CVE-2024-24553 (GCVE-0-2024-24553)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2024-06-24 07:10 – Updated: 2024-08-01 23:19
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Bludit uses SHA1 as Password Hashing Algorithm
Summary
Bludit uses the SHA-1 hashing algorithm to compute password hashes. Thus, attackers could determine cleartext passwords with brute-force attacks due to the inherent speed of SHA-1. In addition, the salt that is computed by Bludit is generated with a non-cryptographically secure function.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2024-06-24 14:07 UTC
CWE
- CWE-916 - Use of Password Hash With Insufficient Computational Effort
Assigner
References
1 reference
Impacted products
Date Public
2024-06-20 16:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:bludit:bludit:2.0:-:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "bludit",
"vendor": "bludit",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "3.15.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-24553",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-06-24T14:07:21.341363Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-06-24T14:07:23.855Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-01T23:19:52.892Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.redguard.ch/blog/2024/06/20/security-advisory-bludit/"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://www.bludit.com/",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "Bludit",
"platforms": [
"Linux",
"Windows",
"MacOS"
],
"product": "Bludit",
"programFiles": [
"bl-kernel/login.class.php",
"bl-kernel/users.class.php"
],
"repo": "https://github.com/bludit/bludit/",
"vendor": "Bludit",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.0"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Andreas Pfefferle, Redguard AG"
}
],
"datePublic": "2024-06-20T16:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Bludit uses the SHA-1 hashing algorithm to compute password hashes. Thus, attackers could determine cleartext passwords with brute-force attacks due to the inherent speed of SHA-1. In addition, the salt that is computed by Bludit is generated with a non-cryptographically secure function.\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Bludit uses the SHA-1 hashing algorithm to compute password hashes. Thus, attackers could determine cleartext passwords with brute-force attacks due to the inherent speed of SHA-1. In addition, the salt that is computed by Bludit is generated with a non-cryptographically secure function."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-49",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-49 Password Brute Forcing"
}
]
},
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-16",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-16 Dictionary-based Password Attack"
}
]
},
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-20",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-20 Encryption Brute Forcing"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 5.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-916",
"description": "CWE-916 Use of Password Hash With Insufficient Computational Effort",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-06-24T07:10:03.585Z",
"orgId": "455daabc-a392-441d-aa46-37d35189897c",
"shortName": "NCSC.ch"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.redguard.ch/blog/2024/06/20/security-advisory-bludit/"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "To address this vulnerability, it is imperative that the Bludit development team transitions to a more secure and intentionally slow hashing algorithm, such as bcrypt or Argon2, for password storage. These algorithms introduce the necessary computational overhead to resist brute-force attacks effectively. In addition, it is advised that appropriate cost factors are used. \u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eFurthermore, the generation of password salts should be revamped to employ a cryptographically secure method. The current approach, utilizing the `Text::randomText function`, should be replaced with a robust random number generator provided by the operating system or a dedicated cryptographic library. This change ensures the creation of unpredictable and secure salts, enhancing the overall resilience of the password storage mechanism."
}
],
"value": "To address this vulnerability, it is imperative that the Bludit development team transitions to a more secure and intentionally slow hashing algorithm, such as bcrypt or Argon2, for password storage. These algorithms introduce the necessary computational overhead to resist brute-force attacks effectively. In addition, it is advised that appropriate cost factors are used. \n\nFurthermore, the generation of password salts should be revamped to employ a cryptographically secure method. The current approach, utilizing the `Text::randomText function`, should be replaced with a robust random number generator provided by the operating system or a dedicated cryptographic library. This change ensures the creation of unpredictable and secure salts, enhancing the overall resilience of the password storage mechanism."
