GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration
Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-295

Allowed

Improper Certificate Validation

Abstraction: Base · Status: Draft

The product does not validate, or incorrectly validates, a certificate.

2077 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.

GHSA-8F6J-263M-G72X

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-13 23:49 – Updated: 2026-07-13 23:49
VLAI
Summary
Apple App Store Server Python Library: SignedDataVerifier accepts stale OCSP GOOD responses and can bypass certificate revocation checks
Details

Summary

SignedDataVerifier attempts to perform online revocation checking when enable_online_checks=True, but its OCSP validation logic accepts stale GOOD responses as valid indefinitely. In appstoreserverlibrary/signed_data_verifier.py, _ChainVerifier.check_ocsp_status() verifies the OCSP response signature and CertID match, but never validates the freshness window carried by producedAt, thisUpdate, or nextUpdate.

As a result, a previously valid signed OCSP GOOD response can be replayed after it is expired, and the library will still treat the certificate as good. If an App Store signing certificate or intermediate is ever revoked, applications using this library with online checks enabled can continue accepting JWS objects signed with the revoked key as long as a stale signed OCSP response is replayed.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 3.1.1"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "app-store-server-library"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0.2.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "3.1.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-295",
      "CWE-299"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-07-13T23:49:14Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\n`SignedDataVerifier` attempts to perform online revocation checking when `enable_online_checks=True`, but its OCSP validation logic accepts stale `GOOD` responses as valid indefinitely. In `appstoreserverlibrary/signed_data_verifier.py`, `_ChainVerifier.check_ocsp_status()` verifies the OCSP response signature and CertID match, but never validates the freshness window carried by `producedAt`, `thisUpdate`, or `nextUpdate`.\n\nAs a result, a previously valid signed OCSP `GOOD` response can be replayed after it is expired, and the library will still treat the certificate as good. If an App Store signing certificate or intermediate is ever revoked, applications using this library with online checks enabled can continue accepting JWS objects signed with the revoked key as long as a stale signed OCSP response is replayed.",
  "id": "GHSA-8f6j-263m-g72x",
  "modified": "2026-07-13T23:49:14Z",
  "published": "2026-07-13T23:49:14Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/apple/app-store-server-library-python/security/advisories/GHSA-8f6j-263m-g72x"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/apple/app-store-server-library-python"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Apple App Store Server Python Library: SignedDataVerifier accepts stale OCSP GOOD responses and can bypass certificate revocation checks"
}

GHSA-8F8H-RQ9J-VXQG

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-04-29 01:27 – Updated: 2022-04-29 01:27
VLAI
Details

X509TrustManager in (1) Java Secure Socket Extension (JSSE) in SDK and JRE 1.4.0 through 1.4.0_01, (2) JSSE before 1.0.3, (3) Java Plug-in SDK and JRE 1.3.0 through 1.4.1, and (4) Java Web Start 1.0 through 1.2 incorrectly calls the isClientTrusted method when determining server trust, which results in improper validation of digital certificate and allows remote attackers to (1) falsely authenticate peers for SSL or (2) incorrectly validate signed JAR files.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2003-1229"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-295"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2003-12-31T05:00:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "X509TrustManager in (1) Java Secure Socket Extension (JSSE) in SDK and JRE 1.4.0 through 1.4.0_01, (2) JSSE before 1.0.3, (3) Java Plug-in SDK and JRE 1.3.0 through 1.4.1, and (4) Java Web Start 1.0 through 1.2 incorrectly calls the isClientTrusted method when determining server trust, which results in improper validation of digital certificate and allows remote attackers to (1) falsely authenticate peers for SSL or (2) incorrectly validate signed JAR files.",
  "id": "GHSA-8f8h-rq9j-vxqg",
  "modified": "2022-04-29T01:27:44Z",
  "published": "2022-04-29T01:27:44Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2003-1229"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/11182"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A5883"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2003-01/0334.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://java.sun.com/products/jsse/CHANGES.txt"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/7943"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1006007"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1007483"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-26-50081-1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/6682"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1006001"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www1.itrc.hp.com/service/cki/docDisplay.do?docId=HPSBUX0301-239"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

GHSA-8G5P-JXP9-457C

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-10 15:31 – Updated: 2026-08-14 19:20
VLAI
Summary
Assisted Migration Agent: Hardcoded insecure Transport Layer Security (TLS) connections during vCenter communication
Details

