CWE-284
DiscouragedImproper Access Control
Abstraction: Pillar · Status: Incomplete
The product does not restrict or incorrectly restricts access to a resource from an unauthorized actor.
10780 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-863M-PWQP-GH34
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-22 00:31 – Updated: 2026-07-22 00:31Vulnerability in the Oracle Price Protection product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Internal Operations). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Price Protection. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Price Protection accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Price Protection accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N).
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-60714"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-284"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-07-21T22:18:11Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Vulnerability in the Oracle Price Protection product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Internal Operations). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Price Protection. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Price Protection accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Price Protection accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N).",
"id": "GHSA-863m-pwqp-gh34",
"modified": "2026-07-22T00:31:57Z",
"published": "2026-07-22T00:31:57Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-60714"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2026.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-8645-7F27-GRXX
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-15 21:32 – Updated: 2026-09-15 21:32Vulnerability in the Oracle Hyperion Financial Management product of Oracle Hyperion (component: Security). The supported version that is affected is 11.2.26.0.000. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Hyperion Financial Management. While the vulnerability is in Oracle Hyperion Financial Management, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Hyperion Financial Management accessible data as well as unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Hyperion Financial Management accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.5 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N).
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-87177"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-284"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-09-15T20:19:05Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Vulnerability in the Oracle Hyperion Financial Management product of Oracle Hyperion (component: Security). The supported version that is affected is 11.2.26.0.000. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Hyperion Financial Management. While the vulnerability is in Oracle Hyperion Financial Management, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Hyperion Financial Management accessible data as well as unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Hyperion Financial Management accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.5 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N).",
"id": "GHSA-8645-7f27-grxx",
"modified": "2026-09-15T21:32:51Z",
"published": "2026-09-15T21:32:51Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-87177"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cspusep2026.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-864G-M8F5-W226
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-09-27 15:30 – Updated: 2024-04-04 07:54Permission control vulnerability in the audio module. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may cause an app to be activated automatically.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-41311"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-284"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-09-27T15:19:29Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Permission control vulnerability in the audio module. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may cause an app to be activated automatically.",
"id": "GHSA-864g-m8f5-w226",
"modified": "2024-04-04T07:54:13Z",
"published": "2023-09-27T15:30:37Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-41311"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://consumer.huawei.com/en/support/bulletin/2023/9"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://device.harmonyos.com/en/docs/security/update/security-bulletins-202309-0000001638925158"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-8686-VHFX-7R3J
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-10-01 15:36 – Updated: 2026-10-01 15:36Summary
NodeVM normalizes node:-prefixed builtin specifiers during require() resolution, but it does not normalize user-provided negative builtin entries in wildcard policy.
As a result, this configuration:
new NodeVM({
require: {
builtin: ['*', '-node:child_process']
}
});
does not deny the canonical child_process builtin. Sandboxed code can require both child_process and node:child_process, and receives the host module with process-spawning APIs such as execSync and spawn.
The safe proof below only checks module and function reachability. It does not execute any OS command.
Affected Mode
NodeVM.
Affected Configuration
new NodeVM({
require: {
builtin: ['*', '-node:child_process']
}
});
This affects users who deny builtins using their node:-prefixed spelling, expecting -node:child_process to deny require('node:child_process') and require('child_process').
Affected Files / Functions
lib/builtin.jsmakeBuiltinsFromLegacyOptions- wildcard builtin expansion
- exact negative entry check:
builtins.indexOf(\-${name}`)` addDefaultBuiltinlib/resolver.jsResolver.resolvelib/setup-node-sandbox.jsrequireImplnode:prefix stripping before builtin load
Root Cause
lib/setup-node-sandbox.js strips the node: prefix from resolved builtin filenames before loading the builtin:
if (localStringPrototypeStartsWith(filename, 'node:')) {
id = localStringPrototypeSlice(filename, 5);
let nmod = cacheBuiltins[id];
if (!nmod) {
nmod = loadBuiltinModule(id);
if (!nmod) throw new VMError(`Cannot find module '${filename}'`, 'ENOTFOUND');
cacheBuiltins[id] = nmod;
}
return nmod;
}
But lib/builtin.js checks wildcard negative entries by exact string match against the names in BUILTIN_MODULES:
if (builtins.indexOf(`-${name}`) === -1) {
addDefaultBuiltin(res, name, hostRequire);
}
BUILTIN_MODULES contains the canonical name child_process, not node:child_process. Therefore -node:child_process does not exclude child_process, and addDefaultBuiltin() registers the host builtin.
