<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://db.gcve.eu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2026 18:57:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-99253 — io_uring/cancel: rearm local work wake up before sleep</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/cve-2026-99253</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;io_uring/cancel: rearm local work wake up before sleep&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;io_uring_try_cancel_requests() sets -&amp;gt;cq_wait_nr to 1 so that the next
io_req_local_work_add() wakes the cancelling task. The add that takes the
count to zero is the only one that wakes, later ones see a count &amp;lt;= 0 and
return. io_uring_cancel_generic() however only becomes
TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE much later, so the one wake up can be spent on a
running task. That is fine as long as the entry of that add is still
queued, as the io_local_work_pending() check then skips the sleep. It is
not if the add was delayed after queueing its entry:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CPU0 (submitter in exec or exit)      CPU1 (io_req_local_work_add)
                                      mpscq_push(req A)
io_uring_try_cancel_requests()
  io_run_local_work()  // runs req A
io_uring_try_cancel_requests()
  atomic_set(&amp;amp;ctx-&amp;gt;cq_wait_nr, 1)
                                      atomic_read(&amp;amp;ctx-&amp;gt;cq_wait_nr) == 1
                                      count taken, wake_up_state()
                                        // task is running, no-op
prepare_to_wait(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE)
io_local_work_pending() == false
schedule()
                                      mpscq_push(req B)
                                      cq_wait_nr &amp;lt;= 0, return&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Only the sleeping task can run req B, so it is stuck in execve() until a
signal happens to wake it. An exiting task doesn&amp;#39;t even get that.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Arm the count again once the task s…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;io_uring/cancel: rearm local work wake up before sleep&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;io_uring_try_cancel_requests() sets -&amp;gt;cq_wait_nr to 1 so that the next
io_req_local_work_add() wakes the cancelling task. The add that takes the
count to zero is the only one that wakes, later ones see a count &amp;lt;= 0 and
return. io_uring_cancel_generic() however only becomes
TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE much later, so the one wake up can be spent on a
running task. That is fine as long as the entry of that add is still
queued, as the io_local_work_pending() check then skips the sleep. It is
not if the add was delayed after queueing its entry:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CPU0 (submitter in exec or exit)      CPU1 (io_req_local_work_add)
                                      mpscq_push(req A)
io_uring_try_cancel_requests()
  io_run_local_work()  // runs req A
io_uring_try_cancel_requests()
  atomic_set(&amp;amp;ctx-&amp;gt;cq_wait_nr, 1)
                                      atomic_read(&amp;amp;ctx-&amp;gt;cq_wait_nr) == 1
                                      count taken, wake_up_state()
                                        // task is running, no-op
prepare_to_wait(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE)
io_local_work_pending() == false
schedule()
                                      mpscq_push(req B)
                                      cq_wait_nr &amp;lt;= 0, return&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Only the sleeping task can run req B, so it is stuck in execve() until a
signal happens to wake it. An exiting task doesn&amp;#39;t even get that.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Arm the count again once the task s…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/cve-2026-99253</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