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Bludit uses SHA1 as Password Hashing Algorithm",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "455daabc-a392-441d-aa46-37d35189897c",
"assignerShortName": "NCSC.ch",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-24553",
"datePublished": "2024-06-24T07:10:03.585Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-01-25T14:02:00.526Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-01T23:19:52.892Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2024-24553",
"date": "2026-11-11",
"epss": "0.00217",
"percentile": "0.12337"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://www.bludit.com/",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "Bludit",
"platforms": [
"Linux",
"Windows",
"MacOS"
],
"product": "Bludit",
"programFiles": [
"bl-kernel/login.class.php",
"bl-kernel/users.class.php"
],
"repo": "https://github.com/bludit/bludit/",
"vendor": "Bludit",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.0"
}
]
}
],
"source": "vulnerability@ncsc.ch"
},
{
"affectedData": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:bludit:bludit:2.0:-:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "bludit",
"vendor": "bludit",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "3.15.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:bludit:bludit:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "B3B53AB2-9197-4BD3-B422-6EE7A962C005",
"versionEndIncluding": "3.15.0",
"versionStartIncluding": "3.14.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Bludit uses the SHA-1 hashing algorithm to compute password hashes. Thus, attackers could determine cleartext passwords with brute-force attacks due to the inherent speed of SHA-1. In addition, the salt that is computed by Bludit is generated with a non-cryptographically secure function."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Bludit utiliza el algoritmo hash SHA-1 para calcular hashes de contrase\u00f1as. Por lo tanto, los atacantes podr\u00edan determinar contrase\u00f1as de texto sin cifrar con ataques de fuerza bruta debido a la velocidad inherente de SHA-1. Adem\u00e1s, la sal que calcula Bludit se genera con una funci\u00f3n no criptogr\u00e1ficamente segura."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2024-24553",
"lastModified": "2026-06-17T07:14:35.740",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
],
"cvssMetricV40": [
{
"cvssData": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"baseScore": 5.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"integrityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackComplexity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackRequirements": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackVector": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedPrivilegesRequired": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedUserInteraction": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"source": "vulnerability@ncsc.ch",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2024-24553",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-06-24T14:07:21.341363Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2024-06-24T07:15:15.063",
"references": [
{
"source": "vulnerability@ncsc.ch",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.redguard.ch/blog/2024/06/20/security-advisory-bludit/"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.redguard.ch/blog/2024/06/20/security-advisory-bludit/"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "vulnerability@ncsc.ch",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-916"
}
],
"source": "vulnerability@ncsc.ch",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
},
"redhat_vex": {
"current_release_date": "2025-05-28T19:13:23+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2024-24553",
"id": "CVE-2024-24553",
"initial_release_date": "2024-06-20T16:00:00+00:00",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "1",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "Bludit uses SHA1 as Password Hashing Algorithm",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2024/cve-2024-24553.json",
"version": "3"
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-01T23:19:52.892Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.redguard.ch/blog/2024/06/20/security-advisory-bludit/"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:bludit:bludit:2.0:-:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "bludit",
"vendor": "bludit",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "3.15.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-24553",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-06-24T14:07:21.341363Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-06-24T14:05:35.734Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://www.bludit.com/",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "Bludit",
"platforms": [
"Linux",
"Windows",
"MacOS"
],
"product": "Bludit",
"programFiles": [
"bl-kernel/login.class.php",
"bl-kernel/users.class.php"
],
"repo": "https://github.com/bludit/bludit/",
"vendor": "Bludit",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.0"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Andreas Pfefferle, Redguard AG"
}
],
"datePublic": "2024-06-20T16:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Bludit uses the SHA-1 hashing algorithm to compute password hashes. Thus, attackers could determine cleartext passwords with brute-force attacks due to the inherent speed of SHA-1. In addition, the salt that is computed by Bludit is generated with a non-cryptographically secure function.\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Bludit uses the SHA-1 hashing algorithm to compute password hashes. Thus, attackers could determine cleartext passwords with brute-force attacks due to the inherent speed of SHA-1. In addition, the salt that is computed by Bludit is generated with a non-cryptographically secure function."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-49",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-49 Password Brute Forcing"
}
]
},
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-16",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-16 Dictionary-based Password Attack"
}
]
},
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-20",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-20 Encryption Brute Forcing"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 5.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-916",
"description": "CWE-916 Use of Password Hash With Insufficient Computational Effort",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-06-24T07:10:03.585Z",
"orgId": "455daabc-a392-441d-aa46-37d35189897c",
"shortName": "NCSC.ch"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.redguard.ch/blog/2024/06/20/security-advisory-bludit/"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "To address this vulnerability, it is imperative that the Bludit development team transitions to a more secure and intentionally slow hashing algorithm, such as bcrypt or Argon2, for password storage. These algorithms introduce the necessary computational overhead to resist brute-force attacks effectively. In addition, it is advised that appropriate cost factors are used. \u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eFurthermore, the generation of password salts should be revamped to employ a cryptographically secure method. The current approach, utilizing the `Text::randomText function`, should be replaced with a robust random number generator provided by the operating system or a dedicated cryptographic library. This change ensures the creation of unpredictable and secure salts, enhancing the overall resilience of the password storage mechanism."
}
],
"value": "To address this vulnerability, it is imperative that the Bludit development team transitions to a more secure and intentionally slow hashing algorithm, such as bcrypt or Argon2, for password storage. These algorithms introduce the necessary computational overhead to resist brute-force attacks effectively. In addition, it is advised that appropriate cost factors are used. \n\nFurthermore, the generation of password salts should be revamped to employ a cryptographically secure method. The current approach, utilizing the `Text::randomText function`, should be replaced with a robust random number generator provided by the operating system or a dedicated cryptographic library. This change ensures the creation of unpredictable and secure salts, enhancing the overall resilience of the password storage mechanism."
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Bludit uses SHA1 as Password Hashing Algorithm",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "455daabc-a392-441d-aa46-37d35189897c",
"assignerShortName": "NCSC.ch",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-24553",
"datePublished": "2024-06-24T07:10:03.585Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-01-25T14:02:00.526Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-01T23:19:52.892Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.