Security Boundary Crossed
Sandboxed code reaches a host builtin that the embedder attempted to deny.
Boundary crossed:
- sandbox -> host
child_processbuiltin - sandbox -> host process-spawning function references
Impact
Confirmed impact:
require('child_process')succeeds inside the sandbox.require('node:child_process')succeeds inside the sandbox.- The returned module exposes
execSyncandspawnas functions.
Worst confirmed impact is access to host process-spawning APIs. The proof does not execute any command.
The proof does not execute a command, but it confirms access to the host child_process module and its process-spawning APIs. For untrusted sandbox code, this is equivalent to command execution capability.
Safe Local Reproduction
Tested on Node.js v24.14.0.
This proof only checks whether the module and dangerous functions are reachable. It does not spawn a process and does not run OS commands.
'use strict';
const { NodeVM } = require('./');
function probe(builtin) {
const vm = new NodeVM({
require: {
builtin
}
});
return vm.run(`
const out = {};
for (const spec of ['child_process', 'node:child_process']) {
try {
const cp = require(spec);
out[spec] = {
loaded: true,
execSyncType: typeof cp.execSync,
spawnType: typeof cp.spawn,
moduleToStringTag: Object.prototype.toString.call(cp)
};
} catch (e) {
out[spec] = {
loaded: false,
name: e && e.name,
code: e && e.code,
message: e && e.message
};
}
}
module.exports = out;
`);
}
console.log(JSON.stringify({
nodeVersion: process.version,
denyNodePrefixed: probe(['*', '-node:child_process']),
denyCanonical: probe(['*', '-child_process'])
}, null, 2));
Observed result:
{
"nodeVersion": "v24.14.0",
"denyNodePrefixed": {
"child_process": {
"loaded": true,
"execSyncType": "function",
"spawnType": "function",
"moduleToStringTag": "[object Object]"
},
"node:child_process": {
"loaded": true,
"execSyncType": "function",
"spawnType": "function",
"moduleToStringTag": "[object Object]"
}
},
"denyCanonical": {
"child_process": {
"loaded": false,
"name": "VMError",
"code": "ENOTFOUND",
"message": "Cannot find module 'child_process'"
},
"node:child_process": {
"loaded": false,
"name": "VMError",
"code": "ENOTFOUND",
"message": "Cannot find module 'node:child_process'"
}
}
}
Expected Secure Behavior
-node:child_process and -child_process should be equivalent.
If either spelling is denied, both of these should fail:
require('child_process')
require('node:child_process')
Suggested Fix
- Canonicalize builtin names before allow/deny comparison:
- Strip
node:from user-provided builtin entries. - Preserve whether an entry is negative (
-...) before canonicalizing. -
Store and compare one canonical builtin key.
