<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://db.gcve.eu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2026 08:13:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-98689</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-98689</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;thunderbolt: Don&amp;#39;t access a DP tunnel after its DPRX read was canceled&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;tb_dp_dprx_work() checks -&amp;gt;dprx_canceled before it takes tb-&amp;gt;lock so it
misses a tb_dp_dprx_stop() that could not cancel the already running
work. It then polls the DPRX capabilities and runs the callback for a
tunnel that has already been torn down while the domain is suspending or
going away.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This can be hit by cancelling the DPRX read from outside the ordered
tb-&amp;gt;wq: During suspend tb_disconnect_and_release_dp() does just this and
with a later patch tb_stop() will do it as well. The latter in combination
with the Apple NHI where the DPRX read never completed is how I hit
this.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Check the flag with tb-&amp;gt;lock held instead and check it again in
tb_dp_tunnel_active() because the callback runs after the lock has been
dropped again.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also clear the flag in tb_dp_dprx_start() so that it only ever describes
the work that is currently in flight.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;thunderbolt: Don&amp;#39;t access a DP tunnel after its DPRX read was canceled&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;tb_dp_dprx_work() checks -&amp;gt;dprx_canceled before it takes tb-&amp;gt;lock so it
misses a tb_dp_dprx_stop() that could not cancel the already running
work. It then polls the DPRX capabilities and runs the callback for a
tunnel that has already been torn down while the domain is suspending or
going away.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This can be hit by cancelling the DPRX read from outside the ordered
tb-&amp;gt;wq: During suspend tb_disconnect_and_release_dp() does just this and
with a later patch tb_stop() will do it as well. The latter in combination
with the Apple NHI where the DPRX read never completed is how I hit
this.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Check the flag with tb-&amp;gt;lock held instead and check it again in
tb_dp_tunnel_active() because the callback runs after the lock has been
dropped again.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also clear the flag in tb_dp_dprx_start() so that it only ever describes
the work that is currently in flight.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-98689</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-8x4h-8gwm-w6jp</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-8x4h-8gwm-w6jp</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;thunderbolt: Don&amp;#39;t access a DP tunnel after its DPRX read was canceled&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;tb_dp_dprx_work() checks -&amp;gt;dprx_canceled before it takes tb-&amp;gt;lock so it
misses a tb_dp_dprx_stop() that could not cancel the already running
work. It then polls the DPRX capabilities and runs the callback for a
tunnel that has already been torn down while the domain is suspending or
going away.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This can be hit by cancelling the DPRX read from outside the ordered
tb-&amp;gt;wq: During suspend tb_disconnect_and_release_dp() does just this and
with a later patch tb_stop() will do it as well. The latter in combination
with the Apple NHI where the DPRX read never completed is how I hit
this.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Check the flag with tb-&amp;gt;lock held instead and check it again in
tb_dp_tunnel_active() because the callback runs after the lock has been
dropped again.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also clear the flag in tb_dp_dprx_start() so that it only ever describes
the work that is currently in flight.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;thunderbolt: Don&amp;#39;t access a DP tunnel after its DPRX read was canceled&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;tb_dp_dprx_work() checks -&amp;gt;dprx_canceled before it takes tb-&amp;gt;lock so it
misses a tb_dp_dprx_stop() that could not cancel the already running
work. It then polls the DPRX capabilities and runs the callback for a
tunnel that has already been torn down while the domain is suspending or
going away.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This can be hit by cancelling the DPRX read from outside the ordered
tb-&amp;gt;wq: During suspend tb_disconnect_and_release_dp() does just this and
with a later patch tb_stop() will do it as well. The latter in combination
with the Apple NHI where the DPRX read never completed is how I hit
this.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Check the flag with tb-&amp;gt;lock held instead and check it again in
tb_dp_tunnel_active() because the callback runs after the lock has been
dropped again.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also clear the flag in tb_dp_dprx_start() so that it only ever describes
the work that is currently in flight.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-8x4h-8gwm-w6jp</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>msrc_CVE-2026-98689 — thunderbolt: Don't access a DP tunnel after its DPRX read was canceled</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-98689</link>
      <description>msrc_CVE-2026-98689</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-98689</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-98689</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-98689</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 120 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: thunderbolt: Don&amp;#39;t access a DP tunnel after its DPRX read was canceled tb_dp_dprx_work() checks -&amp;gt;dprx_canceled before it takes tb-&amp;gt;lock so it misses a tb_dp_dprx_stop() that could not cancel the already running work. It then polls the DPRX capabilities and runs the callback for a tunnel that has already been torn down while the domain is suspending or going away. This can be hit by cancelling the DPRX read from outside the ordered tb-&amp;gt;wq: During suspend tb_disconnect_and_release_dp() does just this and with a later patch tb_stop() will do it as well. The latter in combination with the Apple NHI where the DPRX read never completed is how I hit this. Check the flag with tb-&amp;gt;lock held instead and check it again in tb_dp_tunnel_active() because the callback runs after the lock has been dropped again. Also clear the flag in tb_dp_dprx_start() so that it only ever describes the work that is currently in flight.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 120 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: thunderbolt: Don&amp;#39;t access a DP tunnel after its DPRX read was canceled tb_dp_dprx_work() checks -&amp;gt;dprx_canceled before it takes tb-&amp;gt;lock so it misses a tb_dp_dprx_stop() that could not cancel the already running work. It then polls the DPRX capabilities and runs the callback for a tunnel that has already been torn down while the domain is suspending or going away. This can be hit by cancelling the DPRX read from outside the ordered tb-&amp;gt;wq: During suspend tb_disconnect_and_release_dp() does just this and with a later patch tb_stop() will do it as well. The latter in combination with the Apple NHI where the DPRX read never completed is how I hit this. Check the flag with tb-&amp;gt;lock held instead and check it again in tb_dp_tunnel_active() because the callback runs after the lock has been dropped again. Also clear the flag in tb_dp_dprx_start() so that it only ever describes the work that is currently in flight.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-98689</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2026-4019 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-4019</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen, möglicherweise einen Denial-of-Service-Angriff auszulösen, Daten zu manipulieren oder offenzulegen oder Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen, möglicherweise einen Denial-of-Service-Angriff auszulösen, Daten zu manipulieren oder offenzulegen oder Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-4019</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