A flaw was found in assisted-migration-agent. The application hardcodes insecure Transport Layer Security (TLS) connections when communicating with vCenter. This vulnerability allows a Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attacker to intercept and harvest vCenter administrator credentials. This can lead to unauthorized access to vCenter.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/kubev2v/assisted-migration-agent"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.16.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-53475"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-295"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-08-14T19:20:31Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-06-10T15:16:42Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "A flaw was found in assisted-migration-agent. The application hardcodes insecure Transport Layer Security (TLS) connections when communicating with vCenter. This vulnerability allows a Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attacker to intercept and harvest vCenter administrator credentials. This can lead to unauthorized access to vCenter.",
  "id": "GHSA-8g5p-jxp9-457c",
  "modified": "2026-08-14T19:20:31Z",
  "published": "2026-06-10T15:31:33Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53475"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/kubev2v/assisted-migration-agent/pull/268"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/kubev2v/assisted-migration-agent/commit/b940fec9f5032a0801e994054d30e81d64b2942a"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53475"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2487232"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/kubev2v/assisted-migration-agent"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Assisted Migration Agent: Hardcoded insecure Transport Layer Security (TLS) connections during vCenter communication"
}

GHSA-8GX8-4CH8-VGP8

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 00:59 – Updated: 2022-05-14 00:59
VLAI
Details

The crypto/x509 package of Go before 1.10.6 and 1.11.x before 1.11.3 does not limit the amount of work performed for each chain verification, which might allow attackers to craft pathological inputs leading to a CPU denial of service. Go TLS servers accepting client certificates and TLS clients are affected.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2018-16875"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-295"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2018-12-14T14:29:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "The crypto/x509 package of Go before 1.10.6 and 1.11.x before 1.11.3 does not limit the amount of work performed for each chain verification, which might allow attackers to craft pathological inputs leading to a CPU denial of service. Go TLS servers accepting client certificates and TLS clients are affected.",
  "id": "GHSA-8gx8-4ch8-vgp8",
  "modified": "2022-05-14T00:59:31Z",
  "published": "2022-05-14T00:59:31Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-16875"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2018-16875"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://groups.google.com/forum/?pli=1#!topic/golang-announce/Kw31K8G7Fi0"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201812-09"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-03/msg00044.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00060.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-06/msg00011.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-06/msg00015.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-07/msg00010.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/106230"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-8H26-F7F9-M55R

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 02:39 – Updated: 2025-04-20 03:39
VLAI
Details

The "Oritani Mobile Banking" by Oritani Bank app 3.0.0 -- aka oritani-mobile-banking/id778851066 for iOS does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2017-9588"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-295"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2017-06-16T12:29:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The \"Oritani Mobile Banking\" by Oritani Bank app 3.0.0 -- aka oritani-mobile-banking/id778851066 for iOS does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.",
  "id": "GHSA-8h26-f7f9-m55r",
  "modified": "2025-04-20T03:39:13Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T02:39:39Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-9588"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://medium.com/%40chronic_9612/advisory-44-credit-union-apps-for-ios-may-allow-login-credential-exposure-4d2f380b85c5"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://medium.com/@chronic_9612/advisory-44-credit-union-apps-for-ios-may-allow-login-credential-exposure-4d2f380b85c5"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-8H4J-CM33-Q84H

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-10-15 21:30 – Updated: 2024-10-15 21:30
VLAI
Details

An issue was discovered in Samsung eMMC with KLMAG2GE4A and KLM8G1WEMB firmware. Code bypass through Electromagnetic Fault Injection allows an attacker to successfully authenticate and write to the RPMB (Replay Protected Memory Block) area without possessing secret information.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-31955"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-295"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-10-15T21:15:10Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "An issue was discovered in Samsung eMMC with KLMAG2GE4A and KLM8G1WEMB firmware. Code bypass through Electromagnetic Fault Injection allows an attacker to successfully authenticate and write to the RPMB (Replay Protected Memory Block) area without possessing secret information.",
  "id": "GHSA-8h4j-cm33-q84h",
  "modified": "2024-10-15T21:30:39Z",
  "published": "2024-10-15T21:30:39Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-31955"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://semiconductor.samsung.com/support/quality-support/product-security-updates"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-8HCJ-P8XH-2P28

