Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-693

Discouraged

Protection Mechanism Failure

Abstraction: Pillar · Status: Draft

The product does not use or incorrectly uses a protection mechanism that provides sufficient defense against directed attacks against the product.

1140 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.

GHSA-9J9W-Q224-VC26

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-16 15:33 – Updated: 2026-06-16 21:31
VLAI
Details

Mitigation bypass in the DOM: Security component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 152 and Firefox ESR 140.12.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-12315"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-693"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-06-16T13:16:32Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "Mitigation bypass in the DOM: Security component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 152 and Firefox ESR 140.12.",
  "id": "GHSA-9j9w-q224-vc26",
  "modified": "2026-06-16T21:31:55Z",
  "published": "2026-06-16T15:33:49Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-12315"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2042058"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2026-57"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2026-58"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2026-60"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2026-61"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-9M4G-F42Q-VRRH

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 04:32 – Updated: 2024-10-11 20:47
VLAI
Summary
Plone Sandbox Bypass
Details

The sandbox whitelisting function (allowmodule.py) in Plone before 4.2.3 and 4.3 before beta 1 allows remote authenticated users with certain privileges to bypass the Python sandbox restriction and execute arbitrary Python code via vectors related to importing.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "Plone"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "4.2.3"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "Plone"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "4.3a0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "4.3b1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2012-5487"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-693"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2023-08-29T21:35:59Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2014-09-30T14:55:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The sandbox whitelisting function (`allowmodule.py`) in Plone before 4.2.3 and 4.3 before beta 1 allows remote authenticated users with certain privileges to bypass the Python sandbox restriction and execute arbitrary Python code via vectors related to importing.",
  "id": "GHSA-9m4g-f42q-vrrh",
  "modified": "2024-10-11T20:47:03Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T04:32:24Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-5487"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/plone/Plone"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/plone/Products.CMFPlone/blob/4.2.3/docs/CHANGES.txt"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/plone/PYSEC-2014-29.yaml"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plone.org/products/plone-hotfix/releases/20121106"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plone.org/products/plone/security/advisories/20121106/03"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/11/10/1"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Plone Sandbox Bypass"
}

GHSA-9MRH-PW7C-9MQM

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-11 19:55 – Updated: 2026-08-11 19:55
VLAI
Summary
Microsoft Security Advisory CVE-2026-62902 – .NET Information Disclosure Vulnerability
Details

Executive summary

Microsoft is releasing this security advisory to provide information about a vulnerability in Windows Presentation Foundation. This advisory also provides guidance on what developers can do to update their applications to remove this vulnerability.

A specially crafted document parsed in .NET can trigger the inclusion of functionality from an untrusted control sphere, allowing an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Announcement

Announcement for this issue can be found at https://github.com/dotnet/announcements/issues/433

CVSS Details

  • Version: 3.1
  • Severity: Medium
  • Score: 6.5
  • Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N/E:U/RL:O/RC:C
  • Weakness: CWE-829: Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere; CWE-693: Protection Mechanism Failure; CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

Affected Platforms

  • Platforms: Windows
  • Architectures: All

Affected Packages

The vulnerability affects any Microsoft .NET project if it uses any of affected package versions listed below

.NET 10

Package name Affected version Patched version
Microsoft.WindowsDesktop.App.Runtime.win-arm64 >= 10.0.0, <= 10.0.10 10.0.11
Microsoft.WindowsDesktop.App.Runtime.win-x64 >= 10.0.0, <= 10.0.10 10.0.11
Microsoft.WindowsDesktop.App.Runtime.win-x86 >= 10.0.0, <= 10.0.10 10.0.11

.NET 9

Package name Affected version Patched version
Microsoft.WindowsDesktop.App.Runtime.win-arm64 >= 9.0.0, <= 9.0.18 9.0.19
Microsoft.WindowsDesktop.App.Runtime.win-x64 >= 9.0.0, <= 9.0.18 9.0.19
Microsoft.WindowsDesktop.App.Runtime.win-x86 >= 9.0.0, <= 9.0.18 9.0.19

.NET 8

Package name Affected version Patched version
Microsoft.WindowsDesktop.App.Runtime.win-arm64 >= 8.0.0, <= 8.0.29 8.0.30
Microsoft.WindowsDesktop.App.Runtime.win-x64 >= 8.0.0, <= 8.0.29 8.0.30
Microsoft.WindowsDesktop.App.Runtime.win-x86 >= 8.0.0, <= 8.0.29 8.0.30

Advisory FAQ

How do I know if I am affected?