-
Apply the same normalization to:
- wildcard negative entries
- explicit allowlist entries
- object-form builtin entries
-
mock/override keys if they are intended to support
node:spelling -
Add regression tests:
builtin: ['*', '-node:child_process']blockschild_process.builtin: ['*', '-node:child_process']blocksnode:child_process.builtin: ['*', '-node:fs']blocksfsandnode:fs.builtin: ['*', '-node:fs/promises']and-fs/promisesbehave consistently.- Canonical dangerous builtins remain denied even if explicitly requested with
node:spelling.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 3.11.6"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "vm2"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "3.11.7"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-92957"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-269",
"CWE-284"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-10-01T15:36:01Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "## Summary\n\nNodeVM normalizes `node:`-prefixed builtin specifiers during `require()` resolution, but it does not normalize user-provided negative builtin entries in wildcard policy.\n\nAs a result, this configuration:\n\n```js\nnew NodeVM({\n require: {\n builtin: [\u0027*\u0027, \u0027-node:child_process\u0027]\n }\n});\n```\n\ndoes not deny the canonical `child_process` builtin. Sandboxed code can require both `child_process` and `node:child_process`, and receives the host module with process-spawning APIs such as `execSync` and `spawn`.\n\nThe safe proof below only checks module and function reachability. It does not execute any OS command.\n\n## Affected Mode\n\nNodeVM.\n\n## Affected Configuration\n\n```js\nnew NodeVM({\n require: {\n builtin: [\u0027*\u0027, \u0027-node:child_process\u0027]\n }\n});\n```\n\nThis affects users who deny builtins using their `node:`-prefixed spelling, expecting `-node:child_process` to deny `require(\u0027node:child_process\u0027)` and `require(\u0027child_process\u0027)`.\n\n## Affected Files / Functions\n\n- `lib/builtin.js`\n - `makeBuiltinsFromLegacyOptions`\n - wildcard builtin expansion\n - exact negative entry check: `builtins.indexOf(\\`-${name}\\`)`\n - `addDefaultBuiltin`\n- `lib/resolver.js`\n - `Resolver.resolve`\n- `lib/setup-node-sandbox.js`\n - `requireImpl`\n - `node:` prefix stripping before builtin load\n\n## Root Cause\n\n`lib/setup-node-sandbox.js` strips the `node:` prefix from resolved builtin filenames before loading the builtin:\n\n```js\nif (localStringPrototypeStartsWith(filename, \u0027node:\u0027)) {\n id = localStringPrototypeSlice(filename, 5);\n let nmod = cacheBuiltins[id];\n if (!nmod) {\n nmod = loadBuiltinModule(id);\n if (!nmod) throw new VMError(`Cannot find module \u0027${filename}\u0027`, \u0027ENOTFOUND\u0027);\n cacheBuiltins[id] = nmod;\n }\n return nmod;\n}\n```\n\nBut `lib/builtin.js` checks wildcard negative entries by exact string match against the names in `BUILTIN_MODULES`:\n\n```js\nif (builtins.indexOf(`-${name}`) === -1) {\n addDefaultBuiltin(res, name, hostRequire);\n}\n```\n\n`BUILTIN_MODULES` contains the canonical name `child_process`, not `node:child_process`. Therefore `-node:child_process` does not exclude `child_process`, and `addDefaultBuiltin()` registers the host builtin.\n\n## Security Boundary Crossed\n\nSandboxed code reaches a host builtin that the embedder attempted to deny.\n\nBoundary crossed:\n\n- sandbox -\u003e host `child_process` builtin\n- sandbox -\u003e host process-spawning function references\n\n## Impact\n\nConfirmed impact:\n\n- `require(\u0027child_process\u0027)` succeeds inside the sandbox.\n- `require(\u0027node:child_process\u0027)` succeeds inside the sandbox.\n- The returned module exposes `execSync` and `spawn` as functions.\n\nWorst confirmed impact is access to host process-spawning APIs. The proof does not execute any command.\n\nThe proof does not execute a command, but it confirms access to the host child_process module and its process-spawning APIs. For untrusted sandbox code, this is equivalent to command execution capability.\n\n## Safe Local Reproduction\n\nTested on Node.js `v24.14.0`.\n\nThis proof only checks whether the module and dangerous functions are reachable. It does not spawn a process and does not run OS commands.