CWE-502
AllowedDeserialization of Untrusted Data
Abstraction: Base · Status: Draft
The product deserializes untrusted data without sufficiently ensuring that the resulting data will be valid.
6017 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-8JRJ-525P-826V
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2021-08-25 14:48 – Updated: 2022-07-29 18:10Impact
The vulnerability may allow a remote attacker to load and execute arbitrary code from a remote host only by manipulating the processed input stream. No user is affected, who followed the recommendation to setup XStream's security framework with a whitelist limited to the minimal required types.
Patches
XStream 1.4.18 uses no longer a blacklist by default, since it cannot be secured for general purpose.
Workarounds
See workarounds for the different versions covering all CVEs.
References
See full information about the nature of the vulnerability and the steps to reproduce it in XStream's documentation for CVE-2021-39145.
Credits
李安诺 (Li4n0) from Alibaba Cloud Security Team and Smi1e of DBAPPSecurity WEBIN Lab found and reported the issue independently to XStream and provided the required information to reproduce it.
For more information
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory: * Open an issue in XStream * Contact us at XStream Google Group
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "com.thoughtworks.xstream:xstream"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.4.18"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-39145"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-502"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2021-08-23T18:22:10Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2021-08-23T18:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "### Impact\nThe vulnerability may allow a remote attacker to load and execute arbitrary code from a remote host only by manipulating the processed input stream. No user is affected, who followed the recommendation to setup XStream\u0027s security framework with a whitelist limited to the minimal required types.\n\n### Patches\nXStream 1.4.18 uses no longer a blacklist by default, since it cannot be secured for general purpose.\n\n### Workarounds\nSee [workarounds](https://x-stream.github.io/security.html#workaround) for the different versions covering all CVEs.\n\n### References\nSee full information about the nature of the vulnerability and the steps to reproduce it in XStream\u0027s documentation for [CVE-2021-39145](https://x-stream.github.io/CVE-2021-39145.html).\n\n### Credits\n\u674e\u5b89\u8bfa (Li4n0) from Alibaba Cloud Security Team and Smi1e of DBAPPSecurity WEBIN Lab found and reported the issue independently to XStream and provided the required information to reproduce it.\n\n### For more information\nIf you have any questions or comments about this advisory:\n* Open an issue in [XStream](https://github.com/x-stream/xstream/issues)\n* Contact us at [XStream Google Group](https://groups.google.com/group/xstream-user)\n",
"id": "GHSA-8jrj-525p-826v",
"modified": "2022-07-29T18:10:22Z",
"published": "2021-08-25T14:48:12Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/x-stream/xstream/security/advisories/GHSA-8jrj-525p-826v"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-39145"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/x-stream/xstream"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/09/msg00017.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/22KVR6B5IZP3BGQ3HPWIO2FWWCKT3DHP"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/PVPHZA7VW2RRSDCOIPP2W6O5ND254TU7"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/QGXIU3YDPG6OGTDHMBLAFN7BPBERXREB"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210923-0003"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2021/dsa-5004"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2022.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2022.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://x-stream.github.io/CVE-2021-39145.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "XStream is vulnerable to an Arbitrary Code Execution attack"
}
GHSA-8M35-R25C-QR56
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:28 – Updated: 2023-10-06 21:21The Java implementation of GraniteDS, version 3.1.1.GA, AMF3 deserializers derives class instances from java.io.Externalizable rather than the AMF3 specification's recommendation of flash.utils.IExternalizable. A remote attacker with the ability to spoof or control an RMI server connection may be able to send serialized Java objects that execute arbitrary code when deserialized.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.graniteds:granite-core"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"last_affected": "3.1.1.GA"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2017-3199"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-502"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2023-07-25T23:03:24Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2018-06-11T17:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The Java implementation of GraniteDS, version 3.1.1.GA, AMF3 deserializers derives class instances from java.io.Externalizable rather than the AMF3 specification\u0027s recommendation of flash.utils.IExternalizable. A remote attacker with the ability to spoof or control an RMI server connection may be able to send serialized Java objects that execute arbitrary code when deserialized.",
"id": "GHSA-8m35-r25c-qr56",
"modified": "2023-10-06T21:21:34Z",
"published": "2022-05-13T01:28:41Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-3199"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://codewhitesec.blogspot.com/2017/04/amf.html"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/graniteds/graniteds"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20210124021547/http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/97382"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/307983"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityweek.com/flaws-java-amf-libraries-allow-remote-code-execution"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "GraniteDS Insecure Deserialization"
}
GHSA-8M79-HV2W-XJVH
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-08-06 03:30 – Updated: 2025-08-06 03:30Deserialization vulnerability of untrusted data in the ability module. Impact: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may affect availability.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-54620"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-502"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-08-06T02:15:48Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Deserialization vulnerability of untrusted data in the ability module.\nImpact: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may affect availability.",
"id": "GHSA-8m79-hv2w-xjvh",
"modified": "2025-08-06T03:30:25Z",
"published": "2025-08-06T03:30:25Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-54620"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://consumer.huawei.com/en/support/bulletin/2025/8"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-8M9J-CRXG-VWQ4
