CWE-190
AllowedInteger Overflow or Wraparound
Abstraction: Base · Status: Stable
The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number.
3870 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-3H55-9MCM-2HW7
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 03:13 – Updated: 2022-05-14 03:13The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for ENTER (ENTR) (Contract Name: EnterToken), an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2018-13735"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-190"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2018-07-09T06:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for ENTER (ENTR) (Contract Name: EnterToken), an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.",
"id": "GHSA-3h55-9mcm-2hw7",
"modified": "2022-05-14T03:13:27Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T03:13:27Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-13735"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/BlockChainsSecurity/EtherTokens/blob/master/GEMCHAIN/mint%20integer%20overflow.md"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/BlockChainsSecurity/EtherTokens/tree/master/EnterToken"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-3H5H-WQWP-RQQR
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-14 18:32 – Updated: 2026-07-14 18:32Integer overflow or wraparound in Windows Storage Spaces Direct allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges with a physical attack.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-49168"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-190"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-07-14T17:16:51Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Integer overflow or wraparound in Windows Storage Spaces Direct allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges with a physical attack.",
"id": "GHSA-3h5h-wqwp-rqqr",
"modified": "2026-07-14T18:32:00Z",
"published": "2026-07-14T18:32:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-49168"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49168"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-3H7C-JWRG-47F9
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 03:00 – Updated: 2022-05-14 03:00The increaseApproval function of a smart contract implementation for Tracto (TRCT), an Ethereum ERC20 token, has an integer overflow.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2018-14063"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-190"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2018-07-15T15:29:00Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "The increaseApproval function of a smart contract implementation for Tracto (TRCT), an Ethereum ERC20 token, has an integer overflow.",
"id": "GHSA-3h7c-jwrg-47f9",
"modified": "2022-05-14T03:00:02Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T03:00:02Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-14063"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/tracto2/Tracto-ERC20/issues/1"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-3H84-FCGX-2VCG
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 03:13 – Updated: 2022-05-14 03:13The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Easticoin, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2018-13766"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-190"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2018-07-09T06:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Easticoin, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.",
"id": "GHSA-3h84-fcgx-2vcg",
"modified": "2022-05-14T03:13:48Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T03:13:48Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-13766"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/BlockChainsSecurity/EtherTokens/blob/master/GEMCHAIN/mint%20integer%20overflow.md"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/BlockChainsSecurity/EtherTokens/tree/master/Easticoin"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-3H9F-Q3M2-WJHJ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 03:12 – Updated: 2025-11-25 18:32An error in argument length checking in JavaScript, leading to potential integer overflows or other bounds checking issues. This vulnerability affects Thunderbird < 45.5, Firefox ESR < 45.5, and Firefox < 50.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2016-5297"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-190"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2018-06-11T21:29:00Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "An error in argument length checking in JavaScript, leading to potential integer overflows or other bounds checking issues. This vulnerability affects Thunderbird \u003c 45.5, Firefox ESR \u003c 45.5, and Firefox \u003c 50.",
"id": "GHSA-3h9f-q3m2-wjhj",
"modified": "2025-11-25T18:32:03Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T03:12:09Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-5297"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1303678"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201701-15"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3730"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2016-89"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2016-90"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2016-93"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2780.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94336"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037298"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-3HJ2-5CWP-2349
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 01:59 – Updated: 2025-10-22 03:30The vold volume manager daemon on Android 3.0 and 2.x before 2.3.4 trusts messages that are received from a PF_NETLINK socket, which allows local users to execute arbitrary code and gain root privileges via a negative index that bypasses a maximum-only signed integer check in the DirectVolume::handlePartitionAdded method, which triggers memory corruption, as demonstrated by Gingerbreak.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2011-1823"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-190"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2011-06-09T10:36:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The vold volume manager daemon on Android 3.0 and 2.x before 2.3.4 trusts messages that are received from a PF_NETLINK socket, which allows local users to execute arbitrary code and gain root privileges via a negative index that bypasses a maximum-only signed integer check in the DirectVolume::handlePartitionAdded method, which triggers memory corruption, as demonstrated by Gingerbreak.",
"id": "GHSA-3hj2-5cwp-2349",
"modified": "2025-10-22T03:30:29Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T01:59:36Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-1823"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/67977"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2011-1823"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=platform/system/core.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=b620a0b1c7ae486e979826200e8e441605b0a5d6"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=platform/system/core.git;a=commit;h=b620a0b1c7ae486e979826200e8e441605b0a5d6"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=platform/system/netd.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=79b579c92afc08ab12c0a5788d61f2dd2934836f"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=platform/system/netd.git;a=commit;h=79b579c92afc08ab12c0a5788d61f2dd2934836f"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=platform/system/vold.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=c51920c82463b240e2be0430849837d6fdc5352e"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=platform/system/vold.git;a=commit;h=c51920c82463b240e2be0430849837d6fdc5352e"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://androidcommunity.com/gingerbreak-root-for-gingerbread-app-20110421"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://c-skills.blogspot.com/2011/04/yummy-yummy-gingerbreak.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1044765"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.androidpolice.com/2011/05/03/google-patches-gingerbreak-exploit-but-dont-worry-we-still-have-root-for-now"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://xorl.wordpress.com/2011/04/28/android-vold-mpartminors-signedness-issue"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-3HX6-CM77-2752
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:05 – Updated: 2026-04-24 15:32libsixel 1.8.4 has an integer overflow in sixel_frame_resize in frame.c.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2019-20205"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-190"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2020-01-02T14:16:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "libsixel 1.8.4 has an integer overflow in sixel_frame_resize in frame.c.",
"id": "GHSA-3hx6-cm77-2752",
"modified": "2026-04-24T15:32:16Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T17:05:29Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-20205"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/saitoha/libsixel/issues/127"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-3J5H-F552-7RHH
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-12-05 12:30 – Updated: 2025-12-05 21:30An integer overflow in the case of failed ACME certificate renewal leads, after a number of failures (~30 days in default configurations), to the backoff timer becoming 0. Attempts to renew the certificate then are repeated without delays until it succeeds.
