CWE-129
AllowedImproper Validation of Array Index
Abstraction: Variant · Status: Draft
The product uses untrusted input when calculating or using an array index, but the product does not validate or incorrectly validates the index to ensure the index references a valid position within the array.
747 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-9R77-32HH-RXF4
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-09-27 15:30 – Updated: 2024-10-02 15:30In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mm: vmalloc: ensure vmap_block is initialised before adding to queue
Commit 8c61291fd850 ("mm: fix incorrect vbq reference in purge_fragmented_block") extended the 'vmap_block' structure to contain a 'cpu' field which is set at allocation time to the id of the initialising CPU.
When a new 'vmap_block' is being instantiated by new_vmap_block(), the partially initialised structure is added to the local 'vmap_block_queue' xarray before the 'cpu' field has been initialised. If another CPU is concurrently walking the xarray (e.g. via vm_unmap_aliases()), then it may perform an out-of-bounds access to the remote queue thanks to an uninitialised index.
This has been observed as UBSAN errors in Android:
| Internal error: UBSAN: array index out of bounds: 00000000f2005512 [#1] PREEMPT SMP |
|---|
| Call trace: |
| purge_fragmented_block+0x204/0x21c |
| _vm_unmap_aliases+0x170/0x378 |
| vm_unmap_aliases+0x1c/0x28 |
| change_memory_common+0x1dc/0x26c |
| set_memory_ro+0x18/0x24 |
| module_enable_ro+0x98/0x238 |
| do_init_module+0x1b0/0x310 |
Move the initialisation of 'vb->cpu' in new_vmap_block() ahead of the addition to the xarray.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-46847"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-129"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-09-27T13:15:16Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmm: vmalloc: ensure vmap_block is initialised before adding to queue\n\nCommit 8c61291fd850 (\"mm: fix incorrect vbq reference in\npurge_fragmented_block\") extended the \u0027vmap_block\u0027 structure to contain a\n\u0027cpu\u0027 field which is set at allocation time to the id of the initialising\nCPU.\n\nWhen a new \u0027vmap_block\u0027 is being instantiated by new_vmap_block(), the\npartially initialised structure is added to the local \u0027vmap_block_queue\u0027\nxarray before the \u0027cpu\u0027 field has been initialised. If another CPU is\nconcurrently walking the xarray (e.g. via vm_unmap_aliases()), then it\nmay perform an out-of-bounds access to the remote queue thanks to an\nuninitialised index.\n\nThis has been observed as UBSAN errors in Android:\n\n | Internal error: UBSAN: array index out of bounds: 00000000f2005512 [#1] PREEMPT SMP\n |\n | Call trace:\n | purge_fragmented_block+0x204/0x21c\n | _vm_unmap_aliases+0x170/0x378\n | vm_unmap_aliases+0x1c/0x28\n | change_memory_common+0x1dc/0x26c\n | set_memory_ro+0x18/0x24\n | module_enable_ro+0x98/0x238\n | do_init_module+0x1b0/0x310\n\nMove the initialisation of \u0027vb-\u003ecpu\u0027 in new_vmap_block() ahead of the\naddition to the xarray.",
"id": "GHSA-9r77-32hh-rxf4",
"modified": "2024-10-02T15:30:37Z",
"published": "2024-09-27T15:30:34Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46847"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1b2770e27d6d952f491bb362b657e5b2713c3efd"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3e3de7947c751509027d26b679ecd243bc9db255"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6cf74e0e5e3ab5d5c9defb4c73dad54d52224671"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-9VJ6-RM7G-MHM7
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 22:00 – Updated: 2025-05-20 18:30A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Jet Database Engine improperly handles objects in memory, aka 'Jet Database Engine Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-0904, CVE-2019-0905, CVE-2019-0907, CVE-2019-0908, CVE-2019-0909, CVE-2019-0974.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2019-0906"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-129"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2019-06-12T14:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Jet Database Engine improperly handles objects in memory, aka \u0027Jet Database Engine Remote Code Execution Vulnerability\u0027. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-0904, CVE-2019-0905, CVE-2019-0907, CVE-2019-0908, CVE-2019-0909, CVE-2019-0974.",
"id": "GHSA-9vj6-rm7g-mhm7",
"modified": "2025-05-20T18:30:35Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T22:00:06Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-0906"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2019-0906"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2019-0906"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-19-624"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-9WM7-RC47-G56M
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:37 – Updated: 2024-05-20 19:49Due to improper bounds checking, a number of methods in dhowden tag before 0.0.0-20201120070457-d52dcb253c63 can trigger a panic via readAPICFrame due to attempted out-of-bounds reads. If the package is used to parse user supplied input, this may be used as a vector for a denial of service attack.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/dhowden/tag"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.0.0-20201120070457-d52dcb253c63"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-29243"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-129"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2023-02-07T22:41:02Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2020-12-28T08:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Due to improper bounds checking, a number of methods in dhowden tag before 0.0.0-20201120070457-d52dcb253c63 can trigger a panic via `readAPICFrame` due to attempted out-of-bounds reads. If the package is used to parse user supplied input, this may be used as a vector for a denial of service attack.",
"id": "GHSA-9wm7-rc47-g56m",
