Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-294

Allowed

Authentication Bypass by Capture-replay

Abstraction: Base · Status: Incomplete

A capture-replay flaw exists when the design of the product makes it possible for a malicious user to sniff network traffic and bypass authentication by replaying it to the server in question to the same effect as the original message (or with minor changes).

348 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.

GHSA-9C2V-C4R3-GWMM

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:08 – Updated: 2022-05-13 01:08
VLAI
Details

The Chuango 433 MHz burglar-alarm product line uses static codes in the RF remote control, allowing an attacker to arm, disarm, or trigger the alarm remotely via replay attacks, as demonstrated by Chuango branded products, and non-Chuango branded products such as the Eminent EM8617 OV2 Wifi Alarm System.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2019-9659"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-294"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2019-03-11T15:29:00Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "The Chuango 433 MHz burglar-alarm product line uses static codes in the RF remote control, allowing an attacker to arm, disarm, or trigger the alarm remotely via replay attacks, as demonstrated by Chuango branded products, and non-Chuango branded products such as the Eminent EM8617 OV2 Wifi Alarm System.",
  "id": "GHSA-9c2v-c4r3-gwmm",
  "modified": "2022-05-13T01:08:21Z",
  "published": "2022-05-13T01:08:21Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-9659"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/RiieCco/write-ups/tree/master/CVE-2019-9659"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-9CRQ-QH8V-6XMM

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-03 09:31 – Updated: 2026-07-06 21:30
VLAI
Details

Successfully using libcurl to do a transfer to a specific HTTP origin (hostA) with Digest authentication and then changing the origin to a different one (hostB) for a second transfer, reusing the same handle, makes libcurl wrongly pass on the Authorization: header field meant for hostA, to hostB.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-11856"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-294"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-07-03T07:16:23Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "Successfully using libcurl to do a transfer to a specific HTTP origin\n(`hostA`) with **Digest** authentication and then changing the origin to a\ndifferent one (`hostB`) for a second transfer, reusing the same handle, makes\nlibcurl wrongly pass on the  `Authorization:` header field meant for `hostA`,\nto `hostB`.",
  "id": "GHSA-9crq-qh8v-6xmm",
  "modified": "2026-07-06T21:30:31Z",
  "published": "2026-07-03T09:31:26Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-11856"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://hackerone.com/reports/3793260"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://curl.se/docs/CVE-2026-11856.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://curl.se/docs/CVE-2026-11856.json"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-9GQP-98WR-5XW4

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-04-08 00:00 – Updated: 2022-04-15 00:01
VLAI
Details

Dr Trust USA iCheck Connect BP Monitor BP Testing 118 1.2.1 is vulnerable to a Replay Attack to BP Monitoring.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2020-27374"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-294"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-04-07T02:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Dr Trust USA iCheck Connect BP Monitor BP Testing 118 1.2.1 is vulnerable to a Replay Attack to BP Monitoring.",
  "id": "GHSA-9gqp-98wr-5xw4",
  "modified": "2022-04-15T00:01:04Z",
  "published": "2022-04-08T00:00:24Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-27374"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://drtrust.in/collections/dr-trust-blood-pressure-testing/products/dr-trust-usa-icheck-connect-bp-monitor"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://nvermaa.medium.com/cve-on-radio-technology-d-4b65efa1ba5c"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://dr.com"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-9HP8-P9XX-FRX5

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-19 15:33 – Updated: 2026-06-23 15:32
VLAI
Details

Authentication Bypass by Capture-replay vulnerability in Apache APISIX.

Attacker can benefit from certain configurations in hmac-auth to re-use a token forever, bypassing expiry. This issue affects Apache APISIX: from 3.11.0 through 3.16.0.

Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.17.0, which fixes the issue.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-47341"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-294"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-06-19T14:16:22Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Authentication Bypass by Capture-replay vulnerability in Apache APISIX.\n\nAttacker can benefit from certain configurations in hmac-auth to re-use a token forever, bypassing expiry.\nThis issue affects Apache APISIX: from 3.11.0 through 3.16.0.\n\nUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 3.17.0, which fixes the issue.",
  "id": "GHSA-9hp8-p9xx-frx5",
  "modified": "2026-06-23T15:32:30Z",
  "published": "2026-06-19T15:33:16Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-47341"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/ob6ng9x2hxtyfojs839hs1n0v18xxzf2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/06/19/10"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-9JR3-RJ99-8JQ3

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-19 20:47 – Updated: 2026-06-19 20:47
VLAI
Summary
CoreWCF: SAML token replay protection is inoperative
Details

Impact

When enabling DetectReplayedTokens, a token can be replayed and will be detected despite it being reused.

Patches

Fixed in CoreWCF v1.8.1 and v1.9.1

Workarounds

Provide your own implementation of ITokenReplayCache with the correct behavior.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "NuGet",
        "name": "CoreWCF.Primitives"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.8.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "NuGet",
        "name": "CoreWCF.Primitives"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "1.9.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.9.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-54779"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-294",
      "CWE-613"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-06-19T20:47:02Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Impact\nWhen enabling DetectReplayedTokens, a token can be replayed and will be detected despite it being reused.\n\n### Patches\nFixed in CoreWCF v1.8.1 and v1.9.1\n\n### Workarounds\nProvide your own implementation of `ITokenReplayCache` with the correct behavior.",
  "id": "GHSA-9jr3-rj99-8jq3",
  "modified": "2026-06-19T20:47:02Z",
  "published": "2026-06-19T20:47:02Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/CoreWCF/CoreWCF/security/advisories/GHSA-9jr3-rj99-8jq3"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/CoreWCF/CoreWCF"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "CoreWCF: SAML token replay protection is inoperative"
}

GHSA-9M2G-397C-243R

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-10-29 09:30 – Updated: 2024-10-29 09:30
VLAI
Details

There is a privilege escalation vulnerability in ZTE ZXR10 ZSR V2 intelligent multi service router . An authenticated attacker could use the vulnerability to obtain sensitive information about the device.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-22066"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-294"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-10-29T09:15:06Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "There is a privilege escalation vulnerability in ZTE ZXR10 ZSR V2 intelligent multi service router . An authenticated attacker could use the vulnerability to obtain sensitive information about the device.",
  "id": "GHSA-9m2g-397c-243r",
  "modified": "2024-10-29T09:30:51Z",
  "published": "2024-10-29T09:30:51Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-22066"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://support.zte.com.cn/zte-iccp-isupport-webui/bulletin/detail/1171513586716225590"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-9M99-VM5F-JWF9

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-02-25 00:00 – Updated: 2022-03-17 00:05
VLAI
Details

Honeywell HDZP252DI 1.00.HW02.4 and HBW2PER1 1.000.HW01.3 devices allow command spoofing (for camera control) after ARP cache poisoning has been achieved.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2021-39364"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-294"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-02-24T22:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Honeywell HDZP252DI 1.00.HW02.4 and HBW2PER1 1.000.HW01.3 devices allow command spoofing (for camera control) after ARP cache poisoning has been achieved.",
  "id": "GHSA-9m99-vm5f-jwf9",
  "modified": "2022-03-17T00:05:15Z",
  "published": "2022-02-25T00:00:55Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-39364"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://buildings.honeywell.com/content/dam/hbtbt/en/documents/downloads/Security_Notification_SN_2022-01-26-02_CVE-2021-39364_Video_Replay_HBW2PER1.pdf"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://buildings.honeywell.com/us/en/brands/our-brands/security/support-and-resources/product-resources/eol-and-security-notices"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.honeywell.com/us/en/product-security"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-9QF7-Q6GX-Q652

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-05 18:31 – Updated: 2026-03-25 18:31
VLAI
Details

Authentication Bypass by Capture-replay, Use of Password Hash With Insufficient Computational Effort vulnerability in rustdesk-client RustDesk Client rustdesk-client on Windows, MacOS, Linux, iOS, Android (Client login, peer authentication modules) allows Reusing Session IDs (aka Session Replay). This vulnerability is associated with program files src/client.Rs and program routines hash_password(), login proof construction.