\n\n```js\n\u0027use strict\u0027;\n\nconst { NodeVM } = require(\u0027./\u0027);\n\nfunction probe(builtin) {\n const vm = new NodeVM({\n require: {\n builtin\n }\n });\n\n return vm.run(`\n const out = {};\n\n for (const spec of [\u0027child_process\u0027, \u0027node:child_process\u0027]) {\n try {\n const cp = require(spec);\n out[spec] = {\n loaded: true,\n execSyncType: typeof cp.execSync,\n spawnType: typeof cp.spawn,\n moduleToStringTag: Object.prototype.toString.call(cp)\n };\n } catch (e) {\n out[spec] = {\n loaded: false,\n name: e \u0026\u0026 e.name,\n code: e \u0026\u0026 e.code,\n message: e \u0026\u0026 e.message\n };\n }\n }\n\n module.exports = out;\n `);\n}\n\nconsole.log(JSON.stringify({\n nodeVersion: process.version,\n denyNodePrefixed: probe([\u0027*\u0027, \u0027-node:child_process\u0027]),\n denyCanonical: probe([\u0027*\u0027, \u0027-child_process\u0027])\n}, null, 2));\n```\n\nObserved result:\n\n```json\n{\n \"nodeVersion\": \"v24.14.0\",\n \"denyNodePrefixed\": {\n \"child_process\": {\n \"loaded\": true,\n \"execSyncType\": \"function\",\n \"spawnType\": \"function\",\n \"moduleToStringTag\": \"[object Object]\"\n },\n \"node:child_process\": {\n \"loaded\": true,\n \"execSyncType\": \"function\",\n \"spawnType\": \"function\",\n \"moduleToStringTag\": \"[object Object]\"\n }\n },\n \"denyCanonical\": {\n \"child_process\": {\n \"loaded\": false,\n \"name\": \"VMError\",\n \"code\": \"ENOTFOUND\",\n \"message\": \"Cannot find module \u0027child_process\u0027\"\n },\n \"node:child_process\": {\n \"loaded\": false,\n \"name\": \"VMError\",\n \"code\": \"ENOTFOUND\",\n \"message\": \"Cannot find module \u0027node:child_process\u0027\"\n }\n }\n}\n```\n\n## Expected Secure Behavior\n\n`-node:child_process` and `-child_process` should be equivalent.\n\nIf either spelling is denied, both of these should fail:\n\n```js\nrequire(\u0027child_process\u0027)\nrequire(\u0027node:child_process\u0027)\n```\n\n## Suggested Fix\n\n1. Canonicalize builtin names before allow/deny comparison:\n - Strip `node:` from user-provided builtin entries.\n - Preserve whether an entry is negative (`-...`) before canonicalizing.\n - Store and compare one canonical builtin key.\n\n2. Apply the same normalization to:\n - wildcard negative entries\n - explicit allowlist entries\n - object-form builtin entries\n - mock/override keys if they are intended to support `node:` spelling\n\n3. Add regression tests:\n - `builtin: [\u0027*\u0027, \u0027-node:child_process\u0027]` blocks `child_process`.\n - `builtin: [\u0027*\u0027, \u0027-node:child_process\u0027]` blocks `node:child_process`.\n - `builtin: [\u0027*\u0027, \u0027-node:fs\u0027]` blocks `fs` and `node:fs`.\n - `builtin: [\u0027*\u0027, \u0027-node:fs/promises\u0027]` and `-fs/promises` behave consistently.\n - Canonical dangerous builtins remain denied even if explicitly requested with `node:` spelling.",
"id": "GHSA-8686-vhfx-7r3j",
"modified": "2026-10-01T15:36:01Z",
"published": "2026-10-01T15:36:01Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/patriksimek/vm2/security/advisories/GHSA-8686-vhfx-7r3j"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-92957"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/patriksimek/vm2/commit/b0f50662dd499ff33544bb42387958c64711af1e"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/patriksimek/vm2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/patriksimek/vm2/releases/tag/v3.11.7"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/vm2-before-3.11.7-authentication-bypass-via-node-prefix"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "vm2: NodeVM node:-prefixed negative builtin deny bypass exposes child_process"
}
GHSA-868V-4V5R-XMHH
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-01-18 00:30 – Updated: 2023-01-18 00:30Vulnerability in the Oracle Hospitality Reporting and Analytics product of Oracle Food and Beverage Applications (component: Reporting). The supported version that is affected is 9.1.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTPS to compromise Oracle Hospitality Reporting and Analytics. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Hospitality Reporting and Analytics accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Hospitality Reporting and Analytics accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N).