If using a package listed in affected packages, an application is exposed to the vulnerability.

How do I fix the issue?

  1. To fix the issue please install the latest version of .NET. If users have installed one or more .NET SDKs through Visual Studio, Visual Studio will prompt them to update Visual Studio, which will also update their .NET SDKs.
  2. If a user's application references the vulnerable package, update the package reference to the patched version. Users can list the versions they have installed by running the dotnet --info command.

Once a user has installed the updated runtime or SDK, they should restart their apps for the update to take effect.

Additionally, if they've deployed self-contained applications targeting any of the impacted versions, these applications are also vulnerable and must be recompiled and redeployed.

Other Information

Reporting Security Issues

If a user has found a potential security issue in a supported version of .NET, please report it to the Microsoft Security Response Center (MSRC) via the MSRC Researcher Portal. Further information can be found in the MSRC Report an Issue FAQ.

Security reports made through MSRC may qualify for the Microsoft .NET Bounty. Details of the Microsoft .NET Bounty Program including terms and conditions are at https://aka.ms/corebounty.

Support

Users can ask questions about this issue on GitHub in the .NET GitHub organization. The main repos are located at https://github.com/dotnet/runtime. The Announcements repo (https://github.com/dotnet/Announcements) will contain this bulletin as an issue and will include a link to a discussion issue. Users can ask questions in the linked discussion issue.

Disclaimer

The information provided in this advisory is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Microsoft disclaims all warranties, either express or implied, including the warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. In no event shall Microsoft Corporation or its suppliers be liable for any damages whatsoever including direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, loss of business profits or special damages, even if Microsoft Corporation or its suppliers have been advised of the possibility of such damages. Some states do not allow the exclusion or limitation of liability for consequential or incidental damages so the foregoing limitation may not apply.

