Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-284

Discouraged

Improper Access Control

Abstraction: Pillar · Status: Incomplete

The product does not restrict or incorrectly restricts access to a resource from an unauthorized actor.

11481 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.

GHSA-MQ9G-XRQ8-Q93M

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-15 21:31 – Updated: 2026-09-15 21:31
VLAI
Details

Vulnerability in the Oracle WebCenter Portal product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Runtime Tools). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.1.4.0 and 14.1.2.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle WebCenter Portal. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle WebCenter Portal accessible data as well as unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle WebCenter Portal accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N).

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-83050"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-09-15T20:18:13Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Vulnerability in the Oracle WebCenter Portal product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Runtime Tools).  Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.1.4.0 and  14.1.2.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle WebCenter Portal.  Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in  unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle WebCenter Portal accessible data as well as  unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle WebCenter Portal accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts).  CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N).",
  "id": "GHSA-mq9g-xrq8-q93m",
  "modified": "2026-09-15T21:31:52Z",
  "published": "2026-09-15T21:31:52Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-83050"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cspusep2026.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-MQC3-P2PP-HJ79

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-18 21:32 – Updated: 2026-08-18 21:32
VLAI
Details

Vulnerability in the Oracle Reports Developer product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Security and Authentication). The supported version that is affected is 14.1.2.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via CORBA to compromise Oracle Reports Developer. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Reports Developer. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 9.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-62634"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-18T21:17:17Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "Vulnerability in the Oracle Reports Developer product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Security and Authentication).   The supported version that is affected is 14.1.2.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via CORBA to compromise Oracle Reports Developer.  Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Reports Developer. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 9.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts).  CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).",
  "id": "GHSA-mqc3-p2pp-hj79",
  "modified": "2026-08-18T21:32:36Z",
  "published": "2026-08-18T21:32:36Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-62634"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cspuaug2026.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-MQF6-PGW4-84JV

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-18 21:32 – Updated: 2026-08-18 21:32
VLAI
Details

Vulnerability in the Service Delivery Platform product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Messaging Enabler). The supported version that is affected is 14.1.2.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Service Delivery Platform. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Service Delivery Platform accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Service Delivery Platform accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.5 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N).

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-60866"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-18T21:16:45Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Vulnerability in the Service Delivery Platform product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Messaging Enabler).   The supported version that is affected is 14.1.2.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Service Delivery Platform.  Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in  unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Service Delivery Platform accessible data as well as  unauthorized read access to a subset of Service Delivery Platform accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.5 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts).  CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N).",
  "id": "GHSA-mqf6-pgw4-84jv",
  "modified": "2026-08-18T21:32:03Z",
  "published": "2026-08-18T21:32:03Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-60866"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cspuaug2026.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-MQFG-2R7H-3F8C

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-10-17 19:00 – Updated: 2022-10-19 19:00
VLAI
Details

An issue has been discovered in the Import functionality of GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions starting from 14.4 before 15.2.5, all versions starting from 15.3 before 15.3.4, all versions starting from 15.4 before 15.4.1. It was possible for an authenticated user to read arbitrary projects' content given the project's ID.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-3067"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-10-17T16:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "An issue has been discovered in the Import functionality of GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions starting from 14.4 before 15.2.5, all versions starting from 15.3 before 15.3.4, all versions starting from 15.4 before 15.4.1. It was possible for an authenticated user to read arbitrary projects\u0027 content given the project\u0027s ID.",
  "id": "GHSA-mqfg-2r7h-3f8c",
  "modified": "2022-10-19T19:00:23Z",
  "published": "2022-10-17T19:00:27Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-3067"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://hackerone.com/reports/1685822"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/cves/-/blob/master/2022/CVE-2022-3067.json"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/372165"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-MQJ9-P4H9-7C7X

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-18 21:32 – Updated: 2026-08-18 21:32
VLAI
Details

Vulnerability in the Oracle Hyperion Financial Reporting product of Oracle Hyperion (component: Server). The supported version that is affected is 11.2.25.0.000. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Hyperion Financial Reporting. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Hyperion Financial Reporting accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.5 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N).