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-21828"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-284"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-01-18T00:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Vulnerability in the Oracle Hospitality Reporting and Analytics product of Oracle Food and Beverage Applications (component: Reporting). The supported version that is affected is 9.1.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTPS to compromise Oracle Hospitality Reporting and Analytics. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Hospitality Reporting and Analytics accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Hospitality Reporting and Analytics accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N).",
"id": "GHSA-868v-4v5r-xmhh",
"modified": "2023-01-18T00:30:17Z",
"published": "2023-01-18T00:30:17Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-21828"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2023.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-86C4-6MM3-V64J
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-01 18:30 – Updated: 2026-09-02 21:31Incorrect access control in the remoteCloudUpdateCheck function of TOTOLINK T6 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 allows unauthenticated attackers to restart the cloud update check workflow via sending a crafted MQTT message to the cs_broker component.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-51769"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-284"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-09-01T16:17:05Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "Incorrect access control in the remoteCloudUpdateCheck function of TOTOLINK T6 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 allows unauthenticated attackers to restart the cloud update check workflow via sending a crafted MQTT message to the cs_broker component.",
"id": "GHSA-86c4-6mm3-v64j",
"modified": "2026-09-02T21:31:56Z",
"published": "2026-09-01T18:30:41Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-51769"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/DarkBoulder/CVE-Vendor-Coordination/blob/main/TOTOLINK/README.md"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/ShengWu00/CVE-Vendor-Coordination/blob/main/TOTOLINK/README.md"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.totolink.net"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.totolink.net/home/menu/detail/menu_listtpl/download/id/190/ids/36.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-86C4-M7C4-QC7R
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-18 21:34 – Updated: 2026-08-18 21:34Vulnerability in the Helidon product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Imperative Web Server). The supported version that is affected is 4.5.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Helidon. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a hang or frequently repeatable crash (complete DOS) of Helidon. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.5 (Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H).
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-73915"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-284"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-08-18T21:18:24Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Vulnerability in the Helidon product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Imperative Web Server). The supported version that is affected is 4.5.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Helidon. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a hang or frequently repeatable crash (complete DOS) of Helidon. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.5 (Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H).",
"id": "GHSA-86c4-m7c4-qc7r",
"modified": "2026-08-18T21:34:16Z",
"published": "2026-08-18T21:34:16Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-73915"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cspuaug2026.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-86C7-PP9G-WRGP
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-15 21:31 – Updated: 2026-09-15 21:31Vulnerability in the Oracle WebCenter Enterprise Capture product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Client Bundle). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.1.4.0 and 14.1.2.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via T3, IIOP to compromise Oracle WebCenter Enterprise Capture. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle WebCenter Enterprise Capture. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-83008"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-284"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-09-15T20:18:07Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Vulnerability in the Oracle WebCenter Enterprise Capture product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Client Bundle). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.1.4.0 and 14.1.2.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via T3, IIOP to compromise Oracle WebCenter Enterprise Capture. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle WebCenter Enterprise Capture. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).",
"id": "GHSA-86c7-pp9g-wrgp",
"modified": "2026-09-15T21:31:40Z",
"published": "2026-09-15T21:31:40Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-83008"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cspusep2026.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-86CC-G342-R35V
