Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-190

Allowed

Integer Overflow or Wraparound

Abstraction: Base · Status: Stable

The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number.

3899 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.

GHSA-HPJJ-HPJH-HCFP

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-14 18:32 – Updated: 2026-07-14 18:32
VLAI
Details

Integer overflow or wraparound in Windows Spaceport.sys allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges with a physical attack.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-50298"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-190"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-07-14T17:16:58Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Integer overflow or wraparound in Windows Spaceport.sys allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges with a physical attack.",
  "id": "GHSA-hpjj-hpjh-hcfp",
  "modified": "2026-07-14T18:32:03Z",
  "published": "2026-07-14T18:32:03Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-50298"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50298"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-HPQ9-2MQH-7FG9

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-01 06:31 – Updated: 2026-07-09 06:31
VLAI
Details

UltraVNC repeater through 1.8.2.2 contains an integer overflow in the HTTP request logging path. In repeater/webgui/settings.c:336, the win_log() function allocates list nodes via malloc(sizeof(struct LIST) + strlen(line)), where line is derived from HTTP request URIs. If strlen(line) is sufficiently large, the addition overflows to a value smaller than sizeof(struct LIST), causing a heap allocation smaller than required. The subsequent strcpy of the full string into the undersized allocation produces a heap buffer overflow. In the current implementation this overflow is bounded by the HTTP receive buffer size (WI_RXBUFSIZE = 153600 bytes, well below SIZE_MAX on 32-bit builds), limiting practical exploitability to a partial heap write. A remote unauthenticated attacker can trigger the theoretical overflow path by sending a maximally-sized URI in an HTTP request to the repeater HTTP port.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-7828"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-190"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-07-01T05:16:23Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "UltraVNC repeater through 1.8.2.2 contains an integer overflow in the HTTP request logging path. In repeater/webgui/settings.c:336, the win_log() function allocates list nodes via malloc(sizeof(struct LIST) + strlen(line)), where line is derived from HTTP request URIs. If strlen(line) is sufficiently large, the addition overflows to a value smaller than sizeof(struct LIST), causing a heap allocation smaller than required. The subsequent strcpy of the full string into the undersized allocation produces a heap buffer overflow. In the current implementation this overflow is bounded by the HTTP receive buffer size (WI_RXBUFSIZE = 153600 bytes, well below SIZE_MAX on 32-bit builds), limiting practical exploitability to a partial heap write. A remote unauthenticated attacker can trigger the theoretical overflow path by sending a maximally-sized URI in an HTTP request to the repeater HTTP port.",
  "id": "GHSA-hpq9-2mqh-7fg9",
  "modified": "2026-07-09T06:31:59Z",
  "published": "2026-07-01T06:31:34Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-7828"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/ultravnc/UltraVNC"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://uvnc.com"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.securin.io/zero-days/cve-2026-7828-integer-overflow-win-log-malloc-ultravnc-repeater"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-HQF9-8XV5-X8XW

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-01-05 19:57 – Updated: 2026-01-05 19:57
VLAI
Summary
ERC7984ERC20Wrapper: once a wrapper is filled, subsequent wrap requests do not revert and result in loss of funds.
Details

Impact

The ERC7984 contract tracks total supply using a confidential euint64 value. If a call to the internal _mint function would result in the total supply overflowing, the call fails silently. The wrap and onTransferReceived functions in ERC7984ERC20Wrapper assume that _mint won't fail silently and do not check the return value. If the mint function fails silently, users do not receive the confidential wrapped token but still send the underlying token, resulting in a loss of funds.

By default (without overriding rate(), the wrapper fills up after wrapping ~18.4 trillion tokens. There are very few tokens of value with sufficient total supply to result in the filling of the wrapper. That said, we recommend upgrading to 0.3.1 to remove this issue.

