<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://db.gcve.eu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2026 17:11:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-98990 — namespace: check a submount for references right before unmounting it</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/cve-2026-98990</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;namespace: check a submount for references right before unmounting it&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;shrink_submounts() and mark_mounts_for_expiry() first collect all the
mounts they are allowed to unmount and then unmount them.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Whether a mount is busy is decided by propagate_mount_busy() on the
tree. But unmounting the first mount changes the tree that the second
one propagates into. propagate_umount()
moves a surviving overmount off a copy it unmounts and mounts it where
the copy was mounted. If that&amp;#39;s where the propagated copy of the second
victim is looked up the overmount becomes a candidate of the second
umount_tree(). It&amp;#39;s childless and so trim_one() commits it without
looking at its reference count.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So a synchronous umount pulls out a busy mount that is in use somewhere
else and marks it MNT_SYNC_UMOUNT while it has users:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;umount2(/tmp/plshrink/p1, 0) = 0 errno 0
  cwd is (unreachable)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The same two umounts requested one after the other fail with EBUSY.
This needs a mount with MNT_SHRINKABLE, i.e., automounted submounts of
NFS, AFS and CIFS or the tracefs mount below debugfs. Bind mounts
inherit the flag.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Check each mount right before it is unmounted under the same hold of
namespace_sem and mount_lock as the umount itself. Make sure that the
algorithm stays linear.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;namespace: check a submount for references right before unmounting it&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;shrink_submounts() and mark_mounts_for_expiry() first collect all the
mounts they are allowed to unmount and then unmount them.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Whether a mount is busy is decided by propagate_mount_busy() on the
tree. But unmounting the first mount changes the tree that the second
one propagates into. propagate_umount()
moves a surviving overmount off a copy it unmounts and mounts it where
the copy was mounted. If that&amp;#39;s where the propagated copy of the second
victim is looked up the overmount becomes a candidate of the second
umount_tree(). It&amp;#39;s childless and so trim_one() commits it without
looking at its reference count.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So a synchronous umount pulls out a busy mount that is in use somewhere
else and marks it MNT_SYNC_UMOUNT while it has users:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;umount2(/tmp/plshrink/p1, 0) = 0 errno 0
  cwd is (unreachable)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The same two umounts requested one after the other fail with EBUSY.
This needs a mount with MNT_SHRINKABLE, i.e., automounted submounts of
NFS, AFS and CIFS or the tracefs mount below debugfs. Bind mounts
inherit the flag.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Check each mount right before it is unmounted under the same hold of
namespace_sem and mount_lock as the umount itself. Make sure that the
algorithm stays linear.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/cve-2026-98990</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
