CWE-502
AllowedDeserialization of Untrusted Data
Abstraction: Base · Status: Draft
The product deserializes untrusted data without sufficiently ensuring that the resulting data will be valid.
4802 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-9GW9-MRM5-M5X9
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-10-26 19:00 – Updated: 2022-10-28 19:00A Remote Code Injection vulnerability exists in CERT software prior to version 1.50.5. An authenticated attacker can inject arbitrary pickle object as part of a user's profile. This can lead to code execution on the server when the user's profile is accessed.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-40238"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-502"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-10-26T16:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A Remote Code Injection vulnerability exists in CERT software prior to version 1.50.5. An authenticated attacker can inject arbitrary pickle object as part of a user\u0027s profile. This can lead to code execution on the server when the user\u0027s profile is accessed.",
"id": "GHSA-9gw9-mrm5-m5x9",
"modified": "2022-10-28T19:00:33Z",
"published": "2022-10-26T19:00:39Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-40238"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/CERTCC/VINCE/issues?q=label%3Asecurity"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-9HGJ-F7F3-CPH7
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 01:17 – Updated: 2022-05-17 01:17Versions of MCollective prior to 2.10.4 deserialized YAML from agents without calling safe_load, allowing the potential for arbitrary code execution on the server. The fix for this is to call YAML.safe_load on input. This has been tested in all Puppet-supplied MCollective plugins, but there is a chance that third-party plugins could rely on this insecure behavior.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2017-2292"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-502"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2017-06-30T20:29:00Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "Versions of MCollective prior to 2.10.4 deserialized YAML from agents without calling safe_load, allowing the potential for arbitrary code execution on the server. The fix for this is to call YAML.safe_load on input. This has been tested in all Puppet-supplied MCollective plugins, but there is a chance that third-party plugins could rely on this insecure behavior.",
"id": "GHSA-9hgj-f7f3-cph7",
"modified": "2022-05-17T01:17:12Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T01:17:12Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-2292"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://puppet.com/security/cve/cve-2017-2292"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201709-01"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-9HQP-6JV3-9H7W
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-12-08 18:30 – Updated: 2025-12-11 00:30HummerRisk thru v1.5.0 is using a vulnerable Snakeyaml component allowing attackers to achieve RCE and take over the server.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-63721"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-502"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-12-08T17:16:20Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "HummerRisk thru v1.5.0 is using a vulnerable Snakeyaml component allowing attackers to achieve RCE and take over the server.",
"id": "GHSA-9hqp-6jv3-9h7w",
"modified": "2025-12-11T00:30:28Z",
"published": "2025-12-08T18:30:44Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-63721"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://gist.github.com/k1ng0fic3/e8c8c9353fff8fa95e2c2952587e9266"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/k1ng0fic3/secrisk/blob/main/README.md"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-9HX8-2MRV-R674
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2021-08-09 20:41 – Updated: 2021-08-31 21:02Apache jUDDI uses several classes related to Java's Remote Method Invocation (RMI) which (as an extension to UDDI) provides an alternate transport for accessing UDDI services.
RMI uses the default Java serialization mechanism to pass parameters in RMI invocations. A remote attacker can send a malicious serialized object to the above RMI entries. The objects get deserialized without any check on the incoming data. In the worst case, it may let the attacker run arbitrary code remotely.
