Common Weakness Enumeration
CWE-303
AllowedIncorrect Implementation of Authentication Algorithm
Abstraction: Base · Status: Draft
The requirements for the product dictate the use of an established authentication algorithm, but the implementation of the algorithm is incorrect.
199 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
CVE-2026-73458 (GCVE-0-2026-73458)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-15 19:30 – Updated: 2026-09-15 19:38
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
On affected platforms running Arista EOS with authenticated Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) sessions configured, a specially crafted packet can cause the BFD session(s) to go down. This may result in undesirable network changes because various rou
Summary
On affected platforms running Arista EOS with authenticated Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) sessions configured, a specially crafted packet can cause the BFD session(s) to go down. This may result in undesirable network changes because various routing protocols monitor status on BFD session(s).
Severity
8.2 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-09-15 19:38 UTC
CWE
- CWE-303 - Incorrect Implementation of Authentication Algorithm
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://www.arista.com/en/support/advisories-noti… | vendor-advisory |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arista Networks | EOS |
Affected:
4.36.0 , ≤ 4.36.1F
(custom)
Affected: 4.35.0 , ≤ 4.35.5M (custom) Affected: 4.34.0 , ≤ 4.34.7M (custom) Affected: 4.33.0 , ≤ 4.33.8M (custom) |
Date Public
2026-09-09 19:27
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-73458",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-15T19:38:30.537124Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-15T19:38:38.389Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"platforms": [
"710 Series",
"720D Series",
"720XP/722XPM Series",
"750X Series",
"7010TX Series",
"7020R/R4 Series",
"7130 Series running EOS",
"7170 Series",
"7050X3/X4 Series",
"7060X/X2/X4/X5/X6 Series",
"7260X/X3 Series",
"7280R/R2/R3/R4 Series",
"7300X/X3 Series",
"7320X Series",
"7358X4 Series",
"7368X4 Series",
"7388X5 Series",
"7500R/R2/R3 Series",
"7800R3/R4 Series",
"7700R4 Series",
"AWE 5000 Series",
"AWE 7200R Series",
"CloudEOS",
"cEOS-lab",
"vEOS-lab",
"CloudVision eXchange",
"virtual or physical appliance"
],
"product": "EOS",
"vendor": "Arista Networks",
"versions": [
{
"changes": [
{
"at": "4.36.2F",
"status": "unaffected"
}
],
"lessThanOrEqual": "4.36.1F",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.36.0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"changes": [
{
"at": "4.35.6M",
"status": "unaffected"
}
],
"lessThanOrEqual": "4.35.5M",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.35.0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"changes": [
{
"at": "4.34.8M",
"status": "unaffected"
}
],
"lessThanOrEqual": "4.34.7M",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.34.0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"changes": [
{
"at": "4.33.9M",
"status": "unaffected"
}
],
"lessThanOrEqual": "4.33.8M",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.33.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eIn order to be vulnerable to CVE-2026-73458, the following condition must be met:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cdiv\u003eBFD sessions configured with authentication are affected by this issue. All supported authentication modes are impacted. The full list of authentication modes is below:\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/div\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003ePassword\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eKeyed MD5\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eMeticulous MD5\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eKeyed SHA1\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eMeticulous SHA1\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003e\u003cp\u003eTo determine whether your sessions are affected, run the following show command. If the authentication mode is set to anything other than None, your configuration is impacted. In the example below, the authentication mode is set to Password, indicating an affected configuration.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cpre\u003eswitch\u0026gt;show bfd peers detail\nVRF name: default\n-----------------\nPeer Addr 1.0.0.2, Intf Ethernet3/30/3, Type normal, Role active, State Up\nVRF default, LAddr 1.0.0.1, LD/RD 2432996710/3471785639\nSession state is Up and not using echo function\nHardware Acceleration: Async Off, Echo Off\nLast Up 06/04/26 13:55:50.630\nLast Down 06/04/26 13:55:49.725\nLast Diag: No Diagnostic\nAuthentication mode: Password\nShared-secret profile: bfdProfile_0\nTxInt: 500 ms, RxInt: 500 ms, Multiplier: 20\nReceived RxInt: 500 ms, Received Multiplier: 20\nRx Count: 2308, Rx Interval (ms) min/max/avg: 81/538/438 last: 188 ms ago\nTx Count: 2206, Tx Interval (ms) min/max/avg: 380/516/458 last: 476 ms ago\nDetect Time: 10000 ms\nSched Delay: 1*TxInt: 1762, 2*TxInt: 443, 3*TxInt: 0, GT 3*TxInt: 0\nRegistered protocols: bgp\nUptime: 16:51.08\nLast packet:\u0026nbsp; Version: 1 \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; - Diagnostic: 0\n\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;State bit: Up\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; - Demand bit: 0\n\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;Poll bit: 0\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; - Final bit: 0\n\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;Multiplier: 20 \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; - Length: 38\n\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;My Discr.: 3471785639\u0026nbsp; - Your Discr.: 2432996710\n\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;Min tx interval: 500 \u0026nbsp; - Min rx interval: 500\n\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;Min Echo interval: 500\n\u003c/pre\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/div\u003e\u003cp\u003eIf BFD is not configured, there is no exposure to this issue. The below show command command will return empty output:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cpre\u003eswitch\u0026gt;show running-config section bfd\nswitch\u0026gt;\n\u003c/pre\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/div\u003e\u003cp\u003eIf BFD is configured but not operational, there is no exposure to this issue. The below show command will return empty output:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cpre\u003eswitch\u0026gt;show