Common Weakness Enumeration
CWE-284
DiscouragedImproper Access Control
Abstraction: Pillar · Status: Incomplete
The product does not restrict or incorrectly restricts access to a resource from an unauthorized actor.
8518 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
CVE-2012-6439 (GCVE-0-2012-6439)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2013-01-24 21:00 – Updated: 2025-06-30 21:33
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Rockwell Automation ControlLogix PLC Improper Access Control
Summary
When an affected
product receives a valid CIP message from an unauthorized or unintended
source to Port 2222/TCP, Port 2222/UDP, Port 44818/TCP, or Port
44818/UDP that changes the product’s configuration and network
parameters, a DoS condition can occur. This situation could cause loss
of availability and a disruption of communication with other connected
devices.
Rockwell Automation EtherNet/IP products; 1756-ENBT, 1756-EWEB, 1768-ENBT, and 1768-EWEB communication modules; CompactLogix L32E and L35E controllers; 1788-ENBT FLEXLogix adapter; 1794-AENTR FLEX I/O EtherNet/IP adapter; ControlLogix 18 and earlier; CompactLogix 18 and earlier; GuardLogix 18 and earlier; SoftLogix 18 and earlier; CompactLogix controllers 19 and earlier; SoftLogix controllers 19 and earlier; ControlLogix controllers 20 and earlier; GuardLogix controllers 20 and earlier; and MicroLogix 1100 and 1400
Severity
No CVSS data available.
CWE
Assigner
References
Impacted products
8 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rockwell Automation | 1756-ENBT, 1756-EWEB, 1768-ENBT, 1768-EWEB communication modules |
Affected:
All
|
|
| Rockwell Automation | CompactLogix L32E and L35E controllers |
Affected:
All
|
|
| Rockwell Automation | 1788-ENBT FLEXLogix adapter |
Affected:
All
|
|
| Rockwell Automation | 1794-AENTR FLEX I/O EtherNet/IP adapter |
Affected:
All
|
|
| Rockwell Automation | ControlLogix, CompactLogix, GuardLogix, and SoftLogix |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 18
(custom)
|
|
| Rockwell Automation | CompactLogix and SoftLogix controllers |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 19
(custom)
|
|
| Rockwell Automation | ControlLogix and GuardLogix controllers |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 20
(custom)
|
|
| Rockwell Automation | MicroLogix |
Affected:
1100
Affected: 1400 |
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T21:28:39.816Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.us-cert.gov/control_systems/pdf/ICSA-13-011-03.pdf"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "1756-ENBT, 1756-EWEB, 1768-ENBT, 1768-EWEB communication modules",
"vendor": "Rockwell Automation",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "All"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "CompactLogix L32E and L35E controllers",
"vendor": "Rockwell Automation",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "All"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "1788-ENBT FLEXLogix adapter",
"vendor": "Rockwell Automation",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "All"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "1794-AENTR FLEX I/O EtherNet/IP adapter",
"vendor": "Rockwell Automation",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "All"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "ControlLogix, CompactLogix, GuardLogix, and SoftLogix",
"vendor": "Rockwell Automation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "18",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "CompactLogix and SoftLogix controllers",
"vendor": "Rockwell Automation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "19",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "ControlLogix and GuardLogix controllers",
"vendor": "Rockwell Automation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "20",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "MicroLogix",
"vendor": "Rockwell Automation",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1100"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1400"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Rub\u00e9n Santamarta of IOActive identified vulnerabilities in Rockwell Automation\u2019s ControlLogix PLC and released proof-of-concept (exploit) code at the Digital Bond S4 Conference on January 19, 2012."
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003e\n\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eWhen an affected \nproduct receives a valid CIP message from an unauthorized or unintended \nsource to Port 2222/TCP, Port 2222/UDP, Port 44818/TCP, or Port \n44818/UDP that changes the product\u2019s configuration and network \nparameters, a DoS condition can occur. This situation could cause loss \nof availability and a disruption of communication with other connected \ndevices.\u003c/span\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eRockwell Automation EtherNet/IP products; 1756-ENBT, 1756-EWEB, 1768-ENBT, and 1768-EWEB communication modules; CompactLogix L32E and L35E controllers; 1788-ENBT FLEXLogix adapter; 1794-AENTR FLEX I/O EtherNet/IP adapter; ControlLogix 18 and earlier; CompactLogix 18 and earlier; GuardLogix 18 and earlier; SoftLogix 18 and earlier; CompactLogix controllers 19 and earlier; SoftLogix controllers 19 and earlier; ControlLogix controllers 20 and earlier; GuardLogix controllers 20 and earlier; and MicroLogix 1100 and 1400\u0026nbsp;\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "When an affected \nproduct receives a valid CIP message from an unauthorized or unintended \nsource to Port 2222/TCP, Port 2222/UDP, Port 44818/TCP, or Port \n44818/UDP that changes the product\u2019s configuration and network \nparameters, a DoS condition can occur. This situation could cause loss \nof availability and a disruption of communication with other connected \ndevices.\u00a0\n\nRockwell Automation EtherNet/IP products; 1756-ENBT, 1756-EWEB, 1768-ENBT, and 1768-EWEB communication modules; CompactLogix L32E and L35E controllers; 1788-ENBT FLEXLogix adapter; 1794-AENTR FLEX I/O EtherNet/IP adapter; ControlLogix 18 and earlier; CompactLogix 18 and earlier; GuardLogix 18 and earlier; SoftLogix 18 and earlier; CompactLogix controllers 19 and earlier; SoftLogix controllers 19 and earlier; ControlLogix controllers 20 and earlier; GuardLogix controllers 20 and earlier; and MicroLogix 1100 and 1400"
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV2_0": {
"accessComplexity": "LOW",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE",
"baseScore": 8.5,
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:C",
"version": "2.0"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-284",
"description": "CWE-284",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-06-30T21:33:10.902Z",
"orgId": "7d14cffa-0d7d-4270-9dc0-52cabd5a23a6",
"shortName": "icscert"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "http://www.us-cert.gov/control_systems/pdf/ICSA-13-011-03.pdf"
},
{
"url": "https://rockwellautomation.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/470154"
},
{
"url": "https://rockwellautomation.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/aid/470155"
},
{
"url": "https://rockwellautomation.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/aid/470156"
},
{
"url": "http://rockwellautomation.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/54102"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eAccording to Rockwell, any of the above products that become affected by a vulnerability can be reset by rebooting or power cycling the affected product. After the reboot, the affected product may require some reconfiguration.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eTo mitigate the vulnerabilities, Rockwell has developed and released security patches on July 18, 2012, to address each of the issues. To download and install the patches please refer to Rockwell\u2019s Advisories at:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003ca target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://rockwellautomation.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/470154\"\u003ehttps://rockwellautomation.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/470154\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003ca target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://rockwellautomation.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/aid/470155\"\u003ehttps://rockwellautomation.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/aid/470155\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003ca target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://rockwellautomation.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/aid/470156\"\u003ehttps://rockwellautomation.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/aid/470156\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eFor more information on security with Rockwell Automation products, please refer to \u003ca target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http://rockwellautomation.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/54102\"\u003eRockwell\u2019s Security Advisory Index\u003c/a\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "According to Rockwell, any of the above products that become affected by a vulnerability can be reset by rebooting or power cycling the affected product. After the reboot, the affected product may require some reconfiguration.\n\nTo mitigate the vulnerabilities, Rockwell has developed and released security patches on July 18, 2012, to address each of the issues. To download and install the patches please refer to Rockwell\u2019s Advisories at:\n\n https://rockwellautomation.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/470154 \n https://rockwellautomation.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/aid/470155 \n https://rockwellautomation.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/aid/470156 \n\nFor more information on security with Rockwell Automation products, please refer to Rockwell\u2019s Security Advisory Index http://rockwellautomation.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/54102 ."