External Links

CVE-2026-62902

Acknowledgements

Ky0toFu

Revisions

V1.0 (08/11/2026): Advisory published.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 10.0.10"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "NuGet",
        "name": "Microsoft.WindowsDesktop.App.Runtime.win-arm64"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "10.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "10.0.11"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 10.0.10"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "NuGet",
        "name": "Microsoft.WindowsDesktop.App.Runtime.win-x64"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "10.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "10.0.11"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 10.0.10"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "NuGet",
        "name": "Microsoft.WindowsDesktop.App.Runtime.win-x86"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "10.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "10.0.11"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 9.0.18"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "NuGet",
        "name": "Microsoft.WindowsDesktop.App.Runtime.win-arm64"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "9.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "9.0.19"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 9.0.18"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "NuGet",
        "name": "Microsoft.WindowsDesktop.App.Runtime.win-x64"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "9.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "9.0.19"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 9.0.18"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "NuGet",
        "name": "Microsoft.WindowsDesktop.App.Runtime.win-x86"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "9.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "9.0.19"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 8.0.29"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "NuGet",
        "name": "Microsoft.WindowsDesktop.App.Runtime.win-arm64"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "8.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "8.0.30"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 8.0.29"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "NuGet",
        "name": "Microsoft.WindowsDesktop.App.Runtime.win-x64"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "8.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "8.0.30"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 8.0.29"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "NuGet",
        "name": "Microsoft.WindowsDesktop.App.Runtime.win-x86"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "8.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "8.0.30"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-62902"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-693",
      "CWE-829",
      "CWE-918"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-08-11T19:55:48Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-11T17:18:44Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "## Executive summary\n\nMicrosoft is releasing this security advisory to provide information about a vulnerability in Windows Presentation Foundation. This advisory also provides guidance on what developers can do to update their applications to remove this vulnerability.\n\nA specially crafted document parsed in .NET can trigger the inclusion of functionality from an untrusted control sphere, allowing an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.\n\n## Announcement\n\nAnnouncement for this issue can be found at https://github.com/dotnet/announcements/issues/433\n\n## CVSS Details\n\n- **Version:** 3.1\n- **Severity:** Medium\n- **Score:** 6.5\n- **Vector:** `CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N/E:U/RL:O/RC:C`\n- **Weakness:** CWE-829: Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere; CWE-693: Protection Mechanism Failure; CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)\n\n## Affected Platforms\n\n- **Platforms:** Windows\n- **Architectures:** All\n\n## \u003ca name=\"affected-packages\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003eAffected Packages\nThe vulnerability affects any Microsoft .NET project if it uses any of affected package versions listed below\n\n### \u003ca name=\".NET 10\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e.NET 10\nPackage name | Affected version | Patched version\n------------ | ---------------- | -------------------------\n[Microsoft.WindowsDesktop.App.Runtime.win-arm64](https://www.nuget.org/packages/Microsoft.WindowsDesktop.App.Runtime.win-arm64) | \u003e= 10.0.0, \u003c= 10.0.10 | 10.0.11\n[Microsoft.WindowsDesktop.App.Runtime.win-x64](https://www.nuget.org/packages/Microsoft.WindowsDesktop.App.Runtime.win-x64) | \u003e= 10.0.0, \u003c= 10.0.10 | 10.0.11\n[Microsoft.WindowsDesktop.App.Runtime.win-x86](https://www.nuget.org/packages/Microsoft.WindowsDesktop.App.Runtime.win-x86) | \u003e= 10.0.0, \u003c= 10.0.10 | 10.0.11\n\n### \u003ca name=\".NET 