bfd peers detail\nswitch\u0026gt;\n\u003c/pre\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/div\u003e\u003cp\u003eIf BFD is configured, and operational but not in authentication mode, there is no exposure to this issue and the output of below show command will look something like:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cpre\u003eswitch\u0026gt;show bfd peers detail\nVRF name: default\n-----------------\nPeer Addr 1.0.0.2, Intf Ethernet3/30/3, Type normal, Role active, State Up\nVRF default, LAddr 1.0.0.1, LD/RD 2432996710/3471785639\nSession state is Up and not using echo function\nHardware Acceleration: Async On, Echo Off\nLast Up 06/04/26 14:15:32.259\nLast Down 06/04/26 14:14:50.328\nLast Diag: No Diagnostic\nAuthentication mode: None\nShared-secret profile: None\nTxInt: 500 ms, RxInt: 500 ms, Multiplier: 20\nReceived RxInt: 500 ms, Received Multiplier: 20\nRx Count: 34, Rx Interval (ms) min/max/avg: 161/496/408 last: 163 ms ago\nTx Count: 29, Tx Interval (ms) min/max/avg: 375/499/440 last: 720 ms ago\nDetect Time: 10000 ms\nSched Delay: 1*TxInt: 76, 2*TxInt: 0, 3*TxInt: 0, GT 3*TxInt: 0\nRegistered protocols: bgp\nUptime: 13.65\nLast packet:\u0026nbsp; Version: 1 \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; - Diagnostic: 0\n\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;State bit: Up\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; - Demand bit: 0\n\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;Poll bit: 0\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; - Final bit: 0\n\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;Multiplier: 20 \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; - Length: 24\n\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;My Discr.: 3471785639\u0026nbsp; - Your Discr.: 2432996710\n\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;Min tx interval: 500 \u0026nbsp; - Min rx interval: 500\n\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;Min Echo interval: 500\u003c/pre\u003e"
}
],
"value": "In order to be vulnerable to CVE-2026-73458, the following condition must be met:\n\nBFD sessions configured with authentication are affected by this issue. All supported authentication modes are impacted. The full list of authentication modes is below:\n\n\u00a0\n\n * Password\n * Keyed MD5\n * Meticulous MD5\n * Keyed SHA1\n * Meticulous SHA1\n\n\n\n\nTo determine whether your sessions are affected, run the following show command. If the authentication mode is set to anything other than None, your configuration is impacted. In the example below, the authentication mode is set to Password, indicating an affected configuration.\n\n\n\nswitch\u003eshow bfd peers detail\nVRF name: default\n-----------------\nPeer Addr 1.0.0.2, Intf Ethernet3/30/3, Type normal, Role active, State Up\nVRF default, LAddr 1.0.0.1, LD/RD 2432996710/3471785639\nSession state is Up and not using echo function\nHardware Acceleration: Async Off, Echo Off\nLast Up 06/04/26 13:55:50.630\nLast Down 06/04/26 13:55:49.725\nLast Diag: No Diagnostic\nAuthentication mode: Password\nShared-secret profile: bfdProfile_0\nTxInt: 500 ms, RxInt: 500 ms, Multiplier: 20\nReceived RxInt: 500 ms, Received Multiplier: 20\nRx Count: 2308, Rx Interval (ms) min/max/avg: 81/538/438 last: 188 ms ago\nTx Count: 2206, Tx Interval (ms) min/max/avg: 380/516/458 last: 476 ms ago\nDetect Time: 10000 ms\nSched Delay: 1*TxInt: 1762, 2*TxInt: 443, 3*TxInt: 0, GT 3*TxInt: 0\nRegistered protocols: bgp\nUptime: 16:51.08\nLast packet:\u00a0 Version: 1 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 - Diagnostic: 0\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0State bit: Up\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 - Demand bit: 0\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Poll bit: 0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 - Final bit: 0\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Multiplier: 20 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 - Length: 38\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0My Discr.: 3471785639\u00a0 - Your Discr.: 2432996710\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Min tx interval: 500 \u00a0 - Min rx interval: 500\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Min Echo interval: 500\n\n\n\u00a0\n\n\n\nIf BFD is not configured, there is no exposure to this issue. The below show command command will return empty output:\n\n\n\nswitch\u003eshow running-config section bfd\nswitch\u003e\n\n\n\u00a0\n\n\n\nIf BFD is configured but not operational, there is no exposure to this issue. The below show command will return empty output:\n\n\n\nswitch\u003eshow bfd peers detail\nswitch\u003e\n\n\n\u00a0\n\n\n\nIf BFD is configured, and operational but not in authentication mode, there is no exposure to this issue and the output of below show command will look something like:\n\n\n\nswitch\u003eshow bfd peers detail\nVRF name: default\n-----------------\nPeer Addr 1.0.0.2, Intf Ethernet3/30/3, Type normal, Role active, State Up\nVRF default, LAddr 1.0.0.1, LD/RD 2432996710/3471785639\nSession state is Up and not using echo function\nHardware Acceleration: Async On, Echo Off\nLast Up 06/04/26 14:15:32.259\nLast Down 06/04/26 14:14:50.328\nLast Diag: No Diagnostic\nAuthentication mode: None\nShared-secret profile: None\nTxInt: 500 ms, RxInt: 500 ms, Multiplier: 20\nReceived RxInt: 500 ms, Received Multiplier: 20\nRx Count: 34, Rx Interval (ms) min/max/avg: 161/496/408 last: 163 ms ago\nTx Count: 29, Tx Interval (ms) min/max/avg: 375/499/440 last: 720 ms ago\nDetect Time: 10000 ms\nSched Delay: 1*TxInt: 76, 2*TxInt: 0, 3*TxInt: 0, GT 3*TxInt: 0\nRegistered protocols: bgp\nUptime: 13.65\nLast packet:\u00a0 Version: 1 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 - Diagnostic: 0\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0State bit: Up\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 - Demand bit: 0\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Poll bit: 0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 - Final bit: 0\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Multiplier: 20 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 - Length: 24\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0My Discr.: 3471785639\u00a0 - Your Discr.: 2432996710\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Min tx interval: 500 \u00a0 - Min rx interval: 500\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Min Echo interval: 500"
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "This issue was discovered internally by Arista."