This issue affects RustDesk Client: through 1.4.5.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-30789"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-294",
      "CWE-307",
      "CWE-916"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-03-05T16:16:19Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "Authentication Bypass by Capture-replay, Use of Password Hash With Insufficient Computational Effort vulnerability in rustdesk-client RustDesk Client rustdesk-client on Windows, MacOS, Linux, iOS, Android (Client login, peer authentication modules) allows Reusing Session IDs (aka Session Replay). This vulnerability is associated with program files src/client.Rs and program routines hash_password(), login proof construction.\n\nThis issue affects RustDesk Client: through 1.4.5.",
  "id": "GHSA-9qf7-q6gx-q652",
  "modified": "2026-03-25T18:31:36Z",
  "published": "2026-03-05T18:31:37Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-30789"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vSds6jjpd38oO_yIAyd1HYtKNUuea-I-ozAPpGhYI7QgAU-QGJ7D8a4rOZVj1vmiUXV1EcdRHf9aZAW/pub"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://rustdesk.com/docs/en/client"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.vulsec.org"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-9RPC-XC7C-JHMW

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-01-20 18:30 – Updated: 2025-04-02 18:30
VLAI
Details

The Sinilink XY-WFT1 WiFi Remote Thermostat, running firmware 1.3.6, allows an attacker to bypass the intended requirement to communicate using MQTT. It is possible to replay Sinilink aka SINILINK521 protocol (udp/1024) commands interfacing directly with the target device. This, in turn, allows for an attack to control the onboard relay without requiring authentication via the mobile application. This might result in an unacceptable temperature within the target device's physical environment.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-43704"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-294"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2023-01-20T17:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The Sinilink XY-WFT1 WiFi Remote Thermostat, running firmware 1.3.6, allows an attacker to bypass the intended requirement to communicate using MQTT. It is possible to replay Sinilink aka SINILINK521 protocol (udp/1024) commands interfacing directly with the target device. This, in turn, allows for an attack to control the onboard relay without requiring authentication via the mobile application. This might result in an unacceptable temperature within the target device\u0027s physical environment.",
  "id": "GHSA-9rpc-xc7c-jhmw",
  "modified": "2025-04-02T18:30:37Z",
  "published": "2023-01-20T18:30:22Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-43704"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.trustwave.com/en-us/resources/blogs/spiderlabs-blog/cve-2022-43704-capture-replay-vulnerability-in-sinilink-xy-wft1-thermostat"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-9RR6-JPG7-9JG6

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-03-11 00:02 – Updated: 2024-10-25 20:49
VLAI
Summary
Authentication Bypass by Capture-replay in Apache Spark
Details

Apache Spark supports end-to-end encryption of RPC connections via "spark.authenticate" and "spark.network.crypto.enabled". In versions 3.1.2 and earlier, it uses a bespoke mutual authentication protocol that allows for full encryption key recovery. After an initial interactive attack, this would allow someone to decrypt plaintext traffic offline. Note that this does not affect security mechanisms controlled by "spark.authenticate.enableSaslEncryption", "spark.io.encryption.enabled", "spark.ssl", "spark.ui.strictTransportSecurity". Update to Apache Spark 3.1.3 or later

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "org.apache.spark:spark-core"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "3.1.3"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "pyspark"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "3.1.3"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2021-38296"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-294"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2022-03-11T20:30:09Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-03-10T09:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Apache Spark supports end-to-end encryption of RPC connections via \"spark.authenticate\" and \"spark.network.crypto.enabled\". In versions 3.1.2 and earlier, it uses a bespoke mutual authentication protocol that allows for full encryption key recovery. After an initial interactive attack, this would allow someone to decrypt plaintext traffic offline. Note that this does not affect security mechanisms controlled by \"spark.authenticate.enableSaslEncryption\", \"spark.io.encryption.enabled\", \"spark.ssl\", \"spark.ui.strictTransportSecurity\". Update to Apache Spark 3.1.3 or later",
  "id": "GHSA-9rr6-jpg7-9jg6",
  "modified": "2024-10-25T20:49:39Z",
  "published": "2022-03-11T00:02:36Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-38296"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-9rr6-jpg7-9jg6"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/pyspark/PYSEC-2022-186.yaml"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/70x8fw2gx3g9ty7yk0f2f1dlpqml2smd"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2022.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Authentication Bypass by Capture-replay in Apache Spark"
}

Mitigation
Architecture and Design

Utilize some sequence or time stamping functionality along with a checksum which takes this into account in order to ensure that messages can be parsed only once.