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 05:16 – Updated: 2026-06-03 15:30Rockwell Automation EtherNet/IP products; 1756-ENBT, 1756-EWEB, 1768-ENBT, and 1768-EWEB communication modules; CompactLogix L32E and L35E controllers; 1788-ENBT FLEXLogix adapter; 1794-AENTR FLEX I/O EtherNet/IP adapter; ControlLogix 18 and earlier; CompactLogix 18 and earlier; GuardLogix 18 and earlier; SoftLogix 18 and earlier; CompactLogix controllers 19 and earlier; SoftLogix controllers 19 and earlier; ControlLogix controllers 20 and earlier; GuardLogix controllers 20 and earlier; and MicroLogix 1100 and 1400 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (control and communication outage) via a CIP message that specifies a logic-execution stop and fault.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2012-6435"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-284"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2013-01-24T21:55:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Rockwell Automation EtherNet/IP products; 1756-ENBT, 1756-EWEB, 1768-ENBT, and 1768-EWEB communication modules; CompactLogix L32E and L35E controllers; 1788-ENBT FLEXLogix adapter; 1794-AENTR FLEX I/O EtherNet/IP adapter; ControlLogix 18 and earlier; CompactLogix 18 and earlier; GuardLogix 18 and earlier; SoftLogix 18 and earlier; CompactLogix controllers 19 and earlier; SoftLogix controllers 19 and earlier; ControlLogix controllers 20 and earlier; GuardLogix controllers 20 and earlier; and MicroLogix 1100 and 1400 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (control and communication outage) via a CIP message that specifies a logic-execution stop and fault.",
"id": "GHSA-86cc-g342-r35v",
"modified": "2026-06-03T15:30:31Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T05:16:37Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-6435"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://rockwellautomation.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/470154"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://rockwellautomation.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/aid/470155"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://rockwellautomation.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/aid/470156"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/ics-advisories/icsa-13-011-03"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://rockwellautomation.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/54102"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.us-cert.gov/control_systems/pdf/ICSA-13-011-03.pdf"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-86G5-CC8V-7WV3
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-18 21:33 – Updated: 2026-08-18 21:33Vulnerability in the Oracle Commerce Guided Search / Oracle Commerce Experience Manager product of Oracle Commerce (component: Endeca Application Controller). The supported version that is affected is 11.4.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle Commerce Guided Search / Oracle Commerce Experience Manager executes to compromise Oracle Commerce Guided Search / Oracle Commerce Experience Manager. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Commerce Guided Search / Oracle Commerce Experience Manager. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-71028"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-284"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-08-18T21:18:02Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Vulnerability in the Oracle Commerce Guided Search / Oracle Commerce Experience Manager product of Oracle Commerce (component: Endeca Application Controller). The supported version that is affected is 11.4.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle Commerce Guided Search / Oracle Commerce Experience Manager executes to compromise Oracle Commerce Guided Search / Oracle Commerce Experience Manager. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Commerce Guided Search / Oracle Commerce Experience Manager. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).",
"id": "GHSA-86g5-cc8v-7wv3",
"modified": "2026-08-18T21:33:42Z",
"published": "2026-08-18T21:33:42Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-71028"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cspuaug2026.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation MIT-1
Very carefully manage the setting, management, and handling of privileges. Explicitly manage trust zones in the software.
Mitigation MIT-46
Strategy: Separation of Privilege
- Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area.
- Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.
CAPEC-19: Embedding Scripts within Scripts
An adversary leverages the capability to execute their own script by embedding it within other scripts that the target software is likely to execute due to programs' vulnerabilities that are brought on by allowing remote hosts to execute scripts.
CAPEC-441: Malicious Logic Insertion
An adversary installs or adds malicious logic (also known as malware) into a seemingly benign component of a fielded system. This logic is often hidden from the user of the system and works behind the scenes to achieve negative impacts. With the proliferation of mass digital storage and inexpensive multimedia devices, Bluetooth and 802.11 support, new attack vectors for spreading malware are emerging for things we once thought of as innocuous greeting cards, picture frames, or digital projectors. This pattern of attack focuses on systems already fielded and used in operation as opposed to systems and their components that are still under development and part of the supply chain.
CAPEC-478: Modification of Windows Service Configuration
An adversary exploits a weakness in access control to modify the execution parameters of a Windows service. The goal of this attack is to execute a malicious binary in place of an existing service.
