Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-347

Allowed

Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature

Abstraction: Base · Status: Draft

The product does not verify, or incorrectly verifies, the cryptographic signature for data.

1266 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.

GHSA-CPPW-2MF8-QPM5

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 22:01 – Updated: 2024-09-24 15:48
VLAI
Summary
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature in matrix-synapse
Details

Matrix Synapse before 1.5.0 mishandles signature checking on some federation APIs. Events sent over /send_join, /send_leave, and /invite may not be correctly signed, or may not come from the expected servers.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "matrix-synapse"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.5.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2019-18835"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-347"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2022-09-19T19:32:08Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2019-11-08T00:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Matrix Synapse before 1.5.0 mishandles signature checking on some federation APIs. Events sent over `/send_join`, `/send_leave`, and `/invite` may not be correctly signed, or may not come from the expected servers.",
  "id": "GHSA-cppw-2mf8-qpm5",
  "modified": "2024-09-24T15:48:55Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T22:01:05Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-18835"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/pull/6262"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/commit/172f264ed38e8bef857552f93114b4ee113a880b"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/releases/tag/v1.5.0"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/matrix-synapse/PYSEC-2019-186.yaml"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature in matrix-synapse"
}

GHSA-CQGF-G3QQ-HHXW

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-11-14 21:31 – Updated: 2025-02-13 18:32
VLAI
Details

Improper signature verification of RadeonTM RX Vega M Graphics driver for Windows may allow an attacker with admin privileges to launch RadeonInstaller.exe without validating the file signature potentially leading to arbitrary code execution.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-20568"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-347"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2023-11-14T19:15:15Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Improper signature verification of RadeonTM RX Vega M Graphics driver for Windows may allow an attacker with admin privileges to launch RadeonInstaller.exe without validating the file signature potentially leading to arbitrary code execution.",
  "id": "GHSA-cqgf-g3qq-hhxw",
  "modified": "2025-02-13T18:32:03Z",
  "published": "2023-11-14T21:31:00Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-20568"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.amd.com/en/corporate/product-security/bulletin/AMD-SB-6003"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/security-center/advisory/intel-sa-00971.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-CQVM-J2R2-HWPG

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-03-17 14:42 – Updated: 2023-03-17 14:42
VLAI
Summary
russh may use insecure Diffie-Hellman keys
Details

Summary

Diffie-Hellman key validation is insufficient, which can lead to insecure shared secrets and therefore breaks confidentiality.

Details

Russh does not validate Diffie-Hellman keys.

It accepts received DH public keys $e$ where $e<0$, $e=1$, or $e \geq p-1$ from a misbehaving peer annd successfully performs key exchange.

This is a violation of RFC 4253, section 8 and RFC 8268, section 4, which state that:

DH Public Key values MUST be checked and both conditions:

  • $1 < e < p-1$
  • $1 < f < p-1$

MUST be true. Values not within these bounds MUST NOT be sent or accepted by either side. If either one of these conditions is violated, then the key exchange fails.

For example, a DH client public key $e=1$ would mean that the shared secret that the server calculates is always $K = e^y \mod{p} = 1^y \mod{p} = 1$. In other cases, an insecure order-2 subgroup may be used.

Also, the code does not look like it ensures that the generated secret key $y$ is in the valid interval $0 < y < q$ (or, if russh is the client, that the secret key $x$ satisfies $1 < x < q$): https://github.com/warp-tech/russh/blob/master/russh/src/kex/dh/groups.rs#L72-L76 For example, rng.gen_biguint() might return a number consisting of zeroes, so that $y = 0$.

The public key is not validated either: https://github.com/warp-tech/russh/blob/master/russh/src/kex/dh/groups.rs#L78-L81

Impact

Due to the issues in the DH key generation, I think any connection that uses Diffie-Hellman key exchange is affected. Connections between a russh client and server or those of a russh peer with some other misbehaving peer are most likely to be problematic. These may vulnerable to eavesdropping.

