Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-295

Allowed

Improper Certificate Validation

Abstraction: Base · Status: Draft

The product does not validate, or incorrectly validates, a certificate.

2420 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.

GHSA-HP23-VCJ5-CJVV

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-10-30 18:30 – Updated: 2023-11-04 03:30
VLAI
Details

In UWB Google, there is a possible way for a malicious app to masquerade as system app com.android.uwb.resources due to improperly used crypto. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-21358"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-295"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2023-10-30T17:15:51Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In UWB Google, there is a possible way for a malicious app to masquerade as system app com.android.uwb.resources due to improperly used crypto. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.",
  "id": "GHSA-hp23-vcj5-cjvv",
  "modified": "2023-11-04T03:30:19Z",
  "published": "2023-10-30T18:30:25Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-21358"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://source.android.com/docs/security/bulletin/android-14"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-HPP5-56VF-WWQG

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-05-22 06:30 – Updated: 2024-07-03 18:43
VLAI
Details

TP-Link Tether versions prior to 4.5.13 and TP-Link Tapo versions prior to 3.3.6 do not properly validate certificates, which may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to eavesdrop on an encrypted communication via a man-in-the-middle attack.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-31340"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-295"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-05-22T06:15:12Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "TP-Link Tether versions prior to 4.5.13 and TP-Link Tapo versions prior to 3.3.6 do not properly validate certificates, which may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to eavesdrop on an encrypted communication via a man-in-the-middle attack.",
  "id": "GHSA-hpp5-56vf-wwqg",
  "modified": "2024-07-03T18:43:05Z",
  "published": "2024-05-22T06:30:38Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-31340"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN29471697"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.tplink.iot"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.tplink.tether"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-HQ4R-9XHW-3X4H

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-06-23 09:30 – Updated: 2024-04-04 05:02
VLAI
Details

Dell VxRail, versions prior to 7.0.450, contain an improper certificate validation vulnerability. A high privileged remote attacker may potentially exploit this vulnerability to carry out a man-in-the-middle attack by supplying a crafted certificate and intercepting the victim's traffic to view or modify a victim’s data in transit.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-32464"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-295"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2023-06-23T08:15:09Z",
    "severity": "LOW"
  },
  "details": "\nDell VxRail, versions prior to 7.0.450, contain an improper certificate validation vulnerability. A high privileged remote attacker may potentially exploit this vulnerability to carry out a man-in-the-middle attack by supplying a crafted certificate and intercepting the victim\u0027s traffic to view or modify a victim\u2019s data in transit.\n\n",
  "id": "GHSA-hq4r-9xhw-3x4h",
  "modified": "2024-04-04T05:02:32Z",
  "published": "2023-06-23T09:30:17Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-32464"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000213011/dsa-2023-071-dell-vxrail-security-update-for-multiple-third-party-component-vulnerabilities-7-0-450"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-HQ85-5CPJ-MR62

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-10-20 19:37 – Updated: 2026-10-20 19:37
VLAI
Summary
uv's bundled CA store trusts an emSign root whose intermediate CA keys are compromised
Details

By default, uv verifies TLS connections against a vendored copy of the webpki-root-certs bundle. Versions before 0.13.4 include the emSign ECC Root CA - G3 root. Eight eMudhra intermediate CA certificates that chain to that root have compromised private keys, and the CA has revoked them.

An attacker with one of the compromised keys can issue certificates that uv accepts for any hostname, and can be used to issue certificates to enable MITM attacks.

uv 0.13.4 removes the root from its vendored bundle, following webpki-root-certs 1.0.10. Upgrade to 0.13.4 or later.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "uv"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.13.4"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-295"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-10-20T19:37:52Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "By default, uv verifies TLS connections against a vendored copy of the `webpki-root-certs` bundle. Versions before 0.13.4 include the `emSign ECC Root CA - G3` root. Eight eMudhra intermediate CA certificates that chain to that root have compromised private keys, and the CA has revoked them.\n\nAn attacker with one of the compromised keys can issue certificates that uv accepts for any hostname, and can be used to issue certificates to enable MITM attacks.\n\nuv 0.13.4 removes the root from its vendored bundle, following `webpki-root-certs` 1.0.10. Upgrade to 0.13.4 or later.",
  "id": "GHSA-hq85-5cpj-mr62",
  "modified": "2026-10-20T19:37:53Z",
  "published": "2026-10-20T19:37:52Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/security/advisories/GHSA-hq85-5cpj-mr62"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/certifi/python-certifi/security/advisories/GHSA-6q48-6c7w-9gw2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://emudhra.we-have-a-problem.com"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/astral-sh/uv"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://groups.google.com/a/mozilla.org/g/dev-security-policy/c/0R3XLJL6FuE/m/0XofdebrAAAJ"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "uv\u0027s bundled CA store trusts an emSign root whose intermediate CA keys are compromised"
}

