<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://db.gcve.eu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2026 09:23:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-98715 — KVM: SVM: Preserve TLB control (i.e. pending TLB flush) on failed VMRUN</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/cve-2026-98715</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;KVM: SVM: Preserve TLB control (i.e. pending TLB flush) on failed VMRUN&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Don&amp;#39;t reset the VMCB&amp;#39;s TLB control back to &amp;#34;do nothing&amp;#34; on a failed VMRUN,
as empirical testing shows that the CPU performs the requested TLB flush if
and only if VMRUN is successful, i.e. clearing TLB control on a failed
VMRUN effectively drops a TLB flush.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Explicitly track the need to flush all ASIDs on a per-CPU basis, as the
ASID reuse condition is tied to the pCPU, not to the vCPU.  As a bonus,
this also obviates the need to avoid clobbering FLUSH_ALL_ASID with
TLB_CONTROL_FLUSH_ASID, e.g. in svm_flush_tlb_asid().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Deliberately don&amp;#39;t bother saving/restoring the &amp;#34;old&amp;#34; tlb_ctl on failure,
in quotes because it&amp;#39;s not exactly the old tlb_ctl, it&amp;#39;s the tlb_ctl from
after pre_svm_run(), but before updating tlb_ctl for flush_all_asids.  If
VMRUN fails and TLB_CONTROL_FLUSH_ALL_ASID is forced, then the next
successful run of the VMCB *may* unnecessarily flush all ASIDs, which
strictly speaking could result in noisy neighbor issues.  However, the
fact that new_asid() is already guest-triggerable, because of KVM&amp;#39;s flawed
behavior of clearing the ASID on emulated INIT, means that a guest can
already trigger a flush of all ASIDs at roughly the same rate.  And once
KVM stops clobbering the ASID on emulated INIT, *or* assigns a static ASID
to each vCPU, this flaw goes away.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;KVM: SVM: Preserve TLB control (i.e. pending TLB flush) on failed VMRUN&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Don&amp;#39;t reset the VMCB&amp;#39;s TLB control back to &amp;#34;do nothing&amp;#34; on a failed VMRUN,
as empirical testing shows that the CPU performs the requested TLB flush if
and only if VMRUN is successful, i.e. clearing TLB control on a failed
VMRUN effectively drops a TLB flush.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Explicitly track the need to flush all ASIDs on a per-CPU basis, as the
ASID reuse condition is tied to the pCPU, not to the vCPU.  As a bonus,
this also obviates the need to avoid clobbering FLUSH_ALL_ASID with
TLB_CONTROL_FLUSH_ASID, e.g. in svm_flush_tlb_asid().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Deliberately don&amp;#39;t bother saving/restoring the &amp;#34;old&amp;#34; tlb_ctl on failure,
in quotes because it&amp;#39;s not exactly the old tlb_ctl, it&amp;#39;s the tlb_ctl from
after pre_svm_run(), but before updating tlb_ctl for flush_all_asids.  If
VMRUN fails and TLB_CONTROL_FLUSH_ALL_ASID is forced, then the next
successful run of the VMCB *may* unnecessarily flush all ASIDs, which
strictly speaking could result in noisy neighbor issues.  However, the
fact that new_asid() is already guest-triggerable, because of KVM&amp;#39;s flawed
behavior of clearing the ASID on emulated INIT, means that a guest can
already trigger a flush of all ASIDs at roughly the same rate.  And once
KVM stops clobbering the ASID on emulated INIT, *or* assigns a static ASID
to each vCPU, this flaw goes away.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/cve-2026-98715</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
