<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://db.gcve.eu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2026 16:58:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-98978</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-98978</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;namespace: never expire a locked mount&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Locked mounts are special. They protect the underlying files and
directories from being revealed. do_umount() refuses to unmount locked
mounts but shrink_submounts() doesn&amp;#39;t.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A shrinkable mount can become locked once the owner of a user namespace
puts it beneath a locked mount with MOVE_MOUNT_BENEATH. The locked
property now moves to the mount at the bottom making it possible to
unmount the top mount.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So umount() of an unlocked ancestor now expires the bottom mount first
and the covered directory is revealed:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;move_mount(c -&amp;gt; x/hidden, MOVE_MOUNT_BENEATH) = 0
  the cover after the lock moved:  umount2(x/hidden) = 0
  the holder of the lock:          umount2(x/hidden) = EINVAL
  the root of the copy, busy:      umount2(x) = EBUSY
  reads x/hidden/secret: &amp;#34;covered-by-root&amp;#34;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So leave a locked mount alone as it dies together with its parent. A
plain umount() of an unlocked mount with a locked one below it is EBUSY
from now on. It&amp;#39;s the same for any other locked child. A lazy umount
still takes the whole tree.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;mark_mounts_for_expiry() never sees a locked mount. lock_mnt_tree()
leaves a mount on an expiry list alone and nothing else puts a locked
one on such a list. Add an assert for this.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;namespace: never expire a locked mount&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Locked mounts are special. They protect the underlying files and
directories from being revealed. do_umount() refuses to unmount locked
mounts but shrink_submounts() doesn&amp;#39;t.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A shrinkable mount can become locked once the owner of a user namespace
puts it beneath a locked mount with MOVE_MOUNT_BENEATH. The locked
property now moves to the mount at the bottom making it possible to
unmount the top mount.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So umount() of an unlocked ancestor now expires the bottom mount first
and the covered directory is revealed:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;move_mount(c -&amp;gt; x/hidden, MOVE_MOUNT_BENEATH) = 0
  the cover after the lock moved:  umount2(x/hidden) = 0
  the holder of the lock:          umount2(x/hidden) = EINVAL
  the root of the copy, busy:      umount2(x) = EBUSY
  reads x/hidden/secret: &amp;#34;covered-by-root&amp;#34;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So leave a locked mount alone as it dies together with its parent. A
plain umount() of an unlocked mount with a locked one below it is EBUSY
from now on. It&amp;#39;s the same for any other locked child. A lazy umount
still takes the whole tree.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;mark_mounts_for_expiry() never sees a locked mount. lock_mnt_tree()
leaves a mount on an expiry list alone and nothing else puts a locked
one on such a list. Add an assert for this.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-98978</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-73pw-3qvg-vxhf</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-73pw-3qvg-vxhf</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;namespace: never expire a locked mount&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Locked mounts are special. They protect the underlying files and
directories from being revealed. do_umount() refuses to unmount locked
mounts but shrink_submounts() doesn&amp;#39;t.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A shrinkable mount can become locked once the owner of a user namespace
puts it beneath a locked mount with MOVE_MOUNT_BENEATH. The locked
property now moves to the mount at the bottom making it possible to
unmount the top mount.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So umount() of an unlocked ancestor now expires the bottom mount first
and the covered directory is revealed:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;move_mount(c -&amp;gt; x/hidden, MOVE_MOUNT_BENEATH) = 0
  the cover after the lock moved:  umount2(x/hidden) = 0
  the holder of the lock:          umount2(x/hidden) = EINVAL
  the root of the copy, busy:      umount2(x) = EBUSY
  reads x/hidden/secret: &amp;#34;covered-by-root&amp;#34;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So leave a locked mount alone as it dies together with its parent. A
plain umount() of an unlocked mount with a locked one below it is EBUSY
from now on. It&amp;#39;s the same for any other locked child. A lazy umount
still takes the whole tree.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;mark_mounts_for_expiry() never sees a locked mount. lock_mnt_tree()
leaves a mount on an expiry list alone and nothing else puts a locked
one on such a list. Add an assert for this.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;namespace: never expire a locked mount&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Locked mounts are special. They protect the underlying files and
directories from being revealed. do_umount() refuses to unmount locked
mounts but shrink_submounts() doesn&amp;#39;t.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A shrinkable mount can become locked once the owner of a user namespace
puts it beneath a locked mount with MOVE_MOUNT_BENEATH. The locked
property now moves to the mount at the bottom making it possible to
unmount the top mount.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So umount() of an unlocked ancestor now expires the bottom mount first
and the covered directory is revealed:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;move_mount(c -&amp;gt; x/hidden, MOVE_MOUNT_BENEATH) = 0
  the cover after the lock moved:  umount2(x/hidden) = 0
  the holder of the lock:          umount2(x/hidden) = EINVAL
  the root of the copy, busy:      umount2(x) = EBUSY
  reads x/hidden/secret: &amp;#34;covered-by-root&amp;#34;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So leave a locked mount alone as it dies together with its parent. A
plain umount() of an unlocked mount with a locked one below it is EBUSY
from now on. It&amp;#39;s the same for any other locked child. A lazy umount
still takes the whole tree.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;mark_mounts_for_expiry() never sees a locked mount. lock_mnt_tree()
leaves a mount on an expiry list alone and nothing else puts a locked
one on such a list. Add an assert for this.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-73pw-3qvg-vxhf</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>msrc_CVE-2026-98978 — namespace: never expire a locked mount</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-98978</link>
      <description>msrc_CVE-2026-98978</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-98978</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