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-09-09T19:27:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eOn affected platforms running Arista EOS with authenticated Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) sessions configured, a specially crafted packet can cause the BFD session(s) to go down. This may result in undesirable network changes because various routing protocols monitor status on BFD session(s).\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "On affected platforms running Arista EOS with authenticated Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) sessions configured, a specially crafted packet can cause the BFD session(s) to go down. This may result in undesirable network changes because various routing protocols monitor status on BFD session(s)."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-115",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-115 Authentication Bypass"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.2,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
},
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 9.2,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-303",
"description": "CWE-303 Incorrect Implementation of Authentication Algorithm",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-15T19:30:16.014Z",
"orgId": "c8b34d1a-69ae-45c3-88fe-f3b3d44f39b7",
"shortName": "Arista"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.arista.com/en/support/advisories-notices/security-advisory/24710-security-advisory-0154"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eThe recommended resolution is to upgrade to a remediated software version at your earliest convenience. CVE-2026-73458 has been fixed in the following releases:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003e4.36.2F and later releases in the 4.36.x train\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e4.35.6M and later releases in the 4.35.x train\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e4.34.8M and later releases in the 4.34.x train\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e4.33.9M and later releases in the 4.33.x train\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003e"
}
],
"value": "The recommended resolution is to upgrade to a remediated software version at your earliest convenience. CVE-2026-73458 has been fixed in the following releases:\n\n * 4.36.2F and later releases in the 4.36.x train\n * 4.35.6M and later releases in the 4.35.x train\n * 4.34.8M and later releases in the 4.34.x train\n * 4.33.9M and later releases in the 4.33.x train"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "154",
"defect": [
"1787150"
],
"discovery": "INTERNAL"
},
"title": "On affected platforms running Arista EOS with authenticated Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) sessions configured, a specially crafted packet can cause the BFD session(s) to go down. This may result in undesirable network changes because various rou",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eNo mitigation is available for this issue.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "No mitigation is available for this issue."
}
],
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.5"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "c8b34d1a-69ae-45c3-88fe-f3b3d44f39b7",
"assignerShortName": "Arista",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-73458",
"datePublished": "2026-09-15T19:30:16.014Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-12T16:45:03.510Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-15T19:38:38.389Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-73444 (GCVE-0-2026-73444)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-15 21:11 – Updated: 2026-09-16 18:04
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
On affected platforms running Arista EOS with VRRPv2 IP Authentication Header (IP-AH) authentication configured, an unauthenticated attacker with access to the layer 2 network segment on which VRRP is running could bypass VRRP authentication and claim the
Summary
On affected platforms running Arista EOS with VRRPv2 IP Authentication Header (IP-AH) authentication configured, an unauthenticated attacker with access to the layer 2 network segment on which VRRP is running could bypass VRRP authentication and claim the virtual router master role, enabling the attacker to intercept, modify, or discard traffic that hosts on the segment send to the virtual gateway address.
Severity
4.7 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-09-16 18:04 UTC
CWE
- CWE-303 - Incorrect Implementation of Authentication Algorithm
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://www.arista.com/en/support/advisories-noti… | vendor-advisory |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arista Networks | EOS |
Affected:
4.36.0 , ≤ 4.36.1F
(custom)
Affected: 4.35.0 , ≤ 4.35.5M (custom) Affected: 4.34.0 , ≤ 4.34.7M (custom) Affected: 4.33.0 , ≤ 4.33.9M (custom) Affected: 0 |
Date Public
2026-09-09 21:09
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-73444",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-16T18:04:26.052032Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-16T18:04:45.344Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"platforms": [
"710 Series",
"720D Series",
"720XP/722XPM Series",
"750X Series",
"7010TX Series",
"7020R/R4 Series",
"7130 Series running EOS",
"7170 Series",
"7050X3/X4 Series",
"7060X/X2/X4/X5/X6 Series",
"7260X/X3 Series",
"7280R/R2/R3/R4 Series",
"7300X/X3 Series",
"7320X Series",
"7358X4 Series",
"7368X4 Series",
"7388X5 Series",
"7500R/R2/R3 Series",
"7800R3/R4 Series",
"7700R4 Series",
"AWE 5000 Series",
"AWE 7200R Series",
"CloudEOS",
"cEOS-lab",
"vEOS-lab",
"CloudVision eXchange",
"virtual or physical appliance"
],
"product": "EOS",
"vendor": "Arista Networks",
"versions": [
{
"changes": [
{
"at": "4.36.2F",
"status": "unaffected"
}
],
"lessThanOrEqual": "4.36.1F",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.36.0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"changes": [
{
"at": "4.35.6M",
"status": "unaffected"
}
],
"lessThanOrEqual": "4.35.5M",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.35.0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"changes": [
{
"at": "4.34.8M",
"status": "unaffected"
}
],
"lessThanOrEqual": "4.34.7M",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.34.0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"changes": [
{
"at": "4.33.10M",
"status": "unaffected"
}
],
"lessThanOrEqual": "4.33.9M",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.33.0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0"
}
]
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eIn order to be vulnerable to CVE-2026-73444, VRRPv2 must be configured with IP-AH authentication on at least one interface:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cpre\u003eswitch\u0026gt;show running-config section vrrp\ninterface Ethernet1\n vrrp 1 ipv4 version 2\n vrrp 1 peer authentication ietf-md5 key-string 7 \u0026lt;key\u0026gt;\u003c/pre\u003e\u003cp\u003eIf VRRP is not configured, or is configured as version 3, or is configured without authentication, there is no exposure.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "In order to be vulnerable to CVE-2026-73444, VRRPv2 must be configured with IP-AH authentication on at least one interface:\n\n\n\nswitch\u003eshow running-config section vrrp\ninterface Ethernet1\n vrrp 1 ipv4 version 2\n vrrp 1 peer authentication ietf-md5 key-string 7 \u003ckey\u003e\n\n\n\nIf VRRP is not configured, or is configured as version 3, or is configured without authentication, there is no exposure."