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-04-30 18:20 – Updated: 2022-04-30 18:20
VLAI
Details

The (1) CertGetCertificateChain, (2) CertVerifyCertificateChainPolicy, and (3) WinVerifyTrust APIs within the CryptoAPI for Microsoft products including Microsoft Windows 98 through XP, Office for Mac, Internet Explorer for Mac, and Outlook Express for Mac, do not properly verify the Basic Constraints of intermediate CA-signed X.509 certificates, which allows remote attackers to spoof the certificates of trusted sites via a man-in-the-middle attack for SSL sessions, as originally reported for Internet Explorer and IIS.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2002-0862"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-295"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2002-10-04T04:00:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "The (1) CertGetCertificateChain, (2) CertVerifyCertificateChainPolicy, and (3) WinVerifyTrust APIs within the CryptoAPI for Microsoft products including Microsoft Windows 98 through XP, Office for Mac, Internet Explorer for Mac, and Outlook Express for Mac, do not properly verify the Basic Constraints of intermediate CA-signed X.509 certificates, which allows remote attackers to spoof the certificates of trusted sites via a man-in-the-middle attack for SSL sessions, as originally reported for Internet Explorer and IIS.",
  "id": "GHSA-8hcj-p8xh-2p28",
  "modified": "2022-04-30T18:20:05Z",
  "published": "2022-04-30T18:20:05Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2002-0862"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2002/ms02-050"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/9776"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A1056"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A1332"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A2671"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=102866120821995\u0026w=2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=102918200405308\u0026w=2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=102976967730450\u0026w=2"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

GHSA-8HFJ-XRJ2-PM22

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2021-08-25 20:54 – Updated: 2023-08-04 18:38
VLAI
Summary
Certificate check bypass in openssl-src
Details

The X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT flag enables additional security checks of the certificates present in a certificate chain. It is not set by default. Starting from OpenSSL version 1.1.1h a check to disallow certificates in the chain that have explicitly encoded elliptic curve parameters was added as an additional strict check. An error in the implementation of this check meant that the result of a previous check to confirm that certificates in the chain are valid CA certificates was overwritten. This effectively bypasses the check that non-CA certificates must not be able to issue other certificates. If a "purpose" has been configured then there is a subsequent opportunity for checks that the certificate is a valid CA. All of the named "purpose" values implemented in libcrypto perform this check. Therefore, where a purpose is set the certificate chain will still be rejected even when the strict flag has been used. A purpose is set by default in libssl client and server certificate verification routines, but it can be overridden or removed by an application. In order to be affected, an application must explicitly set the X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT verification flag and either not set a purpose for the certificate verification or, in the case of TLS client or server applications, override the default purpose. OpenSSL versions 1.1.1h and newer are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1k. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not impacted by this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1k (Affected 1.1.1h-1.1.1j).

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "crates.io",
        "name": "openssl-src"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "111.11.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "111.15.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2021-3450"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-295"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2021-08-19T17:22:00Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2021-03-25T15:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "The X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT flag enables additional security checks of the certificates present in a certificate chain. It is not set by default. Starting from OpenSSL version 1.1.1h a check to disallow certificates in the chain that have explicitly encoded elliptic curve parameters was added as an additional strict check. An error in the implementation of this check meant that the result of a previous check to confirm that certificates in the chain are valid CA certificates was overwritten. This effectively bypasses the check that non-CA certificates must not be able to issue other certificates. If a \"purpose\" has been configured then there is a subsequent opportunity for checks that the certificate is a valid CA. All of the named \"purpose\" values implemented in libcrypto perform this check. Therefore, where a purpose is set the certificate chain will still be rejected even when the strict flag has been used. A purpose is set by default in libssl client and server certificate verification routines, but it can be overridden or removed by an application. In order to be affected, an application must explicitly set the X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT verification flag and either not set a purpose for the certificate verification or, in the case of TLS client or server applications, override the default purpose. OpenSSL versions 1.1.1h and newer are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1k. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not impacted by this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1k (Affected 1.1.1h-1.1.1j).",
  "id": "GHSA-8hfj-xrj2-pm22",
  "modified": "2023-08-04T18:38:54Z",
  "published": "2021-08-25T20:54:00Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-3450"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2021-09"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2021-08"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2021-05"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2021.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2022.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuApr2021.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.oracle.com//security-alerts/cpujul2021.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20210325.txt"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-openssl-2021-GHY28dJd"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210326-0006"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202103-03"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://security.FreeBSD.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-21:07.openssl.asc"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2021-0056.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2021-0013"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://mta.openssl.org/pipermail/openssl-announce/2021-March/000198.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/CCBFLLVQVILIVGZMBJL3IXZGKWQISYNP"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content\u0026id=SB10356"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://kb.pulsesecure.net/articles/Pulse_Security_Advisories/SA44845"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/alexcrichton/openssl-src-rs"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=2a40b7bc7b94dd7de897a74571e7024f0cf0d63b"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/27/1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/27/2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/28/3"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/28/4"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Certificate check bypass in openssl-src"
}