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:37 – Updated: 2022-05-13 01:37This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Netgain Enterprise Manager. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within an exposed RMI registry, which listens on TCP ports 1800 and 1850 by default. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in deserialization of untrusted data. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-4753.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2017-17406"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-502"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2018-01-23T01:29:00Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Netgain Enterprise Manager. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within an exposed RMI registry, which listens on TCP ports 1800 and 1850 by default. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in deserialization of untrusted data. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-4753.",
"id": "GHSA-8m9j-crxg-vwq4",
"modified": "2022-05-13T01:37:19Z",
"published": "2022-05-13T01:37:19Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-17406"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.tenable.com/security/research/tra-2018-02"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-17-953"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-8MC5-7W9M-FQV6
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-21 15:31 – Updated: 2026-09-11 19:25Duplicate Advisory
This advisory has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of GHSA-j343-8v2j-ff7w. This link is maintained to preserve external references.
Original Description
picklescan before 0.0.30 fails to detect malicious pickle files using idlelib.pyshell.ModifiedInterpreter.runcommand in reduce methods. Attackers can embed undetected code in pickle files that executes remote commands when loaded by victims.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "picklescan"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.0.30"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-502"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-09-11T19:25:00Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-06-21T14:16:23Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "### Duplicate Advisory\n\nThis advisory has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of GHSA-j343-8v2j-ff7w. This link is maintained to preserve external references.\n\n### Original Description\n\npicklescan before 0.0.30 fails to detect malicious pickle files using idlelib.pyshell.ModifiedInterpreter.runcommand in reduce methods. Attackers can embed undetected code in pickle files that executes remote commands when loaded by victims.",
"id": "GHSA-8mc5-7w9m-fqv6",
"modified": "2026-09-11T19:25:00Z",
"published": "2026-06-21T15:31:23Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/mmaitre314/picklescan/security/advisories/GHSA-j343-8v2j-ff7w"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-71357"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/mmaitre314/picklescan"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/picklescan-arbitrary-code-execution-via-undetected-idlelib-pyshell-modifiedinterpreter-runcommand"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Duplicate Advisory: Picklescan is missing detection when calling built-in python idlelib.pyshell.ModifiedInterpreter.runcommand",
"withdrawn": "2026-09-11T19:25:00Z"
}
GHSA-8MM9-PVMG-V4M4
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-05-23 03:30 – Updated: 2024-04-04 04:17Deserialization of Untrusted Data in Sitecore Experience Platform through 10.2 allows remote attackers to run arbitrary code via ValidationResult.aspx.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-27068"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-502"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-05-23T01:15:09Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "Deserialization of Untrusted Data in Sitecore Experience Platform through 10.2 allows remote attackers to run arbitrary code via ValidationResult.aspx.",
"id": "GHSA-8mm9-pvmg-v4m4",
"modified": "2024-04-04T04:17:12Z",
"published": "2023-05-23T03:30:15Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-27068"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://blogs.night-wolf.io/0-day-vulnerabilities-at-sitecore-pagedesigner"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://dev.sitecore.net/Downloads/Sitecore%20Experience%20Platform/103/Sitecore%20Experience%20Platform%20103/Release%20Notes"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.sitecore.com/products/sitecore-experience-platform"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-8P35-X5R4-V8H6
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-18 15:30 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:36Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in Shinetheme Traveler allows Object Injection.This issue affects Traveler: from n/a before 3.2.8.1.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-25449"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-502"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-18T14:16:39Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in Shinetheme Traveler allows Object Injection.This issue affects Traveler: from n/a before 3.2.8.1.",
"id": "GHSA-8p35-x5r4-v8h6",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:36:32Z",
"published": "2026-03-18T15:30:48Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-25449"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/theme/traveler/vulnerability/wordpress-traveler-theme-3-2-8-php-object-injection-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-8P3V-4RH7-R554
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 19:19 – Updated: 2022-05-24 19:19Zoom Call Recording 6.3.1 from ZOOM International is vulnerable to Java Deserialization attacks targeting the inbuilt RMI service. A remote unauthenticated attacker can exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted RMI requests to execute arbitrary code on the target host.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2019-19810"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-502"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2021-10-28T11:15:00Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "Zoom Call Recording 6.3.1 from ZOOM International is vulnerable to Java Deserialization attacks targeting the inbuilt RMI service. A remote unauthenticated attacker can exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted RMI requests to execute arbitrary code on the target host.",
"id": "GHSA-8p3v-4rh7-r554",
"modified": "2022-05-24T19:19:11Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T19:19:11Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-19810"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/DrunkenShells/Disclosures/tree/master/CVE-2019-19810-Java%20RMI%20Deserialization-ZoomCallRecording"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://support.zoom.us/hc/en-us/articles/201362473-Local-Recording"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-8P5R-XPXR-X2X7
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-10-19 12:32 – Updated: 2026-10-20 15:31Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in Apache Camel Spring Redis component.