"modified": "2024-05-20T19:49:42Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T17:37:26Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-29243"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/dhowden/tag/issues/80"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/dhowden/tag/commit/4b595ed4fac79f467594aa92f8953f90f817116e"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/dhowden/tag/commit/6b18201aa5c5535511802ddfb4e4117686b4866d"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/dhowden/tag/commit/a92213460e4838490ce3066ef11dc823cdc1740e"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/dhowden/tag/commit/d52dcb253c63a153632bfee5f269dd411dcd8e96"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/dhowden/tag"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2021-0097"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "dhowden tag panic due to out-of-bounds read"
}
GHSA-9WRC-JCVC-7HXX
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-11-07 12:30 – Updated: 2024-11-13 18:31In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bpf: Check the remaining info_cnt before repeating btf fields
When trying to repeat the btf fields for array of nested struct, it doesn't check the remaining info_cnt. The following splat will be reported when the value of ret * nelems is greater than BTF_FIELDS_MAX:
------------[ cut here ]------------ UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in ../kernel/bpf/btf.c:3951:49 index 11 is out of range for type 'btf_field_info [11]' CPU: 6 UID: 0 PID: 411 Comm: test_progs ...... 6.11.0-rc4+ #1 Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS ... Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x70 dump_stack+0x10/0x20 ubsan_epilogue+0x9/0x40 __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds+0x6f/0x80 ? kallsyms_lookup_name+0x48/0xb0 btf_parse_fields+0x992/0xce0 map_create+0x591/0x770 __sys_bpf+0x229/0x2410 __x64_sys_bpf+0x1f/0x30 x64_sys_call+0x199/0x9f0 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 RIP: 0033:0x7fea56f2cc5d ...... ---[ end trace ]---
Fix it by checking the remaining info_cnt in btf_repeat_fields() before repeating the btf fields.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-50161"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-129"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-11-07T10:15:07Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbpf: Check the remaining info_cnt before repeating btf fields\n\nWhen trying to repeat the btf fields for array of nested struct, it\ndoesn\u0027t check the remaining info_cnt. The following splat will be\nreported when the value of ret * nelems is greater than BTF_FIELDS_MAX:\n\n ------------[ cut here ]------------\n UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in ../kernel/bpf/btf.c:3951:49\n index 11 is out of range for type \u0027btf_field_info [11]\u0027\n CPU: 6 UID: 0 PID: 411 Comm: test_progs ...... 6.11.0-rc4+ #1\n Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE\n Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS ...\n Call Trace:\n \u003cTASK\u003e\n dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x70\n dump_stack+0x10/0x20\n ubsan_epilogue+0x9/0x40\n __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds+0x6f/0x80\n ? kallsyms_lookup_name+0x48/0xb0\n btf_parse_fields+0x992/0xce0\n map_create+0x591/0x770\n __sys_bpf+0x229/0x2410\n __x64_sys_bpf+0x1f/0x30\n x64_sys_call+0x199/0x9f0\n do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53\n RIP: 0033:0x7fea56f2cc5d\n ......\n \u003c/TASK\u003e\n ---[ end trace ]---\n\nFix it by checking the remaining info_cnt in btf_repeat_fields() before\nrepeating the btf fields.",
"id": "GHSA-9wrc-jcvc-7hxx",
"modified": "2024-11-13T18:31:52Z",
"published": "2024-11-07T12:30:35Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50161"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6f957d972feee9b385ea3ae6530310a84e55ba71"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/797d73ee232dd1833dec4824bc53a22032e97c1c"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-9XM8-8QVC-VW3P
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-02-07 22:41 – Updated: 2024-05-20 19:49dhowden tag before 0.0.0-20201120070457-d52dcb253c63 allows panic: runtime error: index out of range via readPICFrame.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/dhowden/tag"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.0.0-20201120070457-d52dcb253c63"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-29242"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-129"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2023-02-07T22:41:28Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "dhowden tag before 0.0.0-20201120070457-d52dcb253c63 allows `panic: runtime error: index out of range` via readPICFrame.",
"id": "GHSA-9xm8-8qvc-vw3p",
"modified": "2024-05-20T19:49:01Z",
"published": "2023-02-07T22:41:28Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-29242"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/dhowden/tag/issues/77"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/dhowden/tag/issues/78"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/dhowden/tag/issues/79"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/dhowden/tag/issues/80"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/dhowden/tag/commit/4b595ed4fac79f467594aa92f8953f90f817116e"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/dhowden/tag/commit/6b18201aa5c5535511802ddfb4e4117686b4866d"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/dhowden/tag/commit/a92213460e4838490ce3066ef11dc823cdc1740e"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/dhowden/tag/commit/d52dcb253c63a153632bfee5f269dd411dcd8e96"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/dhowden/tag"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2021-0097"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L/E:P/RL:O/RC:C",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Denial of Service in dhowden/tag"
}
GHSA-C27J-W96X-8CV8
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-04-19 00:00 – Updated: 2022-04-24 00:00Multiple code execution vulnerabilities exists in the Nef polygon-parsing functionality of CGAL libcgal CGAL-5.1.1. A specially crafted malformed file can lead to an out-of-bounds read and type confusion, which could lead to code execution. An attacker can provide malicious input to trigger any of these vulnerabilities. An oob read vulnerability exists in Nef_S2/SNC_io_parser.h SNC_io_parser::read_sedge() seh->source().