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-70752"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-18T21:17:28Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Vulnerability in the Oracle Hyperion Financial Reporting product of Oracle Hyperion (component: Server).   The supported version that is affected is 11.2.25.0.000. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Hyperion Financial Reporting.  Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in  unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Hyperion Financial Reporting accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.5 (Confidentiality impacts).  CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N).",
  "id": "GHSA-mqj9-p4h9-7c7x",
  "modified": "2026-08-18T21:32:50Z",
  "published": "2026-08-18T21:32:50Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-70752"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cspuaug2026.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-MQP4-CJCP-3J5X

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-18 21:33 – Updated: 2026-08-18 21:33
VLAI
Details

Vulnerability in the Oracle Agile PLM MCAD Connector product of Oracle Supply Chain (component: CAX Client). The supported version that is affected is 3.6. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle Agile PLM MCAD Connector executes to compromise Oracle Agile PLM MCAD Connector. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Agile PLM MCAD Connector accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 1.9 (Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N).

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-71081"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-18T21:18:08Z",
    "severity": "LOW"
  },
  "details": "Vulnerability in the Oracle Agile PLM MCAD Connector product of Oracle Supply Chain (component: CAX Client).   The supported version that is affected is 3.6. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle Agile PLM MCAD Connector executes to compromise Oracle Agile PLM MCAD Connector.  Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in  unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Agile PLM MCAD Connector accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 1.9 (Integrity impacts).  CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N).",
  "id": "GHSA-mqp4-cjcp-3j5x",
  "modified": "2026-08-18T21:33:56Z",
  "published": "2026-08-18T21:33:56Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-71081"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cspuaug2026.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-MQPQ-2P68-46FV

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-01-08 15:40 – Updated: 2024-01-08 15:40
VLAI
Summary
pyload Unauthenticated Flask Configuration Leakage vulnerability
Details

Summary

Any unauthenticated user can browse to a specific URL to expose the Flask config, including the SECRET_KEY variable.

Details

Any unauthenticated user can browse to a specific URL to expose the Flask config, including the SECRET_KEY variable.

PoC

Run pyload in the default configuration by running the following command

pyload

Now browse to http://localhost:8000/render/info.html. Notice how the Flask configuration gets displayed. PoC

I was quite amused by this finding. I think it's a very interesting coming together of things that is so unlikely to happen. Below I will detail my process a bit more.

I was looking through the code to see how the authorization mechanism is implemented when I spotted this route, which can be accessed by any unauthenticated actor - https://github.com/pyload/pyload/blob/57d81930edb59177c60830ad8ac36a91d0ec4c4e/src/pyload/webui/app/blueprints/app_blueprint.py#L33C1-L37C51

@bp.route("/render/<path:filename>", endpoint="render")
def render(filename):
    mimetype = mimetypes.guess_type(filename)[0] or "text/html"
    data = render_template(filename)
    return flask.Response(data, mimetype=mimetype)
 ```

This route allows me to load in any of the predefined templates. However, these templates will be lacking any form of context, and as such it doesn't seem too useful. That is until I loaded the `info.html` template and scrolled down, revealing the Flask config. This was purely accidental, and I did not understand why it happened, until I looked at the template

- https://github.com/pyload/pyload/blob/57d81930edb59177c60830ad8ac36a91d0ec4c4e/src/pyload/webui/app/templates/info.html#L64C1-L67C10
```python
    <tr>
        <td>{{ _("Config folder:") }}</td>
        <td>{{ config }}</td>
    </tr>

In Flask, every template always gets the Flask config passed to it as the config variable. In the normal execution of this template, this value gets overwritten in the function below, but since we're calling it and bypassing this function altogether, it doesn't get overwritten. Would this variable not be named config and named configuration or Config instead, then this exploit wouldn't work. The likelihood of this occurring is so small, but it seems to have happened here.