9\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e.NET 9\nPackage name | Affected version | Patched version\n------------ | ---------------- | -------------------------\n[Microsoft.WindowsDesktop.App.Runtime.win-arm64](https://www.nuget.org/packages/Microsoft.WindowsDesktop.App.Runtime.win-arm64) | \u003e= 9.0.0, \u003c= 9.0.18 | 9.0.19\n[Microsoft.WindowsDesktop.App.Runtime.win-x64](https://www.nuget.org/packages/Microsoft.WindowsDesktop.App.Runtime.win-x64) | \u003e= 9.0.0, \u003c= 9.0.18 | 9.0.19\n[Microsoft.WindowsDesktop.App.Runtime.win-x86](https://www.nuget.org/packages/Microsoft.WindowsDesktop.App.Runtime.win-x86) | \u003e= 9.0.0, \u003c= 9.0.18 | 9.0.19\n\n### \u003ca name=\".NET 8\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e.NET 8\nPackage name | Affected version | Patched version\n------------ | ---------------- | -------------------------\n[Microsoft.WindowsDesktop.App.Runtime.win-arm64](https://www.nuget.org/packages/Microsoft.WindowsDesktop.App.Runtime.win-arm64) | \u003e= 8.0.0, \u003c= 8.0.29 | 8.0.30\n[Microsoft.WindowsDesktop.App.Runtime.win-x64](https://www.nuget.org/packages/Microsoft.WindowsDesktop.App.Runtime.win-x64) | \u003e= 8.0.0, \u003c= 8.0.29 | 8.0.30\n[Microsoft.WindowsDesktop.App.Runtime.win-x86](https://www.nuget.org/packages/Microsoft.WindowsDesktop.App.Runtime.win-x86) | \u003e= 8.0.0, \u003c= 8.0.29 | 8.0.30\n\n## Advisory FAQ\n\n### \u003ca name=\"how-affected\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003eHow do I know if I am affected?\n\nIf using a package listed in [affected packages](#affected-packages), an application is exposed to the vulnerability.\n\n### \u003ca name=\"how-fix\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003eHow do I fix the issue?\n\n1. To fix the issue please install the latest version of .NET. If users have installed one or more .NET SDKs through Visual Studio, Visual Studio will prompt them to update Visual Studio, which will also update their .NET SDKs.\n2. If a user\u0027s application references the vulnerable package, update the package reference to the patched version. Users can list the versions they have installed by running the `dotnet --info` command.\n\nOnce a user has installed the updated runtime or SDK, they should restart their apps for the update to take effect.\n\nAdditionally, if they\u0027ve deployed [self-contained applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/dotnet/core/deploying/#self-contained-deployments-scd) targeting any of the impacted versions, these applications are also vulnerable and must be recompiled and redeployed.\n\n## Other Information\n\n### Reporting Security Issues\n\nIf a user has found a potential security issue in a supported version of .NET, please report it to the Microsoft Security Response Center (MSRC) via the [MSRC Researcher Portal](https://msrc.microsoft.com/report/vulnerability/new). Further information can be found in the MSRC [Report an Issue FAQ](https://www.microsoft.com/msrc/faqs-report-an-issue).\n\nSecurity reports made through MSRC may qualify for the Microsoft .NET Bounty. Details of the Microsoft .NET Bounty Program including terms and conditions are at https://aka.ms/corebounty.\n\n### Support\n\nUsers can ask questions about this issue on GitHub in the .NET GitHub organization. The main repos are located at https://github.com/dotnet/runtime. The Announcements repo (https://github.com/dotnet/Announcements) will contain this bulletin as an issue and will include a link to a discussion issue. Users can ask questions in the linked discussion issue.\n\n### Disclaimer\n\nThe information provided in this advisory is provided \"as is\" without warranty of any kind. Microsoft disclaims all warranties, either express or implied, including the warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. In no event shall Microsoft Corporation or its suppliers be liable for any damages whatsoever including direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, loss of business profits or special damages, even if Microsoft Corporation or its suppliers have been advised of the possibility of such damages. Some states do not allow the exclusion or limitation of liability for consequential or incidental damages so the foregoing limitation may not apply.\n\n### External Links\n\n[CVE-2026-62902](https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-62902)\n\n### Acknowledgements\n\n[Ky0toFu](https://x.com/ky0tofu)\n\n### Revisions\n\nV1.0 (08/11/2026): Advisory published.",
  "id": "GHSA-9mrh-pw7c-9mqm",
  "modified": "2026-08-11T19:55:48Z",
  "published": "2026-08-11T19:55:48Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/dotnet/wpf/security/advisories/GHSA-9mrh-pw7c-9mqm"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-62902"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/dotnet/announcements/issues/433"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/dotnet/wpf"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-62902"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Microsoft Security Advisory CVE-2026-62902 \u2013 .NET Information Disclosure Vulnerability"
}