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-28631"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-125",
"CWE-129"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-04-18T17:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Multiple code execution vulnerabilities exists in the Nef polygon-parsing functionality of CGAL libcgal CGAL-5.1.1. A specially crafted malformed file can lead to an out-of-bounds read and type confusion, which could lead to code execution. An attacker can provide malicious input to trigger any of these vulnerabilities. An oob read vulnerability exists in Nef_S2/SNC_io_parser.h SNC_io_parser\u003cEW\u003e::read_sedge() seh-\u003esource().",
"id": "GHSA-c27j-w96x-8cv8",
"modified": "2022-04-24T00:00:29Z",
"published": "2022-04-19T00:00:52Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-28631"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/12/msg00011.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202305-34"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://talosintelligence.com/vulnerability_reports/TALOS-2020-1225"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-C27P-CHMH-JJV6
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-01-14 12:31 – Updated: 2026-01-14 12:31Improper Validation of Array Index (CWE-129) in Packetbeat’s MongoDB protocol parser can allow an attacker to cause Overflow Buffers (CAPEC-100) through specially crafted network traffic. This requires an attacker to send a malformed payload to a monitored network interface where MongoDB protocol parsing is enabled.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-0529"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-129"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-01-14T10:16:08Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Improper Validation of Array Index (CWE-129) in Packetbeat\u2019s MongoDB protocol parser can allow an attacker to cause Overflow Buffers (CAPEC-100) through specially crafted network traffic. This requires an attacker to send a malformed payload to a monitored network interface where MongoDB protocol parsing is enabled.",
"id": "GHSA-c27p-chmh-jjv6",
"modified": "2026-01-14T12:31:38Z",
"published": "2026-01-14T12:31:38Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-0529"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://discuss.elastic.co/t/packetbeat-8-19-10-9-1-10-9-2-4-security-update-esa-2026-02/384520"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-C2QG-8333-FG94
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-04-15 00:00 – Updated: 2022-04-22 00:00Two heap-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities exists in the JPEG-JFIF lossless Huffman image parser functionality of Accusoft ImageGear 19.10. A specially-crafted file can lead to a heap buffer overflow. An attacker can provide a malicious file to trigger these vulnerabilities. Placeholder
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-21947"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-122",
"CWE-129",
"CWE-787"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-04-14T20:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Two heap-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities exists in the JPEG-JFIF lossless Huffman image parser functionality of Accusoft ImageGear 19.10. A specially-crafted file can lead to a heap buffer overflow. An attacker can provide a malicious file to trigger these vulnerabilities. Placeholder",
"id": "GHSA-c2qg-8333-fg94",
"modified": "2022-04-22T00:00:50Z",
"published": "2022-04-15T00:00:40Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-21947"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://talosintelligence.com/vulnerability_reports/TALOS-2021-1375"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-C32W-5CXW-R4QR
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-02-12 06:30 – Updated: 2023-02-21 21:30In engineermode services, there is a missing permission check. This could lead to local denial of service in engineermode services.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-47343"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-129"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-02-12T04:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In engineermode services, there is a missing permission check. This could lead to local denial of service in engineermode services.",
"id": "GHSA-c32w-5cxw-r4qr",
"modified": "2023-02-21T21:30:18Z",
"published": "2023-02-12T06:30:28Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-47343"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.unisoc.com/en_us/secy/announcementDetail/1621031430231134210"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-C352-9339-WRC2
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-05-21 18:31 – Updated: 2025-03-06 15:34In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
jfs: fix array-index-out-of-bounds in dbFindLeaf
Currently while searching for dmtree_t for sufficient free blocks there is an array out of bounds while getting element in tp->dm_stree. To add the required check for out of bound we first need to determine the type of dmtree. Thus added an extra parameter to dbFindLeaf so that the type of tree can be determined and the required check can be applied.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-52799"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-129"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-05-21T16:15:18Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\njfs: fix array-index-out-of-bounds in dbFindLeaf\n\nCurrently while searching for dmtree_t for sufficient free blocks there\nis an array out of bounds while getting element in tp-\u003edm_stree. To add\nthe required check for out of bound we first need to determine the type\nof dmtree. Thus added an extra parameter to dbFindLeaf so that the type\nof tree can be determined and the required check can be applied.",
"id": "GHSA-c352-9339-wrc2",
"modified": "2025-03-06T15:34:35Z",
"published": "2024-05-21T18:31:21Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52799"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/20f9310a18e3e99fc031e036fcbed67105ae1859"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/22cad8bc1d36547cdae0eef316c47d917ce3147c"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/81aa58cd8495b8c3b527f58ccbe19478d8087f61"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/86df90f3fea7c5591f05c8a0010871d435e83046"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/87c681ab49e99039ff2dd3e71852417381b13878"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/88b7894a8f8705bf4e7ea90b10229376abf14514"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a50b796d36719757526ee094c703378895ab5e67"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/da3da5e1e6f71c21d8e6149d7076d936ef5d4cb9"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ecfb47f13b08b02cf28b7b50d4941eefa21954d2"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation MIT-7
Strategy: Input Validation
Use an input validation framework such as Struts or the OWASP ESAPI Validation API. Note that using a framework does not automatically address all input validation problems; be mindful of weaknesses that could arise from misusing the framework itself (CWE-1173).