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "This issue was discovered internally by Arista."
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-09-09T21:09:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eOn affected platforms running Arista EOS with VRRPv2 IP Authentication Header (IP-AH) authentication configured, an unauthenticated attacker with access to the layer 2 network segment on which VRRP is running could bypass VRRP authentication and claim the virtual router master role, enabling the attacker to intercept, modify, or discard traffic that hosts on the segment send to the virtual gateway address.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "On affected platforms running Arista EOS with VRRPv2 IP Authentication Header (IP-AH) authentication configured, an unauthenticated attacker with access to the layer 2 network segment on which VRRP is running could bypass VRRP authentication and claim the virtual router master role, enabling the attacker to intercept, modify, or discard traffic that hosts on the segment send to the virtual gateway address."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-115",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-115 Authentication Bypass"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 4.7,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
},
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "ADJACENT",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-303",
"description": "CWE-303 Incorrect Implementation of Authentication Algorithm",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-15T21:11:37.625Z",
"orgId": "c8b34d1a-69ae-45c3-88fe-f3b3d44f39b7",
"shortName": "Arista"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.arista.com/en/support/advisories-notices/security-advisory/24713-security-advisory-0157"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eThe recommended resolution is to upgrade to a remediated software version at your earliest convenience. CVE-2026-73444 has been fixed in the following releases:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003e4.36.2F and later releases in the 4.36.x train\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e4.35.6M and later releases in the 4.35.x train\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e4.34.8M and later releases in the 4.34.x train\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e4.33.10M and later releases in the 4.33.x train\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003e"
}
],
"value": "The recommended resolution is to upgrade to a remediated software version at your earliest convenience. CVE-2026-73444 has been fixed in the following releases:\n\n * 4.36.2F and later releases in the 4.36.x train\n * 4.35.6M and later releases in the 4.35.x train\n * 4.34.8M and later releases in the 4.34.x train\n * 4.33.10M and later releases in the 4.33.x train"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "157",
"defect": [
"1866656"
],
"discovery": "INTERNAL"
},
"title": "On affected platforms running Arista EOS with VRRPv2 IP Authentication Header (IP-AH) authentication configured, an unauthenticated attacker with access to the layer 2 network segment on which VRRP is running could bypass VRRP authentication and claim the",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eRestricting physical and logical access to VRRP-enabled segments reduces the attack surface. Additionally, migrating virtual routers from VRRP version 2 with authentication to VRRP version 3 removes the vulnerable code path:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cpre\u003eswitch(config)# interface vlan 20\nswitch(config-if-vl20)# vrrp 1 ipv4 version 3\u003c/pre\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Restricting physical and logical access to VRRP-enabled segments reduces the attack surface. Additionally, migrating virtual routers from VRRP version 2 with authentication to VRRP version 3 removes the vulnerable code path:\n\n\n\nswitch(config)# interface vlan 20\nswitch(config-if-vl20)# vrrp 1 ipv4 version 3"
}
],
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.5"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "c8b34d1a-69ae-45c3-88fe-f3b3d44f39b7",
"assignerShortName": "Arista",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-73444",
"datePublished": "2026-09-15T21:11:37.625Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-12T16:39:35.977Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-16T18:04:45.344Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-66411 (GCVE-0-2026-66411)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-10 08:13 – Updated: 2026-08-10 11:01
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Summary
DEEBOT PRO M1 and DEEBOT PRO K1VAC incorrectly implement authentication algorithm in Websocket communications.
An unauthenticated attacker may connect and operate the affected robot.
