GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration
Vulnerability from bitnami_vulndb
Published
2026-04-16 23:36
Modified
2026-09-08 08:34
Summary
OAuth2: PKCE can be fully circumvented
Details

authentik is an open-source identity provider. When initialising a oauth2 flow with a code_challenge and code_method (thus requesting PKCE), the single sign-on provider (authentik) must check if there is a matching and existing code_verifier during the token step. Prior to versions 2023.10.4 and 2023.8.5, authentik checks if the contents of code_verifier is matching only when it is provided. When it is left out completely, authentik simply accepts the token request with out it; even when the flow was started with a code_challenge. authentik 2023.8.5 and 2023.10.4 fix this issue.


{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Bitnami",
        "name": "authentik",
        "purl": "pkg:bitnami/authentik"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2023.8.5"
            },
            {
              "introduced": "2023.10.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2023.10.4"
            }
          ],
          "type": "SEMVER"
        }
      ],
      "severity": [
        {
          "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
          "type": "CVSS_V3"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-48228"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cpes": [
      "cpe:2.3:a:goauthentik:authentik:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
    ],
    "severity": "Critical"
  },
  "details": "authentik is an open-source identity provider. When initialising a oauth2 flow with a `code_challenge` and `code_method` (thus requesting PKCE), the single sign-on provider (authentik) must check if there is a matching and existing `code_verifier` during the token step. Prior to versions 2023.10.4 and 2023.8.5, authentik checks if the contents of `code_verifier` is matching only when it is provided. When it is left out completely, authentik simply accepts the token request with out it; even when the flow was started with a `code_challenge`. authentik 2023.8.5 and 2023.10.4 fix this issue.",
  "id": "BIT-authentik-2023-48228",
  "modified": "2026-09-08T08:34:36.952Z",
  "published": "2026-04-16T23:36:07.745Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/goauthentik/authentik/blob/dd4e9030b4e667d3720be2feda24c08972602274/authentik/providers/oauth2/views/token.py#L225"
    },
    {
      "type": "FIX",
      "url": "https://github.com/goauthentik/authentik/commit/3af77ab3821fe9c7df8055ba5eade3d1ecea03a6"
    },
    {
      "type": "FIX",
      "url": "https://github.com/goauthentik/authentik/commit/6b9afed21f7c39f171a4a445654cfe415bba37d5"
    },
    {
      "type": "FIX",
      "url": "https://github.com/goauthentik/authentik/commit/b88e39411c12e3f9e04125a7887f12354f760a14"
    },
    {
      "type": "FIX",
      "url": "https://github.com/goauthentik/authentik/pull/7666"
    },
    {
      "type": "FIX",
      "url": "https://github.com/goauthentik/authentik/pull/7668"
    },
    {
      "type": "FIX",
      "url": "https://github.com/goauthentik/authentik/pull/7669"
    },
    {
      "type": "ARTICLE",
      "url": "https://github.com/goauthentik/authentik/releases/tag/version%2F2023.10.4"
    },
    {
      "type": "ARTICLE",
      "url": "https://github.com/goauthentik/authentik/releases/tag/version%2F2023.8.5"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://github.com/goauthentik/authentik/security/advisories/GHSA-fm34-v8xq-f2c3"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-48228"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.6.2",
  "summary": "OAuth2: PKCE can be fully circumvented"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…