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "ICSA-13-011-03",
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Rockwell Automation ControlLogix PLC Improper Access Control",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eRockwell recommends updating to the newest firmware patches to fix the vulnerabilities, but if not able to do so right away, then Rockwell advises immediately employing the following mitigations for each of the affected products.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eTo mitigate the vulnerabilities pertaining to receiving valid CIP packets:\u003c/p\u003e\u003col\u003e\u003cli\u003eBlock all traffic to the Ethernet/IP or other CIP protocol-based devices from outside the Manufacturing Zone by restricting or blocking access to TCP and UDP Ports 2222 and 44818 using appropriate security technology such as a firewall or Unified Threat Management (UTM).\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eEmploy a UTM appliance that specifically supports CIP message filtering.\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ol\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition to the above, Rockwell recommends concerned customers remain vigilant and continue to follow security strategies that help reduce risk and enhance overall control system security. Where possible, they suggest you apply multiple recommendations and complement this list with your own best-practices:\u003c/p\u003e\u003col\u003e\u003cli\u003eEmploy layered security and defense-in-depth methods in system design to restrict and control access to individual products and control networks. Refer to \u003ca target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http://www.ab.com/networks/architectures.html\"\u003ehttp://www.ab.com/networks/architectures.html\u003c/a\u003e for comprehensive information about implementing validated architectures designed to deliver these measures.\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eRestrict physical and electronic access to automation products, networks, and systems to only those individuals authorized to be in contact with control system equipment.\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eEmploy firewalls with ingress/egress filtering, intrusion detection/prevention systems, and validate all configurations. Evaluate firewall configurations to ensure other appropriate inbound and outbound traffic is blocked.\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eUse up-to-date end-point protection software (e.g., antivirus/antimalware software) on all PC-based assets.\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eMake sure that software and control system device firmware is patched to current releases.\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003ePeriodically change passwords in control system components and infrastructure devices.\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eWhere applicable, set the controller key-switch/mode-switch to RUN mode.\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ol\u003e\n\n\n\n\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eFor more information on security with Rockwell Automation products, please refer to \u003c/span\u003e\u003ca target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http://rockwellautomation.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/54102\"\u003eRockwell\u2019s Security Advisory Index\u003c/a\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\n\n\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Rockwell recommends updating to the newest firmware patches to fix the vulnerabilities, but if not able to do so right away, then Rockwell advises immediately employing the following mitigations for each of the affected products.\n\nTo mitigate the vulnerabilities pertaining to receiving valid CIP packets:\n\n * Block all traffic to the Ethernet/IP or other CIP protocol-based devices from outside the Manufacturing Zone by restricting or blocking access to TCP and UDP Ports 2222 and 44818 using appropriate security technology such as a firewall or Unified Threat Management (UTM).\n * Employ a UTM appliance that specifically supports CIP message filtering.\n\n\nIn addition to the above, Rockwell recommends concerned customers remain vigilant and continue to follow security strategies that help reduce risk and enhance overall control system security. Where possible, they suggest you apply multiple recommendations and complement this list with your own best-practices:\n\n * Employ layered security and defense-in-depth methods in system design to restrict and control access to individual products and control networks. Refer to http://www.ab.com/networks/architectures.html for comprehensive information about implementing validated architectures designed to deliver these measures.\n * Restrict physical and electronic access to automation products, networks, and systems to only those individuals authorized to be in contact with control system equipment.\n * Employ firewalls with ingress/egress filtering, intrusion detection/prevention systems, and validate all configurations. Evaluate firewall configurations to ensure other appropriate inbound and outbound traffic is blocked.\n * Use up-to-date end-point protection software (e.g., antivirus/antimalware software) on all PC-based assets.\n * Make sure that software and control system device firmware is patched to current releases.\n * Periodically change passwords in control system components and infrastructure devices.\n * Where applicable, set the controller key-switch/mode-switch to RUN mode.\n\n\n\n\nFor more information on security with Rockwell Automation products, please refer to Rockwell\u2019s Security Advisory Index http://rockwellautomation.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/54102 ."
}
],
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
},
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "ics-cert@hq.dhs.gov",
"ID": "CVE-2012-6439",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "n/a",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "n/a"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "n/a"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "Rockwell Automation EtherNet/IP products; 1756-ENBT, 1756-EWEB, 1768-ENBT, and 1768-EWEB communication modules; CompactLogix L32E and L35E controllers; 1788-ENBT FLEXLogix adapter; 1794-AENTR FLEX I/O EtherNet/IP adapter; ControlLogix 18 and earlier; CompactLogix 18 and earlier; GuardLogix 18 and earlier; SoftLogix 18 and earlier; CompactLogix controllers 19 and earlier; SoftLogix controllers 19 and earlier; ControlLogix controllers 20 and earlier; GuardLogix controllers 20 and earlier; and MicroLogix 1100 and 1400 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (control and communication outage) via a CIP message that modifies the (1) configuration or (2) network parameters."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "n/a"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "http://www.us-cert.gov/control_systems/pdf/ICSA-13-011-03.pdf",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://www.us-cert.gov/control_systems/pdf/ICSA-13-011-03.pdf"
}
]
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "7d14cffa-0d7d-4270-9dc0-52cabd5a23a6",
"assignerShortName": "icscert",
"cveId": "CVE-2012-6439",
"datePublished": "2013-01-24T21:00:00.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2012-12-26T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-06-30T21:33:10.902Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2012-6435 (GCVE-0-2012-6435)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2013-01-24 21:00 – Updated: 2026-06-03 13:41
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Rockwell Automation ControlLogix PLC Improper Access Control
Summary
When an affected product receives a valid CIP message from an unauthorized or unintended source to Port 2222/TCP, Port 2222/UDP, Port 44818/TCP, or Port 44818/UDP that instructs the CPU to stop logic execution and enter a fault state, a DoS can occur. This situation could cause loss of availability and a disruption of communication with other connected devices.