Severity
5.3 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-08-10 10:58 UTC
CWE
- CWE-303 - Incorrect Implementation of Authentication Algorithm
Assigner
References
2 references
Impacted products
2 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ECOVACS ROBOTICS | DEEBOT PRO M1 |
Affected:
0 , < M1-1.7.27
(semver)
|
|
| ECOVACS ROBOTICS | DEEBOT PRO K1VAC |
Affected:
0 , < V1.7.821
(semver)
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-66411",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-10T10:58:14.457734Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-10T11:01:17.836Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "DEEBOT PRO M1",
"vendor": "ECOVACS ROBOTICS",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "M1-1.7.27",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "DEEBOT PRO K1VAC",
"vendor": "ECOVACS ROBOTICS",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "V1.7.821",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "DEEBOT PRO M1 and DEEBOT PRO K1VAC incorrectly implement authentication algorithm in Websocket communications.\r\nAn unauthenticated attacker may connect and operate the affected robot."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en-US",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
},
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"baseScore": 6.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en-US",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-303",
"description": "Incorrect Implementation of Authentication Algorithm",
"lang": "en-US",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-10T08:13:34.748Z",
"orgId": "ede6fdc4-6654-4307-a26d-3331c018e2ce",
"shortName": "jpcert"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://robot.hellohas.co.jp/news/update_20260331/"
},
{
"url": "https://jvn.jp/en/vu/JVNVU92804348/"
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "ede6fdc4-6654-4307-a26d-3331c018e2ce",
"assignerShortName": "jpcert",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-66411",
"datePublished": "2026-08-10T08:13:34.748Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-07-27T00:45:20.457Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-10T11:01:17.836Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-66028 (GCVE-0-2026-66028)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-07-27 18:00 – Updated: 2026-07-28 01:06
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Ekushey Project Manager CRM 5.0 Missing Uniqueness Constraint via Client Email
Summary
Ekushey Project Manager CRM through version 5.0 contains a missing uniqueness constraint vulnerability that allows authenticated administrators to create duplicate client accounts with identical email and password credentials. Attackers can exploit the lack of email field uniqueness enforcement to create conflicting account states where multiple accounts share the same email address with different passwords, resulting in unpredictable authentication behavior and unauthorized account access.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-07-27 18:24 UTC
CWE
- CWE-303 - Incorrect Implementation of Authentication Algorithm
Assigner
References
3 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/aaronamran/CVE-Disclosures/tre… | technical-descriptionexploit |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/ekushey-proj… | third-party-advisory |
| https://codecanyon.net/item/ekushey-project-manag… | product |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Creativeitem | Ekushey Project Manager CRM |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 5.0
(custom)
cpe:2.3:a:creativeitem:ekushey_project_manager_crm:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
Date Public
2026-07-25 00:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-66028",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-07-27T18:24:50.620701Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-27T18:25:18.297Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Ekushey Project Manager CRM",
"vendor": "Creativeitem",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:creativeitem:ekushey_project_manager_crm:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndIncluding": "5.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Aaron Amran Bin Amiruddin"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-07-25T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Ekushey Project Manager CRM through version 5.0 contains a missing uniqueness constraint vulnerability that allows authenticated administrators to create duplicate client accounts with identical email and password credentials. Attackers can exploit the lack of email field uniqueness enforcement to create conflicting account states where multiple accounts share the same email address with different passwords, resulting in unpredictable authentication behavior and unauthorized account access."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 7.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 6.7,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-303",
"description": "Incorrect Implementation of Authentication Algorithm",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-28T01:06:22.634Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "Researcher Disclosure",
"tags": [
"technical-description",
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/aaronamran/CVE-Disclosures/tree/main/CVE-2026/CVE-2026-66028"
},
{
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/ekushey-project-manager-crm-missing-uniqueness-constraint-via-client-email"
},
{
"name": "Product Webpage",
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://codecanyon.net/item/ekushey-project-manager-crm/9492104"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Ekushey Project Manager CRM 5.0 Missing Uniqueness Constraint via Client Email",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "vulncheck"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-66028",
"datePublished": "2026-07-27T18:00:54.581Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-07-23T20:45:17.816Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-28T01:06:22.634Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-59309 (GCVE-0-2026-59309)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-07-30 12:19 – Updated: 2026-07-30 15:08
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
vCenter authentication-bypass vulnerability
Summary
VMware vCenter contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in the VMware Directory Service. A malicious actor with network access to vCenter may exploit this issue to bypass authentication and gain unauthorized access to the system.
Severity
9.8 (Critical)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-07-30 15:07 UTC
CWE
- CWE-303 - Incorrect implementation of authentication algorithm
Assigner
References
1 reference
Impacted products
5 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| VMware | Cloud Foundation |
Affected:
9.1.x.x
Affected: 9.0.x.x Affected: 5.x |
|
| VMware | vSphere Foundation |
Affected:
9.1.x.x
Affected: 9.0.x.x |
|
| VMware | vCenter |
Affected:
9.1.x.x , < 9.1.0.0300
(custom)
Affected: 9.0.x.x , < 9.0.2.0100 (custom) Affected: 8.0 , < 8.0 U3k (custom) |
|
| VMware | Telco Cloud Infrastructure |
Affected:
3.0
|
|
| VMware | Telco Cloud Platform |
Affected:
5.1.x
Affected: 5.0.x Affected: 4.x Affected: 3.0 |
Date Public
2026-07-29 04:54
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-59309",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-07-30T15:07:53.144480Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-30T15:08:05.176Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Cloud Foundation",
"vendor": "VMware",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "9.1.x.x"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "9.0.x.x"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.x"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "vSphere Foundation",
"vendor": "VMware",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "9.1.x.x"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "9.0.x.x"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "vCenter",
"vendor": "VMware",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "9.1.0.0300",
"status": "affected",
"version": "9.1.x.x",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "9.0.2.0100",
"status": "affected",
"version": "9.0.x.x",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "8.0 U3k",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Telco Cloud Infrastructure",
"vendor": "VMware",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Telco Cloud Platform",
"vendor": "VMware",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.1.x"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.0.x"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.x"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-07-29T04:54:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "VMware vCenter contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in the VMware Directory Service.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan\u003eA malicious actor with network access to vCenter\u0026nbsp;may exploit this issue to bypass authentication and gain unauthorized access to the system.\u003c/span\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "VMware vCenter contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in the VMware Directory Service.\u00a0A malicious actor with network access to vCenter\u00a0may exploit this issue to bypass authentication and gain unauthorized access to the system."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.8,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-303",
"description": "CWE-303 Incorrect implementation of authentication algorithm",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-30T12:27:12.963Z",
"orgId": "dcf2e128-44bd-42ed-91e8-88f912c1401d",
"shortName": "vmware"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/38017"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "vCenter authentication-bypass vulnerability",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.4"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "dcf2e128-44bd-42ed-91e8-88f912c1401d",
"assignerShortName": "vmware",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-59309",
"datePublished": "2026-07-30T12:19:52.390Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-07-04T18:13:57.026Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-30T15:08:05.176Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-57852 (GCVE-0-2026-57852)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-07-20 22:09 – Updated: 2026-07-21 14:55
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Authentication Bypass via Null Short-Circuit in Grav CMS Scheduler Webhook Token Check
Summary
Grav CMS scheduler-webhook plugin contains an authentication bypass vulnerability that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to trigger configured scheduled jobs by exploiting a short-circuit logic flaw in the webhook token validation. Attackers can send a single unauthenticated POST request to the scheduler webhook endpoint to execute all configured scheduled jobs or target a specific job, causing unintended execution of operator-defined commands under the web server process user.