Most other implementations reject such keys, so this is mainly an interoperability issue in such a case.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "crates.io",
        "name": "russh"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.36.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "crates.io",
        "name": "russh"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0.37.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.37.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-28113"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-20",
      "CWE-347"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2023-03-17T14:42:45Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2023-03-16T21:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\n\nDiffie-Hellman key validation is insufficient, which can lead to insecure shared secrets and therefore breaks confidentiality.\n\n### Details\n\nRussh does not validate Diffie-Hellman keys.\n\nIt accepts received DH public keys $e$ where $e\u003c0$, $e=1$, or $e \\geq p-1$ from a misbehaving peer annd successfully performs key exchange.\n\nThis is a violation of [RFC 4253, section 8](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4253#section-8) and [RFC 8268, section 4](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8268#section-4), which state that:\n\n\u003eDH Public Key values MUST be checked and both conditions:\n\u003e\n\u003e - $1 \u003c e \u003c p-1$\n\u003e - $1 \u003c f \u003c p-1$\n\u003e\n\u003e MUST be true.  Values not within these bounds MUST NOT be sent or\n\u003e accepted by either side.  If either one of these conditions is\n\u003e violated, then the key exchange fails.\n\nFor example, a DH client public key $e=1$ would mean that the shared secret that the server calculates is always $K = e^y \\mod{p} = 1^y \\mod{p} = 1$.\nIn other cases, an insecure order-2 subgroup may be used.\n\nAlso, the code does not look like it ensures that the generated secret key $y$ is in the valid interval $0 \u003c y \u003c q$ (or, if russh is the client, that the secret key $x$ satisfies $1 \u003c x \u003c q$):\nhttps://github.com/warp-tech/russh/blob/master/russh/src/kex/dh/groups.rs#L72-L76\nFor example, `rng.gen_biguint()` might return a number consisting of zeroes, so that $y = 0$.\n\nThe public key is not validated either:\nhttps://github.com/warp-tech/russh/blob/master/russh/src/kex/dh/groups.rs#L78-L81\n\n### Impact\n\nDue to the issues in the DH key generation, I think any connection that uses Diffie-Hellman key exchange is affected.\nConnections between a russh client and server or those of a russh peer with some other misbehaving peer are most likely to be problematic. These may vulnerable to eavesdropping.\n\nMost other implementations reject such keys, so this is mainly an interoperability issue in such a case.\n",
  "id": "GHSA-cqvm-j2r2-hwpg",
  "modified": "2023-03-17T14:42:45Z",
  "published": "2023-03-17T14:42:45Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/warp-tech/russh/security/advisories/GHSA-cqvm-j2r2-hwpg"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-28113"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/warp-tech/russh/commit/45d2d82930bf4a675bd57abfafec8fe4065befcd"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/warp-tech/russh/commit/d831a3716d3719dc76f091fcea9d94bd4ef97c6e"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/warp-tech/russh"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/warp-tech/russh/blob/master/russh/src/kex/dh/groups.rs#L72-L76"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/warp-tech/russh/blob/master/russh/src/kex/dh/groups.rs#L78-L81"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/warp-tech/russh/releases/tag/v0.36.2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/warp-tech/russh/releases/tag/v0.37.1"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "russh may use insecure Diffie-Hellman keys"
}

GHSA-CQVV-R3G3-26RF

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-10-23 03:30 – Updated: 2023-10-31 22:07
VLAI
Summary
free5GC udm vulnerable to Invalid Curve Attack
Details

pkg/suci/suci.go in free5GC udm before 1.2.0, when Go before 1.19 is used, allows an Invalid Curve Attack because it may compute a shared secret via an uncompressed public key that has not been validated. An attacker can send arbitrary SUCIs to the UDM, which tries to decrypt them via both its private key and the attacker's public key.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/free5gc/udm"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.2.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-46324"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-327",
      "CWE-347"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2023-10-24T02:00:10Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2023-10-23T01:15:07Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "pkg/suci/suci.go in free5GC udm before 1.2.0, when Go before 1.19 is used, allows an Invalid Curve Attack because it may compute a shared secret via an uncompressed public key that has not been validated. An attacker can send arbitrary SUCIs to the UDM, which tries to decrypt them via both its private key and the attacker\u0027s public key.",
  "id": "GHSA-cqvv-r3g3-26rf",
  "modified": "2023-10-31T22:07:50Z",
  "published": "2023-10-23T03:30:30Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-46324"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/free5gc/udm/pull/20"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/free5gc/udm/commit/5e1479cc686f058992557669b13fd3761a1b6024"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/free5gc/udm"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/free5gc/udm/compare/v1.1.1...v1.2.0"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.gsma.com/security/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/0073-invalid_curve.pdf"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "free5GC udm vulnerable to Invalid Curve Attack"
}