Rockwell Automation EtherNet/IP products; 1756-ENBT, 1756-EWEB, 1768-ENBT, and 1768-EWEB communication modules; CompactLogix L32E and L35E controllers; 1788-ENBT FLEXLogix adapter; 1794-AENTR FLEX I/O EtherNet/IP adapter; ControlLogix 18 and earlier; CompactLogix 18 and earlier; GuardLogix 18 and earlier; SoftLogix 18 and earlier; CompactLogix controllers 19 and earlier; SoftLogix controllers 19 and earlier; ControlLogix controllers 20 and earlier; GuardLogix controllers 20 and earlier; and MicroLogix 1100 and 1400
Severity
7.5 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
Assigner
References
6 references
Impacted products
8 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rockwell Automation | 1756-ENBT, 1756-EWEB, 1768-ENBT, 1768-EWEB communication modules |
Affected:
All
|
|
| Rockwell Automation | CompactLogix L32E and L35E controllers |
Affected:
All
|
|
| Rockwell Automation | 1788-ENBT FLEXLogix adapter |
Affected:
All
|
|
| Rockwell Automation | 1794-AENTR FLEX I/O EtherNet/IP adapter |
Affected:
All
|
|
| Rockwell Automation | ControlLogix, CompactLogix, GuardLogix, and SoftLogix |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 18
(custom)
|
|
| Rockwell Automation | CompactLogix and SoftLogix controllers |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 19
(custom)
|
|
| Rockwell Automation | ControlLogix and GuardLogix controllers |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 20
(custom)
|
|
| Rockwell Automation | MicroLogix |
Affected:
1100
Affected: 1400 |
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T21:28:39.935Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.us-cert.gov/control_systems/pdf/ICSA-13-011-03.pdf"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2012-6435",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-06-03T13:41:32.933358Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-03T13:41:49.296Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "1756-ENBT, 1756-EWEB, 1768-ENBT, 1768-EWEB communication modules",
"vendor": "Rockwell Automation",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "All"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "CompactLogix L32E and L35E controllers",
"vendor": "Rockwell Automation",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "All"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "1788-ENBT FLEXLogix adapter",
"vendor": "Rockwell Automation",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "All"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "1794-AENTR FLEX I/O EtherNet/IP adapter",
"vendor": "Rockwell Automation",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "All"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "ControlLogix, CompactLogix, GuardLogix, and SoftLogix",
"vendor": "Rockwell Automation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "18",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "CompactLogix and SoftLogix controllers",
"vendor": "Rockwell Automation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "19",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "ControlLogix and GuardLogix controllers",
"vendor": "Rockwell Automation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "20",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "MicroLogix",
"vendor": "Rockwell Automation",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1100"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1400"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Rub\u00e9n Santamarta of IOActive identified vulnerabilities in Rockwell Automation\u2019s ControlLogix PLC and released proof-of-concept (exploit) code at the Digital Bond S4 Conference on January 19, 2012."
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003e\n\n\n\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003e\n\n\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eWhen an affected product receives a valid CIP message from an unauthorized or unintended source to Port 2222/TCP, Port 2222/UDP, Port 44818/TCP, or Port 44818/UDP that instructs the CPU to stop logic execution and enter a fault state, a DoS can occur. This situation could cause loss of availability and a disruption of communication with other connected devices.\u003c/span\u003e\n\n\u003c/span\u003e\n\n\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eRockwell Automation EtherNet/IP products; 1756-ENBT, 1756-EWEB, 1768-ENBT, and 1768-EWEB communication modules; CompactLogix L32E and L35E controllers; 1788-ENBT FLEXLogix adapter; 1794-AENTR FLEX I/O EtherNet/IP adapter; ControlLogix 18 and earlier; CompactLogix 18 and earlier; GuardLogix 18 and earlier; SoftLogix 18 and earlier; CompactLogix controllers 19 and earlier; SoftLogix controllers 19 and earlier; ControlLogix controllers 20 and earlier; GuardLogix controllers 20 and earlier; and MicroLogix 1100 and 1400\u0026nbsp;\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "When an affected product receives a valid CIP message from an unauthorized or unintended source to Port 2222/TCP, Port 2222/UDP, Port 44818/TCP, or Port 44818/UDP that instructs the CPU to stop logic execution and enter a fault state, a DoS can occur. This situation could cause loss of availability and a disruption of communication with other connected devices.\n\n\n\n\n\nRockwell Automation EtherNet/IP products; 1756-ENBT, 1756-EWEB, 1768-ENBT, and 1768-EWEB communication modules; CompactLogix L32E and L35E controllers; 1788-ENBT FLEXLogix adapter; 1794-AENTR FLEX I/O EtherNet/IP adapter; ControlLogix 18 and earlier; CompactLogix 18 and earlier; GuardLogix 18 and earlier; SoftLogix 18 and earlier; CompactLogix controllers 19 and earlier; SoftLogix controllers 19 and earlier; ControlLogix controllers 20 and earlier; GuardLogix controllers 20 and earlier; and MicroLogix 1100 and 1400"
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV2_0": {
"accessComplexity": "LOW",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE",
"baseScore": 7.8,
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C",
"version": "2.0"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-284",
"description": "CWE-284",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-06-30T21:37:15.940Z",
"orgId": "7d14cffa-0d7d-4270-9dc0-52cabd5a23a6",
"shortName": "icscert"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/ics-advisories/icsa-13-011-03"
},
{
"url": "https://rockwellautomation.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/470154"
},
{
"url": "https://rockwellautomation.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/aid/470155"
},
{
"url": "https://rockwellautomation.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/aid/470156"
},
{
"url": "http://rockwellautomation.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/54102"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eAccording to Rockwell, any of the above products that become affected by a vulnerability can be reset by rebooting or power cycling the affected product. After the reboot, the affected product may require some reconfiguration.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eTo mitigate the vulnerabilities, Rockwell has developed and released security patches on July 18, 2012, to address each of the issues. To download and install the patches please refer to Rockwell\u2019s Advisories at:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003ca target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://rockwellautomation.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/470154\"\u003ehttps://rockwellautomation.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/470154\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003ca target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://rockwellautomation.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/aid/470155\"\u003ehttps://rockwellautomation.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/aid/470155\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003ca target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://rockwellautomation.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/aid/470156\"\u003ehttps://rockwellautomation.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/aid/470156\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eFor more information on security with Rockwell Automation products, please refer to \u003ca target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http://rockwellautomation.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/54102\"\u003eRockwell\u2019s Security Advisory Index\u003c/a\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "According to Rockwell, any of the above products that become affected by a vulnerability can be reset by rebooting or power cycling the affected product. After the reboot, the affected product may require some reconfiguration.\n\nTo mitigate the vulnerabilities, Rockwell has developed and released security patches on July 18, 2012, to address each of the issues. To download and install the patches please refer to Rockwell\u2019s Advisories at:\n\n https://rockwellautomation.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/470154 \n https://rockwellautomation.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/aid/470155 \n https://rockwellautomation.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/aid/470156 \n\nFor more information on security with Rockwell Automation products, please refer to Rockwell\u2019s Security Advisory Index http://rockwellautomation.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/54102 ."