  • https://github.com/pyload/pyload/blob/57d81930edb59177c60830ad8ac36a91d0ec4c4e/src/pyload/webui/app/blueprints/app_blueprint.py#L450C1-L461C51 python context = { "python": sys.version, "os": " ".join((os.name, sys.platform) + extra), "version": api.get_server_version(), "folder": PKGDIR, "config": api.get_userdir(), "download": conf["general"]["storage_folder"]["value"], "freespace": format.size(api.free_space()), "webif": conf["webui"]["port"]["value"], "language": conf["general"]["language"]["value"], } return render_template("info.html", **context)

Impact

Depending on the how the Flask config data is used, it could have detrimental consequences for the security. It's crucial to keep the SECRET_KEY secret and never expose it in your code or configuration files.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "pyload-ng"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.5.0b3.dev77"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-21644"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2024-01-08T15:40:39Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-01-08T14:15:47Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\nAny unauthenticated user can browse to a specific URL to expose the Flask config, including the `SECRET_KEY` variable.\n\n### Details\nAny unauthenticated user can browse to a specific URL to expose the Flask config, including the `SECRET_KEY` variable.\n\n### PoC\nRun `pyload` in the default configuration by running the following command\n```\npyload\n```\n\nNow browse to `http://localhost:8000/render/info.html`. Notice how the Flask configuration gets displayed.\n![PoC](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/44903767/294522246-4cc19c49-b315-4926-8fd6-ec3c3fdb7c1f.png)\n\nI was quite amused by this finding. I think it\u0027s a very interesting coming together of things that is so unlikely to happen. Below I will detail my process a bit more.\n\nI was looking through the code to see how the authorization mechanism is implemented when I spotted this route, which can be accessed by any unauthenticated actor\n- https://github.com/pyload/pyload/blob/57d81930edb59177c60830ad8ac36a91d0ec4c4e/src/pyload/webui/app/blueprints/app_blueprint.py#L33C1-L37C51\n```python\n@bp.route(\"/render/\u003cpath:filename\u003e\", endpoint=\"render\")\ndef render(filename):\n    mimetype = mimetypes.guess_type(filename)[0] or \"text/html\"\n    data = render_template(filename)\n    return flask.Response(data, mimetype=mimetype)\n ```\n\nThis route allows me to load in any of the predefined templates. However, these templates will be lacking any form of context, and as such it doesn\u0027t seem too useful. That is until I loaded the `info.html` template and scrolled down, revealing the Flask config. This was purely accidental, and I did not understand why it happened, until I looked at the template\n\n- https://github.com/pyload/pyload/blob/57d81930edb59177c60830ad8ac36a91d0ec4c4e/src/pyload/webui/app/templates/info.html#L64C1-L67C10\n```python\n    \u003ctr\u003e\n        \u003ctd\u003e{{ _(\"Config folder:\") }}\u003c/td\u003e\n        \u003ctd\u003e{{ config }}\u003c/td\u003e\n    \u003c/tr\u003e\n```\n\nIn Flask, every template always gets the Flask config passed to it as the `config` variable. In the normal execution of this template, this value gets overwritten in the function below, but since we\u0027re calling it and bypassing this function altogether, it doesn\u0027t get overwritten. Would this variable not be named config and named `configuration` or `Config` instead, then this exploit wouldn\u0027t work. The likelihood of this occurring is so small, but it seems to have happened here.\n\n- https://github.com/pyload/pyload/blob/57d81930edb59177c60830ad8ac36a91d0ec4c4e/src/pyload/webui/app/blueprints/app_blueprint.py#L450C1-L461C51\n```python\n    context = {\n        \"python\": sys.version,\n        \"os\": \" \".join((os.name, sys.platform) + extra),\n        \"version\": api.get_server_version(),\n        \"folder\": PKGDIR,\n        \"config\": api.get_userdir(),\n        \"download\": conf[\"general\"][\"storage_folder\"][\"value\"],\n        \"freespace\": format.size(api.free_space()),\n        \"webif\": conf[\"webui\"][\"port\"][\"value\"],\n        \"language\": conf[\"general\"][\"language\"][\"value\"],\n    }\n    return render_template(\"info.html\", **context)\n ```\n\n### Impact\nDepending on the how the Flask config data is used, it could have detrimental consequences for the security. It\u0027s crucial to keep the `SECRET_KEY` secret and never expose it in your code or configuration files.\n",
  "id": "GHSA-mqpq-2p68-46fv",
  "modified": "2024-01-08T15:40:39Z",
  "published": "2024-01-08T15:40:39Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/pyload/pyload/security/advisories/GHSA-mqpq-2p68-46fv"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-21644"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/pyload/pyload/commit/bb22063a875ffeca357aaf6e2edcd09705688c40"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/pyload/pyload"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "pyload Unauthenticated Flask Configuration Leakage vulnerability"
}

