGIS 11.2. 11.1, 11.0 and 10.9.1 that may allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to craft a URL that could potentially disclose sensitive configuration information by reading internal files.",
"id": "GHSA-qpw8-g895-7hc7",
"modified": "2024-10-04T18:31:11Z",
"published": "2024-10-04T18:31:11Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38040"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.esri.com/arcgis-blog/products/trust-arcgis/administration/portal-for-arcgis-security-2024-update-2-released"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-QQQ7-4HXC-X63C
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-09 17:32 – Updated: 2026-05-06 20:04Impact
Shared reply MEDIA: paths are treated as trusted and can trigger cross-channel local file exfiltration.
A crafted shared reply MEDIA reference could cause another channel to read a local file path as trusted generated media.
OpenClaw is a user-controlled local assistant. This advisory is scoped to the OpenClaw trust model and does not assume a multi-tenant service boundary.
Affected Packages / Versions
- Package:
openclaw(npm) - Affected versions:
<=2026.4.4 - Patched versions:
2026.4.8
Fix
The issue was fixed on main and is available in the patched npm version listed above. The verified fixed tree is commit d7c3210cd6f5fdfdc1beff4c9541673e814354d5.
Verification
The fix was re-checked against main before publication, including targeted regression tests for the affected security boundary.
Credits
Thanks @threalwinky for reporting.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "openclaw"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2026.4.8"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-42424"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-668",
"CWE-73"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-04-09T17:32:58Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-04-28T19:37:46Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "## Impact\n\nShared reply MEDIA: paths are treated as trusted and can trigger cross-channel local file exfiltration.\n\nA crafted shared reply MEDIA reference could cause another channel to read a local file path as trusted generated media.\n\nOpenClaw is a user-controlled local assistant. This advisory is scoped to the OpenClaw trust model and does not assume a multi-tenant service boundary.\n\n## Affected Packages / Versions\n\n- Package: `openclaw` (npm)\n- Affected versions: `\u003c=2026.4.4`\n- Patched versions: `2026.4.8`\n\n## Fix\n\nThe issue was fixed on `main` and is available in the patched npm version listed above. The verified fixed tree is commit `d7c3210cd6f5fdfdc1beff4c9541673e814354d5`.\n\n## Verification\n\nThe fix was re-checked against `main` before publication, including targeted regression tests for the affected security boundary.\n\n## Credits\n\nThanks @threalwinky for reporting.",
"id": "GHSA-qqq7-4hxc-x63c",
"modified": "2026-05-06T20:04:11Z",
"published": "2026-04-09T17:32:58Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-qqq7-4hxc-x63c"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42424"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/d7c3210cd6f5fdfdc1beff4c9541673e814354d5"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openclaw-local-file-exfiltration-via-shared-reply-media-paths"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "OpenClaw: Shared reply MEDIA - paths are treated as trusted and can trigger cross-channel local file exfiltration"
}
GHSA-QR34-QW34-4824
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-03-15 00:00 – Updated: 2022-03-22 00:00The Login with phone number WordPress plugin before 1.3.7 includes a file delete.php with no form of authentication or authorization checks placed in the plugin directory, allowing unauthenticated user to remotely delete the plugin files leading to a potential Denial of Service situation.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-0593"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-73"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-03-14T15:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The Login with phone number WordPress plugin before 1.3.7 includes a file delete.php with no form of authentication or authorization checks placed in the plugin directory, allowing unauthenticated user to remotely delete the plugin files leading to a potential Denial of Service situation.",
"id": "GHSA-qr34-qw34-4824",
"modified": "2022-03-22T00:00:52Z",
"published": "2022-03-15T00:00:56Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-0593"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wordpress.org/plugins/login-with-phone-number"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/76a50157-04b5-43e8-afbc-a6ddf6d1cba3"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation
When the set of filenames is limited or known, create a mapping from a set of fixed input values (such as numeric IDs) to the actual filenames, and reject all other inputs. For example, ID 1 could map to "inbox.txt" and ID 2 could map to "profile.txt". Features such as the ESAPI AccessReferenceMap provide this capability.
Mitigation
- Run your code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict all access to files within a particular directory.
- Examples include the Unix chroot jail and AppArmor. In general, managed code may provide some protection.
- This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating system; the rest of your application may still be subject to compromise.
- Be careful to avoid CWE-243 and other weaknesses related to jails.
Mitigation
For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Mitigation MIT-5.1
Strategy: Input Validation
- Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
- When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
- Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
- When validating filenames, use stringent allowlists that limit the character set to be used. If feasible, only allow a single "." character in the filename to avoid weaknesses such as CWE-23, and exclude directory separators such as "/" to avoid CWE-36. Use a list of allowable file extensions, which will help to avoid CWE-434.