This issue affects Apache Camel: from 2.11.0 before 4.18.5, from 4.19.0 before 4.22.1.
RedisConfiguration.getSerializer lazily built a bare JdkSerializationRedisSerializer whenever no serializer option was configured, and that instance was used for every read the component performs. Spring's implementation delegates through DeserializingConverter to DefaultDeserializer, which reads the bytes with a ConfigurableObjectInputStream and installs no java.io.ObjectInputFilter on the stream, so an arbitrary serialized class graph was materialised and its readObject method executed. RedisConsumer.setBody applied that serializer to the raw bytes of every message published to the subscribed channels, before the Exchange was constructed and therefore before any route logic could inspect the message, so an actor able to issue PUBLISH on a subscribed channel reached the deserialization sink directly. The same default serializer backed the RedisTemplate built by RedisConfiguration.createDefaultTemplate, so the producer read commands GET, HGET, HGETALL and HVALS deserialized whatever was stored in the Redis keyspace, and SpringRedisIdempotentRepository shared that template. Configuring a custom redisTemplate did not close the consumer path, because RedisConsumer.setBody reads getSerializer directly rather than the serializer attached to the template, so a deployment that had wired a String serializer into its own template remained exposed on the consumer side unless it also set the serializer option. The component never constructed a java.io.ObjectInputStream itself, which is why earlier passes over the Camel codebase for unfiltered Java deserialization did not reach it. The behaviour dates back to the introduction of the component, first released in 2.11.0, and was unchanged until this fix.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.23.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.22.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.22.1. If users are on the 4.18.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.18.5. The 4.14.x releases stream and earlier reached end of life before this issue was resolved and will not receive a fix, so deployments on those lines must move to a supported release. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, set the JVM-wide jdk.serialFilter system property, which the affected code path honours because it reads through a java.io.ObjectInputStream, for example -Djdk.serialFilter=!java.net.;java.;javax.;org.apache.camel.;!* ; or set the serializer endpoint option to a serializer that does not use Java serialization, such as StringRedisSerializer, noting that this must be set as the serializer option and not only on a custom redisTemplate. As defence in depth, require authentication on the Redis instance and restrict which clients may publish to the subscribed channels, and do not expose a Redis instance consumed by Camel to untrusted networks.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-78165"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-502"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-10-19T11:17:19Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in Apache Camel Spring Redis component.\n\n\n\nThis issue affects Apache Camel: from 2.11.0 before 4.18.5, from 4.19.0 before 4.22.1.\n\n\n\nRedisConfiguration.getSerializer lazily built a bare JdkSerializationRedisSerializer whenever no serializer option was configured, and that instance was used for every read the component performs. Spring\u0027s implementation delegates through DeserializingConverter to DefaultDeserializer, which reads the bytes with a ConfigurableObjectInputStream and installs no java.io.ObjectInputFilter on the stream, so an arbitrary serialized class graph was materialised and its readObject method executed. RedisConsumer.setBody applied that serializer to the raw bytes of every message published to the subscribed channels, before the Exchange was constructed and therefore before any route logic could inspect the message, so an actor able to issue PUBLISH on a subscribed channel reached the deserialization sink directly. The same default serializer backed the RedisTemplate built by RedisConfiguration.createDefaultTemplate, so the producer read commands GET, HGET, HGETALL and HVALS deserialized whatever was stored in the Redis keyspace, and SpringRedisIdempotentRepository shared that template. Configuring a custom redisTemplate did not close the consumer path, because RedisConsumer.setBody reads getSerializer directly rather than the serializer attached to the template, so a deployment that had wired a String serializer into its own template remained exposed on the consumer side unless it also set the serializer option. The component never constructed a java.io.ObjectInputStream itself, which is why earlier passes over the Camel codebase for unfiltered Java deserialization did not reach it. The behaviour dates back to the introduction of the component, first released in 2.11.0, and was unchanged until this fix.\n\n\n\nUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 4.23.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.22.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.22.1. If users are on the 4.18.