<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://db.gcve.eu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 10:10:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-85088 — Apache Thrift, Apache Thrift: The C++ and D clients fall back to the certificate Common Name when subjectAltName entrie…</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/cve-2026-85088</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Apache Software Foundation Apache Thrift&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch in the C++ and D libraries of Apache Thrift.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Both libraries install a default access manager for client sockets — TSSLSocketFactory does so in C++, and the accessManager property does so in D — which compares the peer certificate against the host&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;name that was connected to. That comparison walks the subjectAltName dNSName entries first and consults the certificate Common Name afterwards. A name that does not match yields a &amp;#34;skip&amp;#34; result rather than&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;a rejection, so a certificate whose subjectAltName entries are all present and all non-matching falls through to the Common Name, which can then satisfy the check.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;RFC 6125 section 6.4.4, and RFC 9525 section 2, require that the Common Name is not consulted when a dNSName subjectAltName is present. A certificate carrying subjectAltName entries for one name and a&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Common Name for another is therefore accepted for a connection to the second name.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Exploitation requires an attacker positioned on the network path who holds a certificate that chains to a certificate authority in the client&amp;#39;s trust store and whose Common Name matches the connected host&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;name. Public certificate authorities have not issued on Common Name alone for many years, so this is principally a concern for deployments using a private or enterprise public-key infrastructure.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This issue affects the C++ library of Apache Thrift from 0.7.0 through 0.24.0 and the D library from 0.9.0 through 0.24.0. User…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Apache Software Foundation Apache Thrift&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch in the C++ and D libraries of Apache Thrift.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Both libraries install a default access manager for client sockets — TSSLSocketFactory does so in C++, and the accessManager property does so in D — which compares the peer certificate against the host&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;name that was connected to. That comparison walks the subjectAltName dNSName entries first and consults the certificate Common Name afterwards. A name that does not match yields a &amp;#34;skip&amp;#34; result rather than&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;a rejection, so a certificate whose subjectAltName entries are all present and all non-matching falls through to the Common Name, which can then satisfy the check.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;RFC 6125 section 6.4.4, and RFC 9525 section 2, require that the Common Name is not consulted when a dNSName subjectAltName is present. A certificate carrying subjectAltName entries for one name and a&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Common Name for another is therefore accepted for a connection to the second name.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Exploitation requires an attacker positioned on the network path who holds a certificate that chains to a certificate authority in the client&amp;#39;s trust store and whose Common Name matches the connected host&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;name. Public certificate authorities have not issued on Common Name alone for many years, so this is principally a concern for deployments using a private or enterprise public-key infrastructure.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This issue affects the C++ library of Apache Thrift from 0.7.0 through 0.24.0 and the D library from 0.9.0 through 0.24.0. User…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/cve-2026-85088</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
