<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://db.gcve.eu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 20:30:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-98584 — net/sched: fix potential stack infoleak in em_text_dump()</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/cve-2026-98584</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;net/sched: fix potential stack infoleak in em_text_dump()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;em_text_dump() allocates struct tcf_em_text on the stack without zeroing
it.  strscpy() writes the algorithm name and a NUL terminator into
conf.algo[], leaving the remaining bytes uninitialised.  nla_put_nohdr()
then copies the full struct to the netlink response.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;KMSAN on Linux 7.2-rc6 reports two kernel-infoleak splats from this path,
one triggered via &amp;#34;tc filter show&amp;#34; and one via a raw RTM_GETTFILTER dump:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in _copy_to_iter+0x1c9/0x2620
    nla_put_nohdr+0x83/0x130
    em_text_dump+0x291/0x550
  Local variable conf created at: em_text_dump+0x5d/0x550
  Bytes 168-179 of 199 are uninitialized&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am not certain whether this constitutes a real security problem in
practice: the test was conducted in a controlled KMSAN environment and
the leaked stack bytes may or may not carry sensitive data on actual
production kernels.  I am reporting it because KMSAN flagged it as a
kernel-infoleak and the fix is straightforward.  I can provide a
userspace reproducer on request.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The original code used strncpy() which zero-pads to the destination size.
Commit b04202d6065c (&amp;#34;net/sched: replace strncpy with strscpy&amp;#34;) replaced
it with strscpy(), which does not pad, creating this condition.
Zero-initialising the struct closes it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;net/sched: fix potential stack infoleak in em_text_dump()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;em_text_dump() allocates struct tcf_em_text on the stack without zeroing
it.  strscpy() writes the algorithm name and a NUL terminator into
conf.algo[], leaving the remaining bytes uninitialised.  nla_put_nohdr()
then copies the full struct to the netlink response.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;KMSAN on Linux 7.2-rc6 reports two kernel-infoleak splats from this path,
one triggered via &amp;#34;tc filter show&amp;#34; and one via a raw RTM_GETTFILTER dump:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in _copy_to_iter+0x1c9/0x2620
    nla_put_nohdr+0x83/0x130
    em_text_dump+0x291/0x550
  Local variable conf created at: em_text_dump+0x5d/0x550
  Bytes 168-179 of 199 are uninitialized&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am not certain whether this constitutes a real security problem in
practice: the test was conducted in a controlled KMSAN environment and
the leaked stack bytes may or may not carry sensitive data on actual
production kernels.  I am reporting it because KMSAN flagged it as a
kernel-infoleak and the fix is straightforward.  I can provide a
userspace reproducer on request.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The original code used strncpy() which zero-pads to the destination size.
Commit b04202d6065c (&amp;#34;net/sched: replace strncpy with strscpy&amp;#34;) replaced
it with strscpy(), which does not pad, creating this condition.
Zero-initialising the struct closes it.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/cve-2026-98584</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