GHSA-8HHF-PC74-44FJ

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-09-12 06:30 – Updated: 2025-09-12 06:30
VLAI
Details

WTW-EAGLE App does not properly validate server certificates, which may allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to monitor encrypted traffic.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-58781"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-295"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-09-12T06:15:42Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "WTW-EAGLE App does not properly validate server certificates, which may allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to monitor encrypted traffic.",
  "id": "GHSA-8hhf-pc74-44fj",
  "modified": "2025-09-12T06:30:26Z",
  "published": "2025-09-12T06:30:26Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-58781"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://apps.apple.com/jp/app/wtw-eagle/id1365998037?uo=4"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN89109713"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.generalcomp.wtw"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-8HRQ-VV4F-QVXR

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-06-20 15:30 – Updated: 2025-06-20 15:30
VLAI
Details

An issue was discovered on COROS PACE 3 devices through 3.0808.0. It implements a function to connect the watch to a WLAN. This function is mainly for downloading firmware files. Before downloading firmware files, the watch requests some information about the firmware via HTTPS from the back-end API. However, the X.509 server certificate within the TLS handshake is not validated by the device. This allows an attacker within an active machine-in-the-middle position, using a TLS proxy and a self-signed certificate, to eavesdrop and manipulate the HTTPS communication. This could be abused, for example, for stealing the API access token of the assigned user account.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-32878"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-295"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-06-20T14:15:28Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "An issue was discovered on COROS PACE 3 devices through 3.0808.0. It implements a function to connect the watch to a WLAN. This function is mainly for downloading firmware files. Before downloading firmware files, the watch requests some information about the firmware via HTTPS from the back-end API. However, the X.509 server certificate within the TLS handshake is not validated by the device. This allows an attacker within an active machine-in-the-middle position, using a TLS proxy and a self-signed certificate, to eavesdrop and manipulate the HTTPS communication. This could be abused, for example, for stealing the API access token of the assigned user account.",
  "id": "GHSA-8hrq-vv4f-qvxr",
  "modified": "2025-06-20T15:30:37Z",
  "published": "2025-06-20T15:30:37Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-32878"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://support.coros.com/hc/en-us/articles/20087694119828-COROS-PACE-3-Release-Notes"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://syss.de"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.syss.de/fileadmin/dokumente/Publikationen/Advisories/SYSS-2025-030.txt"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

Mitigation
Architecture and Design Implementation

Certificates should be carefully managed and checked to assure that data are encrypted with the intended owner's public key.

Mitigation
Implementation

If certificate pinning is being used, ensure that all relevant properties of the certificate are fully validated before the certificate is pinned, including the hostname.

CAPEC-459: Creating a Rogue Certification Authority Certificate

An adversary exploits a weakness resulting from using a hashing algorithm with weak collision resistance to generate certificate signing requests (CSR) that contain collision blocks in their "to be signed" parts. The adversary submits one CSR to be signed by a trusted certificate authority then uses the signed blob to make a second certificate appear signed by said certificate authority. Due to the hash collision, both certificates, though different, hash to the same value and so the signed blob works just as well in the second certificate. The net effect is that the adversary's second X.509 certificate, which the Certification Authority has never seen, is now signed and validated by that Certification Authority.

CAPEC-475: Signature Spoofing by Improper Validation

An adversary exploits a cryptographic weakness in the signature verification algorithm implementation to generate a valid signature without knowing the key.