<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://db.gcve.eu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2026 09:34:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-99147 — drm/exec: don't immediately add prelocked obj to array of locked objs</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/cve-2026-99147</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;drm/exec: don&amp;#39;t immediately add prelocked obj to array of locked objs&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When a contention is detected the drm_exec object grabs a reference to
the contended object, unlocks all other objects and pre-locks the
contended one before anything else.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The problem is that it is possible that this pre-locked object was about
to be destroyed and drm_exec is now holding the last reference to it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So we never actually see this pre-locked object again to be explicitly
locked and so also never reserve a slot for a dma_fence object on it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Should the driver now use drm_exec_for_each_locked_object() to add a new
fence to all locked objects we eventually see a warning or even a
BUG_ON() to prevent random memory corruption.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by keeping the prelocked object out of the array of locked objs
until it was explicitly mentioned by the driver again.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If the prelocked object is never mentioned again by the driver
just unlock and drop the reference at the end of the locking loop.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;drm/exec: don&amp;#39;t immediately add prelocked obj to array of locked objs&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When a contention is detected the drm_exec object grabs a reference to
the contended object, unlocks all other objects and pre-locks the
contended one before anything else.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The problem is that it is possible that this pre-locked object was about
to be destroyed and drm_exec is now holding the last reference to it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So we never actually see this pre-locked object again to be explicitly
locked and so also never reserve a slot for a dma_fence object on it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Should the driver now use drm_exec_for_each_locked_object() to add a new
fence to all locked objects we eventually see a warning or even a
BUG_ON() to prevent random memory corruption.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by keeping the prelocked object out of the array of locked objs
until it was explicitly mentioned by the driver again.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If the prelocked object is never mentioned again by the driver
just unlock and drop the reference at the end of the locking loop.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/cve-2026-99147</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