GHSA-MQRG-R34J-5532

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 02:08 – Updated: 2022-05-14 02:08
VLAI
Details

browser/browsing_data/browsing_data_remover.cc in Google Chrome before 51.0.2704.63 deletes HPKP pins during cache clearing, which makes it easier for remote attackers to spoof web sites via a valid certificate from an arbitrary recognized Certification Authority.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2016-1694"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2016-06-05T23:59:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "browser/browsing_data/browsing_data_remover.cc in Google Chrome before 51.0.2704.63 deletes HPKP pins during cache clearing, which makes it easier for remote attackers to spoof web sites via a valid certificate from an arbitrary recognized Certification Authority.",
  "id": "GHSA-mqrg-r34j-5532",
  "modified": "2022-05-14T02:08:11Z",
  "published": "2022-05-14T02:08:11Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-1694"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:1190"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://codereview.chromium.org/1941073002"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://crbug.com/603682"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201607-07"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://googlechromereleases.blogspot.com/2016/05/stable-channel-update_25.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00062.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00063.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-06/msg00005.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3590"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/90876"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1035981"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-MQRQ-3VGP-G3FF

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-12 06:31 – Updated: 2026-09-12 18:30
VLAI
Details

The Booking for Appointments and Events Calendar WordPress plugin before 9.8.1 does not verify that a payment was actually taken before recording a booking as paid, trusting the payment gateway named in a public, unauthenticated booking request even when the site has never configured that gateway. This lets an unauthenticated attacker obtain confirmed, fully paid appointments and events without any payment being collected.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-77689"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-09-12T06:16:24Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The Booking for Appointments and Events Calendar  WordPress plugin before 9.8.1 does not verify that a payment was actually taken before recording a booking as paid, trusting the payment gateway named in a public, unauthenticated booking request even when the site has never configured that gateway. This lets an unauthenticated attacker obtain confirmed, fully paid appointments and events without any payment being collected.",
  "id": "GHSA-mqrq-3vgp-g3ff",
  "modified": "2026-09-12T18:30:21Z",
  "published": "2026-09-12T06:31:20Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-77689"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/ac597716-193d-419f-b55c-802ee979385e"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-MQRQ-WWQG-H4QG

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-18 21:32 – Updated: 2026-08-18 21:32
VLAI
Details

Vulnerability in the Siebel CRM Cloud Applications product of Oracle Siebel CRM (component: Siebel Cloud Manager). Supported versions that are affected are 22.3-26.6. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Siebel CRM Cloud Applications. While the vulnerability is in Siebel CRM Cloud Applications, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Siebel CRM Cloud Applications. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 9.9 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-61317"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-18T21:16:59Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "Vulnerability in the Siebel CRM Cloud Applications product of Oracle Siebel CRM (component: Siebel Cloud Manager).  Supported versions that are affected are 22.3-26.6. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Siebel CRM Cloud Applications.  While the vulnerability is in Siebel CRM Cloud Applications, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change).  Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Siebel CRM Cloud Applications. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 9.9 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts).  CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).",
  "id": "GHSA-mqrq-wwqg-h4qg",
  "modified": "2026-08-18T21:32:20Z",
  "published": "2026-08-18T21:32:20Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-61317"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cspuaug2026.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

Mitigation MIT-1
Architecture and Design Operation

Very carefully manage the setting, management, and handling of privileges. Explicitly manage trust zones in the software.

Mitigation MIT-46
Architecture and Design

Strategy: Separation of Privilege

  • Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area.
  • Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.
CAPEC-19: Embedding Scripts within Scripts

An adversary leverages the capability to execute their own script by embedding it within other scripts that the target software is likely to execute due to programs' vulnerabilities that are brought on by allowing remote hosts to execute scripts.

CAPEC-441: Malicious Logic Insertion

An adversary installs or adds malicious logic (also known as malware) into a seemingly benign component of a fielded system. This logic is often hidden from the user of the system and works behind the scenes to achieve negative impacts. With the proliferation of mass digital storage and inexpensive multimedia devices, Bluetooth and 802.11 support, new attack vectors for spreading malware are emerging for things we once thought of as innocuous greeting cards, picture frames, or digital projectors. This pattern of attack focuses on systems already fielded and used in operation as opposed to systems and their components that are still under development and part of the supply chain.