GHSA-HQH8-88G9-J6XW

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-10-31 21:31 – Updated: 2026-10-31 21:31
VLAI
Details

Improper certificate validation in Visual Studio allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-118147"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-295"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-10-31T19:16:47Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Improper certificate validation in Visual Studio allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.",
  "id": "GHSA-hqh8-88g9-j6xw",
  "modified": "2026-10-31T21:31:40Z",
  "published": "2026-10-31T21:31:40Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-118147"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-118147"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-HQJ6-MX68-28JM

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-04 21:30 – Updated: 2026-08-04 21:30
VLAI
Details

An improper certificate validation vulnerability was reported in multiple Lenovo XClarity Orchestrator (LXCO) 2.2.0 microservices that could allow an adjacent network attacker to intercept sensitive communications by performing a machine-in-the-middle attack against HTTPS connections during TLS certificate validation under certain circumstances.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-16792"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-295"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-04T20:16:49Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "An improper certificate validation vulnerability was reported in multiple Lenovo XClarity Orchestrator (LXCO) 2.2.0 microservices that could allow an adjacent network attacker to intercept sensitive communications by performing a machine-in-the-middle attack against HTTPS connections during TLS certificate validation under certain circumstances.",
  "id": "GHSA-hqj6-mx68-28jm",
  "modified": "2026-08-04T21:30:29Z",
  "published": "2026-08-04T21:30:29Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-16792"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://support.lenovo.com/my/en/solutions/ht509976-lenovo-xclarity-orchestrator"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-HQPX-MX62-25M9

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-10-13 15:32 – Updated: 2026-10-13 15:32
VLAI
Details

Improper certificate validation in certain Zoom Clients for Windows may allow an unauthenticated user to conduct an information disclosure via network access.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-108184"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-295"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-10-13T15:17:32Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Improper certificate validation in certain Zoom Clients for Windows may allow an unauthenticated user to conduct an information disclosure via network access.",
  "id": "GHSA-hqpx-mx62-25m9",
  "modified": "2026-10-13T15:32:25Z",
  "published": "2026-10-13T15:32:25Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-108184"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.zoom.com/en/trust/security-bulletin/zsb-26021"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-HQQJ-V58H-GR7X

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-10-03 09:31 – Updated: 2026-10-03 09:31
VLAI
Details

In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, neither copy of PKIXCertPathReviewer - org.bouncycastle.pkix.jcajce.PKIXCertPathReviewer nor the legacy org.bouncycastle.x509.PKIXCertPathReviewer - applied X.509 name constraints to the end-entity certificate. checkNameConstraints walked the path with a loop bound of index greater than zero, which is the bound the CA-only steps require, but index zero is the target certificate under the standard CertPath ordering, so the permitted and excluded subtree checks of RFC 5280 sec. 6.1.3 (b) and (c) never ran against the leaf's subject DN or its subjectAltName. A chain whose leaf violated a NameConstraints extension imposed by its own issuing CA therefore reported isValidCertPath() true with an empty error list, while CertPathValidator.getInstance("PKIX", "BC"), which shares no code with the reviewer, rejected the identical chain against the identical trust anchor. An application using the reviewer to make the trust decision rather than for diagnostics alongside a real validation accepted a certificate the constrained CA was never authorised to issue. Both copies now check every certificate in the path including the target, waive the sec. 4.2.1.10 self-issued exemption for the final certificate as sec. 6.1.3 requires, and skip the sec. 6.1.4 (g) constraint-accumulation step for the target. This issue also affects Bouncy Castle for Java LTS before 2.73.13, which carries only the org.bouncycastle.pkix.jcajce copy of the reviewer. It also affects Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS (BC-FJA) before bcpkix-fips 1.0.13 (1.0.X series), 2.0.13 (2.0.X series) and 2.1.13 (2.1.X series).