- Do not rely exclusively on a filtering mechanism that removes potentially dangerous characters. This is equivalent to a denylist, which may be incomplete (CWE-184). For example, filtering "/" is insufficient protection if the filesystem also supports the use of "\" as a directory separator. Another possible error could occur when the filtering is applied in a way that still produces dangerous data (CWE-182). For example, if "../" sequences are removed from the ".../...//" string in a sequential fashion, two instances of "../" would be removed from the original string, but the remaining characters would still form the "../" string.
Mitigation
Use a built-in path canonicalization function (such as realpath() in C) that produces the canonical version of the pathname, which effectively removes ".." sequences and symbolic links (CWE-23, CWE-59).
Mitigation
Use OS-level permissions and run as a low-privileged user to limit the scope of any successful attack.
Mitigation
If you are using PHP, configure your application so that it does not use register_globals. During implementation, develop your application so that it does not rely on this feature, but be wary of implementing a register_globals emulation that is subject to weaknesses such as CWE-95, CWE-621, and similar issues.
Mitigation
Use tools and techniques that require manual (human) analysis, such as penetration testing, threat modeling, and interactive tools that allow the tester to record and modify an active session. These may be more effective than strictly automated techniques. This is especially the case with weaknesses that are related to design and business rules.
CAPEC-13: Subverting Environment Variable Values
The adversary directly or indirectly modifies environment variables used by or controlling the target software. The adversary's goal is to cause the target software to deviate from its expected operation in a manner that benefits the adversary.
CAPEC-267: Leverage Alternate Encoding
An adversary leverages the possibility to encode potentially harmful input or content used by applications such that the applications are ineffective at validating this encoding standard.
CAPEC-64: Using Slashes and URL Encoding Combined to Bypass Validation Logic
This attack targets the encoding of the URL combined with the encoding of the slash characters. An attacker can take advantage of the multiple ways of encoding a URL and abuse the interpretation of the URL. A URL may contain special character that need special syntax handling in order to be interpreted. Special characters are represented using a percentage character followed by two digits representing the octet code of the original character (%HEX-CODE). For instance US-ASCII space character would be represented with %20. This is often referred as escaped ending or percent-encoding. Since the server decodes the URL from the requests, it may restrict the access to some URL paths by validating and filtering out the URL requests it received. An attacker will try to craft an URL with a sequence of special characters which once interpreted by the server will be equivalent to a forbidden URL. It can be difficult to protect against this attack since the URL can contain other format of encoding such as UTF-8 encoding, Unicode-encoding, etc.
CAPEC-72: URL Encoding
This attack targets the encoding of the URL. An adversary can take advantage of the multiple way of encoding an URL and abuse the interpretation of the URL.
CAPEC-76: Manipulating Web Input to File System Calls
An attacker manipulates inputs to the target software which the target software passes to file system calls in the OS. The goal is to gain access to, and perhaps modify, areas of the file system that the target software did not intend to be accessible.
CAPEC-78: Using Escaped Slashes in Alternate Encoding
This attack targets the use of the backslash in alternate encoding. An adversary can provide a backslash as a leading character and causes a parser to believe that the next character is special. This is called an escape. By using that trick, the adversary tries to exploit alternate ways to encode the same character which leads to filter problems and opens avenues to attack.
CAPEC-79: Using Slashes in Alternate Encoding
This attack targets the encoding of the Slash characters. An adversary would try to exploit common filtering problems related to the use of the slashes characters to gain access to resources on the target host. Directory-driven systems, such as file systems and databases, typically use the slash character to indicate traversal between directories or other container components. For murky historical reasons, PCs (and, as a result, Microsoft OSs) choose to use a backslash, whereas the UNIX world typically makes use of the forward slash. The schizophrenic result is that many MS-based systems are required to understand both forms of the slash. This gives the adversary many opportunities to discover and abuse a number of common filtering problems. The goal of this pattern is to discover server software that only applies filters to one version, but not the other.
CAPEC-80: Using UTF-8 Encoding to Bypass Validation Logic
This attack is a specific variation on leveraging alternate encodings to bypass validation logic. This attack leverages the possibility to encode potentially harmful input in UTF-8 and submit it to applications not expecting or effective at validating this encoding standard making input filtering difficult. UTF-8 (8-bit UCS/Unicode Transformation Format) is a variable-length character encoding for Unicode. Legal UTF-8 characters are one to four bytes long. However, early version of the UTF-8 specification got some entries wrong (in some cases it permitted overlong characters). UTF-8 encoders are supposed to use the "shortest possible" encoding, but naive decoders may accept encodings that are longer than necessary. According to the RFC 3629, a particularly subtle form of this attack can be carried out against a parser which performs security-critical validity checks against the UTF-8 encoded form of its input, but interprets certain illegal octet sequences as characters.