For both jUDDI web service applications and jUDDI clients, the usage of RMI is disabled by default. Since this is an optional feature and an extension to the UDDI protocol, the likelihood of impact is low. Starting with 3.3.10, all RMI related code was removed.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.apache.juddi:juddi-core"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "3.3.10"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-37578"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-502"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2021-08-02T18:16:42Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2021-07-29T07:15:00Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "Apache jUDDI uses several classes related to Java\u0027s Remote Method Invocation (RMI) which (as an extension to UDDI) provides an alternate transport for accessing UDDI services.\n\nRMI uses the default Java serialization mechanism to pass parameters in RMI invocations. A remote attacker can send a malicious serialized object to the above RMI entries. The objects get deserialized without any check on the incoming data. In the worst case, it may let the attacker run arbitrary code remotely. \n\nFor both jUDDI web service applications and jUDDI clients, the usage of RMI is disabled by default. Since this is an optional feature and an extension to the UDDI protocol, the likelihood of impact is low. Starting with 3.3.10, all RMI related code was removed.",
"id": "GHSA-9hx8-2mrv-r674",
"modified": "2021-08-31T21:02:02Z",
"published": "2021-08-09T20:41:37Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-37578"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/apache/juddi/commit/dd880ffe7694a70cee75efeee79c9197d261866f"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/apache/juddi"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r82047b3ba774cf870ea8e1e9ec51c6107f6cd056d4e36608148c6e71%40%3Cprivate.juddi.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/07/29/1"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Deserialization of Untrusted Data in Apache jUDDI"
}
GHSA-9J7F-JRV9-W3RR
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-25 18:31 – Updated: 2026-03-26 18:31Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in rascals Meloo meloo allows Object Injection.This issue affects Meloo: from n/a through < 2.8.2.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-25358"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-502"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-25T17:16:46Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in rascals Meloo meloo allows Object Injection.This issue affects Meloo: from n/a through \u003c 2.8.2.",
"id": "GHSA-9j7f-jrv9-w3rr",
"modified": "2026-03-26T18:31:33Z",
"published": "2026-03-25T18:31:51Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-25358"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Theme/meloo/vulnerability/wordpress-meloo-theme-2-8-2-php-object-injection-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-9J7W-3H5G-WV28
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-17 18:35 – Updated: 2026-06-17 18:35Unauthenticated PHP Object Injection in Kapee < 1.7.0 versions.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-39446"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-502"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-06-17T13:20:18Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Unauthenticated PHP Object Injection in Kapee \u003c 1.7.0 versions.",
"id": "GHSA-9j7w-3h5g-wv28",
"modified": "2026-06-17T18:35:48Z",
"published": "2026-06-17T18:35:48Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-39446"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/theme/kapee/vulnerability/wordpress-kapee-theme-1-7-0-php-object-injection-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-9J8G-2RC4-666J
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-09-04 18:30 – Updated: 2024-04-04 07:26Dell Alienware Command Center, versions prior to 5.5.51.0, contain a deserialization of untrusted data vulnerability. A local malicious user could potentially send specially crafted requests to the .NET Remoting server to run arbitrary code on the system.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-28072"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-502"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-09-04T16:15:07Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "\nDell Alienware Command Center, versions prior to 5.5.51.0, contain a deserialization of untrusted data vulnerability. A local malicious user could potentially send specially crafted requests to the .NET Remoting server to run arbitrary code on the system.\n\n",
"id": "GHSA-9j8g-2rc4-666j",
"modified": "2024-04-04T07:26:17Z",
"published": "2023-09-04T18:30:25Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-28072"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-in/000212982/dsa-2023-158"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-9JFW-FMCQ-HGJP
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-04-01 09:30 – Updated: 2025-04-01 09:30Welcart e-Commerce 2.11.6 and earlier versions contains an untrusted data deserialization vulnerability. If this vulnerability is exploited, arbitrary code may be executed by a remote unauthenticated attacker who can access websites created using the product.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-27130"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-502"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-04-01T09:15:15Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Welcart e-Commerce 2.11.6 and earlier versions contains an untrusted data deserialization vulnerability. If this vulnerability is exploited, arbitrary code may be executed by a remote unauthenticated attacker who can access websites created using the product.",
"id": "GHSA-9jfw-fmcq-hgjp",
"modified": "2025-04-01T09:30:20Z",
"published": "2025-04-01T09:30:20Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-27130"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN87266215"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.welcart.com/archives/23868.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-9M3X-QQW2-H32H
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-02-02 20:45 – Updated: 2026-06-18 14:41Summary
An unsafe deserialization vulnerability allows any unauthenticated user to execute arbitrary code on the host loading a pickle payload from an untrusted source.
Details
It's possible to hide the eval call nested under another callable via getattr.
PoC
import builtins
class EvilClass:
@staticmethod
def _obfuscated_eval(payload):
getattr(builtins, "eval")(payload)
def __reduce__(self):
payload = "__import__('os').system('echo \"successful attack\"')"
return self._obfuscated_eval, (payload,)
Impact
Who is impacted? Any organization or individual relying on picklescan to detect malicious pickle files from untrusted sources.
