CVE-2024-12908 (GCVE-0-2024-12908)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2024-12-26 15:45 – Updated: 2024-12-27 14:22- CWE-94 - Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://docs.delinea.com/online-help/secret-serve… | release-notes |
| https://trust.delinea.com/ | vendor-advisory |
| https://blog.amberwolf.com/blog/2024/december/cve… | third-party-advisory |
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Delinea | Secret Server |
Affected:
11.7.31
|
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-12908",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-12-27T14:22:42.484455Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-12-27T14:22:58.318Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://blog.amberwolf.com/blog/2024/december/cve-2024-12908-delinea-protocol-handler---remote-code-execution-via-update-process/"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"Protocol Handler"
],
"product": "Secret Server",
"vendor": "Delinea",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "11.7.31"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "David Cash and Richard Warren of Amber Wolf"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Delinea a\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eddressed a reported case on Secret Server v11.7.31 (protocol handler version\u003c/span\u003e\u0026nbsp;6.0.3.26)\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;where, within the protocol handler function, URI\u0027s were compared before normalization and canonicalization, potentially leading to over matching against the approved list. If this attack were successfully exploited, a\u0026nbsp;\u003c/span\u003eremote attacker may be able to convince a user to visit a malicious web-page, or open a\nmalicious document which could trigger the vulnerable handler, allowing them to execute\narbitrary code on the user\u0027s machine.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eDelinea a\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003edded additional validation that the downloaded installer\u0027s batch file was in the expected format.\u003c/span\u003e\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Delinea addressed a reported case on Secret Server v11.7.31 (protocol handler version\u00a06.0.3.26)\u00a0where, within the protocol handler function, URI\u0027s were compared before normalization and canonicalization, potentially leading to over matching against the approved list. If this attack were successfully exploited, a\u00a0remote attacker may be able to convince a user to visit a malicious web-page, or open a\nmalicious document which could trigger the vulnerable handler, allowing them to execute\narbitrary code on the user\u0027s machine.\u00a0Delinea added additional validation that the downloaded installer\u0027s batch file was in the expected format."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-242",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-242 Code Injection"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-94",
"description": "CWE-94 Improper Control of Generation of Code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-12-26T15:45:39.592Z",
"orgId": "1443cd92-d354-46d2-9290-d812316ca43a",
"shortName": "Delinea"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"release-notes"
],
"url": "https://docs.delinea.com/online-help/secret-server/release-notes/ss-rn-11-7-000049.htm"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://trust.delinea.com/"
},
{
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://blog.amberwolf.com/blog/2024/december/cve-2024-12908-delinea-protocol-handler---remote-code-execution-via-update-process/"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "1443cd92-d354-46d2-9290-d812316ca43a",
"assignerShortName": "Delinea",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-12908",
"datePublished": "2024-12-26T15:45:39.592Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-12-23T16:24:16.226Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-12-27T14:22:58.318Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2024-12908",
"date": "2026-11-07",
"epss": "0.00714",
"percentile": "0.53937"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"Protocol Handler"
],
"product": "Secret Server",
"vendor": "Delinea",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "11.7.31"
}
]
}
],
"source": "1443cd92-d354-46d2-9290-d812316ca43a"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:delinea:secret_server:*:*:*:*:on-premises:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "A0574563-724D-4B64-9B9A-1DB738C20ECD",
"versionEndExcluding": "11.9.000006",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Delinea addressed a reported case on Secret Server v11.7.31 (protocol handler version\u00a06.0.3.26)\u00a0where, within the protocol handler function, URI\u0027s were compared before normalization and canonicalization, potentially leading to over matching against the approved list. If this attack were successfully exploited, a\u00a0remote attacker may be able to convince a user to visit a malicious web-page, or open a\nmalicious document which could trigger the vulnerable handler, allowing them to execute\narbitrary code on the user\u0027s machine.\u00a0Delinea added additional validation that the downloaded installer\u0027s batch file was in the expected format."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Delinea abord\u00f3 un caso informado en Secret Server v11.7.31 (versi\u00f3n del controlador de protocolo 6.0.3.26) donde, dentro de la funci\u00f3n del controlador de protocolo, se compararon las URL antes de la normalizaci\u00f3n y la canonizaci\u00f3n, lo que potencialmente llev\u00f3 a una coincidencia excesiva con la lista aprobada. Si este ataque se explotara con \u00e9xito, un atacante remoto podr\u00eda convencer a un usuario de visitar una p\u00e1gina web maliciosa o abrir un documento malicioso que podr\u00eda activar el controlador vulnerable, lo que le permitir\u00eda ejecutar c\u00f3digo arbitrario en la m\u00e1quina del usuario. Delinea agreg\u00f3 una validaci\u00f3n adicional de que el archivo por lotes del instalador descargado estaba en el formato esperado."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2024-12908",