GHSA-9PP5-9C7G-4R83

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-05-21 15:30 – Updated: 2025-10-15 20:13
VLAI
Summary
Spring Security authorization bypass for method security annotations on private methods
Details

Spring Security Aspects may not correctly locate method security annotations on private methods. This can cause an authorization bypass.

Your application may be affected by this if the following are true:

  • You are using @EnableMethodSecurity(mode=ASPECTJ) and spring-security-aspects, and
  • You have Spring Security method annotations on a private method In that case, the target method may be able to be invoked without proper authorization.

You are not affected if:

  • You are not using @EnableMethodSecurity(mode=ASPECTJ) or spring-security-aspects, or
  • You have no Spring Security-annotated private methods
Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "org.springframework.security:spring-security-aspects"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "6.4.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "6.4.6"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "org.springframework.security:spring-security-core"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "6.4.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "6.4.6"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-41232"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-693"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2025-05-21T18:31:29Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-05-21T12:16:21Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "Spring Security Aspects may not correctly locate method security annotations on private methods. This can cause an authorization bypass.\n\nYour application may be affected by this if the following are true:\n\n  *  You are using @EnableMethodSecurity(mode=ASPECTJ)\u00a0and spring-security-aspects, and\n  *  You have Spring Security method annotations on a private method\nIn that case, the target method may be able to be invoked without proper authorization.\n\nYou are not affected if:\n\n  *  You are not using @EnableMethodSecurity(mode=ASPECTJ)\u00a0or spring-security-aspects, or\n  *  You have no Spring Security-annotated private methods",
  "id": "GHSA-9pp5-9c7g-4r83",
  "modified": "2025-10-15T20:13:15Z",
  "published": "2025-05-21T15:30:33Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-41232"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-security/commit/bf2aaa1b1830e534ba651d422545ac08a115151b"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-security/commit/c972de5369a1261ab674a3f5e3a80e8ce3e8cdfb"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-security"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-security/releases/tag/6.4.6"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://spring.io/security/cve-2025-41232"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Spring Security authorization bypass for method security annotations on private methods"
}

GHSA-9PRX-6FQF-VVJH

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-12 15:30 – Updated: 2026-03-12 15:30
VLAI
Details

A vulnerability allowing an authenticated user with the Backup Administrator role to perform remote code execution (RCE) in high availability (HA) deployments of Veeam Backup & Replication.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-21671"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-693",
      "CWE-94"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-03-12T15:16:13Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "A vulnerability allowing an authenticated user with the Backup Administrator role to perform remote code execution (RCE) in high availability (HA) deployments of Veeam Backup \u0026 Replication.",
  "id": "GHSA-9prx-6fqf-vvjh",
  "modified": "2026-03-12T15:30:26Z",
  "published": "2026-03-12T15:30:26Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-21671"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.veeam.com/kb4831"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-9Q36-67VC-RRWG

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-09 19:54 – Updated: 2026-03-30 13:31
VLAI
Summary
OpenClaw: Sandboxed /acp spawn requests could initialize host ACP sessions
Details

Summary

Sandboxed requester sessions could reach host-side ACP session initialization through /acp spawn.

OpenClaw already blocked sessions_spawn({ runtime: "acp" }) from sandboxed sessions, but the slash-command path initialized ACP directly without applying the same host-runtime guard first.

Affected Packages / Versions

  • npm package: openclaw
  • Affected versions: <= 2026.3.2
  • Patched version: >= 2026.3.7

Details

ACP sessions run on the host, not inside the OpenClaw sandbox. The direct ACP spawn path in src/agents/acp-spawn.ts already denied sandboxed requesters, but /acp spawn in src/auto-reply/reply/commands-acp/lifecycle.ts called initializeSession(...) without first applying the same restriction.

In affected versions, an already authorized sender in a sandboxed session could use /acp spawn to cross from sandboxed chat context into host-side ACP runtime initialization when ACP was enabled and a backend was available.

Fix Commit(s)

  • 61000b8e4ded919ca1a825d4700db4cb3fdc56e3

Fix Details

The fix introduced a shared ACP runtime-policy guard in src/agents/acp-spawn.ts and reused it from the /acp spawn handler in src/auto-reply/reply/commands-acp/lifecycle.ts before any ACP backend initialization. Regression coverage was added in src/auto-reply/reply/commands-acp.test.ts to prove sandboxed /acp spawn requests are rejected early, while existing ACP spawn behavior for non-sandboxed sessions remains unchanged.

Release Process Note

Patched version is pre-set to 2026.3.7 so the advisory can be published once that npm release is available.