What is the impact? Attackers can embed malicious code in pickle file that remains undetected but executes when the pickle file is loaded.
Supply Chain Attack: Attackers can distribute infected pickle files to system that load serialized ML models, APIs, or saved Python objects from untrusted sources.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "picklescan"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.0.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-53874"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-502"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-02-02T20:45:20Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "### Summary\n\nAn unsafe deserialization vulnerability allows any unauthenticated user to execute arbitrary code on the host loading a pickle payload from an untrusted source.\n\n### Details\n\nIt\u0027s possible to hide the `eval` call nested under another callable via `getattr`.\n\n### PoC\n\n```python\nimport builtins\n\nclass EvilClass:\n @staticmethod\n def _obfuscated_eval(payload):\n getattr(builtins, \"eval\")(payload)\n\n def __reduce__(self):\n payload = \"__import__(\u0027os\u0027).system(\u0027echo \\\"successful attack\\\"\u0027)\"\n return self._obfuscated_eval, (payload,)\n```\n\n\n### Impact\n\nWho is impacted? \nAny organization or individual relying on picklescan to detect malicious pickle files from untrusted sources.\n\nWhat is the impact? \nAttackers can embed malicious code in pickle file that remains undetected but executes when the pickle file is loaded.\n\nSupply Chain Attack: Attackers can distribute infected pickle files to system that load serialized ML models, APIs, or saved Python objects from untrusted sources.",
"id": "GHSA-9m3x-qqw2-h32h",
"modified": "2026-06-18T14:41:54Z",
"published": "2026-02-02T20:45:20Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/mmaitre314/picklescan/security/advisories/GHSA-9m3x-qqw2-h32h"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53874"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/mmaitre314/picklescan/pull/59"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/mmaitre314/picklescan/commit/173c8f2a869ea9b69b543477525ec70611c3c6f4"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/mmaitre314/picklescan"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/mmaitre314/picklescan/releases/tag/v1.0.1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/picklescan-arbitrary-code-execution-via-obfuscated-eval-call"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "picklescan missing detection by simple obfuscation of a `builtins.eval` call"
}
GHSA-9M65-766C-R333
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-14 16:37 – Updated: 2026-05-14 16:37Summary
A type-confusion bug in seroval ≤ 1.5.2 (upstream advisory) allowed a crafted JSON body sent to one TanStack Start server function to trigger invocation of a different client-referenced server function as a side effect of deserializing the request payload.
This is not an authentication bypass and not remote code execution. The mechanism only invokes server functions that the same client could already reach directly via /_serverFn/, and the target function's full middleware chain — including any user-supplied authentication, authorization, and inputValidator — runs as it would on a direct call.
Impact
To be exploitable in any meaningful sense, an application would need to expose a client-referenced server function that:
- [ ] Performs a privileged side effect, and
- [ ] Has no authentication/authorization middleware, and
- [ ] Has no input validation
A function meeting all three is already directly callable by any unauthenticated client at its own endpoint, so the practical impact on correctly-written applications is nil. The residual concerns are:
A request to function A could cause function B to also execute, which may surprise observability/audit logging that keys off the request URL.
Request-level middleware (as opposed to per-function middleware) does not re-run for the inner invocation. Server-only functions (isClientReferenced: false) cannot be reached through this mechanism.
Patches
Upgrade to @tanstack/start-server-core ≥ 1.167.30 (or the equivalent dated release of @tanstack/react-start / @tanstack/solid-start). The fix bumps seroval to ≥ 1.5.3 and adds defense-in-depth to the serialization adapter plugin shape so adapter payloads cannot be confused with internal seroval node types.
Workarounds
If you cannot upgrade immediately, ensure every createServerFn(...) exposed to the client has both an .inputValidator(...) and authentication/authorization middleware via .middleware([...]). This is recommended regardless of this advisory.