Patches

This issue has been patched in the 0.3.1 release.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 0.3.0"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "@openzeppelin/confidential-contracts"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.3.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-190"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-01-05T19:57:46Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Impact\nThe `ERC7984` contract tracks total supply using a confidential `euint64` value. If a call to the internal `_mint` function would result in the total supply overflowing, the call fails silently. The `wrap` and `onTransferReceived` functions in `ERC7984ERC20Wrapper` assume that `_mint` won\u0027t fail silently and do not check the return value. If the mint function fails silently, users do not receive the confidential wrapped token but still send the underlying token, resulting in a loss of funds.\n\nBy default (without overriding `rate()`, the wrapper fills up after wrapping ~18.4 trillion tokens. There are very few tokens of value with sufficient total supply to result in the filling of the wrapper. That said, we recommend upgrading to `0.3.1` to remove this issue. \n\n### Patches\nThis issue has been patched in the `0.3.1` release.",
  "id": "GHSA-hqf9-8xv5-x8xw",
  "modified": "2026-01-05T19:57:46Z",
  "published": "2026-01-05T19:57:46Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-confidential-contracts/security/advisories/GHSA-hqf9-8xv5-x8xw"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-confidential-contracts"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "ERC7984ERC20Wrapper: once a wrapper is filled, subsequent wrap requests do not revert and result in loss of funds."
}

GHSA-HQMH-WJGQ-P4P3

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 03:03 – Updated: 2022-05-14 03:03
VLAI
Details

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for TESTAhihi, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2018-13596"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-190"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2018-07-09T06:29:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for TESTAhihi, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.",
  "id": "GHSA-hqmh-wjgq-p4p3",
  "modified": "2022-05-14T03:03:04Z",
  "published": "2022-05-14T03:03:04Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-13596"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/BlockChainsSecurity/EtherTokens/blob/master/GEMCHAIN/mint%20integer%20overflow.md"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/BlockChainsSecurity/EtherTokens/tree/master/TESTAhihi"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-HQMJ-33CM-GQPQ

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-21 18:32 – Updated: 2026-06-21 18:32
VLAI
Details

libexpat before 2.8.2 has an integer overflow in getAttributeId.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-56405"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-190"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-06-21T16:16:27Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "libexpat before 2.8.2 has an integer overflow in getAttributeId.",
  "id": "GHSA-hqmj-33cm-gqpq",
  "modified": "2026-06-21T18:32:19Z",
  "published": "2026-06-21T18:32:19Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-56405"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/libexpat/libexpat/pull/1251"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-HQW9-4VMR-235R

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:16 – Updated: 2025-04-20 03:34
VLAI
Details

An issue was discovered in apng2gif 1.7. There is an integer overflow resulting in a heap-based buffer over-read, related to the load_apng function and the imagesize variable.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2017-6960"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-190"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2017-03-17T09:59:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "An issue was discovered in apng2gif 1.7. There is an integer overflow resulting in a heap-based buffer over-read, related to the load_apng function and the imagesize variable.",
  "id": "GHSA-hqw9-4vmr-235r",
  "modified": "2025-04-20T03:34:26Z",
  "published": "2022-05-13T01:16:08Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-6960"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=854367"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/03/msg00039.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/4513-1"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-HQX6-XXCJ-4CHG

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-11-12 18:30 – Updated: 2024-11-12 18:30
VLAI
Details

Windows Telephony Service Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-43628"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-190"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-11-12T18:15:30Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Windows Telephony Service Remote Code Execution Vulnerability",
  "id": "GHSA-hqx6-xxcj-4chg",
  "modified": "2024-11-12T18:30:58Z",
  "published": "2024-11-12T18:30:58Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43628"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2024-43628"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-HR75-2GFF-5HQ9

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 03:04 – Updated: 2022-05-14 03:04
VLAI
Details

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for MoonToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2018-13462"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-190"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2018-07-09T06:29:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for MoonToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.",
  "id": "GHSA-hr75-2gff-5hq9",
  "modified": "2022-05-14T03:04:01Z",
  "published": "2022-05-14T03:04:01Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-13462"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/BlockChainsSecurity/EtherTokens/blob/master/GEMCHAIN/mint%20integer%20overflow.md"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/BlockChainsSecurity/EtherTokens/tree/master/MoonToken"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-HR9W-2CFW-R557

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 16:51 – Updated: 2024-04-04 01:24
VLAI
Details

