<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://db.gcve.eu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 23:03:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-78216 — AshLua eval read operations can read field-policy-protected fields via aggregates</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/cve-2026-78216</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; ash-project ash_lua&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;AshLua exposes Ash read actions to Lua scripts run through an eval action. A read call accepts an operation (list, min, max, first, sum, avg) that builds an ad-hoc Ash.Query.Aggregate over a named field and returns its raw value.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ash field policies redact forbidden fields on returned records (replacing them with %Ash.ForbiddenField{}), but that redaction does not apply to aggregate values. A script could therefore read a field the calling actor&amp;#39;s field policies forbid by requesting it as an aggregate instead of as a field. This includes fields that are public? true but restricted per-actor by a field policy, such as sensitive PII. The prior hardening only enforced the exposed-field allow-list (field visibility), which is a separate axis from per-actor field-policy authorization.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The fix authorizes the aggregated field against the resource&amp;#39;s field policies, so aggregating over a field the actor may not see is refused or scoped to the rows where it is visible.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This issue affects ash_lua: from 0.1.0 before 0.2.2.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; ash-project ash_lua&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;AshLua exposes Ash read actions to Lua scripts run through an eval action. A read call accepts an operation (list, min, max, first, sum, avg) that builds an ad-hoc Ash.Query.Aggregate over a named field and returns its raw value.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ash field policies redact forbidden fields on returned records (replacing them with %Ash.ForbiddenField{}), but that redaction does not apply to aggregate values. A script could therefore read a field the calling actor&amp;#39;s field policies forbid by requesting it as an aggregate instead of as a field. This includes fields that are public? true but restricted per-actor by a field policy, such as sensitive PII. The prior hardening only enforced the exposed-field allow-list (field visibility), which is a separate axis from per-actor field-policy authorization.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The fix authorizes the aggregated field against the resource&amp;#39;s field policies, so aggregating over a field the actor may not see is refused or scoped to the rows where it is visible.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This issue affects ash_lua: from 0.1.0 before 0.2.2.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/cve-2026-78216</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