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "ICSA-13-011-03",
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Rockwell Automation ControlLogix PLC Improper Access Control",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eRockwell recommends updating to the newest firmware patches to fix the vulnerabilities, but if not able to do so right away, then Rockwell advises immediately employing the following mitigations for each of the affected products.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eTo mitigate the vulnerabilities pertaining to receiving valid CIP packets:\u003c/p\u003e\u003col\u003e\u003cli\u003eBlock all traffic to the Ethernet/IP or other CIP protocol-based devices from outside the Manufacturing Zone by restricting or blocking access to TCP and UDP Ports 2222 and 44818 using appropriate security technology such as a firewall or Unified Threat Management (UTM).\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eEmploy a UTM appliance that specifically supports CIP message filtering.\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ol\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition to the above, Rockwell recommends concerned customers remain vigilant and continue to follow security strategies that help reduce risk and enhance overall control system security. Where possible, they suggest you apply multiple recommendations and complement this list with your own best-practices:\u003c/p\u003e\u003col\u003e\u003cli\u003eEmploy layered security and defense-in-depth methods in system design to restrict and control access to individual products and control networks. Refer to \u003ca target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http://www.ab.com/networks/architectures.html\"\u003ehttp://www.ab.com/networks/architectures.html\u003c/a\u003e for comprehensive information about implementing validated architectures designed to deliver these measures.\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eRestrict physical and electronic access to automation products, networks, and systems to only those individuals authorized to be in contact with control system equipment.\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eEmploy firewalls with ingress/egress filtering, intrusion detection/prevention systems, and validate all configurations. Evaluate firewall configurations to ensure other appropriate inbound and outbound traffic is blocked.\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eUse up-to-date end-point protection software (e.g., antivirus/antimalware software) on all PC-based assets.\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eMake sure that software and control system device firmware is patched to current releases.\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003ePeriodically change passwords in control system components and infrastructure devices.\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eWhere applicable, set the controller key-switch/mode-switch to RUN mode.\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ol\u003e\n\n\n\n\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eFor more information on security with Rockwell Automation products, please refer to \u003c/span\u003e\u003ca target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http://rockwellautomation.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/54102\"\u003eRockwell\u2019s Security Advisory Index\u003c/a\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\n\n\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Rockwell recommends updating to the newest firmware patches to fix the vulnerabilities, but if not able to do so right away, then Rockwell advises immediately employing the following mitigations for each of the affected products.\n\nTo mitigate the vulnerabilities pertaining to receiving valid CIP packets:\n\n * Block all traffic to the Ethernet/IP or other CIP protocol-based devices from outside the Manufacturing Zone by restricting or blocking access to TCP and UDP Ports 2222 and 44818 using appropriate security technology such as a firewall or Unified Threat Management (UTM).\n * Employ a UTM appliance that specifically supports CIP message filtering.\n\n\nIn addition to the above, Rockwell recommends concerned customers remain vigilant and continue to follow security strategies that help reduce risk and enhance overall control system security. Where possible, they suggest you apply multiple recommendations and complement this list with your own best-practices:\n\n * Employ layered security and defense-in-depth methods in system design to restrict and control access to individual products and control networks. Refer to http://www.ab.com/networks/architectures.html for comprehensive information about implementing validated architectures designed to deliver these measures.\n * Restrict physical and electronic access to automation products, networks, and systems to only those individuals authorized to be in contact with control system equipment.\n * Employ firewalls with ingress/egress filtering, intrusion detection/prevention systems, and validate all configurations. Evaluate firewall configurations to ensure other appropriate inbound and outbound traffic is blocked.\n * Use up-to-date end-point protection software (e.g., antivirus/antimalware software) on all PC-based assets.\n * Make sure that software and control system device firmware is patched to current releases.\n * Periodically change passwords in control system components and infrastructure devices.\n * Where applicable, set the controller key-switch/mode-switch to RUN mode.\n\n\n\n\nFor more information on security with Rockwell Automation products, please refer to Rockwell\u2019s Security Advisory Index http://rockwellautomation.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/54102 ."
}
],
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
},
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "ics-cert@hq.dhs.gov",
"ID": "CVE-2012-6439",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "n/a",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "n/a"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "n/a"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "Rockwell Automation EtherNet/IP products; 1756-ENBT, 1756-EWEB, 1768-ENBT, and 1768-EWEB communication modules; CompactLogix L32E and L35E controllers; 1788-ENBT FLEXLogix adapter; 1794-AENTR FLEX I/O EtherNet/IP adapter; ControlLogix 18 and earlier; CompactLogix 18 and earlier; GuardLogix 18 and earlier; SoftLogix 18 and earlier; CompactLogix controllers 19 and earlier; SoftLogix controllers 19 and earlier; ControlLogix controllers 20 and earlier; GuardLogix controllers 20 and earlier; and MicroLogix 1100 and 1400 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (control and communication outage) via a CIP message that modifies the (1) configuration or (2) network parameters."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "n/a"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "http://www.us-cert.gov/control_systems/pdf/ICSA-13-011-03.pdf",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://www.us-cert.gov/control_systems/pdf/ICSA-13-011-03.pdf"
}
]
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "7d14cffa-0d7d-4270-9dc0-52cabd5a23a6",
"assignerShortName": "icscert",
"cveId": "CVE-2012-6435",
"datePublished": "2013-01-24T21:00:00.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2012-12-26T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-03T13:41:49.296Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2012-6068 (GCVE-0-2012-6068)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2013-01-21 21:00 – Updated: 2025-07-02 20:12
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
3S CoDeSys Improper Access Control
Summary
The Runtime Toolkit in CODESYS Runtime System 2.3.x and 2.4.x does not require authentication, which allows remote attackers to execute commands via the command-line interface in the TCP listener service or transfer files via requests to the TCP listener service.
Severity
9.8 (Critical)
CWE
Assigner
References
7 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| http://www.codesys.com/news-events/press-releases… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/ics-advisories/i… | |
| http://www.digitalbond.com/tools/basecamp/3s-codesys/ | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/ics-advisories/i… | |
| https://us.codesys.com/ecosystem/security/ | |
| http://ics-cert.us-cert.gov/advisories/ICSA-14-084-01 | x_refsource_MISCx_transferred |
| http://www.us-cert.gov/control_systems/pdf/ICSA-1… | x_refsource_MISCx_transferred |
Impacted products
6 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3S-Smart Software Solutions | CODESYS Control Runtime embedded |
Affected:
0 , < 2.3.2.8
(custom)
|
|
| 3S-Smart Software Solutions | CODESYS Control Runtime full |
Affected:
0 , < 2.4.7.40
(custom)
|
|
| 3S-Smart Software Solutions | CODESYS Control RTE |
Affected:
0 , < 2.3.7.17
(custom)
|
|
| Festo | CECX-X-C1 Modular Master Controller with CoDeSys |
Affected:
All
|
|
| Festo | CECX-X-M1 Modular Controller with CoDeSys and SoftMotion |
Affected:
All
|
|
| 3S-Smart Software Solutions | CoDeSys |
Unaffected:
3.X
|
Date Public
2012-10-31 06:00
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T21:21:28.369Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.codesys.com/news-events/press-releases/detail/article/sicherheitsluecke-in-codesys-v23-laufzeitsystem.html"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://ics-cert.us-cert.gov/advisories/ICSA-14-084-01"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.digitalbond.com/tools/basecamp/3s-codesys/"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.us-cert.gov/control_systems/pdf/ICSA-13-011-01.pdf"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "CODESYS Control Runtime embedded",
"vendor": "3S-Smart Software Solutions",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2.3.2.8",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "CODESYS Control Runtime full",
"vendor": "3S-Smart Software Solutions",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2.4.7.40",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "CODESYS Control RTE",
"vendor": "3S-Smart Software Solutions",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2.3.7.17",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "CECX-X-C1 Modular Master Controller with CoDeSys",
"vendor": "Festo",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "All"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "CECX-X-M1 Modular Controller with CoDeSys and SoftMotion",
"vendor": "Festo",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "All"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "CoDeSys",
"vendor": "3S-Smart Software Solutions",
"versions": [
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "3.X"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Independent researcher Reid Wightman of IOActive, formerly of Digital Bond has validated that the patch, issued by 3S, mitigates theses vulnerabilities."