GHSA-CRH8-242H-76G6

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-21 00:31 – Updated: 2026-08-21 00:31
VLAI
Details

Improper verification of cryptographic signature in Azure Data Factory allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-62834"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-347"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-20T22:17:43Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "Improper verification of cryptographic signature in Azure Data Factory allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.",
  "id": "GHSA-crh8-242h-76g6",
  "modified": "2026-08-21T00:31:21Z",
  "published": "2026-08-21T00:31:21Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-62834"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-62834"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-CRQ4-6FJX-J758

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-02-11 00:00 – Updated: 2022-02-17 00:00
VLAI
Details

There is a vulnerability of signature verification mechanism failure in system upgrade through recovery mode.Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may affect service confidentiality.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2021-40045"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-347"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-02-09T23:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "There is a vulnerability of signature verification mechanism failure in system upgrade through recovery mode.Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may affect service confidentiality.",
  "id": "GHSA-crq4-6fjx-j758",
  "modified": "2022-02-17T00:00:47Z",
  "published": "2022-02-11T00:00:54Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-40045"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://consumer.huawei.com/en/support/bulletin/2022/2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://device.harmonyos.com/en/docs/security/update/security-bulletins-202202-0000001204253396"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

GHSA-CVCQ-MW35-Q882

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-11-04 19:01 – Updated: 2022-11-08 19:00
VLAI
Details

A CWE-347: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability exists in the SGIUtility component that allows adversaries with local user privileges to load a malicious DLL which could result in execution of malicious code. Affected Products: EcoStruxure Operator Terminal Expert(V3.3 Hotfix 1 or prior), Pro-face BLUE(V3.3 Hotfix1 or prior).

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-41669"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-347"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-11-04T13:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "A CWE-347: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability exists in the SGIUtility component that allows adversaries with local user privileges to load a malicious DLL which could result in execution of malicious code. Affected Products: EcoStruxure Operator Terminal Expert(V3.3 Hotfix 1 or prior), Pro-face BLUE(V3.3 Hotfix1 or prior).",
  "id": "GHSA-cvcq-mw35-q882",
  "modified": "2022-11-08T19:00:22Z",
  "published": "2022-11-04T19:01:16Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-41669"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.se.com/ww/en/download/document/SEVD-2022-284-01"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-CVP8-5R8G-FHVQ

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-09-11 21:08 – Updated: 2024-09-19 18:25
VLAI
Summary
omniauth-saml vulnerable to Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
Details

ruby-saml, the dependent SAML gem of omniauth-saml has a signature wrapping vulnerability in <= v1.12.0 and v1.13.0 to v1.16.0 , see https://github.com/SAML-Toolkits/ruby-saml/security/advisories/GHSA-jw9c-mfg7-9rx2 As a result, omniauth-saml created a new release by upgrading ruby-saml to the patched versions v1.17.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "RubyGems",
        "name": "omniauth-saml"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "2.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.1.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "RubyGems",
        "name": "omniauth-saml"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.10.5"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "RubyGems",
        "name": "omniauth-saml"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "2.2.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.2.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-347"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2024-09-11T21:08:26Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "ruby-saml, the dependent SAML gem of omniauth-saml has a signature wrapping vulnerability in \u003c= v1.12.0 and v1.13.0 to v1.16.0 , see https://github.com/SAML-Toolkits/ruby-saml/security/advisories/GHSA-jw9c-mfg7-9rx2 \nAs a result, omniauth-saml created a [new release](https://github.com/omniauth/omniauth-saml/releases) by upgrading ruby-saml to the patched versions v1.17. \n",
  "id": "GHSA-cvp8-5r8g-fhvq",
  "modified": "2024-09-19T18:25:42Z",
  "published": "2024-09-11T21:08:26Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/SAML-Toolkits/ruby-saml/security/advisories/GHSA-jw9c-mfg7-9rx2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/omniauth/omniauth-saml/security/advisories/GHSA-cvp8-5r8g-fhvq"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/omniauth/omniauth-saml/commit/4274e9d57e65f2dcaae4aa3b2accf831494f2ddd"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/omniauth/omniauth-saml/commit/6c681fd082ab3daf271821897a40ab3417382e29"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/omniauth/omniauth-saml"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/rubysec/ruby-advisory-db/blob/master/gems/omniauth-saml/GHSA-cvp8-5r8g-fhvq.yml"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "omniauth-saml vulnerable to Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature"
}

