CVE-2021-24753 (GCVE-0-2021-24753)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2021-12-27 10:33 – Updated: 2024-08-03 19:42
VLAI
Title
Rich Reviews by Starfish < 1.9.6 - Admin+ SQL Injection
Summary
The Rich Reviews by Starfish WordPress plugin before 1.9.6 does not properly validate the orderby GET parameter of the pending reviews page before using it in a SQL statement, leading to an authenticated SQL injection issue
CWE
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version CPE status
Unknown Rich Reviews by Starfish Affected: 1.9.6 , < 1.9.6 (custom)
guessed Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T19:42:16.632Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/be7b102f-3982-46bd-a79c-203498f7c820"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_CONFIRM",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/2624882/"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "Rich Reviews by Starfish",
          "vendor": "Unknown",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "1.9.6",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "1.9.6",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "bl4derunner"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "The Rich Reviews by Starfish WordPress plugin before 1.9.6 does not properly validate the orderby GET parameter of the pending reviews page before using it in a SQL statement, leading to an authenticated SQL injection issue"
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-89",
              "description": "CWE-89 SQL Injection",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2021-12-27T10:33:18.000Z",
        "orgId": "1bfdd5d7-9bf6-4a53-96ea-42e2716d7a81",
        "shortName": "WPScan"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/be7b102f-3982-46bd-a79c-203498f7c820"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/2624882/"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "EXTERNAL"
      },
      "title": "Rich Reviews by Starfish \u003c 1.9.6 - Admin+ SQL Injection",
      "x_generator": "WPScan CVE Generator",
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "contact@wpscan.com",
          "ID": "CVE-2021-24753",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC",
          "TITLE": "Rich Reviews by Starfish \u003c 1.9.6 - Admin+ SQL Injection"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "Rich Reviews by Starfish",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_affected": "\u003c",
                            "version_name": "1.9.6",
                            "version_value": "1.9.6"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "Unknown"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "credit": [
          {
            "lang": "eng",
            "value": "bl4derunner"
          }
        ],
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "The Rich Reviews by Starfish WordPress plugin before 1.9.6 does not properly validate the orderby GET parameter of the pending reviews page before using it in a SQL statement, leading to an authenticated SQL injection issue"
            }
          ]
        },
        "generator": "WPScan CVE Generator",
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "CWE-89 SQL Injection"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/be7b102f-3982-46bd-a79c-203498f7c820",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/be7b102f-3982-46bd-a79c-203498f7c820"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/2624882/",
              "refsource": "CONFIRM",
              "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/2624882/"
            }
          ]
        },
        "source": {
          "discovery": "EXTERNAL"
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "1bfdd5d7-9bf6-4a53-96ea-42e2716d7a81",
    "assignerShortName": "WPScan",
    "cveId": "CVE-2021-24753",
    "datePublished": "2021-12-27T10:33:18.000Z",
    "dateReserved": "2021-01-14T00:00:00.000Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T19:42:16.632Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2021-24753",
      "date": "2026-09-20",
      "epss": "0.01497",
      "percentile": "0.73057"
    },
    "nvd": {
      "cve": {
        "configurations": [
          {
            "nodes": [
              {
                "cpeMatch": [
                  {
                    "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:starfish:rich_review:*:*:*:*:*:wordpress:*:*",
                    "matchCriteriaId": "ACF9E11F-8D0B-42D2-8EC8-2D0D0EAE1684",
                    "versionEndExcluding": "1.9.6",
                    "vulnerable": true
                  }
                ],
                "negate": false,
                "operator": "OR"
              }
            ]
          }
        ],
        "cveTags": [],
        "descriptions": [
          {
            "lang": "en",
            "value": "The Rich Reviews by Starfish WordPress plugin before 1.9.6 does not properly validate the orderby GET parameter of the pending reviews page before using it in a SQL statement, leading to an authenticated SQL injection issue"
          },
          {
            "lang": "es",
            "value": "El plugin Rich Reviews by Starfish de WordPress versiones anteriores a 1.9.6, no comprueba apropiadamente el par\u00e1metro orderby GET de la p\u00e1gina de rese\u00f1as pendientes antes de usarlo en una sentencia SQL, conllevando a un problema de inyecci\u00f3n SQL autenticada"
          }
        ],
        "id": "CVE-2021-24753",
        "lastModified": "2024-11-21T05:53:41.780",
        "metrics": {
          "cvssMetricV2": [
            {
              "acInsufInfo": false,
              "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
              "cvssData": {
                "accessComplexity": "LOW",
                "accessVector": "NETWORK",
                "authentication": "SINGLE",
                "availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
                "baseScore": 6.5,
                "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
                "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
                "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P",
                "version": "2.0"
              },
              "exploitabilityScore": 8.0,
              "impactScore": 6.4,
              "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
              "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
              "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
              "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
              "type": "Primary",
              "userInteractionRequired": false
            }
          ],
          "cvssMetricV31": [
            {
              "cvssData": {
                "attackComplexity": "LOW",
                "attackVector": "NETWORK",
                "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
                "baseScore": 7.2,
                "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
                "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
                "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
                "privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
                "scope": "UNCHANGED",
                "userInteraction": "NONE",
                "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
                "version": "3.1"
              },
              "exploitabilityScore": 1.2,
              "impactScore": 5.9,
              "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
              "type": "Primary"
            }
          ]
        },
        "published": "2021-12-27T11:15:08.520",
        "references": [
          {
            "source": "contact@wpscan.com",
            "tags": [
              "Patch",
              "Third Party Advisory"
            ],
            "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/2624882/"
          },
          {
            "source": "contact@wpscan.com",
            "tags": [
              "Exploit",
              "Patch",
              "Third Party Advisory"
            ],
            "url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/be7b102f-3982-46bd-a79c-203498f7c820"
          },
          {
            "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
            "tags": [
              "Patch",
              "Third Party Advisory"
            ],
            "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/2624882/"
          },
          {
            "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
            "tags": [
              "Exploit",
              "Patch",
              "Third Party Advisory"
            ],
            "url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/be7b102f-3982-46bd-a79c-203498f7c820"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIdentifier": "contact@wpscan.com",
        "vulnStatus": "Modified",
        "weaknesses": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "en",
                "value": "CWE-89"
              }
            ],
            "source": "contact@wpscan.com",
            "type": "Secondary"
          },
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "en",
                "value": "CWE-89"
              }
            ],
            "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
            "type": "Primary"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    "redhat_vex": {
      "current_release_date": "2026-03-27T14:38:21+00:00",
      "cve": "CVE-2021-24753",
      "id": "CVE-2021-24753",
      "initial_release_date": "2021-01-01T00:00:00+00:00",
      "product_status:known_not_affected": "1",
      "source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
      "status": "final",
      "title": "Rich Reviews by Starfish \u003c 1.9.6 - Admin+ SQL Injection",
      "url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2021/cve-2021-24753.json",
      "version": "3"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…