}
],
"datePublic": "2012-10-31T06:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eThe Runtime Toolkit in CODESYS Runtime System 2.3.x and 2.4.x does not require authentication, which allows remote attackers to execute commands via the command-line interface in the TCP listener service or transfer files via requests to the TCP listener service.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "The Runtime Toolkit in CODESYS Runtime System 2.3.x and 2.4.x does not require authentication, which allows remote attackers to execute commands via the command-line interface in the TCP listener service or transfer files via requests to the TCP listener service."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.8,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-284",
"description": "CWE-284",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-02T20:12:04.890Z",
"orgId": "7d14cffa-0d7d-4270-9dc0-52cabd5a23a6",
"shortName": "icscert"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "http://www.codesys.com/news-events/press-releases/detail/article/sicherheitsluecke-in-codesys-v23-laufzeitsystem.html"
},
{
"url": "https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/ics-advisories/icsa-13-011-01"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "http://www.digitalbond.com/tools/basecamp/3s-codesys/"
},
{
"url": "https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/ics-advisories/icsa-14-084-01"
},
{
"url": "https://us.codesys.com/ecosystem/security/"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "CoDeSys recommends upgrading to the latest version, which is Version 3. It can be downloaded \u003ca target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://store.codesys.com/engineering/codesys.html?___store=en#All%20versions\"\u003ehere\u003c/a\u003e.\u003cp\u003e3S released a patch which implements a password for authentication to the device.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe patch can be downloaded from the \u003ca target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http://www.codesys.com/download.html\"\u003eCoDeSys Download Center\u003c/a\u003e.\u003c/p\u003eCoDeSys Version 3.X is not affected by these vulnerabilities.\n\n\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "CoDeSys recommends upgrading to the latest version, which is Version 3. It can be downloaded here https://store.codesys.com/engineering/codesys.html .3S released a patch which implements a password for authentication to the device.\n\nThe patch can be downloaded from the CoDeSys Download Center http://www.codesys.com/download.html .\n\nCoDeSys Version 3.X is not affected by these vulnerabilities."
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "ICSA-13-011-01",
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "3S CoDeSys Improper Access Control",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "3S also recommends the usage of standard security methods like firewalls\n or virtual private network (VPN) access to prevent unauthorized access \nto the controller.\n\n\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "3S also recommends the usage of standard security methods like firewalls\n or virtual private network (VPN) access to prevent unauthorized access \nto the controller."
}
],
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
},
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "ics-cert@hq.dhs.gov",
"ID": "CVE-2012-6068",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "n/a",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "n/a"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "n/a"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "The Runtime Toolkit in CODESYS Runtime System 2.3.x and 2.4.x does not require authentication, which allows remote attackers to (1) execute commands via the command-line interface in the TCP listener service or (2) transfer files via requests to the TCP listener service."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "n/a"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "http://www.codesys.com/news-events/press-releases/detail/article/sicherheitsluecke-in-codesys-v23-laufzeitsystem.html",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "http://www.codesys.com/news-events/press-releases/detail/article/sicherheitsluecke-in-codesys-v23-laufzeitsystem.html"
},
{
"name": "http://ics-cert.us-cert.gov/advisories/ICSA-14-084-01",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://ics-cert.us-cert.gov/advisories/ICSA-14-084-01"
},
{
"name": "http://www.digitalbond.com/tools/basecamp/3s-codesys/",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://www.digitalbond.com/tools/basecamp/3s-codesys/"
},
{
"name": "http://www.us-cert.gov/control_systems/pdf/ICSA-13-011-01.pdf",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://www.us-cert.gov/control_systems/pdf/ICSA-13-011-01.pdf"
}
]
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "7d14cffa-0d7d-4270-9dc0-52cabd5a23a6",
"assignerShortName": "icscert",
"cveId": "CVE-2012-6068",
"datePublished": "2013-01-21T21:00:00.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2012-12-05T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-02T20:12:04.890Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2011-4181 (GCVE-0-2011-4181)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2018-06-11 15:00 – Updated: 2024-09-17 02:21
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
open build service information leak via unauthorized source access
Summary
A vulnerability in open build service allows remote attackers to gain access to source files even though source access is disabled. Affected releases are SUSE open build service up to and including version 2.1.15 (for 2.1) and before version 2.3.
Severity
4.3 (Medium)
CWE
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/openSUSE/open-build-service/co… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734003 | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SUSE | open build service |
Affected:
unspecified , ≤ 2.1.15
(custom)
Affected: unspecified , < 2.3 (custom) |
Date Public
2011-12-06 00:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-07T00:01:51.247Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openSUSE/open-build-service/commit/5281e4bff9df31f1f91e22a0d1e9086b93b23d7e"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734003"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "open build service",
"vendor": "SUSE",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "2.1.15",
"status": "affected",
"version": "unspecified",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "2.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "unspecified",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2011-12-06T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A vulnerability in open build service allows remote attackers to gain access to source files even though source access is disabled. Affected releases are SUSE open build service up to and including version 2.1.15 (for 2.1) and before version 2.3."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 4.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.0"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-284",
"description": "CWE-284",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2021-01-06T16:15:28.000Z",
"orgId": "f81092c5-7f14-476d-80dc-24857f90be84",
"shortName": "microfocus"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openSUSE/open-build-service/commit/5281e4bff9df31f1f91e22a0d1e9086b93b23d7e"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734003"
}
],
"source": {
"defect": [
"734003"
],
"discovery": "INTERNAL"
},
"title": "open build service information leak via unauthorized source access",
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "security@microfocus.com",
"DATE_PUBLIC": "2011-12-06",
"ID": "CVE-2011-4181",
"STATE": "PUBLIC",
"TITLE": "open build service information leak via unauthorized source access"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "open build service",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"affected": "\u003c=",
"version_affected": "\u003c=",
"version_value": "2.1.15"
},
{
"affected": "\u003c",
"version_affected": "\u003c",
"version_value": "2.3"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "SUSE"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "A vulnerability in open build service allows remote attackers to gain access to source files even though source access is disabled. Affected releases are SUSE open build service up to and including version 2.1.15 (for 2.1) and before version 2.3."
}
]
},
"impact": {
"cvss": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 4.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.0"
}
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "CWE-284"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/openSUSE/open-build-service/commit/5281e4bff9df31f1f91e22a0d1e9086b93b23d7e",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "https://github.com/openSUSE/open-build-service/commit/5281e4bff9df31f1f91e22a0d1e9086b93b23d7e"
},
{
"name": "https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734003",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734003"
}
]
},
"source": {
"defect": [
"734003"
],
"discovery": "INTERNAL"
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "f81092c5-7f14-476d-80dc-24857f90be84",
"assignerShortName": "microfocus",
"cveId": "CVE-2011-4181",
"datePublished": "2018-06-11T15:00:00.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2011-10-25T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-09-17T02:21:47.163Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2011-1762 (GCVE-0-2011-1762)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2022-04-18 16:20 – Updated: 2024-08-06 22:37
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Summary
A flaw exists in Wordpress related to the 'wp-admin/press-this.php 'script improperly checking user permissions when publishing posts. This may allow a user with 'Contributor-level' privileges to post as if they had 'publish_posts' permission.
Severity
No CVSS data available.
CWE
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://wordpress.org/support/wordpress-version/v… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T22:37:25.769Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://wordpress.org/support/wordpress-version/version-3-1-2/"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "wordpress",
"vendor": "n/a",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "wordpress before 3.0.6 and 3.1.2"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A flaw exists in Wordpress related to the \u0027wp-admin/press-this.php \u0027script improperly checking user permissions when publishing posts. This may allow a user with \u0027Contributor-level\u0027 privileges to post as if they had \u0027publish_posts\u0027 permission."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-284",
"description": "CWE-284",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2022-04-18T16:20:38.000Z",
"orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
"shortName": "redhat"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://wordpress.org/support/wordpress-version/version-3-1-2/"
}
],
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "secalert@redhat.com",
"ID": "CVE-2011-1762",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "wordpress",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "wordpress before 3.0.6 and 3.1.2"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "n/a"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "A flaw exists in Wordpress related to the \u0027wp-admin/press-this.php \u0027script improperly checking user permissions when publishing posts. This may allow a user with \u0027Contributor-level\u0027 privileges to post as if they had \u0027publish_posts\u0027 permission."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "CWE-284"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://wordpress.org/support/wordpress-version/version-3-1-2/",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://wordpress.org/support/wordpress-version/version-3-1-2/"
}
]
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
"assignerShortName": "redhat",
"cveId": "CVE-2011-1762",
"datePublished": "2022-04-18T16:20:38.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2011-04-19T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T22:37:25.769Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2009-2631 (GCVE-0-2009-2631)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2009-12-04 11:00 – Updated: 2025-06-16 20:54
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Clientless SSL VPN products break web browser domain-based security models
Summary
Multiple clientless SSL VPN products that run in web browsers, including Stonesoft StoneGate; Cisco ASA; SonicWALL E-Class SSL VPN and SonicWALL SSL VPN; SafeNet SecureWire Access Gateway; Juniper Networks Secure Access; Nortel CallPilot; Citrix Access Gateway; and other products, when running in configurations that do not restrict access to the same domain as the VPN, retrieve the content of remote URLs from one domain and rewrite them so they originate from the VPN's domain, which violates the same origin policy and allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site scripting attacks, read cookies that originated from other domains, access the Web VPN session to gain access to internal resources, perform key logging, and conduct other attacks. NOTE: it could be argued that this is a fundamental design problem in any clientless VPN solution, as opposed to a commonly-introduced error that can be fixed in separate implementations. Therefore a single CVE has been assigned for all products that have this design
Severity
No CVSS data available.