Severity
5.6 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-07-21 13:12 UTC
CWE
- CWE-303 - Incorrect Implementation of Authentication Algorithm
Assigner
References
3 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/getgrav/grav/security/advisori… | vendor-advisory |
| https://github.com/getgrav/grav | |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/authenticati… | third-party-advisory |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trilby Media | Grav CMS scheduler-webhook plugin |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 1.1.3
(semver)
Affected: 0 , ≤ 2.0.8 (semver) |
Date Public
2026-07-20 22:10
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-57852",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-07-21T13:12:46.072253Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-21T14:55:56.254Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Grav CMS scheduler-webhook plugin",
"vendor": "Trilby Media",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.1.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "2.0.8",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "Saidakbarxon Maxsudxonov"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-07-20T22:10:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eGrav CMS scheduler-webhook plugin contains an authentication bypass vulnerability that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to trigger configured scheduled jobs by exploiting a short-circuit logic flaw in the webhook token validation. Attackers can send a single unauthenticated POST request to the scheduler webhook endpoint to execute all configured scheduled jobs or target a specific job, causing unintended execution of operator-defined commands under the web server process user.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Grav CMS scheduler-webhook plugin contains an authentication bypass vulnerability that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to trigger configured scheduled jobs by exploiting a short-circuit logic flaw in the webhook token validation. Attackers can send a single unauthenticated POST request to the scheduler webhook endpoint to execute all configured scheduled jobs or target a specific job, causing unintended execution of operator-defined commands under the web server process user."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 5.6,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
},
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-303",
"description": "CWE-303 Incorrect Implementation of Authentication Algorithm",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-21T11:08:15.685Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "GitHub Security Advisory (GHSA-xwv3-2mv2-w33x)",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/getgrav/grav/security/advisories/GHSA-xwv3-2mv2-w33x"
},
{
"name": "Product",
"url": "https://github.com/getgrav/grav"
},
{
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/authentication-bypass-via-null-short-circuit-in-grav-cms-scheduler-webhook-token-check"
}
],
"title": "Authentication Bypass via Null Short-Circuit in Grav CMS Scheduler Webhook Token Check",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "vulncheck-endgame"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-57852",
"datePublished": "2026-07-20T22:09:01.640Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-06-25T18:48:00.282Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-21T14:55:56.254Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-50360 (GCVE-0-2026-50360)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-07-14 17:06 – Updated: 2026-10-08 18:14
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Windows SMB Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
Summary
Incorrect implementation of authentication algorithm in Windows SMB Server allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-07-22 00:00 UTC
CWE
- CWE-303 - Incorrect Implementation of Authentication Algorithm
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerabi… | vendor-advisorypatch |
Impacted products
8 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft | Windows 10 Version 21H2 |
Affected:
10.0.19044.0 , < 10.0.19044.7548
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows 10 Version 22H2 |
Affected:
10.0.19045.0 , < 10.0.19045.7548
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows 11 Version 24H2 |
Affected:
10.0.26100.0 , < 10.0.26100.8875
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows 11 Version 25H2 |
Affected:
10.0.26200.0 , < 10.0.26200.8875
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows 11 version 26H1 |
Affected:
10.0.28000.0 , < 10.0.28000.2525
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2022 |
Affected:
10.0.20348.0 , < 10.0.20348.5386
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2025 |
Affected:
10.0.26100.0 , < 10.0.26100.33158
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) |
Affected:
10.0.26100.0 , < 10.0.26100.33158
(custom)
|
Date Public
2026-07-14 14:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-50360",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-07-22T00:00:00+00:00",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-23T03:55:36.760Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"platforms": [
"32-bit Systems",
"ARM64-based Systems",
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows 10 Version 21H2",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.0.19044.7548",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.19044.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"32-bit Systems",
"ARM64-based Systems",
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows 10 Version 22H2",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.0.19045.7548",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.19045.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"ARM64-based Systems",
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows 11 Version 24H2",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.0.26100.8875",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.26100.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"ARM64-based Systems",
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows 11 Version 25H2",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.0.26200.8875",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.26200.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"ARM64-based Systems",
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows 11 version 26H1",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.0.28000.2525",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.28000.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows Server 2022",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.0.20348.5386",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.20348.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows Server 2025",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.0.26100.33158",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.26100.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation)",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.0.26100.33158",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.26100.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2022:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "10.0.20348.5386",
"versionStartIncluding": "10.0.20348.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_10_21H2:*:*:*:*:*:*:x86:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "10.0.19044.7548",
"versionStartIncluding": "10.0.19044.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_10_22H2:*:*:*:*:*:*:x64:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "10.0.19045.7548",