A flaw was found in the Linux kernel's freescale hypervisor manager implementation, kernel versions 5.0.x up to, excluding 5.0.17. A parameter passed to an ioctl was incorrectly validated and used in size calculations for the page size calculation. An attacker can use this flaw to crash the system, corrupt memory, or create other adverse security affects.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2019-10142"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-119",
      "CWE-190"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2019-07-30T17:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "A flaw was found in the Linux kernel\u0027s freescale hypervisor manager implementation, kernel versions 5.0.x up to, excluding 5.0.17. A parameter passed to an ioctl was incorrectly validated and used in size calculations for the page size calculation. An attacker can use this flaw to crash the system, corrupt memory, or create other adverse security affects.",
  "id": "GHSA-hr9w-2cfw-r557",
  "modified": "2024-04-04T01:24:56Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T16:51:42Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-10142"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-10142"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-HRF4-HCPC-3345

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-03-16 00:00 – Updated: 2022-03-25 17:09
VLAI
Summary
Denial of service in microweber
Details

Microweber is drag and drop website builder and CMS with E-commerce. The microweber prior 1.2.12 application allows large characters to insert in the input field "post title" which can allow attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted HTTP request. The post title input can be limited to 500 characters or max 1000 characters as a workaround.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Packagist",
        "name": "microweber/microweber"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "last_affected": "1.2.11"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-0961"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-190"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2022-03-19T00:16:10Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-03-15T15:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Microweber is drag and drop website builder and CMS with E-commerce. The microweber prior 1.2.12 application allows large characters to insert in the input field \"post title\" which can allow attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted HTTP request. The post title input can be limited to 500 characters or max 1000 characters as a workaround.",
  "id": "GHSA-hrf4-hcpc-3345",
  "modified": "2022-03-25T17:09:24Z",
  "published": "2022-03-16T00:00:48Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-0961"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/microweber/microweber/commit/f7acbd075dff4825b35b597b74958de9edce67fc"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/microweber/microweber"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://huntr.dev/bounties/cdf00e14-38a7-4b6b-9bb4-3a71bf24e436"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Denial of service in microweber"
}

Mitigation
Requirements

Ensure that all protocols are strictly defined, such that all out-of-bounds behavior can be identified simply, and require strict conformance to the protocol.

Mitigation MIT-3
Requirements

Strategy: Language Selection

  • Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
  • If possible, choose a language or compiler that performs automatic bounds checking.
Mitigation MIT-4
Architecture and Design

Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks

  • Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
  • Use libraries or frameworks that make it easier to handle numbers without unexpected consequences.
  • Examples include safe integer handling packages such as SafeInt (C++) or IntegerLib (C or C++). [REF-106]
Mitigation MIT-8
Implementation

Strategy: Input Validation

  • Perform input validation on any numeric input by ensuring that it is within the expected range. Enforce that the input meets both the minimum and maximum requirements for the expected range.
  • Use unsigned integers where possible. This makes it easier to perform validation for integer overflows. When signed integers are required, ensure that the range check includes minimum values as well as maximum values.
Mitigation MIT-36
Implementation
  • Understand the programming language's underlying representation and how it interacts with numeric calculation (CWE-681). Pay close attention to byte size discrepancies, precision, signed/unsigned distinctions, truncation, conversion and casting between types, "not-a-number" calculations, and how the language handles numbers that are too large or too small for its underlying representation. [REF-7]
  • Also be careful to account for 32-bit, 64-bit, and other potential differences that may affect the numeric representation.
Mitigation MIT-15
Architecture and Design

For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.

Mitigation MIT-26
Implementation

Strategy: Compilation or Build Hardening

Examine compiler warnings closely and eliminate problems with potential security implications, such as signed / unsigned mismatch in memory operations, or use of uninitialized variables. Even if the weakness is rarely exploitable, a single failure may lead to the compromise of the entire system.

CAPEC-92: Forced Integer Overflow

This attack forces an integer variable to go out of range. The integer variable is often used as an offset such as size of memory allocation or similarly. The attacker would typically control the value of such variable and try to get it out of range. For instance the integer in question is incremented past the maximum possible value, it may wrap to become a very small, or negative number, therefore providing a very incorrect value which can lead to unexpected behavior. At worst the attacker can execute arbitrary code.