Mitigation MIT-15
- For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
- Even though client-side checks provide minimal benefits with respect to server-side security, they are still useful. First, they can support intrusion detection. If the server receives input that should have been rejected by the client, then it may be an indication of an attack. Second, client-side error-checking can provide helpful feedback to the user about the expectations for valid input. Third, there may be a reduction in server-side processing time for accidental input errors, although this is typically a small savings.
Mitigation MIT-3
Strategy: Language Selection
- Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
- For example, Ada allows the programmer to constrain the values of a variable and languages such as Java and Ruby will allow the programmer to handle exceptions when an out-of-bounds index is accessed.
Mitigation MIT-11
Strategy: Environment Hardening
- Run or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program's executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code.
- Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported modules may be similarly realigned if their default memory addresses conflict with other modules, in a process known as "rebasing" (for Windows) and "prelinking" (for Linux) [REF-1332] using randomly generated addresses. ASLR for libraries cannot be used in conjunction with prelink since it would require relocating the libraries at run-time, defeating the whole purpose of prelinking.
- For more information on these techniques see D3-SAOR (Segment Address Offset Randomization) from D3FEND [REF-1335].
Mitigation MIT-12
Strategy: Environment Hardening
- Use a CPU and operating system that offers Data Execution Protection (using hardware NX or XD bits) or the equivalent techniques that simulate this feature in software, such as PaX [REF-60] [REF-61]. These techniques ensure that any instruction executed is exclusively at a memory address that is part of the code segment.
- For more information on these techniques see D3-PSEP (Process Segment Execution Prevention) from D3FEND [REF-1336].
Mitigation MIT-5
Strategy: Input Validation
- Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
- When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
- Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
- When accessing a user-controlled array index, use a stringent range of values that are within the target array. Make sure that you do not allow negative values to be used. That is, verify the minimum as well as the maximum of the range of acceptable values.
Mitigation MIT-35
Be especially careful to validate all input when invoking code that crosses language boundaries, such as from an interpreted language to native code. This could create an unexpected interaction between the language boundaries. Ensure that you are not violating any of the expectations of the language with which you are interfacing. For example, even though Java may not be susceptible to buffer overflows, providing a large argument in a call to native code might trigger an overflow.
Mitigation MIT-17
Strategy: Environment Hardening
Run your code using the lowest privileges that are required to accomplish the necessary tasks [REF-76]. If possible, create isolated accounts with limited privileges that are only used for a single task. That way, a successful attack will not immediately give the attacker access to the rest of the software or its environment. For example, database applications rarely need to run as the database administrator, especially in day-to-day operations.
Mitigation MIT-22
Strategy: Sandbox or Jail
- Run the code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which files can be accessed in a particular directory or which commands can be executed by the software.
- OS-level examples include the Unix chroot jail, AppArmor, and SELinux. In general, managed code may provide some protection. For example, java.io.FilePermission in the Java SecurityManager allows the software to specify restrictions on file operations.
- This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating system; the rest of the application may still be subject to compromise.
- Be careful to avoid CWE-243 and other weaknesses related to jails.
CAPEC-100: Overflow Buffers
Buffer Overflow attacks target improper or missing bounds checking on buffer operations, typically triggered by input injected by an adversary. As a consequence, an adversary is able to write past the boundaries of allocated buffer regions in memory, causing a program crash or potentially redirection of execution as per the adversaries' choice.