This issue affects Apache HTTP Server: from 2.4.30 before 2.4.66.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.4.66, which fixes the issue.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-55753"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-190"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-12-05T11:15:51Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "An integer overflow in the case of failed ACME certificate renewal leads, after a number of failures (~30 days in default configurations), to the backoff timer becoming 0. Attempts to renew the certificate then are repeated without delays until it succeeds.\n\nThis issue affects Apache HTTP Server: from 2.4.30 before 2.4.66.\n\n\nUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 2.4.66, which fixes the issue.",
"id": "GHSA-3j5h-f552-7rhh",
"modified": "2025-12-05T21:30:23Z",
"published": "2025-12-05T12:30:13Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-55753"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://httpd.apache.org/security/vulnerabilities_24.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/12/04/4"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-3J96-2FMW-98F4
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:35 – Updated: 2023-03-12 00:30A flaw was found in ImageMagick in MagickCore/quantum.h. An attacker who submits a crafted file that is processed by ImageMagick could trigger undefined behavior in the form of values outside the range of types float and unsigned char. This would most likely lead to an impact to application availability, but could potentially cause other problems related to undefined behavior. This flaw affects ImageMagick versions prior to 7.0.9-0.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-27767"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-190"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2020-12-04T15:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A flaw was found in ImageMagick in MagickCore/quantum.h. An attacker who submits a crafted file that is processed by ImageMagick could trigger undefined behavior in the form of values outside the range of types `float` and `unsigned char`. This would most likely lead to an impact to application availability, but could potentially cause other problems related to undefined behavior. This flaw affects ImageMagick versions prior to 7.0.9-0.",
"id": "GHSA-3j96-2fmw-98f4",
"modified": "2023-03-12T00:30:16Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T17:35:23Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-27767"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1894687"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/03/msg00030.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/03/msg00008.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-3JH2-P3QQ-V4P3
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 03:04 – Updated: 2022-05-14 03:04The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for DaddyToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2018-13493"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-190"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2018-07-09T06:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for DaddyToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.",
"id": "GHSA-3jh2-p3qq-v4p3",
"modified": "2022-05-14T03:04:18Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T03:04:18Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-13493"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/BlockChainsSecurity/EtherTokens/blob/master/GEMCHAIN/mint%20integer%20overflow.md"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/BlockChainsSecurity/EtherTokens/tree/master/DaddyToken"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation
Ensure that all protocols are strictly defined, such that all out-of-bounds behavior can be identified simply, and require strict conformance to the protocol.
Mitigation MIT-3
Strategy: Language Selection
- Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
- If possible, choose a language or compiler that performs automatic bounds checking.
Mitigation MIT-4
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
- Use libraries or frameworks that make it easier to handle numbers without unexpected consequences.
- Examples include safe integer handling packages such as SafeInt (C++) or IntegerLib (C or C++). [REF-106]
Mitigation MIT-8
Strategy: Input Validation
- Perform input validation on any numeric input by ensuring that it is within the expected range. Enforce that the input meets both the minimum and maximum requirements for the expected range.
- Use unsigned integers where possible. This makes it easier to perform validation for integer overflows. When signed integers are required, ensure that the range check includes minimum values as well as maximum values.
Mitigation MIT-36
- Understand the programming language's underlying representation and how it interacts with numeric calculation (CWE-681). Pay close attention to byte size discrepancies, precision, signed/unsigned distinctions, truncation, conversion and casting between types, "not-a-number" calculations, and how the language handles numbers that are too large or too small for its underlying representation. [REF-7]
- Also be careful to account for 32-bit, 64-bit, and other potential differences that may affect the numeric representation.
Mitigation MIT-15
For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Mitigation MIT-26
Strategy: Compilation or Build Hardening
Examine compiler warnings closely and eliminate problems with potential security implications, such as signed / unsigned mismatch in memory operations, or use of uninitialized variables. Even if the weakness is rarely exploitable, a single failure may lead to the compromise of the entire system.
CAPEC-92: Forced Integer Overflow
This attack forces an integer variable to go out of range. The integer variable is often used as an offset such as size of memory allocation or similarly. The attacker would typically control the value of such variable and try to get it out of range. For instance the integer in question is incremented past the maximum possible value, it may wrap to become a very small, or negative number, therefore providing a very incorrect value which can lead to unexpected behavior. At worst the attacker can execute arbitrary code.