<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://db.gcve.eu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2026 21:47:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-99019 — scsi: ch: Do not keep references to data transfer element devices</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/cve-2026-99019</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;scsi: ch: Do not keep references to data transfer element devices&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ch_readconfig() looks up the scsi_device of every data transfer element
whose SCSI id the changer reports in READ ELEMENT STATUS, and stores it in
ch-&amp;gt;dt[]. scsi_device_lookup() takes a reference, and nothing ever drops
it: ch_destroy() frees the array with kfree(). ch-&amp;gt;dt[] is read nowhere
else - it only supplies the vendor, model and revision printed in the same
loop.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Once such a drive is removed, its scsi_device can never be released. It
stays on the host&amp;#39;s device list at its address, so a new device there is
refused by anything that walks the list - target_core_pscsi reports
&amp;#34;scsi_device_get() failed for H:C:T:L&amp;#34; - and the low-level driver&amp;#39;s module
can no longer be unloaded. Only a reboot recovers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It shows with any changer that reports its drives&amp;#39; ids; with the mhvtl
virtual library (IBM 3573-TL personality), each create and remove of a
library with four drives leaves four references behind, counted by the
module&amp;#39;s use count in lsmod. With ch not bound the count is unchanged, and
with this patch applied it is unchanged too.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Drop the reference as soon as the name has been printed, and remove the now
unused dt[] array. That also removes the array leaked when ch_probe() fails
after ch_readconfig().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The same leak was reported with an RFC patch in 2022, which was not merged.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;scsi: ch: Do not keep references to data transfer element devices&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ch_readconfig() looks up the scsi_device of every data transfer element
whose SCSI id the changer reports in READ ELEMENT STATUS, and stores it in
ch-&amp;gt;dt[]. scsi_device_lookup() takes a reference, and nothing ever drops
it: ch_destroy() frees the array with kfree(). ch-&amp;gt;dt[] is read nowhere
else - it only supplies the vendor, model and revision printed in the same
loop.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Once such a drive is removed, its scsi_device can never be released. It
stays on the host&amp;#39;s device list at its address, so a new device there is
refused by anything that walks the list - target_core_pscsi reports
&amp;#34;scsi_device_get() failed for H:C:T:L&amp;#34; - and the low-level driver&amp;#39;s module
can no longer be unloaded. Only a reboot recovers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It shows with any changer that reports its drives&amp;#39; ids; with the mhvtl
virtual library (IBM 3573-TL personality), each create and remove of a
library with four drives leaves four references behind, counted by the
module&amp;#39;s use count in lsmod. With ch not bound the count is unchanged, and
with this patch applied it is unchanged too.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Drop the reference as soon as the name has been printed, and remove the now
unused dt[] array. That also removes the array leaked when ch_probe() fails
after ch_readconfig().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The same leak was reported with an RFC patch in 2022, which was not merged.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/cve-2026-99019</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