Mitigation
Architecture and Design

Since any attacker who can listen to traffic can see sequence numbers, it is necessary to sign messages with some kind of cryptography to ensure that sequence numbers are not simply doctored along with content.

CAPEC-102: Session Sidejacking

Session sidejacking takes advantage of an unencrypted communication channel between a victim and target system. The attacker sniffs traffic on a network looking for session tokens in unencrypted traffic. Once a session token is captured, the attacker performs malicious actions by using the stolen token with the targeted application to impersonate the victim. This attack is a specific method of session hijacking, which is exploiting a valid session token to gain unauthorized access to a target system or information. Other methods to perform a session hijacking are session fixation, cross-site scripting, or compromising a user or server machine and stealing the session token.

CAPEC-509: Kerberoasting

Through the exploitation of how service accounts leverage Kerberos authentication with Service Principal Names (SPNs), the adversary obtains and subsequently cracks the hashed credentials of a service account target to exploit its privileges. The Kerberos authentication protocol centers around a ticketing system which is used to request/grant access to services and to then access the requested services. As an authenticated user, the adversary may request Active Directory and obtain a service ticket with portions encrypted via RC4 with the private key of the authenticated account. By extracting the local ticket and saving it disk, the adversary can brute force the hashed value to reveal the target account credentials.

CAPEC-555: Remote Services with Stolen Credentials

This pattern of attack involves an adversary that uses stolen credentials to leverage remote services such as RDP, telnet, SSH, and VNC to log into a system. Once access is gained, any number of malicious activities could be performed.

CAPEC-561: Windows Admin Shares with Stolen Credentials

An adversary guesses or obtains (i.e. steals or purchases) legitimate Windows administrator credentials (e.g. userID/password) to access Windows Admin Shares on a local machine or within a Windows domain.

CAPEC-60: Reusing Session IDs (aka Session Replay)

This attack targets the reuse of valid session ID to spoof the target system in order to gain privileges. The attacker tries to reuse a stolen session ID used previously during a transaction to perform spoofing and session hijacking. Another name for this type of attack is Session Replay.

CAPEC-644: Use of Captured Hashes (Pass The Hash)

An adversary obtains (i.e. steals or purchases) legitimate Windows domain credential hash values to access systems within the domain that leverage the Lan Man (LM) and/or NT Lan Man (NTLM) authentication protocols.

CAPEC-645: Use of Captured Tickets (Pass The Ticket)

An adversary uses stolen Kerberos tickets to access systems/resources that leverage the Kerberos authentication protocol. The Kerberos authentication protocol centers around a ticketing system which is used to request/grant access to services and to then access the requested services. An adversary can obtain any one of these tickets (e.g. Service Ticket, Ticket Granting Ticket, Silver Ticket, or Golden Ticket) to authenticate to a system/resource without needing the account's credentials. Depending on the ticket obtained, the adversary may be able to access a particular resource or generate TGTs for any account within an Active Directory Domain.

CAPEC-652: Use of Known Kerberos Credentials

An adversary obtains (i.e. steals or purchases) legitimate Kerberos credentials (e.g. Kerberos service account userID/password or Kerberos Tickets) with the goal of achieving authenticated access to additional systems, applications, or services within the domain.

CAPEC-701: Browser in the Middle (BiTM)

An adversary exploits the inherent functionalities of a web browser, in order to establish an unnoticed remote desktop connection in the victim's browser to the adversary's system. The adversary must deploy a web client with a remote desktop session that the victim can access.

CAPEC-94: Adversary in the Middle (AiTM)

An adversary targets the communication between two components (typically client and server), in order to alter or obtain data from transactions. A general approach entails the adversary placing themself within the communication channel between the two components.