CAPEC-479: Malicious Root Certificate
An adversary exploits a weakness in authorization and installs a new root certificate on a compromised system. Certificates are commonly used for establishing secure TLS/SSL communications within a web browser. When a user attempts to browse a website that presents a certificate that is not trusted an error message will be displayed to warn the user of the security risk. Depending on the security settings, the browser may not allow the user to establish a connection to the website. Adversaries have used this technique to avoid security warnings prompting users when compromised systems connect over HTTPS to adversary controlled web servers that spoof legitimate websites in order to collect login credentials.
CAPEC-502: Intent Spoof
An adversary, through a previously installed malicious application, issues an intent directed toward a specific trusted application's component in an attempt to achieve a variety of different objectives including modification of data, information disclosure, and data injection. Components that have been unintentionally exported and made public are subject to this type of an attack. If the component trusts the intent's action without verififcation, then the target application performs the functionality at the adversary's request, helping the adversary achieve the desired negative technical impact.
CAPEC-503: WebView Exposure
An adversary, through a malicious web page, accesses application specific functionality by leveraging interfaces registered through WebView's addJavascriptInterface API. Once an interface is registered to WebView through addJavascriptInterface, it becomes global and all pages loaded in the WebView can call this interface.
CAPEC-536: Data Injected During Configuration
An attacker with access to data files and processes on a victim's system injects malicious data into critical operational data during configuration or recalibration, causing the victim's system to perform in a suboptimal manner that benefits the adversary.
CAPEC-546: Incomplete Data Deletion in a Multi-Tenant Environment
An adversary obtains unauthorized information due to insecure or incomplete data deletion in a multi-tenant environment. If a cloud provider fails to completely delete storage and data from former cloud tenants' systems/resources, once these resources are allocated to new, potentially malicious tenants, the latter can probe the provided resources for sensitive information still there.
CAPEC-550: Install New Service
When an operating system starts, it also starts programs called services or daemons. Adversaries may install a new service which will be executed at startup (on a Windows system, by modifying the registry). The service name may be disguised by using a name from a related operating system or benign software. Services are usually run with elevated privileges.
CAPEC-551: Modify Existing Service
When an operating system starts, it also starts programs called services or daemons. Modifying existing services may break existing services or may enable services that are disabled/not commonly used.
CAPEC-552: Install Rootkit
An adversary exploits a weakness in authentication to install malware that alters the functionality and information provide by targeted operating system API calls. Often referred to as rootkits, it is often used to hide the presence of programs, files, network connections, services, drivers, and other system components.
CAPEC-556: Replace File Extension Handlers
When a file is opened, its file handler is checked to determine which program opens the file. File handlers are configuration properties of many operating systems. Applications can modify the file handler for a given file extension to call an arbitrary program when a file with the given extension is opened.
CAPEC-558: Replace Trusted Executable
An adversary exploits weaknesses in privilege management or access control to replace a trusted executable with a malicious version and enable the execution of malware when that trusted executable is called.
CAPEC-562: Modify Shared File
An adversary manipulates the files in a shared location by adding malicious programs, scripts, or exploit code to valid content. Once a user opens the shared content, the tainted content is executed.
CAPEC-563: Add Malicious File to Shared Webroot
An adversaries may add malicious content to a website through the open file share and then browse to that content with a web browser to cause the server to execute the content. The malicious content will typically run under the context and permissions of the web server process, often resulting in local system or administrative privileges depending on how the web server is configured.
CAPEC-564: Run Software at Logon
Operating system allows logon scripts to be run whenever a specific user or users logon to a system. If adversaries can access these scripts, they may insert additional code into the logon script. This code can allow them to maintain persistence or move laterally within an enclave because it is executed every time the affected user or users logon to a computer. Modifying logon scripts can effectively bypass workstation and enclave firewalls. Depending on the access configuration of the logon scripts, either local credentials or a remote administrative account may be necessary.
CAPEC-578: Disable Security Software
An adversary exploits a weakness in access control to disable security tools so that detection does not occur. This can take the form of killing processes, deleting registry keys so that tools do not start at run time, deleting log files, or other methods.