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-71889"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-295"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-10-03T09:17:05Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, neither copy of PKIXCertPathReviewer - org.bouncycastle.pkix.jcajce.PKIXCertPathReviewer nor the legacy org.bouncycastle.x509.PKIXCertPathReviewer - applied X.509 name constraints to the end-entity certificate. checkNameConstraints walked the path with a loop bound of index greater than zero, which is the bound the CA-only steps require, but index zero is the target certificate under the standard CertPath ordering, so the permitted and excluded subtree checks of RFC 5280 sec. 6.1.3 (b) and (c) never ran against the leaf\u0027s subject DN or its subjectAltName. A chain whose leaf violated a NameConstraints extension imposed by its own issuing CA therefore reported isValidCertPath() true with an empty error list, while CertPathValidator.getInstance(\"PKIX\", \"BC\"), which shares no code with the reviewer, rejected the identical chain against the identical trust anchor. An application using the reviewer to make the trust decision rather than for diagnostics alongside a real validation accepted a certificate the constrained CA was never authorised to issue. Both copies now check every certificate in the path including the target, waive the sec. 4.2.1.10 self-issued exemption for the final certificate as sec. 6.1.3 requires, and skip the sec. 6.1.4 (g) constraint-accumulation step for the target. This issue also affects Bouncy Castle for Java LTS before 2.73.13, which carries only the org.bouncycastle.pkix.jcajce copy of the reviewer. It also affects Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS (BC-FJA) before bcpkix-fips 1.0.13 (1.0.X series), 2.0.13 (2.0.X series) and 2.1.13 (2.1.X series).",
  "id": "GHSA-hqqj-v58h-gr7x",
  "modified": "2026-10-03T09:31:18Z",
  "published": "2026-10-03T09:31:18Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-71889"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/bcgit/bc-java/commit/06dcff2f51037095de126986285c998e3455ab85"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/bcgit/bc-java/wiki/CVE%E2%80%902026%E2%80%9071889"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:Amber",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-HQRM-74P3-W275

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 19:08 – Updated: 2022-08-05 00:00
VLAI
Details

The crypto/tls package of Go through 1.16.5 does not properly assert that the type of public key in an X.509 certificate matches the expected type when doing a RSA based key exchange, allowing a malicious TLS server to cause a TLS client to panic.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2021-34558"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-295"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2021-07-15T14:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The crypto/tls package of Go through 1.16.5 does not properly assert that the type of public key in an X.509 certificate matches the expected type when doing a RSA based key exchange, allowing a malicious TLS server to cause a TLS client to panic.",
  "id": "GHSA-hqrm-74p3-w275",
  "modified": "2022-08-05T00:00:23Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T19:08:13Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-34558"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2021.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2022.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210813-0005"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202208-02"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/WXJ2MVMAHOIGRH37ZSFYC4EVWLJFL2EQ"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/NLOGBB7XBBRB3J5FDPW5KWHSH7IRF64W"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/LBMLUQMN6XRKPVOI5XFFBP4XSR7RNTYR"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/JYIUSR4YP52PWG7YE7AA3DZ5OSURNFJB"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ITRXPCHUCJGXCX2CUEPKZRRTB27GG4ZB"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/D7FRFM7WWR2JCT6NORQ7AO6B453OMI3I"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/6BTC3JQUASFN5U2XA4UZIGAPZQBD5JSS"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/3XBQUFVI5TMV4KMKI7GKA223LHGPQISE"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/3BA7MFVXRBEKRTLSLYDICTYCGEMK2HZ7"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://groups.google.com/g/golang-announce/c/n9FxMelZGAQ"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://groups.google.com/g/golang-announce"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://golang.org/doc/devel/release#go1.16.minor"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-HQX9-F7WH-P26W

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-20 15:31 – Updated: 2026-03-23 15:30
VLAI
Details

Improper certificate validation in the PAM propagation WinRM connections allows a network attacker to perform a man-in-the-middle attack via disabled TLS certificate verification.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-4434"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-295"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-03-20T13:16:13Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Improper certificate validation in the PAM propagation WinRM connections\n allows a network attacker to perform a man-in-the-middle attack via \ndisabled TLS certificate verification.",
  "id": "GHSA-hqx9-f7wh-p26w",
  "modified": "2026-03-23T15:30:33Z",
  "published": "2026-03-20T15:31:13Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-4434"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://devolutions.net/security/advisories/DEVO-2026-0005"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

Mitigation
Architecture and Design Implementation

Certificates should be carefully managed and checked to assure that data are encrypted with the intended owner's public key.

Mitigation
Implementation

If certificate pinning is being used, ensure that all relevant properties of the certificate are fully validated before the certificate is pinned, including the hostname.

CAPEC-459: Creating a Rogue Certification Authority Certificate

An adversary exploits a weakness resulting from using a hashing algorithm with weak collision resistance to generate certificate signing requests (CSR) that contain collision blocks in their "to be signed" parts. The adversary submits one CSR to be signed by a trusted certificate authority then uses the signed blob to make a second certificate appear signed by said certificate authority. Due to the hash collision, both certificates, though different, hash to the same value and so the signed blob works just as well in the second certificate. The net effect is that the adversary's second X.509 certificate, which the Certification Authority has never seen, is now signed and validated by that Certification Authority.

CAPEC-475: Signature Spoofing by Improper Validation

An adversary exploits a cryptographic weakness in the signature verification algorithm implementation to generate a valid signature without knowing the key.