<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://db.gcve.eu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2026 04:01:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-99218</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-99218</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;coredump: hold RCU while releasing parked threads&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;coredump_finish() releases the parked threads by clearing -&amp;gt;task in
their core_thread entry and calling wake_up_process() on each of them.
It does that without holding a reference on the task and without being
inside rcu.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But calling wake_up_process(task) without rcu here isn&amp;#39;t safe. A parked
thread doesn&amp;#39;t need that wakeup to leave. A spurious wakeup or a
preemption after the store is enough for the task to go away.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So if the coredump client is preempted between the store and
wake_up_process() the thread can exit and be freed in the meantime and
try_to_wake_up() takes pi_lock in freed memory.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hold rcu across the loop.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;coredump: hold RCU while releasing parked threads&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;coredump_finish() releases the parked threads by clearing -&amp;gt;task in
their core_thread entry and calling wake_up_process() on each of them.
It does that without holding a reference on the task and without being
inside rcu.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But calling wake_up_process(task) without rcu here isn&amp;#39;t safe. A parked
thread doesn&amp;#39;t need that wakeup to leave. A spurious wakeup or a
preemption after the store is enough for the task to go away.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So if the coredump client is preempted between the store and
wake_up_process() the thread can exit and be freed in the meantime and
try_to_wake_up() takes pi_lock in freed memory.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hold rcu across the loop.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-99218</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-2cpv-4f6v-pr9h</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-2cpv-4f6v-pr9h</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;coredump: hold RCU while releasing parked threads&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;coredump_finish() releases the parked threads by clearing -&amp;gt;task in
their core_thread entry and calling wake_up_process() on each of them.
It does that without holding a reference on the task and without being
inside rcu.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But calling wake_up_process(task) without rcu here isn&amp;#39;t safe. A parked
thread doesn&amp;#39;t need that wakeup to leave. A spurious wakeup or a
preemption after the store is enough for the task to go away.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So if the coredump client is preempted between the store and
wake_up_process() the thread can exit and be freed in the meantime and
try_to_wake_up() takes pi_lock in freed memory.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hold rcu across the loop.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;coredump: hold RCU while releasing parked threads&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;coredump_finish() releases the parked threads by clearing -&amp;gt;task in
their core_thread entry and calling wake_up_process() on each of them.
It does that without holding a reference on the task and without being
inside rcu.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But calling wake_up_process(task) without rcu here isn&amp;#39;t safe. A parked
thread doesn&amp;#39;t need that wakeup to leave. A spurious wakeup or a
preemption after the store is enough for the task to go away.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So if the coredump client is preempted between the store and
wake_up_process() the thread can exit and be freed in the meantime and
try_to_wake_up() takes pi_lock in freed memory.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hold rcu across the loop.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-2cpv-4f6v-pr9h</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-99218</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-99218</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 257 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: coredump: hold RCU while releasing parked threads coredump_finish() releases the parked threads by clearing -&amp;gt;task in their core_thread entry and calling wake_up_process() on each of them. It does that without holding a reference on the task and without being inside rcu. But calling wake_up_process(task) without rcu here isn&amp;#39;t safe. A parked thread doesn&amp;#39;t need that wakeup to leave. A spurious wakeup or a preemption after the store is enough for the task to go away. So if the coredump client is preempted between the store and wake_up_process() the thread can exit and be freed in the meantime and try_to_wake_up() takes pi_lock in freed memory. Hold rcu across the loop.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 257 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: coredump: hold RCU while releasing parked threads coredump_finish() releases the parked threads by clearing -&amp;gt;task in their core_thread entry and calling wake_up_process() on each of them. It does that without holding a reference on the task and without being inside rcu. But calling wake_up_process(task) without rcu here isn&amp;#39;t safe. A parked thread doesn&amp;#39;t need that wakeup to leave. A spurious wakeup or a preemption after the store is enough for the task to go away. So if the coredump client is preempted between the store and wake_up_process() the thread can exit and be freed in the meantime and try_to_wake_up() takes pi_lock in freed memory. Hold rcu across the loop.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-99218</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