GHSA-CWPH-2586-4QWC

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-10 15:33 – Updated: 2026-08-10 15:33
VLAI
Details

Improper verification of cryptographic signature and Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in Estonian Information System Authority (RIA) libdigidocpp, DigiDoc4, DigiDoc on Android, and DigiDoc on iOS. This issue affects libdigidocpp: from 4.1.0 before 4.2.1; DigiDoc4: from 4.7.0 before 4.8.2; DigiDoc on Android: from 2.7.0 before 2.7.2; DigiDoc on iOS: from 2.8.0 before 2.8.1.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-59112"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-347"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-10T14:17:25Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Improper verification of cryptographic signature and Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in Estonian Information System Authority (RIA) libdigidocpp, DigiDoc4, DigiDoc on Android, and DigiDoc on iOS.\u00a0This issue affects libdigidocpp: from 4.1.0 before 4.2.1; DigiDoc4: from 4.7.0 before 4.8.2; DigiDoc on Android: from 2.7.0 before 2.7.2; DigiDoc on iOS: from 2.8.0 before 2.8.1.",
  "id": "GHSA-cwph-2586-4qwc",
  "modified": "2026-08-10T15:33:51Z",
  "published": "2026-08-10T15:33:51Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-59112"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/open-eid/libdigidocpp/pull/690"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.id.ee/en/article/ria-soovitab-kasutajatel-uuendada-id-tarkvara-eng"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.ria.ee/blogi/digidoc-rakendustes-esinenud-turvanorkus-mis-juhtus-ja-kuidas-see-parandati"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-CX5H-J8W3-WHPR

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-12-12 21:31 – Updated: 2025-12-17 21:30
VLAI
Details

A downgrade issue affecting Intel-based Mac computers was addressed with additional code-signing restrictions. This issue is fixed in macOS Sequoia 15.7.3. An app may be able to access sensitive user data.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-43521"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-347"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-12-12T21:15:56Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "A downgrade issue affecting Intel-based Mac computers was addressed with additional code-signing restrictions. This issue is fixed in macOS Sequoia 15.7.3. An app may be able to access sensitive user data.",
  "id": "GHSA-cx5h-j8w3-whpr",
  "modified": "2025-12-17T21:30:43Z",
  "published": "2025-12-12T21:31:39Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-43521"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://support.apple.com/en-us/125886"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://support.apple.com/en-us/125887"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

No mitigation information available for this CWE.

CAPEC-463: Padding Oracle Crypto Attack

An adversary is able to efficiently decrypt data without knowing the decryption key if a target system leaks data on whether or not a padding error happened while decrypting the ciphertext. A target system that leaks this type of information becomes the padding oracle and an adversary is able to make use of that oracle to efficiently decrypt data without knowing the decryption key by issuing on average 128*b calls to the padding oracle (where b is the number of bytes in the ciphertext block). In addition to performing decryption, an adversary is also able to produce valid ciphertexts (i.e., perform encryption) by using the padding oracle, all without knowing the encryption key.

CAPEC-475: Signature Spoofing by Improper Validation

An adversary exploits a cryptographic weakness in the signature verification algorithm implementation to generate a valid signature without knowing the key.