CWE
- CWE-284 - Improper Access Control
Assigner
References
25 references
Impacted products
2 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cisco | Adaptive Security Appliance Web SSL VPN |
Affected:
*
|
|
| Palo Alto | PAN OS Web SSL VPN |
Affected:
*
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-07T05:59:56.986Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "37786",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory",
"x_refsource_SECUNIA",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/37786"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www116.nortel.com/pub/repository/CLARIFY/DOCUMENT/2009/50/025367-01.pdf"
},
{
"name": "20091202 Same-origin policy bypass vulnerabilities in several VPN products reported",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_BUGTRAQ",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/508164/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://support.nortel.com/go/main.jsp?cscat=BLTNDETAIL\u0026DocumentOID=984744"
},
{
"name": "VU#261869",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory",
"x_refsource_CERT-VN",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/261869"
},
{
"name": "37152",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_BID",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/37152"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.stonesoft.com/en/support/security_advisories/2009_03_12.html"
},
{
"name": "ADV-2009-3569",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_VUPEN",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/3569"
},
{
"name": "20060608 SSL VPNs and security",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_FULLDISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2006/Jun/238"
},
{
"name": "1023255",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_SECTRACK",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1023255"
},
{
"name": "ADV-2009-3571",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_VUPEN",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/3571"
},
{
"name": "20060609 Re: SSL VPNs and security",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_FULLDISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2006/Jun/269"
},
{
"name": "37788",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory",
"x_refsource_SECUNIA",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/37788"
},
{
"name": "37696",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory",
"x_refsource_SECUNIA",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/37696"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.sonicwall.com/us/2123_14882.html"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.sonicwall.com/us/2123_14883.html"
},
{
"name": "ADV-2009-3570",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_VUPEN",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/3570"
},
{
"name": "sslvpn-sameorigin-security-bypass(54523)",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_XF",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/54523"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://kb.juniper.net/KB15799"
},
{
"name": "20060609 Re: SSL VPNs and security",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_FULLDISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2006/Jun/270"
},
{
"name": "ADV-2009-3568",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_VUPEN",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/3568"
},
{
"name": "ADV-2009-3567",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_VUPEN",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/3567"
},
{
"name": "37789",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory",
"x_refsource_SECUNIA",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/37789"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "Adaptive Security Appliance Web SSL VPN",
"vendor": "Cisco",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "*"
}
]
},
{
"product": "PAN OS Web SSL VPN",
"vendor": "Palo Alto",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "*"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:h:aladdin:safenet_securewire_access_gateway:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:h:cisco:adaptive_security_appliance:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:h:sonicwall:e-class_ssl_vpn:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:h:sonicwall:ssl_vpn:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:h:stonesoft:stonegate:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Multiple clientless SSL VPN products that run in web browsers, including Stonesoft StoneGate; Cisco ASA; SonicWALL E-Class SSL VPN and SonicWALL SSL VPN; SafeNet SecureWire Access Gateway; Juniper Networks Secure Access; Nortel CallPilot; Citrix Access Gateway; and other products, when running in configurations that do not restrict access to the same domain as the VPN, retrieve the content of remote URLs from one domain and rewrite them so they originate from the VPN\u0027s domain, which violates the same origin policy and allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site scripting attacks, read cookies that originated from other domains, access the Web VPN session to gain access to internal resources, perform key logging, and conduct other attacks. NOTE: it could be argued that this is a fundamental design problem in any clientless VPN solution, as opposed to a commonly-introduced error that can be fixed in separate implementations. Therefore a single CVE has been assigned for all products that have this design"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-284",
"description": "CWE-284: Improper Access Control",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-06-16T20:54:35.965Z",
"orgId": "37e5125f-f79b-445b-8fad-9564f167944b",
"shortName": "certcc"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "CERT/CC Advisory",
"url": "https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/261869"
},
{
"name": "Vendor-Advisory",
"url": "https://security.paloaltonetworks.com/PAN-SA-2025-0005"
}
],
"title": "Clientless SSL VPN products break web browser domain-based security models",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "cveClient/1.0.15"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "37e5125f-f79b-445b-8fad-9564f167944b",
"assignerShortName": "certcc",
"cveId": "CVE-2009-2631",
"datePublished": "2009-12-04T11:00:00.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2009-07-28T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-06-16T20:54:35.965Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
GHSA-223W-3RXG-P29X
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-11-02 12:00 – Updated: 2022-11-03 19:00
VLAI
Details
Database connections on deleted users could stay active on MySQL data sources in Remote Desktop Manager 2022.3.7 and below which allow deleted users to access unauthorized data. This issue affects : Remote Desktop Manager 2022.3.7 and prior versions.
Severity
7.5 (High)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-3780"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-284",
"CWE-863"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-11-01T19:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Database connections on deleted users could stay active on MySQL data sources in Remote Desktop Manager 2022.3.7 and below which allow deleted users to access unauthorized data. This issue affects : Remote Desktop Manager 2022.3.7 and prior versions.",
"id": "GHSA-223w-3rxg-p29x",
"modified": "2022-11-03T19:00:24Z",
"published": "2022-11-02T12:00:44Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-3780"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://devolutions.net/security/advisories/DEVO-2022-0008"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-2269-968Q-6HCQ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-02-12 06:30 – Updated: 2023-02-21 18:30
VLAI
Details
Memory corruption due to improper access control in Qualcomm IPC.
Severity
7.8 (High)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-33243"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-284",
"CWE-787"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-02-12T04:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Memory corruption due to improper access control in Qualcomm IPC.",
"id": "GHSA-2269-968q-6hcq",
"modified": "2023-02-21T18:30:23Z",
"published": "2023-02-12T06:30:29Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-33243"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.qualcomm.com/company/product-security/bulletins/february-2023-bulletin"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-228V-WC5R-J8M7
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-12 14:20 – Updated: 2026-03-12 14:21
VLAI
Summary
OliveTin Vulnerable to Unauthorized Action Output Disclosure via EventStream
Details
Summary
OliveTin’s live EventStream broadcasts execution events and action output to authenticated dashboard subscribers without enforcing per-action authorization. A low-privileged authenticated user can receive output from actions they are not allowed to view, resulting in broken access control and sensitive information disclosure. I validated this on OliveTin 3000.10.2.
Details
The issue is in the live event streaming path.
