<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://db.gcve.eu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2026 17:11:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-98923 — arm64: io: Reject non-user protection in ioremap_prot()</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/cve-2026-98923</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;arm64: io: Reject non-user protection in ioremap_prot()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mapping a stack-top page via /dev/mem with PROT_NONE and then
reading that process&amp;#39;s /proc/&amp;lt;pid&amp;gt;/cmdline triggers a spurious WARN
in ioremap_prot() through generic_access_phys():&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WARNING: ./arch/arm64/include/asm/io.h:275 at generic_access_phys
  Call trace:
    generic_access_phys+0x1c8/0x228 (P)
    __access_remote_vm+0x2b4/0x398
    access_remote_vm+0x14/0x30
    get_mm_cmdline+0xf8/0x2a0
    proc_pid_cmdline_read+0x68/0x120&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;generic_access_phys() passes the protection derived from the user PTE
to ioremap_prot(). On arm64, a PROT_NONE mapping is represented by a
present-invalid PTE, so pte_present() still returns true and the
protection reaches ioremap_prot().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A PROT_NONE mapping does not have PTE_USER, causing the existing
WARN_ON_ONCE() in ioremap_prot() to fire even though this is a valid
user mapping. Execute-only mappings have the same issue and must not
be readable through this path either.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ioremap_prot() should therefore reject protection values without
PTE_USER without warning. This makes the access fail cleanly for
PROT_NONE and execute-only mappings while retaining the existing
user-protection contract.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;arm64: io: Reject non-user protection in ioremap_prot()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mapping a stack-top page via /dev/mem with PROT_NONE and then
reading that process&amp;#39;s /proc/&amp;lt;pid&amp;gt;/cmdline triggers a spurious WARN
in ioremap_prot() through generic_access_phys():&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WARNING: ./arch/arm64/include/asm/io.h:275 at generic_access_phys
  Call trace:
    generic_access_phys+0x1c8/0x228 (P)
    __access_remote_vm+0x2b4/0x398
    access_remote_vm+0x14/0x30
    get_mm_cmdline+0xf8/0x2a0
    proc_pid_cmdline_read+0x68/0x120&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;generic_access_phys() passes the protection derived from the user PTE
to ioremap_prot(). On arm64, a PROT_NONE mapping is represented by a
present-invalid PTE, so pte_present() still returns true and the
protection reaches ioremap_prot().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A PROT_NONE mapping does not have PTE_USER, causing the existing
WARN_ON_ONCE() in ioremap_prot() to fire even though this is a valid
user mapping. Execute-only mappings have the same issue and must not
be readable through this path either.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ioremap_prot() should therefore reject protection values without
PTE_USER without warning. This makes the access fail cleanly for
PROT_NONE and execute-only mappings while retaining the existing
user-protection contract.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/cve-2026-98923</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