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.18.5. The 4.14.x releases stream and earlier reached end of life before this issue was resolved and will not receive a fix, so deployments on those lines must move to a supported release. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, set the JVM-wide jdk.serialFilter system property, which the affected code path honours because it reads through a java.io.ObjectInputStream, for example -Djdk.serialFilter=!java.net.**;java.**;javax.**;org.apache.camel.**;!* ; or set the serializer endpoint option to a serializer that does not use Java serialization, such as StringRedisSerializer, noting that this must be set as the serializer option and not only on a custom redisTemplate. As defence in depth, require authentication on the Redis instance and restrict which clients may publish to the subscribed channels, and do not expose a Redis instance consumed by Camel to untrusted networks.",
"id": "GHSA-8p5r-xpxr-x2x7",
"modified": "2026-10-20T15:31:17Z",
"published": "2026-10-19T12:32:49Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-78165"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/25587"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/25588"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/25589"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/25734"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://camel.apache.org/security/CVE-2026-78165.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/oscerd/CVE-2026-78165"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-24421"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-8PHF-82CJ-4M65
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 02:40 – Updated: 2022-05-17 02:40The PooledInvokerServlet in JBoss EAP 4.x and 5.x allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted serialized payload.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2016-3690"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-502"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2017-06-08T18:29:00Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "The PooledInvokerServlet in JBoss EAP 4.x and 5.x allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted serialized payload.",
"id": "GHSA-8phf-82cj-4m65",
"modified": "2022-05-17T02:40:36Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T02:40:36Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-3690"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/solutions/178393"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/solutions/45530"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327037"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/99079"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation
If available, use the signing/sealing features of the programming language to assure that deserialized data has not been tainted. For example, a hash-based message authentication code (HMAC) could be used to ensure that data has not been modified.
Mitigation
When deserializing data, populate a new object rather than just deserializing. The result is that the data flows through safe input validation and that the functions are safe.
Mitigation
Explicitly define a final object() to prevent deserialization.
Mitigation
- Make fields transient to protect them from deserialization.
- An attempt to serialize and then deserialize a class containing transient fields will result in NULLs where the transient data should be. This is an excellent way to prevent time, environment-based, or sensitive variables from being carried over and used improperly.
Mitigation
Avoid having unnecessary types or gadgets (a sequence of instances and method invocations that can self-execute during the deserialization process, often found in libraries) available that can be leveraged for malicious ends. This limits the potential for unintended or unauthorized types and gadgets to be leveraged by the attacker. Add only acceptable classes to an allowlist. Note: new gadgets are constantly being discovered, so this alone is not a sufficient mitigation.
Mitigation
Employ cryptography of the data or code for protection. However, it's important to note that it would still be client-side security. This is risky because if the client is compromised then the security implemented on the client (the cryptography) can be bypassed.
Mitigation MIT-29
Strategy: Firewall
Use an application firewall that can detect attacks against this weakness. It can be beneficial in cases in which the code cannot be fixed (because it is controlled by a third party), as an emergency prevention measure while more comprehensive software assurance measures are applied, or to provide defense in depth [REF-1481].
CAPEC-586: Object Injection
An adversary attempts to exploit an application by injecting additional, malicious content during its processing of serialized objects. Developers leverage serialization in order to convert data or state into a static, binary format for saving to disk or transferring over a network. These objects are then deserialized when needed to recover the data/state. By injecting a malformed object into a vulnerable application, an adversary can potentially compromise the application by manipulating the deserialization process. This can result in a number of unwanted outcomes, including remote code execution.