Vulnerability from bitnami_vulndb
Published
2025-02-05 07:28
Modified
2025-10-22 09:08
Summary
Apache Superset: Session validation vulnerability when using provided default SECRET_KEY
Details

Session Validation attacks in Apache Superset versions up to and including 2.0.1. Installations that have not altered the default configured SECRET_KEY according to installation instructions allow for an attacker to authenticate and access unauthorized resources. This does not affect Superset administrators who have changed the default value for SECRET_KEY config.

All superset installations should always set a unique secure random SECRET_KEY. Your SECRET_KEY is used to securely sign all session cookies and encrypting sensitive information on the database. Add a strong SECRET_KEY to your superset_config.py file like:

SECRET_KEY =

Alternatively you can set it with SUPERSET_SECRET_KEY environment variable.


{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Bitnami",
        "name": "superset",
        "purl": "pkg:bitnami/superset"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.0.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "SEMVER"
        }
      ],
      "severity": [
        {
          "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
          "type": "CVSS_V3"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-27524"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cpes": [
      "cpe:2.3:a:apache:superset:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
    ],
    "severity": "Critical"
  },
  "details": "Session Validation attacks in Apache Superset versions up to and including 2.0.1. Installations that have not altered the default configured SECRET_KEY according to installation instructions allow for an attacker to authenticate and access unauthorized resources. This does not affect Superset administrators who have changed the default value for SECRET_KEY config.\n\nAll superset installations should always set a unique secure random SECRET_KEY. Your SECRET_KEY is used to securely sign all session cookies and encrypting sensitive information on the database.\nAdd a strong SECRET_KEY to your `superset_config.py` file like:\n\nSECRET_KEY = \u003cYOUR_OWN_RANDOM_GENERATED_SECRET_KEY\u003e\n\nAlternatively you can set it with `SUPERSET_SECRET_KEY` environment variable.",
  "id": "BIT-superset-2023-27524",
  "modified": "2025-10-22T09:08:25.162Z",
  "published": "2025-02-05T07:28:32.393Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/n0ftx60sllf527j7g11kmt24wvof8xyk"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://packetstormsecurity.com/files/172522/Apache-Superset-2.0.0-Authentication-Bypass.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://packetstormsecurity.com/files/175094/Apache-Superset-2.0.0-Remote-Code-Execution.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/04/24/2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-27524"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2023-27524"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.5.0",
  "summary": "Apache Superset: Session validation vulnerability when using provided default SECRET_KEY"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…