Credits
- Mufeed VH of Winfunc Research
- Upstream fix coordinated with Seroval maintainers https://github.com/lxsmnsyc/seroval
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "@tanstack/start-server-core"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.167.30"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-502",
"CWE-843"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-14T16:37:10Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Summary\nA type-confusion bug in seroval \u2264 1.5.2 ([upstream advisory](https://github.com/lxsmnsyc/seroval/security/advisories)) allowed a crafted JSON body sent to one TanStack Start server function to trigger invocation of a different client-referenced server function as a side effect of deserializing the request payload.\n\nThis is not an authentication bypass and not remote code execution. The mechanism only invokes server functions that the same client could already reach directly via /_serverFn/\u003cid\u003e, and the target function\u0027s full middleware chain \u2014 including any user-supplied authentication, authorization, and inputValidator \u2014 runs as it would on a direct call.\n\n### Impact\nTo be exploitable in any meaningful sense, an application would need to expose a client-referenced server function that:\n\n- [ ] Performs a privileged side effect, and\n- [ ] Has no authentication/authorization middleware, and\n- [ ] Has no input validation\n\nA function meeting all three is already directly callable by any unauthenticated client at its own endpoint, so the practical impact on correctly-written applications is nil. The residual concerns are:\n\nA request to function A could cause function B to also execute, which may surprise observability/audit logging that keys off the request URL.\n\nRequest-level middleware (as opposed to per-function middleware) does not re-run for the inner invocation.\nServer-only functions (isClientReferenced: false) cannot be reached through this mechanism.\n\n### Patches\nUpgrade to @tanstack/start-server-core \u2265 1.167.30 (or the equivalent dated release of @tanstack/react-start / @tanstack/solid-start). The fix bumps seroval to \u2265 1.5.3 and adds defense-in-depth to the serialization adapter plugin shape so adapter payloads cannot be confused with internal seroval node types.\n\n### Workarounds\nIf you cannot upgrade immediately, ensure every createServerFn(...) exposed to the client has both an .inputValidator(...) and authentication/authorization middleware via .middleware([...]). This is recommended regardless of this advisory.\n\n### Credits\n- [Mufeed VH](https://x.com/mufeedvh) of [Winfunc Research](https://winfunc.com/)\n- Upstream fix coordinated with Seroval maintainers https://github.com/lxsmnsyc/seroval",
"id": "GHSA-9m65-766c-r333",
"modified": "2026-05-14T16:37:10Z",
"published": "2026-05-14T16:37:10Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/TanStack/router/security/advisories/GHSA-9m65-766c-r333"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/TanStack/router"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/lxsmnsyc/seroval/security/advisories"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "TanStack Start - Server Core: Inbound server-function request deserialization could invoke a sibling client-referenced server function"
}
Mitigation
If available, use the signing/sealing features of the programming language to assure that deserialized data has not been tainted. For example, a hash-based message authentication code (HMAC) could be used to ensure that data has not been modified.
Mitigation
When deserializing data, populate a new object rather than just deserializing. The result is that the data flows through safe input validation and that the functions are safe.
Mitigation
Explicitly define a final object() to prevent deserialization.
Mitigation
- Make fields transient to protect them from deserialization.
- An attempt to serialize and then deserialize a class containing transient fields will result in NULLs where the transient data should be. This is an excellent way to prevent time, environment-based, or sensitive variables from being carried over and used improperly.
Mitigation
Avoid having unnecessary types or gadgets (a sequence of instances and method invocations that can self-execute during the deserialization process, often found in libraries) available that can be leveraged for malicious ends. This limits the potential for unintended or unauthorized types and gadgets to be leveraged by the attacker. Add only acceptable classes to an allowlist. Note: new gadgets are constantly being discovered, so this alone is not a sufficient mitigation.
Mitigation
Employ cryptography of the data or code for protection. However, it's important to note that it would still be client-side security. This is risky because if the client is compromised then the security implemented on the client (the cryptography) can be bypassed.
Mitigation MIT-29
Strategy: Firewall
Use an application firewall that can detect attacks against this weakness. It can be beneficial in cases in which the code cannot be fixed (because it is controlled by a third party), as an emergency prevention measure while more comprehensive software assurance measures are applied, or to provide defense in depth [REF-1481].
CAPEC-586: Object Injection
An adversary attempts to exploit an application by injecting additional, malicious content during its processing of serialized objects. Developers leverage serialization in order to convert data or state into a static, binary format for saving to disk or transferring over a network. These objects are then deserialized when needed to recover the data/state. By injecting a malformed object into a vulnerable application, an adversary can potentially compromise the application by manipulating the deserialization process. This can result in a number of unwanted outcomes, including remote code execution.