"lastModified": "2026-06-17T07:00:44.607",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.6,
"impactScore": 4.7,
"source": "1443cd92-d354-46d2-9290-d812316ca43a",
"type": "Secondary"
},
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.3,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.6,
"impactScore": 6.0,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2024-12908",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-12-27T14:22:42.484455Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2024-12-26T16:15:06.050",
"references": [
{
"source": "1443cd92-d354-46d2-9290-d812316ca43a",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://blog.amberwolf.com/blog/2024/december/cve-2024-12908-delinea-protocol-handler---remote-code-execution-via-update-process/"
},
{
"source": "1443cd92-d354-46d2-9290-d812316ca43a",
"tags": [
"Release Notes"
],
"url": "https://docs.delinea.com/online-help/secret-server/release-notes/ss-rn-11-7-000049.htm"
},
{
"source": "1443cd92-d354-46d2-9290-d812316ca43a",
"tags": [
"Product"
],
"url": "https://trust.delinea.com/"
},
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://blog.amberwolf.com/blog/2024/december/cve-2024-12908-delinea-protocol-handler---remote-code-execution-via-update-process/"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "1443cd92-d354-46d2-9290-d812316ca43a",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-94"
}
],
"source": "1443cd92-d354-46d2-9290-d812316ca43a",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
},
"redhat_vex": {
"current_release_date": "2025-05-28T20:38:17+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2024-12908",
"id": "CVE-2024-12908",
"initial_release_date": "2024-01-01T00:00:00+00:00",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "1",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "CVE-2024-12908",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2024/cve-2024-12908.json",
"version": "3"
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-12908",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-12-27T14:22:42.484455Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-12-27T14:22:53.898Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://blog.amberwolf.com/blog/2024/december/cve-2024-12908-delinea-protocol-handler---remote-code-execution-via-update-process/"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"Protocol Handler"
],
"product": "Secret Server",
"vendor": "Delinea",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "11.7.31"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "David Cash and Richard Warren of Amber Wolf"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Delinea a\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eddressed a reported case on Secret Server v11.7.31 (protocol handler version\u003c/span\u003e\u0026nbsp;6.0.3.26)\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;where, within the protocol handler function, URI\u0027s were compared before normalization and canonicalization, potentially leading to over matching against the approved list. If this attack were successfully exploited, a\u0026nbsp;\u003c/span\u003eremote attacker may be able to convince a user to visit a malicious web-page, or open a\nmalicious document which could trigger the vulnerable handler, allowing them to execute\narbitrary code on the user\u0027s machine.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eDelinea a\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003edded additional validation that the downloaded installer\u0027s batch file was in the expected format.\u003c/span\u003e\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Delinea addressed a reported case on Secret Server v11.7.31 (protocol handler version\u00a06.0.3.26)\u00a0where, within the protocol handler function, URI\u0027s were compared before normalization and canonicalization, potentially leading to over matching against the approved list. If this attack were successfully exploited, a\u00a0remote attacker may be able to convince a user to visit a malicious web-page, or open a\nmalicious document which could trigger the vulnerable handler, allowing them to execute\narbitrary code on the user\u0027s machine.\u00a0Delinea added additional validation that the downloaded installer\u0027s batch file was in the expected format."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-242",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-242 Code Injection"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-94",
"description": "CWE-94 Improper Control of Generation of Code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-12-26T15:45:39.592Z",
"orgId": "1443cd92-d354-46d2-9290-d812316ca43a",
"shortName": "Delinea"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"release-notes"
],
"url": "https://docs.delinea.com/online-help/secret-server/release-notes/ss-rn-11-7-000049.htm"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://trust.delinea.com/"
},
{
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://blog.amberwolf.com/blog/2024/december/cve-2024-12908-delinea-protocol-handler---remote-code-execution-via-update-process/"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "1443cd92-d354-46d2-9290-d812316ca43a",
"assignerShortName": "Delinea",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-12908",
"datePublished": "2024-12-26T15:45:39.592Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-12-23T16:24:16.226Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-12-27T14:22:58.318Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
}
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.