"versionStartIncluding": "10.0.19045.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2025:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "10.0.26100.33158",
"versionStartIncluding": "10.0.26100.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_11_25H2:*:*:*:*:*:*:arm64:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "10.0.26200.8875",
"versionStartIncluding": "10.0.26200.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_11_24H2:*:*:*:*:*:*:arm64:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "10.0.26100.8875",
"versionStartIncluding": "10.0.26100.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2025:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "10.0.26100.33158",
"versionStartIncluding": "10.0.26100.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_11_26H1:*:*:*:*:*:*:x64:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "10.0.28000.2525",
"versionStartIncluding": "10.0.28000.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-07-14T14:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en-US",
"value": "Incorrect implementation of authentication algorithm in Windows SMB Server allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:U/RL:O/RC:C",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en-US",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-303",
"description": "CWE-303: Incorrect Implementation of Authentication Algorithm",
"lang": "en-US",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-08T18:14:34.353Z",
"orgId": "f38d906d-7342-40ea-92c1-6c4a2c6478c8",
"shortName": "microsoft"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "Windows SMB Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"patch"
],
"url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50360"
}
],
"title": "Windows SMB Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "f38d906d-7342-40ea-92c1-6c4a2c6478c8",
"assignerShortName": "microsoft",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-50360",
"datePublished": "2026-07-14T17:06:24.527Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-06-04T18:48:26.815Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-08T18:14:34.353Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-49467 (GCVE-0-2026-49467)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-12 17:02 – Updated: 2026-08-14 21:52
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
TOTP enrollment hijack: password gate skipped due to unawaited promise
Summary
Pingvin Share X is a secure and easy self-hosted file sharing platform. A vulnerability in versions 1.5.0 through 1.18.0 allow an attacker to bypass password verification when managing Time-based One-Time Password (TOTP) settings. The root cause is a missing `await` keyword on calls to the asynchronous `verifyPassword` method in `authTotp.service.ts` and the `authenticateUser` method in `auth.service.ts`. In JavaScript, an unawaited `Promise` is always truthy. So the logic intended to throw a `ForbiddenException` when a password is incorrect. It never executes because the expression evaluates the existence of the `Promise` object rather than its resolved boolean result. The vulnerability is fixed in version 1.18.1 by ensuring all asynchronous authentication calls are properly awaited. There are no official workarounds. If a user is locked out, an administrator must manually reset the user's TOTP status in the database.
Severity
8.8 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-08-14 21:52 UTC
CWE
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/smp46/pingvin-share-x/security… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| smp46 | pingvin-share-x |
Affected:
>= 1.5.0, < 1.18.1
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-49467",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-14T21:52:03.631125Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-14T21:52:13.060Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "pingvin-share-x",
"vendor": "smp46",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 1.5.0, \u003c 1.18.1"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Pingvin Share X is a secure and easy self-hosted file sharing platform. A vulnerability in versions 1.5.0 through 1.18.0 allow an attacker to bypass password verification when managing Time-based One-Time Password (TOTP) settings. The root cause is a missing `await` keyword on calls to the asynchronous `verifyPassword` method in `authTotp.service.ts` and the `authenticateUser` method in `auth.service.ts`. In JavaScript, an unawaited `Promise` is always truthy. So the logic intended to throw a `ForbiddenException` when a password is incorrect. It never executes because the expression evaluates the existence of the `Promise` object rather than its resolved boolean result. The vulnerability is fixed in version 1.18.1 by ensuring all asynchronous authentication calls are properly awaited. There are no official workarounds. If a user is locked out, an administrator must manually reset the user\u0027s TOTP status in the database."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-303",
"description": "CWE-303: Incorrect Implementation of Authentication Algorithm",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-304",
"description": "CWE-304: Missing Critical Step in Authentication",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-12T17:02:26.556Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/smp46/pingvin-share-x/security/advisories/GHSA-59q6-jvp6-w282",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/smp46/pingvin-share-x/security/advisories/GHSA-59q6-jvp6-w282"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-59q6-jvp6-w282",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "TOTP enrollment hijack: password gate skipped due to unawaited promise"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-49467",
"datePublished": "2026-08-12T17:02:26.556Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-05-30T04:17:43.094Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-14T21:52:13.060Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-47300 (GCVE-0-2026-47300)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-07-14 18:20 – Updated: 2026-10-08 18:12
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
ASP.NET Core Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
Summary
Incorrect implementation of authentication algorithm in ASP.NET Core allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-07-15 03:57 UTC
CWE
- CWE-303 - Incorrect Implementation of Authentication Algorithm
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerabi… | vendor-advisorypatch |
Impacted products
6 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft | .NET 10.0 |
Affected:
10.0.0 , < 10.0.10
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | .NET 8.0 |
Affected:
8.0.0 , < 8.0.29
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | .NET 9.0 |
Affected:
9.0.0 , < 9.0.18
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Microsoft Visual Studio 2022 version 17.12 |
Affected:
17.12.0 , < 17.12.22
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Microsoft Visual Studio 2022 version 17.14 |
Affected:
17.14.0 , < 17.14.36
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Microsoft Visual Studio 2026 version 18.7 |
Affected:
18.0 , < 18.7.4
(custom)
|
Date Public
2026-07-14 14:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-47300",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-07-15T03:57:39.408951Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-15T10:57:52.578Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": ".NET 10.0",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.0.10",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"product": ".NET 8.0",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "8.0.29",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8.0.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"product": ".NET 9.0",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "9.0.18",