Thanks @tdjackey for reporting.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 2026.3.2"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "openclaw"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2026.3.7"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-27646"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284",
      "CWE-693",
      "CWE-863"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-09T19:54:54Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-03-23T22:16:25Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\nSandboxed requester sessions could reach host-side ACP session initialization through `/acp spawn`.\n\nOpenClaw already blocked `sessions_spawn({ runtime: \"acp\" })` from sandboxed sessions, but the slash-command path initialized ACP directly without applying the same host-runtime guard first.\n\n### Affected Packages / Versions\n- npm package: `openclaw`\n- Affected versions: `\u003c= 2026.3.2`\n- Patched version: `\u003e= 2026.3.7`\n\n### Details\nACP sessions run on the host, not inside the OpenClaw sandbox. The direct ACP spawn path in `src/agents/acp-spawn.ts` already denied sandboxed requesters, but `/acp spawn` in `src/auto-reply/reply/commands-acp/lifecycle.ts` called `initializeSession(...)` without first applying the same restriction.\n\nIn affected versions, an already authorized sender in a sandboxed session could use `/acp spawn` to cross from sandboxed chat context into host-side ACP runtime initialization when ACP was enabled and a backend was available.\n\n### Fix Commit(s)\n- `61000b8e4ded919ca1a825d4700db4cb3fdc56e3`\n\n### Fix Details\nThe fix introduced a shared ACP runtime-policy guard in `src/agents/acp-spawn.ts` and reused it from the `/acp spawn` handler in `src/auto-reply/reply/commands-acp/lifecycle.ts` before any ACP backend initialization. Regression coverage was added in `src/auto-reply/reply/commands-acp.test.ts` to prove sandboxed `/acp spawn` requests are rejected early, while existing ACP spawn behavior for non-sandboxed sessions remains unchanged.\n\n### Release Process Note\nPatched version is pre-set to `2026.3.7` so the advisory can be published once that npm release is available.\n\nThanks @tdjackey for reporting.",
  "id": "GHSA-9q36-67vc-rrwg",
  "modified": "2026-03-30T13:31:02Z",
  "published": "2026-03-09T19:54:54Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-9q36-67vc-rrwg"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-27646"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/61000b8e4ded919ca1a825d4700db4cb3fdc56e3"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/releases/tag/v2026.3.7"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vulncheck.com/advisories/openclaw-mar-sandbox-escape-via-acp-spawn-command"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "OpenClaw: Sandboxed /acp spawn requests could initialize host ACP sessions"
}

GHSA-9Q6Q-QV82-8QM9

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-04 03:31 – Updated: 2026-07-04 03:31
VLAI
Details

picklescan before 0.0.33 fails to detect operator.methodcaller function calls in pickle files, allowing attackers to bypass security checks. Remote attackers can craft malicious pickle payloads using operator.methodcaller that execute arbitrary code when loaded, compromising systems relying on picklescan for validation.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-71373"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-693"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-07-04T02:16:23Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "picklescan before 0.0.33 fails to detect operator.methodcaller function calls in pickle files, allowing attackers to bypass security checks. Remote attackers can craft malicious pickle payloads using operator.methodcaller that execute arbitrary code when loaded, compromising systems relying on picklescan for validation.",
  "id": "GHSA-9q6q-qv82-8qm9",
  "modified": "2026-07-04T03:31:02Z",
  "published": "2026-07-04T03:31:02Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/mmaitre314/picklescan/security/advisories/GHSA-x843-g5mx-g377"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-71373"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/picklescan-remote-code-execution-via-operator-methodcaller-detection-bypass"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-9QMG-VJ62-G95Q

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-21 15:30 – Updated: 2026-07-22 21:31
VLAI
Details

Mitigation bypass in the PDF Viewer component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 153 and Firefox ESR 140.13.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-16377"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-693"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-07-21T13:17:12Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "Mitigation bypass in the PDF Viewer component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 153 and Firefox ESR 140.13.",
  "id": "GHSA-9qmg-vj62-g95q",
  "modified": "2026-07-22T21:31:52Z",
  "published": "2026-07-21T15:30:39Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-16377"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2037770"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2026-68"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2026-70"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2026-71"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2026-72"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-9QVR-8P9R-M8VJ

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-02 21:31 – Updated: 2026-03-06 06:30
VLAI
Details