EventStream() only checks whether the caller may access the dashboard, then registers the user as a stream subscriber:
- service/internal/api/api.go:776
After subscription, execution events are broadcast to all connected clients without checking whether each recipient is authorized to view logs for the action:
- service/internal/api/api.go:846 OnExecutionStarted
- service/internal/api/api.go:869 OnExecutionFinished
- service/internal/api/api.go:1047 OnOutputChunk
The event payload includes action output through:
- service/internal/api/api.go:295 internalLogEntryToPb
- service/internal/api/api.go:302 Output
By contrast, the normal log APIs do apply per-action authorization checks:
- service/internal/api/api.go:518 GetLogs
- service/internal/api/api.go:585 GetActionLogs
- service/internal/api/api.go:544 isLogEntryAllowed
Root cause:
- the subscription path enforces only coarse dashboard access
- execution callbacks broadcast to every connected client
- no per-recipient ACL check is applied before sending action metadata or output
I validated the issue using:
- an admin user with full ACLs
- an alice user with no ACLs
- a protected action that outputs TOPSECRET=alpha-bravo-charlie
Despite having no relevant ACLs, alice still receives the ExecutionFinished event for the privileged action, including the protected output.
PoC
Tested version:
- 3000.10.2
- Fetch and check out 3000.10.2 in a clean worktree:
git -C OliveTin fetch origin tag 3000.10.2
git -C OliveTin worktree add /home/kali/CVE/OliveTin-3000.10.2 3000.10.2
- Copy the PoC test into the clean tree:
cp OliveTin/service/internal/api/event_stream_leak_test.go \
OliveTin-3000.10.2/service/internal/api/
- Run the targeted PoC test:
cd OliveTin-3000.10.2/service
go test ./internal/api -run TestEventStreamLeaksUnauthorizedExecutionOutput -count=1 -timeout 30s -v
- Optional: save validation output:
go test ./internal/api -run TestEventStreamLeaksUnauthorizedExecutionOutput -count=1 -timeout 30s -v \
2>&1 | tee /tmp/olivetin_eventstream_3000.10.2.log
Observed validation output:
=== RUN TestEventStreamLeaksUnauthorizedExecutionOutput
time="2026-03-01T04:44:59-05:00" level=info msg="Action requested" actionTitle=secret-action tags="[]"
time="2026-03-01T04:44:59-05:00" level=info msg="Action parse args - Before" actionTitle=secret-action cmd="echo 'TOPSECRET=alpha-bravo-charlie'"
time="2026-03-01T04:44:59-05:00" level=info msg="Action parse args - After" actionTitle=secret-action cmd="echo 'TOPSECRET=alpha-bravo-charlie'"
time="2026-03-01T04:44:59-05:00" level=info msg="Action started" actionTitle=secret-action timeout=1
time="2026-03-01T04:44:59-05:00" level=info msg="Action finished" actionTitle=secret-action exit=0 outputLength=30 timedOut=false
--- PASS: TestEventStreamLeaksUnauthorizedExecutionOutput (0.00s)
PASS
ok github.com/OliveTin/OliveTin/internal/api 0.025s
What this proves:
- admin can execute the protected action
- alice has no ACLs
- alice still receives the streamed completion event for the protected action
- protected action output is exposed through the event stream
Impact
This is an authenticated broken access control / information disclosure vulnerability.
A low-privileged authenticated user can subscribe to EventStream and receive:
- action execution metadata
- execution tracking IDs
- initiating username
- live output chunks
- final command output
Who is impacted:
- multi-user OliveTin deployments
- environments where privileged actions produce secrets, tokens, internal system details, or other sensitive operational output
- deployments where lower-privileged authenticated users can access the dashboard and subscribe to live events
This bypasses intended per-action log/view restrictions for protected actions.
Severity
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/OliveTin/OliveTin"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "3000.10.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-32102"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-284",
"CWE-863"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-12T14:20:16Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-11T21:16:16Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "### Summary\n\n OliveTin\u2019s live EventStream broadcasts execution events and action output to authenticated dashboard subscribers without enforcing per-action authorization. A low-privileged authenticated user can receive output from actions they are\n not allowed to view, resulting in broken access control and sensitive information disclosure. I validated this on OliveTin 3000.10.2.\n\n\n\n\n### Details\nThe issue is in the live event streaming path.\n\n EventStream() only checks whether the caller may access the dashboard, then registers the user as a stream subscriber:\n\n - service/internal/api/api.go:776\n\n After subscription, execution events are broadcast to all connected clients without checking whether each recipient is authorized to view logs for the action:\n\n - service/internal/api/api.go:846 OnExecutionStarted\n - service/internal/api/api.go:869 OnExecutionFinished\n - service/internal/api/api.go:1047 OnOutputChunk\n\n The event payload includes action output through:\n\n - service/internal/api/api.go:295 internalLogEntryToPb\n - service/internal/api/api.go:302 Output\n\n By contrast, the normal log APIs do apply per-action authorization checks:\n\n - service/internal/api/api.go:518 GetLogs\n - service/internal/api/api.go:585 GetActionLogs\n - service/internal/api/api.go:544 isLogEntryAllowed\n\n Root cause:\n\n - the subscription path enforces only coarse dashboard access\n - execution callbacks broadcast to every connected client\n - no per-recipient ACL check is applied before sending action metadata or output\n\n I validated the issue using:\n\n - an admin user with full ACLs\n - an alice user with no ACLs\n - a protected action that outputs TOPSECRET=alpha-bravo-charlie\n\n Despite having no relevant ACLs, alice still receives the ExecutionFinished event for the privileged action, including the protected output.\n\n\n\n### PoC\nTested version:\n```\n - 3000.10.2\n```\n 1. Fetch and check out 3000.10.2 in a clean worktree:\n```bash\n git -C OliveTin fetch origin tag 3000.10.2\n git -C OliveTin worktree add /home/kali/CVE/OliveTin-3000.10.2 3000.10.2\n```\n 2. Copy the PoC test into the clean tree:\n```bash\n cp OliveTin/service/internal/api/event_stream_leak_test.go \\\n OliveTin-3000.10.2/service/internal/api/\n```\n 3. Run the targeted PoC test:\n```bash\n cd OliveTin-3000.10.2/service\n go test ./internal/api -run TestEventStreamLeaksUnauthorizedExecutionOutput -count=1 -timeout 30s -v\n```\n 4. Optional: save validation output:\n```bash\n go test ./internal/api -run TestEventStreamLeaksUnauthorizedExecutionOutput -count=1 -timeout 30s -v \\\n 2\u003e\u00261 | tee /tmp/olivetin_eventstream_3000.10.2.log\n```\n Observed validation output:\n```bash\n === RUN TestEventStreamLeaksUnauthorizedExecutionOutput\n time=\"2026-03-01T04:44:59-05:00\" level=info msg=\"Action requested\" actionTitle=secret-action tags=\"[]\"\n time=\"2026-03-01T04:44:59-05:00\" level=info msg=\"Action parse args - Before\" actionTitle=secret-action cmd=\"echo \u0027TOPSECRET=alpha-bravo-charlie\u0027\"\n time=\"2026-03-01T04:44:59-05:00\" level=info msg=\"Action parse args - After\" actionTitle=secret-action cmd=\"echo \u0027TOPSECRET=alpha-bravo-charlie\u0027\"\n time=\"2026-03-01T04:44:59-05:00\" level=info msg=\"Action started\" actionTitle=secret-action timeout=1\n time=\"2026-03-01T04:44:59-05:00\" level=info msg=\"Action finished\" actionTitle=secret-action exit=0 outputLength=30 timedOut=false\n --- PASS: TestEventStreamLeaksUnauthorizedExecutionOutput (0.00s)\n PASS\n ok github.com/OliveTin/OliveTin/internal/api 0.025s\n```\n What this proves:\n\n - admin can execute the protected action\n - alice has no ACLs\n - alice still receives the streamed completion event for the protected action\n - protected action output is exposed through the event stream\n\n\n### Impact\n This is an authenticated broken access control / information disclosure vulnerability.\n\n A low-privileged authenticated user can subscribe to EventStream and receive:\n\n - action execution metadata\n - execution tracking IDs\n - initiating username\n - live output chunks\n - final command output\n\n Who is impacted:\n\n - multi-user OliveTin deployments\n - environments where privileged actions produce secrets, tokens, internal system details, or other sensitive operational output\n - deployments where lower-privileged authenticated users can access the dashboard and subscribe to live events\n\n This bypasses intended per-action log/view restrictions for protected actions.",
"id": "GHSA-228v-wc5r-j8m7",
"modified": "2026-03-12T14:21:00Z",
"published": "2026-03-12T14:20:16Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/OliveTin/OliveTin/security/advisories/GHSA-228v-wc5r-j8m7"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-32102"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/OliveTin/OliveTin"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "OliveTin Vulnerable to Unauthorized Action Output Disclosure via EventStream"