"status": "affected",
"version": "9.0.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"product": "Microsoft Visual Studio 2022 version 17.12",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "17.12.22",
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.12.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"product": "Microsoft Visual Studio 2022 version 17.14",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "17.14.36",
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.14.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"product": "Microsoft Visual Studio 2026 version 18.7",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "18.7.4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "18.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:.net:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "10.0.10",
"versionStartIncluding": "10.0.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:.net:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "8.0.29",
"versionStartIncluding": "8.0.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:.net:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "9.0.18",
"versionStartIncluding": "9.0.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:visual_studio_2022:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "17.12.22",
"versionStartIncluding": "17.12.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:visual_studio_2022:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "17.14.36",
"versionStartIncluding": "17.14.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:visual_studio_2026:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "18.7.4",
"versionStartIncluding": "18.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-07-14T14:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en-US",
"value": "Incorrect implementation of authentication algorithm in ASP.NET Core allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:U/RL:O/RC:C",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en-US",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-303",
"description": "CWE-303: Incorrect Implementation of Authentication Algorithm",
"lang": "en-US",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-08T18:12:45.141Z",
"orgId": "f38d906d-7342-40ea-92c1-6c4a2c6478c8",
"shortName": "microsoft"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "ASP.NET Core Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"patch"
],
"url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47300"
}
],
"title": "ASP.NET Core Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "f38d906d-7342-40ea-92c1-6c4a2c6478c8",
"assignerShortName": "microsoft",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-47300",
"datePublished": "2026-07-14T18:20:12.225Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-05-18T23:53:33.897Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-08T18:12:45.141Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-46389 (GCVE-0-2026-46389)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-06-05 18:10 – Updated: 2026-06-05 19:40
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
UDS Identity Config has a client authentication bypass in `ClientIdAndKubernetesSecretAuthenticator`
Summary
UDS Identity Config builds the Keycloak configuration image (realm, plugins, theme, truststore, JARs) consumed by UDS Core's Identity deployment. In versions 0.11.0 through 0.26.0, a logic error in the `client-kubernetes-secret` Keycloak client authenticator (shipped by `uds-identity-config` and consumed by UDS Core) causes the submitted `client_secret` to be overwritten with the mounted Kubernetes secret before comparison. An attacker who can reach the Keycloak token endpoint and knows a `client_id` using this authenticator can authenticate as that client with any `client_secret` value and obtain OAuth2 tokens scoped to the client's service account. In the case of the `uds-operator` client this token can be used to registry/modify other clients. Version 0.26.1 patches the issue.
Severity
10 (Critical)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-06-05 19:40 UTC
CWE
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/defenseunicorns/uds-identity-c… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/defenseunicorns/uds-identity-c… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| defenseunicorns | uds-identity-config |
Affected:
>= 0.11.0, < 0.26.1
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-46389",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-06-05T19:40:35.029663Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-05T19:40:55.970Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "uds-identity-config",
"vendor": "defenseunicorns",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 0.11.0, \u003c 0.26.1"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "UDS Identity Config builds the Keycloak configuration image (realm, plugins, theme, truststore, JARs) consumed by UDS Core\u0027s Identity deployment. In versions 0.11.0 through 0.26.0, a logic error in the `client-kubernetes-secret` Keycloak client authenticator (shipped by `uds-identity-config` and consumed by UDS Core) causes the submitted `client_secret` to be overwritten with the mounted Kubernetes secret before comparison. An attacker who can reach the Keycloak token endpoint and knows a `client_id` using this authenticator can authenticate as that client with any `client_secret` value and obtain OAuth2 tokens scoped to the client\u0027s service account. In the case of the `uds-operator` client this token can be used to registry/modify other clients. Version 0.26.1 patches the issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 10,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-287",
"description": "CWE-287: Improper Authentication",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-303",
"description": "CWE-303: Incorrect Implementation of Authentication Algorithm",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-05T18:10:47.173Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/defenseunicorns/uds-identity-config/security/advisories/GHSA-8mg2-6588-r4hw",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/defenseunicorns/uds-identity-config/security/advisories/GHSA-8mg2-6588-r4hw"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/defenseunicorns/uds-identity-config/releases/tag/v0.26.1",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/defenseunicorns/uds-identity-config/releases/tag/v0.26.1"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-8mg2-6588-r4hw",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "UDS Identity Config has a client authentication bypass in `ClientIdAndKubernetesSecretAuthenticator`"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-46389",
"datePublished": "2026-06-05T18:10:47.173Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-05-13T19:53:47.922Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-05T19:40:55.970Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
No mitigation information available for this CWE.
CAPEC-90: Reflection Attack in Authentication Protocol
An adversary can abuse an authentication protocol susceptible to reflection attack in order to defeat it. Doing so allows the adversary illegitimate access to the target system, without possessing the requisite credentials. Reflection attacks are of great concern to authentication protocols that rely on a challenge-handshake or similar mechanism. An adversary can impersonate a legitimate user and can gain illegitimate access to the system by successfully mounting a reflection attack during authentication.