CAPEC-478: Modification of Windows Service Configuration

An adversary exploits a weakness in access control to modify the execution parameters of a Windows service. The goal of this attack is to execute a malicious binary in place of an existing service.

CAPEC-479: Malicious Root Certificate

An adversary exploits a weakness in authorization and installs a new root certificate on a compromised system. Certificates are commonly used for establishing secure TLS/SSL communications within a web browser. When a user attempts to browse a website that presents a certificate that is not trusted an error message will be displayed to warn the user of the security risk. Depending on the security settings, the browser may not allow the user to establish a connection to the website. Adversaries have used this technique to avoid security warnings prompting users when compromised systems connect over HTTPS to adversary controlled web servers that spoof legitimate websites in order to collect login credentials.

CAPEC-502: Intent Spoof

An adversary, through a previously installed malicious application, issues an intent directed toward a specific trusted application's component in an attempt to achieve a variety of different objectives including modification of data, information disclosure, and data injection. Components that have been unintentionally exported and made public are subject to this type of an attack. If the component trusts the intent's action without verififcation, then the target application performs the functionality at the adversary's request, helping the adversary achieve the desired negative technical impact.

CAPEC-503: WebView Exposure

An adversary, through a malicious web page, accesses application specific functionality by leveraging interfaces registered through WebView's addJavascriptInterface API. Once an interface is registered to WebView through addJavascriptInterface, it becomes global and all pages loaded in the WebView can call this interface.

CAPEC-536: Data Injected During Configuration

An attacker with access to data files and processes on a victim's system injects malicious data into critical operational data during configuration or recalibration, causing the victim's system to perform in a suboptimal manner that benefits the adversary.

CAPEC-546: Incomplete Data Deletion in a Multi-Tenant Environment

An adversary obtains unauthorized information due to insecure or incomplete data deletion in a multi-tenant environment. If a cloud provider fails to completely delete storage and data from former cloud tenants' systems/resources, once these resources are allocated to new, potentially malicious tenants, the latter can probe the provided resources for sensitive information still there.

CAPEC-550: Install New Service

When an operating system starts, it also starts programs called services or daemons. Adversaries may install a new service which will be executed at startup (on a Windows system, by modifying the registry). The service name may be disguised by using a name from a related operating system or benign software. Services are usually run with elevated privileges.

CAPEC-551: Modify Existing Service

When an operating system starts, it also starts programs called services or daemons. Modifying existing services may break existing services or may enable services that are disabled/not commonly used.

CAPEC-552: Install Rootkit

An adversary exploits a weakness in authentication to install malware that alters the functionality and information provide by targeted operating system API calls. Often referred to as rootkits, it is often used to hide the presence of programs, files, network connections, services, drivers, and other system components.

CAPEC-556: Replace File Extension Handlers

When a file is opened, its file handler is checked to determine which program opens the file. File handlers are configuration properties of many operating systems. Applications can modify the file handler for a given file extension to call an arbitrary program when a file with the given extension is opened.

CAPEC-558: Replace Trusted Executable

An adversary exploits weaknesses in privilege management or access control to replace a trusted executable with a malicious version and enable the execution of malware when that trusted executable is called.

CAPEC-562: Modify Shared File

An adversary manipulates the files in a shared location by adding malicious programs, scripts, or exploit code to valid content. Once a user opens the shared content, the tainted content is executed.

CAPEC-563: Add Malicious File to Shared Webroot

An adversaries may add malicious content to a website through the open file share and then browse to that content with a web browser to cause the server to execute the content. The malicious content will typically run under the context and permissions of the web server process, often resulting in local system or administrative privileges depending on how the web server is configured.

CAPEC-564: Run Software at Logon

Operating system allows logon scripts to be run whenever a specific user or users logon to a system. If adversaries can access these scripts, they may insert additional code into the logon script. This code can allow them to maintain persistence or move laterally within an enclave because it is executed every time the affected user or users logon to a computer. Modifying logon scripts can effectively bypass workstation and enclave firewalls. Depending on the access configuration of the logon scripts, either local credentials or a remote administrative account may be necessary.

CAPEC-578: Disable Security Software

An adversary exploits a weakness in access control to disable security tools so that detection does not occur. This can take the form of killing processes, deleting registry keys so that tools do not start at run time, deleting log files, or other methods.