In exitKeyguardAndFinishSurfaceBehindRemoteAnimation of KeyguardViewMediator.java, there is a possible lockscreen bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-48602"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-693"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-03-02T19:16:26Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In exitKeyguardAndFinishSurfaceBehindRemoteAnimation of KeyguardViewMediator.java, there is a possible lockscreen bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.",
  "id": "GHSA-9qvr-8p9r-m8vj",
  "modified": "2026-03-06T06:30:29Z",
  "published": "2026-03-02T21:31:30Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-48602"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://source.android.com/docs/security/bulletin/2026/2026-03-01"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://source.android.com/security/bulletin/2026-03-01"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-9R2R-C24C-X9G4

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-15 06:31 – Updated: 2026-06-15 06:31
VLAI
Details

A security flaw has been discovered in Qihoo 360 Total Security 6.0. This vulnerability affects the function RpcStringBindingComposeW of the component Nucleus Engine Monitoring Logic. Performing a manipulation of the argument NetworkAddr results in protection mechanism failure. The attack requires a local approach. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-12214"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-693"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-06-15T04:16:25Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "A security flaw has been discovered in Qihoo 360 Total Security 6.0. This vulnerability affects the function RpcStringBindingComposeW of the component Nucleus Engine Monitoring Logic. Performing a manipulation of the argument NetworkAddr results in protection mechanism failure. The attack requires a local approach. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.",
  "id": "GHSA-9r2r-c24c-x9g4",
  "modified": "2026-06-15T06:31:38Z",
  "published": "2026-06-15T06:31:38Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-12214"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/Gach0ng/vuldb_submit/issues/4"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-12214"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/submit/833135"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/370858"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/370858/cti"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

No mitigation information available for this CWE.

CAPEC-1: Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs

In applications, particularly web applications, access to functionality is mitigated by an authorization framework. This framework maps Access Control Lists (ACLs) to elements of the application's functionality; particularly URL's for web apps. In the case that the administrator failed to specify an ACL for a particular element, an attacker may be able to access it with impunity. An attacker with the ability to access functionality not properly constrained by ACLs can obtain sensitive information and possibly compromise the entire application. Such an attacker can access resources that must be available only to users at a higher privilege level, can access management sections of the application, or can run queries for data that they otherwise not supposed to.

CAPEC-107: Cross Site Tracing

Cross Site Tracing (XST) enables an adversary to steal the victim's session cookie and possibly other authentication credentials transmitted in the header of the HTTP request when the victim's browser communicates to a destination system's web server.

CAPEC-127: Directory Indexing

An adversary crafts a request to a target that results in the target listing/indexing the content of a directory as output. One common method of triggering directory contents as output is to construct a request containing a path that terminates in a directory name rather than a file name since many applications are configured to provide a list of the directory's contents when such a request is received. An adversary can use this to explore the directory tree on a target as well as learn the names of files. This can often end up revealing test files, backup files, temporary files, hidden files, configuration files, user accounts, script contents, as well as naming conventions, all of which can be used by an attacker to mount additional attacks.

CAPEC-17: Using Malicious Files

An attack of this type exploits a system's configuration that allows an adversary to either directly access an executable file, for example through shell access; or in a possible worst case allows an adversary to upload a file and then execute it. Web servers, ftp servers, and message oriented middleware systems which have many integration points are particularly vulnerable, because both the programmers and the administrators must be in synch regarding the interfaces and the correct privileges for each interface.

CAPEC-20: Encryption Brute Forcing

An attacker, armed with the cipher text and the encryption algorithm used, performs an exhaustive (brute force) search on the key space to determine the key that decrypts the cipher text to obtain the plaintext.

CAPEC-22: Exploiting Trust in Client

An attack of this type exploits vulnerabilities in client/server communication channel authentication and data integrity. It leverages the implicit trust a server places in the client, or more importantly, that which the server believes is the client. An attacker executes this type of attack by communicating directly with the server where the server believes it is communicating only with a valid client. There are numerous variations of this type of attack.