}
GHSA-2293-8XX3-2X87
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-05-28 12:30 – Updated: 2025-05-28 12:30
VLAI
Details
A vulnerability was found in SourceCodester Client Database Management System 1.0. It has been declared as critical. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /user_order_customer_update.php. The manipulation of the argument uploaded_file_cancelled leads to unrestricted upload. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
Severity
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-5299"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-284"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-05-28T12:15:21Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A vulnerability was found in SourceCodester Client Database Management System 1.0. It has been declared as critical. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /user_order_customer_update.php. The manipulation of the argument uploaded_file_cancelled leads to unrestricted upload. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.",
"id": "GHSA-2293-8xx3-2x87",
"modified": "2025-05-28T12:30:34Z",
"published": "2025-05-28T12:30:34Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-5299"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/RS7325/cve/issues/3"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.310426"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.310426"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?submit.585732"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.sourcecodester.com"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
Mitigation MIT-1
Architecture and Design
Operation
Very carefully manage the setting, management, and handling of privileges. Explicitly manage trust zones in the software.
Mitigation MIT-46
Architecture and Design
Strategy: Separation of Privilege
- Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area.
- Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.
CAPEC-19: Embedding Scripts within Scripts
An adversary leverages the capability to execute their own script by embedding it within other scripts that the target software is likely to execute due to programs' vulnerabilities that are brought on by allowing remote hosts to execute scripts.
CAPEC-441: Malicious Logic Insertion
An adversary installs or adds malicious logic (also known as malware) into a seemingly benign component of a fielded system. This logic is often hidden from the user of the system and works behind the scenes to achieve negative impacts. With the proliferation of mass digital storage and inexpensive multimedia devices, Bluetooth and 802.11 support, new attack vectors for spreading malware are emerging for things we once thought of as innocuous greeting cards, picture frames, or digital projectors. This pattern of attack focuses on systems already fielded and used in operation as opposed to systems and their components that are still under development and part of the supply chain.
CAPEC-478: Modification of Windows Service Configuration
An adversary exploits a weakness in access control to modify the execution parameters of a Windows service. The goal of this attack is to execute a malicious binary in place of an existing service.
CAPEC-479: Malicious Root Certificate
An adversary exploits a weakness in authorization and installs a new root certificate on a compromised system. Certificates are commonly used for establishing secure TLS/SSL communications within a web browser. When a user attempts to browse a website that presents a certificate that is not trusted an error message will be displayed to warn the user of the security risk. Depending on the security settings, the browser may not allow the user to establish a connection to the website. Adversaries have used this technique to avoid security warnings prompting users when compromised systems connect over HTTPS to adversary controlled web servers that spoof legitimate websites in order to collect login credentials.
CAPEC-502: Intent Spoof
An adversary, through a previously installed malicious application, issues an intent directed toward a specific trusted application's component in an attempt to achieve a variety of different objectives including modification of data, information disclosure, and data injection. Components that have been unintentionally exported and made public are subject to this type of an attack. If the component trusts the intent's action without verififcation, then the target application performs the functionality at the adversary's request, helping the adversary achieve the desired negative technical impact.
CAPEC-503: WebView Exposure
An adversary, through a malicious web page, accesses application specific functionality by leveraging interfaces registered through WebView's addJavascriptInterface API. Once an interface is registered to WebView through addJavascriptInterface, it becomes global and all pages loaded in the WebView can call this interface.
CAPEC-536: Data Injected During Configuration
An attacker with access to data files and processes on a victim's system injects malicious data into critical operational data during configuration or recalibration, causing the victim's system to perform in a suboptimal manner that benefits the adversary.
CAPEC-546: Incomplete Data Deletion in a Multi-Tenant Environment
An adversary obtains unauthorized information due to insecure or incomplete data deletion in a multi-tenant environment. If a cloud provider fails to completely delete storage and data from former cloud tenants' systems/resources, once these resources are allocated to new, potentially malicious tenants, the latter can probe the provided resources for sensitive information still there.
CAPEC-550: Install New Service
When an operating system starts, it also starts programs called services or daemons. Adversaries may install a new service which will be executed at startup (on a Windows system, by modifying the registry). The service name may be disguised by using a name from a related operating system or benign software. Services are usually run with elevated privileges.
CAPEC-551: Modify Existing Service
When an operating system starts, it also starts programs called services or daemons. Modifying existing services may break existing services or may enable services that are disabled/not commonly used.
CAPEC-552: Install Rootkit
An adversary exploits a weakness in authentication to install malware that alters the functionality and information provide by targeted operating system API calls. Often referred to as rootkits, it is often used to hide the presence of programs, files, network connections, services, drivers, and other system components.
CAPEC-556: Replace File Extension Handlers
When a file is opened, its file handler is checked to determine which program opens the file. File handlers are configuration properties of many operating systems. Applications can modify the file handler for a given file extension to call an arbitrary program when a file with the given extension is opened.
CAPEC-558: Replace Trusted Executable
An adversary exploits weaknesses in privilege management or access control to replace a trusted executable with a malicious version and enable the execution of malware when that trusted executable is called.
CAPEC-562: Modify Shared File
An adversary manipulates the files in a shared location by adding malicious programs, scripts, or exploit code to valid content. Once a user opens the shared content, the tainted content is executed.
CAPEC-563: Add Malicious File to Shared Webroot
An adversaries may add malicious content to a website through the open file share and then browse to that content with a web browser to cause the server to execute the content. The malicious content will typically run under the context and permissions of the web server process, often resulting in local system or administrative privileges depending on how the web server is configured.
CAPEC-564: Run Software at Logon
Operating system allows logon scripts to be run whenever a specific user or users logon to a system. If adversaries can access these scripts, they may insert additional code into the logon script. This code can allow them to maintain persistence or move laterally within an enclave because it is executed every time the affected user or users logon to a computer. Modifying logon scripts can effectively bypass workstation and enclave firewalls. Depending on the access configuration of the logon scripts, either local credentials or a remote administrative account may be necessary.
CAPEC-578: Disable Security Software
An adversary exploits a weakness in access control to disable security tools so that detection does not occur. This can take the form of killing processes, deleting registry keys so that tools do not start at run time, deleting log files, or other methods.