CVE-2021-24790 (GCVE-0-2021-24790)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2021-12-13 10:40 – Updated: 2024-08-03 19:42- CWE-862 - Missing Authorization
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/adc5dd9b-0781-4c… | x_refsource_MISC |
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Contact Form Advanced Database |
Affected:
1.0.8 , ≤ 1.0.8
(custom)
|
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T19:42:17.185Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/adc5dd9b-0781-4cea-8cc5-2c10ac35b968"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "Contact Form Advanced Database",
"vendor": "Unknown",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.0.8",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.0.8",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Quentin VILLAIN (3wsec)"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The Contact Form Advanced Database WordPress plugin through 1.0.8 does not have any authorisation as well as CSRF checks in its delete_cf7_data and export_cf7_data AJAX actions, available to any authenticated users, which could allow users with a role as low as subscriber to call them. The delete_cf7_data would lead to arbitrary metadata deletion, as well as PHP Object Injection if a suitable gadget chain is present in another plugin, as user data is passed to the maybe_unserialize() function without being first validated."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-862",
"description": "CWE-862 Missing Authorization",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2021-12-13T10:40:54.000Z",
"orgId": "1bfdd5d7-9bf6-4a53-96ea-42e2716d7a81",
"shortName": "WPScan"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/adc5dd9b-0781-4cea-8cc5-2c10ac35b968"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Contact Form Advanced Database \u003c= 1.0.8 - Unauthorised AJAX Calls",
"x_generator": "WPScan CVE Generator",
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "contact@wpscan.com",
"ID": "CVE-2021-24790",
"STATE": "PUBLIC",
"TITLE": "Contact Form Advanced Database \u003c= 1.0.8 - Unauthorised AJAX Calls"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "Contact Form Advanced Database",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_affected": "\u003c=",
"version_name": "1.0.8",
"version_value": "1.0.8"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "Unknown"
}
]
}
},
"credit": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "Quentin VILLAIN (3wsec)"
}
],
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "The Contact Form Advanced Database WordPress plugin through 1.0.8 does not have any authorisation as well as CSRF checks in its delete_cf7_data and export_cf7_data AJAX actions, available to any authenticated users, which could allow users with a role as low as subscriber to call them. The delete_cf7_data would lead to arbitrary metadata deletion, as well as PHP Object Injection if a suitable gadget chain is present in another plugin, as user data is passed to the maybe_unserialize() function without being first validated."
}
]
},
"generator": "WPScan CVE Generator",
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "CWE-862 Missing Authorization"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/adc5dd9b-0781-4cea-8cc5-2c10ac35b968",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/adc5dd9b-0781-4cea-8cc5-2c10ac35b968"
}
]
},
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "1bfdd5d7-9bf6-4a53-96ea-42e2716d7a81",
"assignerShortName": "WPScan",
"cveId": "CVE-2021-24790",
"datePublished": "2021-12-13T10:40:54.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2021-01-14T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T19:42:17.185Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2021-24790",
"date": "2026-11-09",
"epss": "0.00382",
"percentile": "0.32456"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:contact_form_advanced_database_project:contact_form_advanced_database:*:*:*:*:*:wordpress:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "226F3910-A4EA-4B23-939E-2AF7CF4C9A32",
"versionEndIncluding": "1.0.8",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The Contact Form Advanced Database WordPress plugin through 1.0.8 does not have any authorisation as well as CSRF checks in its delete_cf7_data and export_cf7_data AJAX actions, available to any authenticated users, which could allow users with a role as low as subscriber to call them. The delete_cf7_data would lead to arbitrary metadata deletion, as well as PHP Object Injection if a suitable gadget chain is present in another plugin, as user data is passed to the maybe_unserialize() function without being first validated."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "El plugin Contact Form Advanced Database de WordPress versiones hasta 1.0.8, no presenta ninguna autorizaci\u00f3n ni comprobaciones de tipo CSRF en sus acciones delete_cf7_data y export_cf7_data AJAX, disponibles para cualquier usuario autenticado, lo que podr\u00eda permitir que usuarios con un rol tan bajo como el de suscriptor las ejecuten. La acci\u00f3n delete_cf7_data podr\u00eda conducir a una eliminaci\u00f3n arbitraria de metadatos, as\u00ed como a una inyecci\u00f3n de objetos PHP si una cadena de gadgets apropiada est\u00e1 presente en otro plugin, ya que los datos del usuario se pasan a la funci\u00f3n maybe_unserialize() sin ser comprobados previamente"
}
],
"id": "CVE-2021-24790",
"lastModified": "2024-11-21T05:53:46.170",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV2": [
{
"acInsufInfo": false,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"cvssData": {
"accessComplexity": "LOW",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "SINGLE",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 4.0,
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:P/A:N",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 8.0,
"impactScore": 2.9,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary",
"userInteractionRequired": false
}
],
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 4.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
"impactScore": 1.4,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"published": "2021-12-13T11:15:08.593",
"references": [
{
"source": "contact@wpscan.com",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/adc5dd9b-0781-4cea-8cc5-2c10ac35b968"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/adc5dd9b-0781-4cea-8cc5-2c10ac35b968"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "contact@wpscan.com",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-862"
}
],
"source": "contact@wpscan.com",
"type": "Secondary"
},
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-352"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-862"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
},
"redhat_vex": {
"current_release_date": "2026-03-27T14:38:02+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2021-24790",
"id": "CVE-2021-24790",
"initial_release_date": "2021-01-01T00:00:00+00:00",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "1",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "Contact Form Advanced Database \u003c= 1.0.8 - Unauthorised AJAX Calls",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2021/cve-2021-24790.json",
"version": "3"
}
}
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.