CAPEC-237: Escaping a Sandbox by Calling Code in Another Language

The attacker may submit malicious code of another language to obtain access to privileges that were not intentionally exposed by the sandbox, thus escaping the sandbox. For instance, Java code cannot perform unsafe operations, such as modifying arbitrary memory locations, due to restrictions placed on it by the Byte code Verifier and the JVM. If allowed, Java code can call directly into native C code, which may perform unsafe operations, such as call system calls and modify arbitrary memory locations on their behalf. To provide isolation, Java does not grant untrusted code with unmediated access to native C code. Instead, the sandboxed code is typically allowed to call some subset of the pre-existing native code that is part of standard libraries.

CAPEC-36: Using Unpublished Interfaces or Functionality

An adversary searches for and invokes interfaces or functionality that the target system designers did not intend to be publicly available. If interfaces fail to authenticate requests, the attacker may be able to invoke functionality they are not authorized for.

CAPEC-477: Signature Spoofing by Mixing Signed and Unsigned Content

An attacker exploits the underlying complexity of a data structure that allows for both signed and unsigned content, to cause unsigned data to be processed as though it were signed data.

CAPEC-480: Escaping Virtualization

An adversary gains access to an application, service, or device with the privileges of an authorized or privileged user by escaping the confines of a virtualized environment. The adversary is then able to access resources or execute unauthorized code within the host environment, generally with the privileges of the user running the virtualized process. Successfully executing an attack of this type is often the first step in executing more complex attacks.

CAPEC-51: Poison Web Service Registry

SOA and Web Services often use a registry to perform look up, get schema information, and metadata about services. A poisoned registry can redirect (think phishing for servers) the service requester to a malicious service provider, provide incorrect information in schema or metadata, and delete information about service provider interfaces.

CAPEC-57: Utilizing REST's Trust in the System Resource to Obtain Sensitive Data

This attack utilizes a REST(REpresentational State Transfer)-style applications' trust in the system resources and environment to obtain sensitive data once SSL is terminated.

CAPEC-59: Session Credential Falsification through Prediction

This attack targets predictable session ID in order to gain privileges. The attacker can predict the session ID used during a transaction to perform spoofing and session hijacking.

CAPEC-65: Sniff Application Code

An adversary passively sniffs network communications and captures application code bound for an authorized client. Once obtained, they can use it as-is, or through reverse-engineering glean sensitive information or exploit the trust relationship between the client and server. Such code may belong to a dynamic update to the client, a patch being applied to a client component or any such interaction where the client is authorized to communicate with the server.

CAPEC-668: Key Negotiation of Bluetooth Attack (KNOB)

An adversary can exploit a flaw in Bluetooth key negotiation allowing them to decrypt information sent between two devices communicating via Bluetooth. The adversary uses an Adversary in the Middle setup to modify packets sent between the two devices during the authentication process, specifically the entropy bits. Knowledge of the number of entropy bits will allow the attacker to easily decrypt information passing over the line of communication.

CAPEC-74: Manipulating State

The adversary modifies state information maintained by the target software or causes a state transition in hardware. If successful, the target will use this tainted state and execute in an unintended manner.

State management is an important function within a software application. User state maintained by the application can include usernames, payment information, browsing history as well as application-specific contents such as items in a shopping cart. Manipulating user state can be employed by an adversary to elevate privilege, conduct fraudulent transactions or otherwise modify the flow of the application to derive certain benefits.

If there is a hardware logic error in a finite state machine, the adversary can use this to put the system in an undefined state which could cause a denial of service or exposure of secure data.

CAPEC-87: Forceful Browsing

An attacker employs forceful browsing (direct URL entry) to access portions of a website that are otherwise unreachable. Usually, a front controller or similar design pattern is employed to protect access to portions of a web application. Forceful browsing enables an attacker to access information, perform privileged operations and otherwise reach sections of the web application that have been improperly protected.