CVE-2022-39181 (GCVE-0-2022-39181)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2022-11-17 22:27 – Updated: 2025-04-29 19:48- CWE-79 - Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLPI | Reports plugin for GLPI |
Affected:
All versions , < Upgrade to the latest version.
(git)
|
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T12:00:43.784Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.gov.il/en/Departments/faq/cve_advisories"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2022-39181",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-04-29T19:48:07.392257Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-29T19:48:20.822Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Reports plugin for GLPI",
"vendor": "GLPI",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": " Upgrade to the latest version.",
"status": "affected",
"version": "All versions",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"value": "Moriel Harush, Dudu Moyal - EY \u2013 Hacktics."
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\n\n\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eGLPI - Reports plugin for GLPI Reflected Cross-Site-Scripting (RXSS).\u003c/span\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eType 1: \u003c/strong\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eReflected XSS (or Non-Persistent) - The server reads data directly from the HTTP request and reflects it back in\u003c/span\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003ethe HTTP response. Reflected XSS exploits occur when an attacker causes a victim to supply dangerous content to a\u003c/span\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003evulnerable web application, which is then reflected back to the victim and executed by the web browser. The most\u003c/span\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003ecommon mechanism for delivering malicious content is to include it as a parameter in a URL that is posted publicly or emailed directly to the victim. URLs constructed in this manner constitute the core of many phishing schemes, whereby\u003c/span\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003ean attacker convinces a victim to visit a URL that refers to a vulnerable site. After the site reflects the attacker\u0027s content\u003c/span\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eback to the victim, the content is executed by the victim\u0027s browser. \u003c/span\u003e\n\n"
}
],
"value": "\nGLPI - Reports plugin for GLPI Reflected Cross-Site-Scripting (RXSS).\nType 1: Reflected XSS (or Non-Persistent) - The server reads data directly from the HTTP request and reflects it back in\nthe HTTP response. Reflected XSS exploits occur when an attacker causes a victim to supply dangerous content to a\nvulnerable web application, which is then reflected back to the victim and executed by the web browser. The most\ncommon mechanism for delivering malicious content is to include it as a parameter in a URL that is posted publicly or emailed directly to the victim. URLs constructed in this manner constitute the core of many phishing schemes, whereby\nan attacker convinces a victim to visit a URL that refers to a vulnerable site. After the site reflects the attacker\u0027s content\nback to the victim, the content is executed by the victim\u0027s browser. \n\n"
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.1,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-79",
"description": "CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2023-10-25T13:21:24.847Z",
"orgId": "a57ee1ae-c9c1-4f40-aa7b-cf10760fde3f",
"shortName": "INCD"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.gov.il/en/Departments/faq/cve_advisories"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "ILVN-2022-0062",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "GLPI - Reports plugin for GLPI Reflected Cross-Site-Scripting (RXSS)",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a57ee1ae-c9c1-4f40-aa7b-cf10760fde3f",
"assignerShortName": "INCD",
"cveId": "CVE-2022-39181",
"datePublished": "2022-11-17T22:27:54.504Z",
"dateReserved": "2022-09-02T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-29T19:48:20.822Z",
"serial": 1,
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2022-39181",
"date": "2026-11-11",
"epss": "0.00398",
"percentile": "0.34494"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Reports plugin for GLPI",
"vendor": "GLPI",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": " Upgrade to the latest version.",
"status": "affected",
"version": "All versions",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
}
],
"source": "cna@cyber.gov.il"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:glpi-project:reports:-:*:*:*:*:glpi:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "63941FB6-2486-4731-AE62-AAED31DAF043",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "\nGLPI - Reports plugin for GLPI Reflected Cross-Site-Scripting (RXSS).\nType 1: Reflected XSS (or Non-Persistent) - The server reads data directly from the HTTP request and reflects it back in\nthe HTTP response. Reflected XSS exploits occur when an attacker causes a victim to supply dangerous content to a\nvulnerable web application, which is then reflected back to the victim and executed by the web browser. The most\ncommon mechanism for delivering malicious content is to include it as a parameter in a URL that is posted publicly or emailed directly to the victim. URLs constructed in this manner constitute the core of many phishing schemes, whereby\nan attacker convinces a victim to visit a URL that refers to a vulnerable site. After the site reflects the attacker\u0027s content\nback to the victim, the content is executed by the victim\u0027s browser. \n\n"
