<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://db.gcve.eu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2026 22:11:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-98975 — xfs: stop exchanging reflink flags when exchanging mappings</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/cve-2026-98975</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;xfs: stop exchanging reflink flags when exchanging mappings&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When an exchange covers both files from offset 0 to i_disk_size,
xmi_can_exchange_reflink_flags() assumes every mapping moved and hands
the reflink flag over to the other file.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That assumption is wrong.  A file can still own shared blocks past
i_disk_size, e.g. after EXCHANGE_RANGE_TO_EOF sets a smaller size
without unmapping anything.  The flag is cleared anyway, and the next
write to such a block happens in place instead of CoW, corrupting the
other file that shares it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commit a23eca88448e (&amp;#34;xfs: fix exchange-range reflink flag clearing
issue with INO1_WRITTEN&amp;#34;) fixed one instance of this.  Rather than add
another special case, stop moving the flags.
xfs_exchmaps_ensure_reflink() already sets the flag on both inodes
before the exchange, so both just keep it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nothing sets CLEAR_INO{1,2}_REFLINK anymore.  Intents logged by older
kernels may still carry them; recovery already masks them off, so they
stay in the log format mask and are ignored.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;XFS_IOC_SWAPEXT has the same problem: it moves the reflink flag from
one inode to the other along with the extents.  Just removing that is
not enough here: the exchange path flags both inodes up front in
xfs_exchmaps_ensure_reflink(), but swapext has no such step, so the
inode receiving the shared extents would be left without the flag.
Set it on both inodes instead, and make sure both have a CoW fork,
si…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;xfs: stop exchanging reflink flags when exchanging mappings&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When an exchange covers both files from offset 0 to i_disk_size,
xmi_can_exchange_reflink_flags() assumes every mapping moved and hands
the reflink flag over to the other file.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That assumption is wrong.  A file can still own shared blocks past
i_disk_size, e.g. after EXCHANGE_RANGE_TO_EOF sets a smaller size
without unmapping anything.  The flag is cleared anyway, and the next
write to such a block happens in place instead of CoW, corrupting the
other file that shares it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commit a23eca88448e (&amp;#34;xfs: fix exchange-range reflink flag clearing
issue with INO1_WRITTEN&amp;#34;) fixed one instance of this.  Rather than add
another special case, stop moving the flags.
xfs_exchmaps_ensure_reflink() already sets the flag on both inodes
before the exchange, so both just keep it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nothing sets CLEAR_INO{1,2}_REFLINK anymore.  Intents logged by older
kernels may still carry them; recovery already masks them off, so they
stay in the log format mask and are ignored.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;XFS_IOC_SWAPEXT has the same problem: it moves the reflink flag from
one inode to the other along with the extents.  Just removing that is
not enough here: the exchange path flags both inodes up front in
xfs_exchmaps_ensure_reflink(), but swapext has no such step, so the
inode receiving the shared extents would be left without the flag.
Set it on both inodes instead, and make sure both have a CoW fork,
si…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/cve-2026-98975</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
