Vulnerability from bitnami_vulndb
Published
2026-01-02 17:44
Modified
2026-01-02 18:06
Summary
Details
It was discovered that Canonical's Pebble service manager read-file API and the associated pebble pull command, before v1.10.2, allowed unprivileged local users to read files with root-equivalent permissions when Pebble was running as root. Fixes are also available as backports to v1.1.1, v1.4.2, and v1.7.4.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Bitnami",
"name": "pebble",
"purl": "pkg:bitnami/pebble"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.4.1"
},
{
"introduced": "1.4.2"
},
{
"fixed": "1.7.3"
},
{
"introduced": "1.7.4"
},
{
"fixed": "1.10.2"
}
],
"type": "SEMVER"
}
],
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-3250"
],
"database_specific": {
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:canonical:pebble:*:*:*:*:*:go:*:*"
],
"severity": "Medium"
},
"details": "It was discovered that Canonical\u0027s Pebble service manager read-file API and the associated pebble pull command, before v1.10.2, allowed unprivileged local users to read files with root-equivalent permissions when Pebble was running as root. Fixes are also available as backports to v1.1.1, v1.4.2, and v1.7.4.",
"id": "BIT-pebble-2024-3250",
"modified": "2026-01-02T18:06:33.396Z",
"published": "2026-01-02T17:44:20.392Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/canonical/pebble/security/advisories/GHSA-4685-2x5r-65pj"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-3250"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-3250"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.6.2"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…