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "GLPI: complemento de informes para GLPI Cross-Site-Scripting (XSS) Reflejado. Tipo 1: XSS reflejado (o no persistente): el servidor lee los datos directamente de la solicitud HTTP y los refleja en la respuesta HTTP. Los exploits XSS reflejados ocurren cuando un atacante hace que una v\u00edctima proporcione contenido peligroso a una aplicaci\u00f3n web vulnerable, que luego se refleja en la v\u00edctima y el navegador web lo ejecuta. El mecanismo m\u00e1s com\u00fan para entregar contenido malicioso es incluirlo como par\u00e1metro en una URL que se publica p\u00fablicamente o se env\u00eda por correo electr\u00f3nico directamente a la v\u00edctima. Las URL construidas de esta manera constituyen el n\u00facleo de muchos esquemas de phishing, mediante los cuales un atacante convence a una v\u00edctima para que visite una URL que hace referencia a un sitio vulnerable. Despu\u00e9s de que el sitio refleja el contenido del atacante a la v\u00edctima, el navegador de la v\u00edctima ejecuta el contenido."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2022-39181",
"lastModified": "2026-06-17T04:57:51.920",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.1,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
"impactScore": 2.7,
"source": "cna@cyber.gov.il",
"type": "Secondary"
},
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.1,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
"impactScore": 2.7,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2022-39181",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-04-29T19:48:07.392257Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2022-11-17T23:15:19.187",
"references": [
{
"source": "cna@cyber.gov.il",
"url": "https://www.gov.il/en/Departments/faq/cve_advisories"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://www.gov.il/en/Departments/faq/cve_advisories"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "cna@cyber.gov.il",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-79"
}
],
"source": "cna@cyber.gov.il",
"type": "Secondary"
},
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-79"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
},
"redhat_vex": {
"current_release_date": "2025-05-29T03:14:05+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2022-39181",
"id": "CVE-2022-39181",
"initial_release_date": "2022-01-01T00:00:00+00:00",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "1",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "GLPI - Reports plugin for GLPI Reflected Cross-Site-Scripting (RXSS)",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2022/cve-2022-39181.json",
"version": "3"
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T12:00:43.784Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.gov.il/en/Departments/faq/cve_advisories"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2022-39181",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-04-29T19:48:07.392257Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-29T19:48:17.106Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Reports plugin for GLPI",
"vendor": "GLPI",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": " Upgrade to the latest version.",
"status": "affected",
"version": "All versions",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"value": "Moriel Harush, Dudu Moyal - EY \u2013 Hacktics."
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\n\n\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eGLPI - Reports plugin for GLPI Reflected Cross-Site-Scripting (RXSS).\u003c/span\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eType 1: \u003c/strong\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eReflected XSS (or Non-Persistent) - The server reads data directly from the HTTP request and reflects it back in\u003c/span\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003ethe HTTP response. Reflected XSS exploits occur when an attacker causes a victim to supply dangerous content to a\u003c/span\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003evulnerable web application, which is then reflected back to the victim and executed by the web browser. The most\u003c/span\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003ecommon mechanism for delivering malicious content is to include it as a parameter in a URL that is posted publicly or emailed directly to the victim. URLs constructed in this manner constitute the core of many phishing schemes, whereby\u003c/span\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003ean attacker convinces a victim to visit a URL that refers to a vulnerable site. After the site reflects the attacker\u0027s content\u003c/span\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eback to the victim, the content is executed by the victim\u0027s browser. \u003c/span\u003e\n\n"
}
],
"value": "\nGLPI - Reports plugin for GLPI Reflected Cross-Site-Scripting (RXSS).\nType 1: Reflected XSS (or Non-Persistent) - The server reads data directly from the HTTP request and reflects it back in\nthe HTTP response. Reflected XSS exploits occur when an attacker causes a victim to supply dangerous content to a\nvulnerable web application, which is then reflected back to the victim and executed by the web browser. The most\ncommon mechanism for delivering malicious content is to include it as a parameter in a URL that is posted publicly or emailed directly to the victim. URLs constructed in this manner constitute the core of many phishing schemes, whereby\nan attacker convinces a victim to visit a URL that refers to a vulnerable site. After the site reflects the attacker\u0027s content\nback to the victim, the content is executed by the victim\u0027s browser. \n\n"
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.1,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-79",
"description": "CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2023-10-25T13:21:24.847Z",
"orgId": "a57ee1ae-c9c1-4f40-aa7b-cf10760fde3f",
"shortName": "INCD"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.gov.il/en/Departments/faq/cve_advisories"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "ILVN-2022-0062",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "GLPI - Reports plugin for GLPI Reflected Cross-Site-Scripting (RXSS)",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a57ee1ae-c9c1-4f40-aa7b-cf10760fde3f",
"assignerShortName": "INCD",
"cveId": "CVE-2022-39181",
"datePublished": "2022-11-17T22:27:54.504Z",
"dateReserved": "2022-09-02T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-29T19:48:20.822Z",
"serial": 1,
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
}
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.